<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition</title>
        <author>Kaiming He</author>
        <author>Xiangyu Zhang</author>
        <author>Shaoqing Ren</author>
        <author>Jian Sun</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition</title>
          <date>2015</date>
          <publisher>IEEE CVPR / arXiv</publisher>
          
          <idno type="arXiv">1512.03385</idno>
          <idno type="record">he2015-resnet</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">he2015-resnet.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">5a027378e84009d441919a67edee439ff6bfbc8f</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>artificial-intelligence</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>the degradation problem in very deep neural networks</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>system-or-tool-building</label>
        <term>system-or-tool-building</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>reformulate each layer to learn a residual function via identity shortcut connections, so very deep networks are easier to optimize and avoid the depth-degradation problem</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>why residual mappings are easier to optimize remains an open question</label>
        <note>what this limits: the explanation of why residual learning works: THIS HYPOTHESIS, HOWEVER, IS STILL AN OPEN QUESTION</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The cause of the optimisation difficulty in deep plain nets is not explained.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the account of what goes wrong in plain deep nets: THE REASON FOR SUCH OPTIMIZATION DIFFICULTIES WILL BE STUDIED IN THE FUTURE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Extremely deep (1202-layer) models remain problematic.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the very deep regime: THERE ARE STILL OPEN PROBLEMS ON SUCH AGGRESSIVELY DEEP MODELS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The 1202-layer net&#x27;s worse test error is attributed to overfitting from excess capacity on a small dataset.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the 1202-layer result specifically: THE 1202-LAYER NETWORK MAY BE UNNECESSARILY LARGE (19.4M) FOR THIS SMALL DATASET</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The premise that multiple nonlinear layers can asymptotically approximate complicated functions is unproven.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the approximation premise rather than the optimisation question of item 0: THE PREMISE THAT MULTIPLE NONLINEAR LAYERS CAN ASYMPTOTICALLY APPROXIMATE COMPLICATED FUNCTIONS is stated as a hypothesis that is STILL AN OPEN QUESTION</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Stronger regularisation was not explored and might improve the CIFAR-10 results.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the CIFAR-10 results: COMBINING WITH STRONGER REGULARIZATION MAY IMPROVE RESULTS, WHICH WE WILL STUDY IN THE FUTURE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The scenario that motivates the design is conceded to be unlikely in practice.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the intuition given for residual learning: the authors concede that in real cases</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The paper&#x27;s central premise is labelled a hypothesis by its authors.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the claim that residual mappings are easier to optimize: the authors present it as a hypothesis rather than as a demonstrated result</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>overfitting as the cause of the degradation problem</label>
        <note>eliminates: the reading that deeper networks degrade because they overfit · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>vanishing gradients as the cause of the optimisation difficulty in plain nets</label>
        <note>eliminates: the standard explanation that deep plain nets fail because signals vanish · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper">
        <label>degradation</label>
        <term>degradation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>overfitting</label>
        <term>overfitting</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>vanishing gradients</label>
        <term>vanishing gradients</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper">
        <label>optimization difficulty</label>
        <term>optimization difficulty</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper">
        <label>residual mapping</label>
        <term>residual mapping</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper">
        <label>identity mapping</label>
        <term>identity mapping</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the degradation problem - IDENTIFIED BY TRAINING ERROR, NOT TEST ERROR: accuracy saturates then degrades rapidly with depth, and the authors&#x27; point is that this is NOT overfitting because adding layers raises the TRAINING error - the distinction is what makes it an optimisation problem rather than a generalisation one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>an identity mapping - AN IDEALISATION THE PAPER WITHDRAWS: the argument for residual learning runs through the case where identity mappings are optimal and the solver can drive the weights to zero, and the authors then state in their own words that in real cases this is unlikely</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the residual mapping - A REFORMULATION, PRESENTED AS A HYPOTHESIS: instead of fitting the desired underlying mapping the layers fit its residual, and the claim that this is easier to optimise is given in the authors&#x27; own words as something they hypothesize</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → plain deep convolutional networks (the degradation problem)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → prior reports [11, 42] that adding layers to a deep model raises training error</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → VGG nets [41]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Faster R-CNN [32]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → highway networks [42, 43]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>vanishing gradients —causes→ optimization difficulty</label>
        <term>vanishing gradients</term>
        <term>optimization difficulty</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: no-change · strength of the relation: 0.8</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>152 — depth of the residual nets evaluated (8x deeper than VGG, lower complexity)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>3.57% — ImageNet test-set error of the ResNet ensemble (1st place ILSVRC 2015)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>100 and 1000 — network depths analysed on CIFAR-10</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>An ensemble of residual nets reached 3.57% error on the ImageNet test set, winning 1st place in the ILSVRC 2015 classification task.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>network depth</label>
        <term>network depth</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>residual learning</label>
        <term>residual learning</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>shortcut connection</label>
        <term>shortcut connection</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>degradation problem</label>
        <term>degradation problem</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard-deviation</label>
        <term>standard-deviation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
