<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art</title>
        <author>Aleksandra Sherman</author>
        <author>Clair Morrissey</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art</title>
          <date>2017</date>
          <publisher></publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.3389/fnhum.2017.00411</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">frontiers2017-what-is-art-good-for</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">frontiers2017-what-is-art-good-for.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">f1352a4835170118cfda0e9078883c6540bbc195</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>philosophy-of-art</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>the social and epistemic value of art appreciation - what art is good for beyond beauty, pleasure and preference, understood as a social practice that cultivates self- and other-understanding</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether and how a systematic scientific study of art appreciation, reframed as a social practice, should explain the socio-epistemic outcomes of arts engagement rather than only aesthetic pleasure or liking</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>an argument to reframe art appreciation as socio-epistemically valuable - an embodied, enactive social practice cultivating self-understanding and other-understanding - and a call for an expanded empirical (neuroaesthetic) research program beyond judgments of beauty and preference</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>art appreciation as a social practice that cultivates socio-epistemic skills, specifically self-understanding and other-understanding</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.86">
        <label>Emotionally moving, potentially transformative art experiences produce an inward, self-reflective focus - felt as chills or tears - that can exercise self- and other-understanding.</label>
        <term>being moved prompts self-reflection</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>During intensely moving aesthetic experiences the default mode network, involved in self-contemplation and self-referential thought, is recruited more strongly for artworks rated as highly moving.</label>
        <term>default mode network recruitment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.82">
        <label>When a beholder&#x27;s expectations are violated, self-reflective meta-cognitive re-assessment begins and can eventually restructure the self-schema.</label>
        <term>expectancy violation and self-schema transformation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>Embodied responses to art are cognitive and affective simulations that help the beholder grasp both the representational content of the work and the intentions of the artist.</label>
        <term>embodied simulation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>Empathy lets a beholder resonate with and share an isomorphic affective state while remaining aware of its source, providing a route to understanding others through art.</label>
        <term>affect sharing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>Mirror neurons and homologous human cortical regions respond both when performing and when observing an action, a candidate substrate for experientially understanding an artwork&#x27;s content and the artist&#x27;s intentions.</label>
        <term>mirror neuron system</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>The authors decline to commit to any specific or direct causal pathway between cognitive processes, art appreciation, and self- or other-understanding, identifying it instead as an open area of investigation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>The reviewed studies are not direct evidence that self-understanding is developed by art appreciation; they show only that self-reflection, a related process, is prompted by moving art experiences.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>The empirical and philosophical research on art appreciation and other-understanding is still limited in scope, quantity, and specificity.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>Many claims that art appreciation cultivates empathy are contested; causal effects have not always replicated, and a brief encounter is typically shallow.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>The extent to which mirroring, simulation, and empathy actually affect art appreciation and aesthetic evaluation remains understudied.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.96">
        <label>art appreciation</label>
        <term>art appreciation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.94">
        <label>neuroaesthetics</label>
        <term>neuroaesthetics</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.92">
        <label>aesthetic experience</label>
        <term>aesthetic experience</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.93">
        <label>social practices</label>
        <term>social practices</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.93">
        <label>socio-epistemic skill</label>
        <term>socio-epistemic skill</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.94">
        <label>self-understanding</label>
        <term>self-understanding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.94">
        <label>other-understanding</label>
        <term>other-understanding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>self-knowledge</label>
        <term>self-knowledge</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>knowledge of the self</label>
        <term>knowledge of the self</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>self-identity</label>
        <term>self-identity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.91">
        <label>self-reflection</label>
        <term>self-reflection</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>being moved</label>
        <term>being moved</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>default mode network</label>
        <term>default mode network</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.86">
        <label>self-schema transformation</label>
        <term>self-schema transformation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[14]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>clarificationism</label>
        <term>clarificationism</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[15]" resp="#paper" cert="0.88">
        <label>imaginative understanding</label>
        <term>imaginative understanding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[16]" resp="#paper" cert="0.93">
        <label>empathy</label>
        <term>empathy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[17]" resp="#paper" cert="0.89">
        <label>sympathy</label>
        <term>sympathy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[18]" resp="#paper" cert="0.92">
        <label>cognitive empathy</label>
        <term>cognitive empathy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[19]" resp="#paper" cert="0.92">
        <label>affective empathy</label>
        <term>affective empathy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[20]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>emotional contagion</label>
        <term>emotional contagion</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[21]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>theory of mind</label>
        <term>theory of mind</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[22]" resp="#paper" cert="0.89">
        <label>embodied responses</label>
        <term>embodied responses</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[23]" resp="#paper" cert="0.88">
        <label>mirror neuron system</label>
        <term>mirror neuron system</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[24]" resp="#paper" cert="0.86">
        <label>aesthetic distance</label>
        <term>aesthetic distance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[25]" resp="#paper" cert="0.88">
        <label>aesthetic evaluation</label>
        <term>aesthetic evaluation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[26]" resp="#paper" cert="0.88">
        <label>well-being</label>
        <term>well-being</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>art appreciation → self-understanding</label>
        <note>Art appreciation as a practice is proposed to enhance self-understanding, but the authors explicitly decline to assert a specific or direct causal pathway. — the relation stated: Art appreciation may cultivate self-understanding, held open rather than causally asserted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>art appreciation → other-understanding</label>
        <note>Reviewed findings suggest art appreciation is deeply connected to other-understanding, engaging mental-state-attribution processes. — the relation stated: Art appreciation is connected to other-understanding on the reviewed evidence.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>cognitive empathy → affective empathy</label>
        <note>Cognitive empathy (modelling minds without emotional investment) and affective empathy (resonating with an isomorphic emotion) are two distinct routes to understanding others. — the relation stated: Cognitive and affective empathy are two related but distinct capacities for understanding others.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>art appreciation → well-being</label>
        <note>Art appreciation and creation are associated with increased well-being and are argued to be partially constitutive of a flourishing life. — the relation stated: Art appreciation is associated with well-being and flourishing.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>understanding - Carroll&#x27;s clarificationist sense: deepening and clarifying moral knowledge one already has, as opposed to acquiring new propositional knowledge from the sciences</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>self - two philosophical senses: &#x27;self-knowledge&#x27; as knowledge of one&#x27;s own mental states, versus &#x27;knowledge of the self&#x27; as understanding of one&#x27;s self and its nature</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>empathy - feeling WITH another (isomorphic affect sharing), distinguished from sympathy as feeling FOR another</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.89">
        <label>social - the authors&#x27; sense: longstanding practices embedded in the fabric and life of communities, not mere co-presence or a social context of viewing</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>value of art - social, epistemic and personal value, as opposed to monetary or economic value</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>being moved - an intense, attachment-relevant emotional response prompting self-reflection, distinct from liking or a judgment of beauty</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.89">
        <label>the arts vs aesthetics - the paper resists reducing &#x27;the arts&#x27; (their nature and function) to &#x27;aesthetics&#x27; (the capacity to cause disinterested pleasure)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>builds-on → Wolterstorff&#x27;s and MacIntyre&#x27;s account of the arts as social practices</label>
        <note>note: Adopts MacIntyre&#x27;s social-practices framework, via Wolterstorff, as the frame for the nature of the arts.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>contrasts-with → neuroaesthetics&#x27; focus on beauty, preference and pleasure as the primary outcomes of art appreciation</label>
        <note>note: Argues that focus risks conflating the arts with aesthetics and reducing art to the capacity to cause disinterested pleasure.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>extends → information-processing accounts of art appreciation</label>
        <note>note: Not opposed to them, but reoriented: investigate the information-processing system through socially-related outputs rather than aesthetic outcomes.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>supports → the claim that art appreciation is deeply connected to other-understanding</label>
        <note>note: Reviewed neural findings are read as promising but not decisive support; more research is called crucial.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>qualifies → claims that art appreciation cultivates empathy</label>
        <note>note: Notes many such claims are contested, causal effects have not always replicated, and brief encounters are shallow.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>recommends → longitudinal, multi-method empirical designs beyond single-exposure preference measures</label>
        <note>note: Recommends longer engagement, naturalistic comparison, combined methods, and state/trait individual-difference measures.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>self-knowledge —distinct-from→ knowledge of the self</label>
        <term>self-knowledge</term>
        <term>knowledge of the self</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Differentiator stated: mental states versus the self and its nature; cue &#x27;In contrast&#x27;. · the relation stated: Self-knowledge is knowledge of one&#x27;s own mental states, whereas knowledge of the self is understanding of one&#x27;s self and its nature.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>empathy —distinct-from→ sympathy</label>
        <term>empathy</term>
        <term>sympathy</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Differentiator stated: feeling &#x27;with&#x27; versus feeling &#x27;for&#x27;; cue &#x27;distinct from / rather than&#x27;. · the relation stated: Empathy is feeling &#x27;with&#x27; another (an isomorphic shared emotion), distinct from sympathy, which is feeling &#x27;for&#x27; another.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span shown is about &#x27;catching&#x27; another&#x27;s state; the empathy-sympathy distinction is not visible.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.91">
        <label>empathy —distinct-from→ emotional contagion</label>
        <term>empathy</term>
        <term>emotional contagion</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Differentiator: awareness of the source of one&#x27;s affect; cue &#x27;does not / rather than&#x27;. · the relation stated: True empathy requires a developed sense of self, agency, and other, whereas imitation or emotional contagion alone - seen even in infants - does not.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span shown is about &#x27;catching&#x27; another&#x27;s state; the empathy-contagion distinction is not visible.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>self-understanding —is-a→ socio-epistemic skill</label>
        <term>self-understanding</term>
        <term>socio-epistemic skill</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: Flat categorical is-a; cue &#x27;is a&#x27;, instance first. · the relation stated: Self-understanding is a socio-epistemic skill, because recognizing and acting on one&#x27;s central values is a social ability.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>being moved —contrasted-with→ aesthetic evaluation</label>
        <term>being moved</term>
        <term>aesthetic evaluation</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: Contrast of research focus; cue &#x27;rather than&#x27;. · the relation stated: Understanding the experience of being moved is set against just focusing on aesthetic evaluation as the object of research.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Default mode network activity was higher for artworks rated as highly moving than for those rated lower, consistent with an inward, self-reflective focus during moving aesthetic experiences.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>Feeling like crying while viewing art was correlated with increased self-awareness, feelings of epiphany and insight, and with mixed emotions corresponding to being moved.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>Participants whose bodily motions were congruent with a painting&#x27;s style (e.g., stippling for Pointillism) reported liking the artworks more than incongruent groups, suggesting motor resonance shapes preference.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>Individuals high in emotion contagion were more moved by, interested in, and enjoyed visual art, and reacted more strongly to emotion-congruent aspects of the work.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>People who read more literary or narrative fiction score higher on mental-state tests (RMET, Yoni), and even brief exposure to a literary short story raised scores relative to popular fiction or nonfiction.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.87">
        <label>After watching empathy-inducing film clips, individuals were more charitable, a prosocial effect that was partially mediated by age.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.89">
        <label>A large-scale population study found that both art appreciation and art creation are associated with increased well-being (perceived health, life satisfaction, and lower anxiety and depression).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.86">
        <label>Contrary to a simple empathy-boost account, reading fiction was found to decrease perceptual accuracy in discriminating fearful emotions, plausibly through a prosocial attribution bias.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>in philosophy, knowledge of one&#x27;s own mental states - one&#x27;s own beliefs, thoughts, or sensations</label>
        <term>self-knowledge</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>knowledge or understanding of one&#x27;s self and its nature, as opposed to knowledge of one&#x27;s particular mental states</label>
        <term>knowledge of the self</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>following Martin, an achievement: developing a justifiable and meaningful perspective on one&#x27;s life, calling for adjustments in attitude, emotion and conduct</label>
        <term>self-understanding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>individuals&#x27; subjective senses of who they are - their self-images - organized around a set of central commitments or values</label>
        <term>self-identity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>Carroll&#x27;s view that art appreciation deepens and clarifies moral knowledge one already has (understanding) rather than delivering new propositional knowledge</label>
        <term>clarificationism</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>&#x27;catching&#x27; another person&#x27;s experience - an affective capacity to resonate with an isomorphic emotion while remaining aware of its source, distinguishing self from other</label>
        <term>empathy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>the capacity to model others&#x27; experiences by inferring their intentions and predicting future actions, without requiring emotional investment</label>
        <term>cognitive empathy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Kieran&#x27;s skill, promoted by the arts, of appreciating the appropriate way to feel for, regard, and respond to others</label>
        <term>imaginative understanding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>MacIntyre&#x27;s coherent, complex forms of socially established cooperative human activity through which internal goods are realized in pursuing the standards of excellence definitive of that activity</label>
        <term>social practices</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.91">
        <label>following Koopman and Hakemulder, thoughts and insights on oneself, often in relation to others and/or to society</label>
        <term>self-reflection</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>rarely exceeding 15 seconds — typical short viewing time per artwork in lab studies of visual aesthetic experience the authors critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>at least 1 minute — longer per-artwork engagement time the authors recommend for future designs</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00411.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
