<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women’s and Men’s Voting Behavior in Global Perspective</title>
        <author>Ronald Inglehart</author>
        <author>Pippa Norris</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women’s and Men’s Voting Behavior in Global Perspective</title>
          <date>2000</date>
          <publisher>International Political Science Review</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1177/0192512100214007</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">inglehart2000-the-developmental-theory-of-the-ge</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">inglehart2000-the-developmental-theory-of-the-ge.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">e5abc777651ed6be40884f5d6c55569e22ba0bb1</note>
          <note type="rights">open-access</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>political-science</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>gender gap in voting</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>observational-study</label>
        <term>observational-study</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Modernization converges men&#x27;s and women&#x27;s roles through the paid labour market, education and changed family structure, which in turn changes their political preferences</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Value change — the spread of postmaterialist and egalitarian/feminist attitudes — pulls women&#x27;s vote leftwards</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Generational turnover: as younger cohorts replace older ones the aggregate gap keeps moving left</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Occupational segregation concentrates working women in low-paid and public-sector jobs, encouraging support for parties of the left</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The survey data do not cover consistent over-time trends for most of the countries compared, so the wider comparison is cross-sectional (1990s only).</label>
        <note>what this limits: the cross-national comparison: WE LACK EVIDENCE IN THE WORLD VALUES SURVEY FOR CONSISTENT TRENDS OVER TIME IN A WIDER RANGE OF SOCIETIES</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>No systematic comparative evidence exists before the 1980s, so long-term secular change has to be inferred from age-cohort differences rather than observed directly.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the long-term secular claim: WE LACK SYSTEMATIC COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE ... FROM THE ERA PRIOR TO THE 1980S, so it is inferred rather than observed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The analysis covers only one dimension of a multidimensional phenomenon: vote choice, not partisanship, attitudes, or civic engagement.</label>
        <note>what this limits: every use of the phrase gender gap drawn from this work: THE TERM ... CONCERNS A MULTIDIMENSIONAL POLITICAL PHENOMENON, and only vote choice is measured here</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The realignment is uneven across countries and may reflect country-specific circumstances the theory does not model.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the generality of the realignment claim: THE PROCESS IS FAR FROM UNIFORM, PROBABLY REFLECTING PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES WITHIN EACH COUNTRY</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The headline realignment is explicitly not global, although the title says global perspective: the old pattern is reported as persisting in postcommunist and developing societies.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the claim that women have realigned to the left worldwide: the paper reports the modern gap in postindustrial and some West European states, and states it was not yet evident in postcommunist or developing societies</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Sympathy for feminist ideals is measured by two proxies chosen as indicators, so the construct is interpretive rather than observed.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the feminism controls in this analysis: they are confidence in the women&#x27;s movement and attitudes towards abortion, described as key indicators of sympathy for feminist ideals rather than direct measures of it</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>structural controls were introduced and the gender gap re-estimated in each country</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the modern gender gap is a by-product of structural differences - education, income, labour-force participation - rather than a value shift · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>traditional gender gap</label>
        <term>traditional gender gap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>modern gender gap</label>
        <term>modern gender gap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>World Values Surveys</label>
        <term>World Values Surveys</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>gender gap - TRADITIONAL: women voting more conservatively and participating less than men, the orthodoxy the article sets out to test</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>gender gap - MODERN: women voting to the LEFT of men, the opposite sign under the same term, reported for postindustrial societies by the 1990s</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>sympathy for feminist ideals - operationalised as two survey items: confidence in the women&#x27;s movement and attitudes towards abortion</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>claim_type: mechanism</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: mechanism — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>method: comparative-survey-analysis</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: observational-study — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>phenomenon: the gender gap in voting behaviour and its reversal as societies become postindustrial</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: gender gap in voting — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Inglehart (1977) and Norris (1988) predictions that women&#x27;s relative conservatism would disappear</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Studlar, McAllister and Hayes (1998)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>traditional gender gap —contrasted-with→ modern gender gap</label>
        <term>traditional gender gap</term>
        <term>modern gender gap</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>difference between group means</label>
        <term>difference between group means</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ordinary least squares regression</label>
        <term>ordinary least squares regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standardized regression coefficient</label>
        <term>standardized regression coefficient</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>By the 1990s women in postindustrial societies voted significantly further to the left than men, and the difference survived a battery of social controls.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The leftward shift did not appear in postcommunist or developing societies, where women were still voting further right than men in the mid-1990s.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Averaged by type of society, the voting gap was +.10 (women left) in advanced industrialized democracies, -.08 in postcommunist societies and -.14 in developing societies (women right).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>In postindustrial societies the modern gender gap survives structural controls but shrinks once cultural attitudes are added to the model.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The gap is therefore attributed mainly to women&#x27;s and men&#x27;s differing value orientations — postmaterialism and support for the women&#x27;s movement — rather than to differences in their lifestyles.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Within established democracies the gap reverses across age groups: in the youngest cohort women are far to the left of men, while among the over-65s women are more conservative than men.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Country by country, the modern gap held up under structural controls in the United States, France and Germany, but only the United States kept a significant gap after cultural attitudes were controlled.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>By the 1990s women were significantly more right wing than men in only six of 57 nations.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>In Europe the mean female ideological position moved from 5.61 in 1973 to 5.20 in 1999.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The American gender gap is not exceptional in size; larger ideological gaps appear in Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>traditional gender gap</label>
        <term>traditional gender gap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>modern gender gap</label>
        <term>modern gender gap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>developmental theory of the gender gap</label>
        <term>developmental theory of the gender gap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>gender dealignment</label>
        <term>gender dealignment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ideological gap</label>
        <term>ideological gap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>gender</label>
        <term>gender</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>10-point left–right voting scale</label>
        <term>10-point left–right voting scale</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cultural attitudes</label>
        <term>cultural attitudes</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>generational cohort</label>
        <term>generational cohort</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>type of society</label>
        <term>type of society</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>religiosity</label>
        <term>religiosity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>labor force participation</label>
        <term>labor force participation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>education</label>
        <term>education</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>age</label>
        <term>age</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>socioeconomic status</label>
        <term>socioeconomic status</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>+.10 / –.08 / –.14 — Mean gender gap on the 10-point voting scale in advanced industrialized, postcommunist and developing societies respectively (positive = women further left)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>r=.46 — Correlation between respondents&#x27; left-right ideological self-placement and the expert-coded left-right position of the party they intended to vote for, used as a reliability check on the voting scale</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>six out of 57 nations — Number of countries in the 1990s where women were significantly more right wing than men on ideological self-placement</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>fourteen countries — Number of countries in the same comparison where women were significantly more left wing than men</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>sixty societies — Number of societies compared across the three waves of the World Values Surveys</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>5.61 in 1973 to 5.20 in 1999 — Mean ideological self-placement of European women on the 10-point left-right scale at the start and end of the Eurobarometer series</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>six out of ten nations — Number of advanced industrialized countries (of the ten with a complete set of controls) where women voted significantly further left than men in the uncontrolled model</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512100214007.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
