<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines</title>
        <author>Thilo Hagendorff</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines</title>
          <date>2020</date>
          <publisher>Minds and Machines</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">hagendorff2020-the-ethics-of-ai-ethics-an-evaluat</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">hagendorff2020-the-ethics-of-ai-ethics-an-evaluat.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">c5298cb847e1b7837bcac87e85db4f9f1fbcf978</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>ai-ethics</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>22 AI ethics guidelines - which issues each one covers, which it omits, and whether any of it changes what practitioners do</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether ethical guidelines have an actual impact on human decision-making in AI and machine learning</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>a comparison of 22 guidelines that tallies coverage AND absence, sorts the absences into justified and unjustified, and states that the selection method decided the list</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>a normative vocabulary assembled by many bodies at once, whose commonest terms turn out to be the ones with engineering solutions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>accountability, privacy and fairness appear in about 80% of the guidelines, and the author&#x27;s observation is that these are exactly the aspects for which technical fixes exist or are being built. A NORMATIVE VOCABULARY SELECTED BY TRACTABILITY: what can be engineered gets written down, and what cannot - political abuse, ecological cost, democratic erosion - does not</label>
        <term>the vocabulary is shaped by what is solvable</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>excluding robot ethics guidelines means the list of issues lacks robotics issues. The author states this BEFORE reporting the omissions, so every absence in the paper is already qualified by the selection that produced it - which is the discipline a negative finding needs and almost never gets</label>
        <term>the sample decides the absence list</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>an issue can be missing without any good reason - political abuse, hidden social and ecological costs - or missing for a reason that can be stated. The author refuses to count them together, which turns a list of gaps into two different claims</label>
        <term>two kinds of absence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a marker goes in only where an issue is explicitly discussed in one or more paragraphs - unless the guideline is so short that it is nothing but brief mentions, in which case brief mentions count. THE EXCEPTION IS WHERE THE MEASUREMENT WOULD OTHERWISE PENALISE BREVITY RATHER THAN SILENCE</label>
        <term>a coding rule with its exception printed</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>industry guidelines suggest to legislators that self-governance suffices and no specific laws are needed. So the existence of an ethical vocabulary is itself an argument against a binding one - the guidelines are not only a record of values, they are an intervention in whether values become rules</label>
        <term>ethics as a substitute for law</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the sampling method has an effect on the list of issues and omissions - excluding robot ethics guidelines removes robotics issues from the result</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the selection is biased towards western and northern documents and excludes guidelines not written in English</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the evaluation is semi-systematic rather than a full analysis of every available soft-law or non-legal norm document</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>documents about big data, algorithms or robotics, and papers on single aspects of AI ethics, were excluded</label>
        <note>about this quote: PAGE FURNITURE IS SPLICED INTO THE &#x27;evidence&#x27; QUOTE - the publisher&#x27;s page mark, a page number and the author running head: &#x27;1 3 102 T. Hagendorff&#x27;. The words on either side of it were never continuous on the page; read the quote with it deleted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the overview of missing issues is stated as non-exhaustive</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>systematic-review methodology from evidence-based medicine, applied semi-systematically to normative documents rather than to trials</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a stated marking criterion - explicit discussion in one or more paragraphs - applied before any tally, with the exception for guidelines that are entirely brief mentions</label>
        <note>eliminates: a word-count masquerading as coverage; a guideline that names privacy once does not score the same as one that discusses it · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the effect of the sampling method on the omissions list, stated in the same section as the omissions</label>
        <note>eliminates: an absence being read as a property of the field when it is a property of the sample - the robotics example is given as the worked case · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>omissions sorted into those without any good reason and those that can be justified, rather than counted as one figure</label>
        <note>eliminates: a gap count in which a deliberate scope decision and a genuine blind spot are the same number · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="controls" ana="#controls[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>selection criterion declared as the discernible intention of comprehensive mapping rather than depth of detail</label>
        <note>eliminates: the longest documents dominating the sample, which would make coverage a function of document length · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="controls" ana="#controls[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the author&#x27;s own selection bias towards western, northern and English-language documents, named as a shortcoming</label>
        <note>eliminates: guidelines from outside the western, northern, English-language world - the author names the bias in his own corpus and does not correct it · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): absent-declared-unreported</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>omissions</label>
        <term>omissions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>sampling method</label>
        <term>sampling method</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>political abuse</label>
        <term>political abuse</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>technical fixes</label>
        <term>technical fixes</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>accountability</label>
        <term>accountability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>green markers</label>
        <term>green markers</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Isolated mentions</label>
        <term>Isolated mentions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>AI ethics</label>
        <term>AI ethics</term>
        <note>about this quote: PAGE FURNITURE IS SPLICED INTO THE &#x27;evidence&#x27; QUOTE - the publisher&#x27;s page mark, a page number and the author running head: &#x27;1 3 102 T. Hagendorff&#x27;. The words on either side of it were never continuous on the page; read the quote with it deleted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>big data</label>
        <term>big data</term>
        <note>about this quote: PAGE FURNITURE IS SPLICED INTO THE &#x27;evidence&#x27; QUOTE - the publisher&#x27;s page mark, a page number and the author running head: &#x27;1 3 102 T. Hagendorff&#x27;. The words on either side of it were never continuous on the page; read the quote with it deleted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>depth of detail</label>
        <term>depth of detail</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>machine consciousness</label>
        <term>machine consciousness</term>
        <note>about this quote: PAGE FURNITURE IS SPLICED INTO THE &#x27;evidence&#x27; QUOTE - the publisher&#x27;s page mark, the title running head and a page number: &#x27;1 3 The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines 105&#x27;. The words on either side of it were never continuous on the page; read the quote with it deleted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>an omission - UNJUSTIFIED: missing or severely underrepresented without any good reason, such as political abuse or the hidden social and ecological costs of AI</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>an omission - JUSTIFIED: absent for a reason the analysis can state, which the author separates out rather than counting alongside the first</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>an issue covered - AS CODED: explicitly discussed in one or more paragraphs, with isolated mentions not counted</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>an issue covered - THE EXCEPTION TO THE CODING: unless the guideline is so short that it consists entirely of brief mentions, in which case brief mentions count</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`AI` - AS USED IN THE GUIDELINES: the only term they use, referred to exclusively and almost never replaced by more specific terminology</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`AI` - AS THE AUTHOR READS IT: a collective term for a wide range of technologies, or an abstract large-scale phenomenon - which is why no guideline goes into technical detail</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>critiques → the AI ethics guidelines themselves, on the grounds that they lack any mechanism to reinforce their own normative claims</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>critiques → industry self-governance, as a device for suggesting to legislators that no specific laws are necessary</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>critiques → the guidelines&#x27; exclusive use of the term AI, which is a collective term for a wide range of technologies and lets every document avoid technical detail</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>qualifies → its own omissions list, by stating that the sampling method produced it and that the selection is western, northern and English-language</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>green markers —distinct-from→ Isolated mentions</label>
        <term>green markers</term>
        <term>Isolated mentions</term>
        <note>differs in: whether the issue was discussed or merely named · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): whether the issue was discussed or merely named · the relation stated: an issue counts as covered only where it is explicitly discussed in one or more paragraphs; a bare mention does not - unless the whole guideline is bare mentions
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span explains which issues got a green marker; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AI ethics —distinct-from→ big data</label>
        <term>AI ethics</term>
        <term>big data</term>
        <note>differs in: which technology the document is about, which is the boundary the selection drew · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): which technology the document is about, which is the boundary the selection drew · about this quote: PAGE FURNITURE IS SPLICED INTO THE &#x27;evidence&#x27; QUOTE - the publisher&#x27;s page mark, a page number and the author running head: &#x27;1 3 102 T. Hagendorff&#x27;. The words on either side of it were never continuous on the page; read the quote with it deleted. PAGE FURNITURE IS SPLICED INTO THE relation evidence QUOTE - the publisher&#x27;s page mark, a page number and the author running head: &#x27;1 3 102 T. Hagendorff&#x27;. The words on either side of it were never continuous on the page; read the quote with it deleted. · the relation stated: documents about big data, algorithms or robotics were excluded from the sample even where they are ethics documents, so the issues peculiar to them are absent from the list by construction</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the most frequently mentioned ethical aspects are exactly those for which technical fixes exist or are being developed</label>
        <term>the most frequently mentioned ethical aspects are exactly those for which technical fixes exist or are being developed</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the sampling method used to select the guidelines has an effect on the list of issues and omissions</label>
        <term>the sampling method used to select the guidelines has an effect on the list of issues and omissions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>not all omissions can be treated equally - some are missing without any good reason and some can be justified</label>
        <term>not all omissions can be treated equally - some are missing without any good reason and some can be justified</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>hardly any guideline discusses political abuse of AI - propaganda, bots, fake news, deepfakes, micro targeting, election fraud</label>
        <term>hardly any guideline discusses political abuse of AI - propaganda, bots, fake news, deepfakes, micro targeting, election fraud</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>machine consciousness is omitted from all examined guidelines</label>
        <term>machine consciousness is omitted from all examined guidelines</term>
        <note>about this quote: PAGE FURNITURE IS SPLICED INTO THE &#x27;evidence&#x27; QUOTE - the publisher&#x27;s page mark, the title running head and a page number: &#x27;1 3 The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines 105&#x27;. The words on either side of it were never continuous on the page; read the quote with it deleted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Only the AI Now 2019 Report notes that AI producer and consumer practices may themselves contradict sustainability goals.</label>
        <term>Only the AI Now 2019 Report notes that AI producer and consumer practices may themselves contradict sustainability goals.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the guidelines refer exclusively to the term AI and never or very seldom use more specific terminology</label>
        <term>the guidelines refer exclusively to the term AI and never or very seldom use more specific terminology</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AI ethics lacks mechanisms to reinforce its own normative claims, and deviations from the codes have no consequences</label>
        <term>AI ethics lacks mechanisms to reinforce its own normative claims, and deviations from the codes have no consequences</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>industry ethics guidelines serve to suggest to legislators that self-governance is sufficient and no specific laws are necessary</label>
        <term>industry ethics guidelines serve to suggest to legislators that self-governance is sufficient and no specific laws are necessary</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>issues absent from the guidelines, divided into those missing or severely underrepresented without any good reason and those that can be justified</label>
        <term>omissions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>inserted only where an issue is explicitly discussed in one or more paragraphs; isolated mentions without further explanation do not count, unless the guideline consists entirely of brief mentions</label>
        <term>green markers</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AI ethics guidelines analysed and compared</label>
        <term>22</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>of all guidelines mention accountability, privacy or fairness - the three aspects with technical fixes</label>
        <term>80%</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>omissions</label>
        <term>omissions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>sampling method</label>
        <term>sampling method</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
