<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>DIFFERENCES IN THE ABILITIES OF CREATIVE THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING OF STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS BY USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING AND LEARNING OF PROBLEM SOLVING</title>
        <author>Hasanah</author>
        <author>Surya</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>DIFFERENCES IN THE ABILITIES OF CREATIVE THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING OF STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS BY USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING AND LEARNING OF PROBLEM SOLVING</title>
          <date>2017</date>
          <publisher>International Journal of Sciences : Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)</publisher>
          
          
          <idno type="record">hasanah2017-differences-in-the-abilities-of-cr</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">hasanah2017-differences-in-the-abilities-of-cr.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">94eeb29d01ed0efcc971448365ceb2873747edd7</note>
          <note type="rights">open-access</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>education</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>creative thinking and problem-solving ability in mathematics learning</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Cooperative group work makes students interact and exchange and inspect each other&#x27;s ideas, which is what raises creative thinking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>In STAD every problem is worked through in group discussion before the individual quiz, so students get repeated rehearsal at solving problems</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Creative thinking entails generating alternative solutions, so exercising it automatically exercises problem solving — which is why the two abilities interact with the learning model</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The abstract reports the two abilities TOGETHER as no better than the comparison, and each ability SEPARATELY as better than the same comparison; the three statements do not compose and are not reconciled.</label>
        <note>what this limits: citing this study for whether STAD cooperative learning outperforms problem-solving learning: the abstract&#x27;s combined result says no better while both component results say better, and the paper does not state which reading holds</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The whole population was used as the sample, so there is no sampling beyond the single class group studied.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the generality of these results: the population is all 60 students of class VII at one school, and the analysis treats the data as coming from a saturated sample</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE ABSTRACT&#x27;S THIRD FINDING IS CONTRADICTED BY THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN MEANS. It states that problem-solving ability is better under STAD than under problem-solving learning; the reported means are 51.467 for STAD and 62.800 for problem-solving learning, so STAD is 11.3 points WORSE on that measure. The direction of the claim is the opposite of the direction of the data, and both are in this paper.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A standard deviation that cannot come from its own variance: variance 136.585 is reported with SD 111.821, where the square root is 11.687. Four of the six cells are exact to three decimals, so the computation was right and this is a transcription error - but it is printed as a result.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A second impossible standard deviation: variance 145.640 with SD 62.609, where the square root is 12.068.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>The whole population of 60 was used, described by the paper as a saturated sample, so the analysis assumes normality and homogeneity of a set that was not sampled from anything wider.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>each student&#x27;s quiz score compared against that student&#x27;s own earlier average score</label>
        <note>eliminates: between-student differences in ability - the comparison is within a pupil, so a rise is a rise relative to how that pupil was already performing · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>creative thinking</label>
        <term>creative thinking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>problem solving</label>
        <term>problem solving</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>saturated sample</label>
        <term>saturated sample</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>creativity</label>
        <term>creativity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>STAD</label>
        <term>STAD</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the abstract&#x27;s claim that STAD is better for problem solving → the paper&#x27;s own reported means for that comparison</label>
        <note>A PAPER CONTRADICTING ITSELF, WHICH NO TYPE CAN EXPRESS. Every claim relations type points at ANOTHER work; there is no way to record that a paper&#x27;s stated finding runs opposite to the numbers printed in its own results section. Filed here because the alternative is to record only one half and lose the fact that both are present.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>effect of STAD cooperative learning - AS THE COMBINED RESULT: the two abilities taken together are reported as NO BETTER than the comparison method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>effect of STAD cooperative learning - AS THE COMPONENT RESULTS: creative thinking is reported as BETTER, and problem solving is reported as BETTER, against the same comparison</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>creativity - identified with its PRODUCT: the paper states the main criterion in creativity is the product rather than the process</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>creativity - given three different definitions in a single paragraph, from three cited authors: the PRODUCT of good thinking, the ABILITY to create something new, and the capacity to see relationships among pre-existing elements</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>claim_type: existence</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: existence — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>method: quasi-experiment</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: behavioural-experiment — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>phenomenon: differences in creative thinking and mathematical problem-solving ability between two teaching models</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: creative thinking and problem-solving ability in mathematics learning — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Slavin&#x27;s account of cooperative learning</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Iin Septi Jannah Siregar&#x27;s study of creative thinking and problem solving under problem-based vs conventional learning</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>two-way ANOVA</label>
        <term>two-way ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Tukey post-hoc test</label>
        <term>Tukey post-hoc test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F-test</label>
        <term>F-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Lilliefors normality test</label>
        <term>Lilliefors normality test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Bartlett test of homogeneity of variance</label>
        <term>Bartlett test of homogeneity of variance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>null hypothesis testing</label>
        <term>null hypothesis testing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variance</label>
        <term>variance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard deviation</label>
        <term>standard deviation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Taking creative thinking and problem solving together, students taught by STAD cooperative learning were not better than those taught by problem-solving learning on the topic of the circle.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Considered on its own, mathematical creative thinking was better in the STAD group than in the problem-solving-learning group.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Mathematical problem-solving ability was also better in the STAD group than in the problem-solving-learning group.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The two-way analysis found a significant interaction between the learning model used and which of the two abilities was being measured.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>creative thinking in mathematics</label>
        <term>creative thinking in mathematics</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>problem solving</label>
        <term>problem solving</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ability to solve problems of mathematics</label>
        <term>ability to solve problems of mathematics</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cooperative learning</label>
        <term>cooperative learning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Student Team Achievement Division</label>
        <term>Student Team Achievement Division</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>subject matter</label>
        <term>subject matter</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ability of creative thinking</label>
        <term>ability of creative thinking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ability of problem solving</label>
        <term>ability of problem solving</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>60 — total class VII population, which is also the study sample under saturated sampling</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>X = 65 — mean creative-thinking post-test score of students taught by STAD cooperative learning</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>X = 52.7 — mean creative-thinking post-test score of students taught by problem-solving learning</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>X = 51.467 — mean problem-solving post-test score of students taught by STAD cooperative learning</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>X = 62.800 — mean problem-solving post-test score of students taught by problem-solving learning</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>5 items — number of description-type test items for each of the two measured abilities</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at .</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
