<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review</title>
        <author>Hutchison</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review</title>
          <date>2003</date>
          <publisher>Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.3758/bf03196544</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">hutchison2003-is-semantic-priming-due-to-associa</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">hutchison2003-is-semantic-priming-due-to-associa.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">5e2cae7a67dd56df634d75a58781d39864e0c075</note>
          <note type="rights">open-access</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>cognitive-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>semantic priming</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Activation spreads from the prime&#x27;s concept along indirect links to concepts it is not directly associated with, producing mediated priming.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Participants notice that related pairs predict word targets and check back from target to prime, so relatedness biases the lexical decision after the target has been accessed.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>An auditory prime leaves an echoic trace that survives into target presentation, letting participants integrate or strategically match prime and target and so inflating auditory priming effects.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>In distributed recurrent networks a featurally similar prime leaves the network nearer the target&#x27;s attractor basin, so it settles into the target pattern in fewer iterations.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The status of several relation types (collocates, episodic relatives, script relations) is left unresolved and needs further experiments.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Restricting the review to published studies leaves the direction of the resulting bias in effect-size estimates unknown.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The review cannot say why auditory presentation yields so much larger priming estimates than visual presentation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The available evidence cannot decide whether the associative boost reflects combined lexical and semantic connections or simply greater featural overlap.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>THE NORMS THE WHOLE LITERATURE RESTS ON ARE CONCEDED NOT TO BE WHAT THEY ARE TAKEN FOR: &#x27;Quotation withheld&#x27; This is the review&#x27;s own instrument being withdrawn mid-argument, and it is what licenses a senses row&#x27;s verdict on a whole class of studies.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>every target was counterbalanced BOTH ACROSS AND WITHIN subjects so that each appeared in the related, unrelated and neutral conditions</label>
        <note>eliminates: that a priming effect is an item effect - that the related and unrelated sets simply contain different words · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>association strength</label>
        <term>association strength</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>feature overlap</label>
        <term>feature overlap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>automatic priming</label>
        <term>automatic priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>mediated associates</label>
        <term>mediated associates</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>semantic matching</label>
        <term>semantic matching</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>stimulus onset asynchrony</label>
        <term>stimulus onset asynchrony</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>semantic similarity</label>
        <term>semantic similarity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE ANSWER IS BOTH, AND IT IS NOT A COMPROMISE - IT IS A PARTITION BY STIMULUS CLASS. `Quotation withheld` Then the split: `Quotation withheld` Different stimulus classes, different mechanisms, one label over all of them - which is precisely the condition under which a controlled vocabulary stops being informative</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND IT CATCHES A CLAIM CHANGING MEANING ALONG A CITATION CHAIN, BY HAND. Lucas (2000) cited Hodgson (1991), who cites Neely (1991), for the claim that priming is smaller in pronunciation than in lexical decision. `Quotation withheld such as Cohen&#x27;s d.` A claim about milliseconds became a claim about effect sizes in two citations, and the meta-analysis built on it. This is the failure the concept-record design exists to make visible, found here by one person reading a chain backwards</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE VERDICT ON A WHOLE CLASS OF STUDIES, STATED WITHOUT SOFTENING: `Quotation withheld` The reason is the confound: associated words tend also to be similar words, so varying association alone varies both. Not `limited`, not `to be interpreted with caution`. A review willing to write that sentence about its own field&#x27;s standard design is rare enough to be worth the tag on its own</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`dominance` and `association strength` - REPORTED AS INTERCHANGEABLE IN THE LITERATURE, with a citation: `the terms dominance and association strength have been used interchangeably (Lorch, 1982)`. Two measures that a paper arguing about WHICH ONE DRIVES PRIMING needs kept apart.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>`similar` - THE MEASURED QUANTITY DEPENDS ON HOW THE EXPERIMENTER DEFINED THE WORD TO THE PARTICIPANT, AND THE PAPER LISTS THAT AS ONE OF FIVE SOURCES OF VARIANCE: `there is no universal method for determining similarity in this task`, and ratings vary on (1) the other words in the norming set, (2) HOW THE RESEARCHER DEFINES SIMILAR FOR THE PARTICIPANTS, (3) presentation order, (4) instructional set, (5) association between the items. THE DEFINITION IS NOT UPSTREAM OF THE MEASUREMENT HERE - IT IS ONE OF ITS INPUTS, named alongside stimulus order.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the CONSCIOUS/UNCONSCIOUS boundary - A THEORETICAL DISTINCTION WITH NO UNIVERSAL OPERATIONAL VALUE: `there is no universal SOA that distinctly separates conscious from unconscious processing, and the SOA necessary to demonstrate automatic priming may vary from task to task`. A THRESHOLD DISPUTE, not a naming one - the two categories are not in doubt and the number that divides them is, so no nomenclature body can repair it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Lucas (2000)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Lucas (2000)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Lucas (2000)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>association strength —causes→ automatic priming</label>
        <term>association strength</term>
        <term>automatic priming</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.95 · direction on the measure (stated by the tagger, no quotation): increases · note: HALF OF A CONCLUSION SENTENCE, AND THE OTHER HALF IS THE NEXT EDGE. The span names all three endpoints, so two triples come out of one quote and the note has to say which half each is carrying or a reader gets a partial claim as if it were the whole one. Weight 0.95: it is the review&#x27;s stated conclusion, both endpoints are named, and &#x27;due to&#x27; is unambiguous. The &#x27;both&#x27; is the finding - either edge alone reproduces exactly the one-sided reading this paper was written to correct.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>feature overlap —causes→ automatic priming</label>
        <term>feature overlap</term>
        <term>automatic priming</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.95 · direction on the measure (stated by the tagger, no quotation): increases · note: The other half. Lucas&#x27;s (2000) meta-analysis concluded feature overlap was the WHOLE story - &#x27;implies that semantic…&#x27; - and this review keeps the mechanism while removing the &#x27;primarily&#x27;. A finding preserved and a quantifier withdrawn, which is a shape the schema records only in prose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>association strength —distinct-from→ feature overlap</label>
        <term>association strength</term>
        <term>feature overlap</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: THE EDGE IS A CONFOUND, WHICH IS A STRANGE THING TO BE ABLE TO SAY. &#x27;The second problem…&#x27; They are distinct - the whole review depends on that - and in ordinary stimuli they travel together, because words people associate tend also to be words that resemble each other. Weight 0.9 rather than 0.95: the span asserts the distinction only by asserting the difficulty of drawing it. That is real evidence of distinctness and it is weaker than a sentence saying so directly.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span notes the DIFFICULTY of separating the two; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>effect size</label>
        <term>effect size</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p-value</label>
        <term>p-value</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Automatic semantic priming is produced by both association strength and feature overlap, not by either alone.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Mediated associates (e.g. lion-stripes) give the strongest evidence for automatic purely associative priming, while functional associates, synonyms and antonyms instead support priming based on feature overlap.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Category coordinates and perceptually similar items show no automatic priming when the stimuli are presented visually.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Category coordinates produced only 4 ms of priming in the pronunciation task.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>In the standard lexical decision task at long SOA, backward priming (28 ms) was comparable to forward priming (34 ms), and statistically equivalent in every experiment.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Mediated priming is strongest when strategic processing is minimised and disappears when it is encouraged.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>LSA similarity of Balota and Lorch&#x27;s mediated pairs (.20) was significantly higher than when the items were randomly re-paired (.10).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Auditory-presentation studies gave more than twice the effect size of visual ones (d = .51 vs .25).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Published studies averaged an effect size of .35, almost twice the .18 of unpublished studies.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Contrary to Lucas&#x27;s claim, close inspection of her studies shows that priming from category coordinates is not automatic.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>semantic priming effect</label>
        <term>semantic priming effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>automatic</label>
        <term>automatic</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>association strength</label>
        <term>association strength</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>expectancy generation</label>
        <term>expectancy generation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>instrument relations</label>
        <term>instrument relations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>script relations</label>
        <term>script relations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>attractor basins</label>
        <term>attractor basins</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>semantic distance</label>
        <term>semantic distance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Hyperspace Analogue to Language (HAL)</label>
        <term>Hyperspace Analogue to Language (HAL)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>priming effect</label>
        <term>priming effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>RP</label>
        <term>RP</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>presentation modality</label>
        <term>presentation modality</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>association strengths</label>
        <term>association strengths</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>type of task</label>
        <term>type of task</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>SOA</label>
        <term>SOA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>31 msec — average priming from category coordinates across studies using the standard lexical decision task</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>4 msec — average priming from the same category-coordinate items in the pronunciation task</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t(47) 5 4.27, p , .001 — test comparing LSA similarity of mediated pairs (.20) with randomly re-paired controls (.10)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>.51 — mean Cohen&#x27;s d for the five auditory-presentation studies, against .25 for the visual ones</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>.35 — unweighted mean effect size of published studies, against .18 for unpublished ones</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>26 studies (accounting for 116 experiments) — size of the Lucas (2000) meta-analysis that this review re-examines</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>over 6,000 participants — norming sample behind the Nelson et al. (1999) association norms used to recheck every study&#x27;s stimuli</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>160 million words — size of the Usenet corpus from which HAL builds its co-occurrence matrix</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>14 — number of association types into which the author classified each Palermo-Jenkins norm pair, showing association norms are heterogeneous</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196544.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
