<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>On the Automatic Activation of Attitudes</title>
        <author>Russell H. Fazio</author>
        <author>David M. Sanbonmatsu</author>
        <author>Martha C. Powell</author>
        <author>Frank R. Kardes</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>On the Automatic Activation of Attitudes</title>
          <date>1986</date>
          <publisher>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">fazio1986-attitudes</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">fazio1986-attitudes.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">b727efb832a6903ce179363b643e641d3fc0b4a2</note>
          <note type="rights">personal-copy</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>social-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>automatic activation of attitudes</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>In Experiments 1 and 2 associative strength was measured rather than manipulated, so the two classes of attitude may differ in other ways.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The inhibition produced by weak negative primes in Experiment 1 did not replicate in the later experiments.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The control primes of Experiment 3 were not equivalent to the weak primes of the first two experiments.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Whether the priming procedure works as an unobtrusive attitude measure has not been tested.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a block of practice trials used DIFFERENT words from those serving as primes</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the practice block primes the critical items before the experiment begins · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>subjects were required to RECITE the prime aloud</label>
        <note>eliminates: that a null or weak priming effect is a failure of ATTENTION - a subject who never processed the prime cannot be primed by it · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>automatic activation</label>
        <term>automatic activation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper">
        <label>attitude</label>
        <term>attitude</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>associative strength</label>
        <term>associative strength</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>nonattitude</label>
        <term>nonattitude</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AN ATTITUDE BECOMES A QUANTITY WITH A NAMED ZERO: `attitudes as evaluative associations with objects. Quotation withheld.` An attitude stops being something a person has or lacks and becomes a link with a magnitude. Everything else in the paper follows: if it is an association, its strength is measurable, manipulable, and predictive of whether it fires unbidden - and `nonattitude` gives the theory a prediction at the bottom of the scale as well as the top</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A FIFTH KIND OF BOUNDARY CONDITION - A PROPERTY OF THE STORED REPRESENTATION: `the likelihood of such automatic activation of an attitude appears to depend upon the strength of the association between the attitude object and the evaluation.` The corpus now holds five places a priming effect can be conditional: the OUTCOME SITUATION (ambiguity - four papers), the OBSERVER (prime visibility, Holcomb2005), the STIMULUS (contains a face, Huang2018), the RELATION between primes (conflict, buchner2003), and here the stored representation itself. Each needs a different remedy when a replication fails - change the task, screen the subjects, change the materials, redesign the trial structure, or select the items</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE MODERATOR IS BOTH MEASURED AND MANIPULATED, WHICH IS THE STRONGEST FORM THE CLAIM COULD TAKE: `Quotation withheld.` Experiments 1 and 2 identified pre-existing strong and weak associations; Experiment 3 created them. The measured version alone would be confounded with anything that makes an object memorable or familiar; the manipulation rules that out, and the agreement between the two is the argument</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE PAPER CLAIMS AFFECT WORKS LIKE MEANING, EXPLICITLY: `Quotation withheld.` A bridge between two literatures, stated by the paper itself - the semantic priming of meyer1971 and neely1977 and the affective priming this paper starts are claimed to be one mechanism running on different contents. `Just as activation can spread from one node in the network to another ... the present data indicate a spontaneous spreading of activation from the object to the affective association`</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Fazio, Chen, McDonel &amp; Sherman (1982), Fazio, Powell &amp; Herr (1983) and Powell &amp; Fazio (1984) on attitudes as object-evaluation associations</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Neely&#x27;s (1977) semantic priming investigation and its short- versus long-SOA pattern</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → past research employing the repeated attitudinal expression manipulation (Powell &amp; Fazio, 1984)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>associative strength —causes→ automatic activation</label>
        <term>associative strength</term>
        <term>automatic activation</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: THE STRONGEST-EVIDENCED EDGE ON THIS RECORD, BECAUSE THE SPAN CARRIES BOTH OPERATIONS: &#x27;MEASURED or MANIPULATED…&#x27;. A correlational moderator would be confounded with familiarity; the manipulation rules that out, and the quote says both were done. Weight 0.9 rather than 0.95 because &#x27;evidence ... was far stronger&#x27; is a statement about evidence rather than about effect size.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p-value</label>
        <term>p-value</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>statistical-significance</label>
        <term>statistical-significance</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variance</label>
        <term>variance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
