<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>CAN: Creative Adversarial Networks, Generating Art by Learning About Styles and Deviating from Style Norms</title>
        <author>Ahmed Elgammal</author>
        <author>Bingchen Liu</author>
        <author>Mohamed Elhoseiny</author>
        <author>Marian Mazzone</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>CAN: Creative Adversarial Networks, Generating Art by Learning About Styles and Deviating from Style Norms</title>
          <date>2017</date>
          <publisher>ICCC / arXiv</publisher>
          
          <idno type="arXiv">1706.07068</idno>
          <idno type="record">elgammal2017-creative-gan</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">elgammal2017-creative-gan.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">b663c2afcfc3874455fec84cd3b9b55db386a2db</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>art-history</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>machine generation of creative visual art</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>system-or-tool-building</label>
        <term>system-or-tool-building</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>modify the GAN objective to push generated images to deviate from established style norms while staying near the art distribution</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>GANs have a fundamental limitation in generating genuinely creative works</label>
        <note>what this limits: the generative approach itself: Quotation withheld</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Creativity of machine-generated artifacts is acknowledged to be an unresolved assessment problem.</label>
        <note>what this limits: every creativity claim in the paper: ASSESSING THE CREATIVITY OF ARTIFACTS GENERATED BY THE MACHINE IS AN OPEN AND HARD QUESTION</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Creativity was operationalised only as novelty, because influence could not be measured.</label>
        <note>what this limits: what the word creative means in this work: SINCE INFLUENCE IS NOT RELEVANT HERE, WE USE NOVELTY AS A PROXY FOR CREATIVITY</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The system has no semantic understanding of art beyond style categories.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any semantic reading of what the system does: IT DOES NOT HAVE ANY SEMANTIC UNDERSTANDING OF ART BEHIND THE CONCEPT OF STYLES</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors cannot explain why subjects rated CAN images above the human Art Basel set.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the headline comparison, which the authors decline to interpret: WE LEAVE OPEN HOW TO INTERPRET THE HUMAN SUBJECTS&#x27; RESPONSES THAT RANKED THE CAN ART BETTER THAN THE ART BASEL SAMPLES</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Further experiments are needed to settle the interpretation of the results.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the same scope as limitations[4]: MORE EXPERIMENTS ARE DEFINITELY NEEDED TO HELP ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Creativity is implemented as making a classifier maximally unsure which style it is looking at.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the creativity claimed for these images: it is implemented as maximising the entropy of the style class posterior, that is, as being hard for the style classifier to assign to any class</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The style vocabulary is a fixed list whose length is a design parameter of the network.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the style categories used here: they are a fixed set whose size K is a network design parameter, fixed by the label set of the training corpus rather than by art history</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The paper&#x27;s own object is scare-quoted in its title.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the claim that this system generates art: the paper&#x27;s title puts the word in quotation marks and describes the method as learning about styles and deviating from style norms</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>generative adversarial networks adapted to generate art that deviates from style norms</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Berlyne theory of aesthetic novelty and arousal used to design the creativity objective</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>an art-trained DCGAN baseline at both 64x64 and 256x256, generated and rated alongside the proposed model by the same human subjects</label>
        <note>eliminates: the human ratings reflecting that the images are art-like at all rather than that the proposed objective did anything - the baseline is the same architecture without it · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>style</label>
        <term>style</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper">
        <label>style class</label>
        <term>style class</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>style ambiguity</label>
        <term>style ambiguity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>collative variables</label>
        <term>collative variables</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper">
        <label>novelty</label>
        <term>novelty</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>style - AS A CLASS IN A CLASSIFIER: the network&#x27;s final layer has K outputs where K is the number of style classes, so here the word names a position in a label set rather than any property of the picture, and an image&#x27;s style is whichever index wins</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>style ambiguity - AS POSTERIOR ENTROPY: the generator is rewarded for making the style classifier uncertain, so &#x27;deviating from style norms&#x27; is implemented as producing images the classifier cannot place, and creativity becomes a property of a confusion matrix</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>novelty - INHERITED FROM BERLYNE&#x27;S COLLATIVE VARIABLES: it is one of five arousal-raising properties named in an aesthetics theory - novelty, surprisingness, complexity, ambiguity and puzzlingness - and this system implements the fourth of them while the record&#x27;s limitation says creativity was operationalised as the first</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Generative Adversarial Networks (from AI)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Martindale&#x27;s principle of least effort and explanation of style breaks</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the art-perception experiment of Snapper et al [23]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>style ambiguity —operationalised-as→ style class</label>
        <term>style ambiguity</term>
        <term>style class</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but ambiguity is achieved by maximizing the style-class posterior entropy; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>novelty —part-of→ collative variables</label>
        <term>novelty</term>
        <term>collative variables</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Experiments compared human subjects&#x27; responses to the generated art with their responses to art created by people.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>arousal potential</label>
        <term>arousal potential</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Creative Adversarial Network (CAN)</label>
        <term>Creative Adversarial Network (CAN)</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>collative variables</label>
        <term>collative variables</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Wundt curve</label>
        <term>Wundt curve</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>hypothesis-testing</label>
        <term>hypothesis-testing</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a unicode and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>null-hypothesis</label>
        <term>null-hypothesis</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a unicode and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p-value</label>
        <term>p-value</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard-deviation</label>
        <term>standard-deviation</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07068.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
