<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Multi-Source Spatial Entity Linkage</title>
        <author>Suela Isaj</author>
        <author>Esteban Zimányi</author>
        <author>Torben Bach Pedersen</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Multi-Source Spatial Entity Linkage</title>
          <date>2019</date>
          <publisher>SSDBM</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1145/3340964.3340979</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">isaj2019-spatial-entity-linkage</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">isaj2019-spatial-entity-linkage.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">56cb61cd9b7512d58f69f636202e29627b1ae7c2</note>
          <note type="rights">gold-oa</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>computer-science</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>spatial entity linkage across location-based sources</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>system-or-tool-building</label>
        <term>system-or-tool-building</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the blocking structure&#x27;s splitting criterion is changed from CAPACITY to density and diagonal, because a count of points is not a spatial quantity: a dense city block should split before its capacity is reached, and two farm points far apart may still be one entity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>a point is allowed to be assigned to MORE THAN ONE child of the split, so that two nearby entities are not separated merely because a dividing line happened to fall between them</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the address is deliberately NOT compared by edit distance, because syntactic and spatial closeness come apart in both directions - one changed digit is 650 metres, eight added characters is the same building - and is instead scored by equality, inclusion, or nothing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>category and keyword similarity is taken as the MAXIMUM over all cross-pairs of the two entities&#x27; keyword lists under a Wordnet-based measure, rather than by string matching, so that synonyms count as agreement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the weighted scoring function is removed entirely and replaced by Pareto optimality: points on one frontier have equal utility, so the method says a pair is better than another WITHOUT quantifying by how much, and needs no attribute weights to do it</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the whole threshold problem is collapsed to ONE number - which skyline level separates the classes - in place of a threshold per attribute similarity plus another for the function that aggregates them</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE UNSUPERVISED CUT-OFF WORKS BECAUSE THE POSITIVE CLASS IS NOT A CLUSTER: matching pairs are scattered, since several different patterns can make a match, so instead of intra-class compactness the method separates them by their distance to the NEGATIVE class, and sets the cut-off where that inter-class distance starts to increase</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the attributes used to BUILD the ground truth - phone, opening hours - are excluded from the similarity computation, and the stated reason is that they are used to construct the ground truth</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Ground truth for the full dataset is mostly automatic, not manually checked, because manual labelling at that scale was not feasible.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Performance on the full dataset is lower than on the manually labelled sample, possibly an artefact of the automatic labelling rather than of the method.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The skyline-based algorithms could in principle degrade to cubic complexity.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The ranking step is computationally expensive because it requires repeated Pareto frontier computation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The attributes that define a correct match are the ones excluded from the scoring, so identity is fixed by whichever fields were reserved.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any accuracy figure reported here: the attributes used to construct the ground truth are deliberately excluded from the similarity computation, so what counts as the same entity is defined by one set of attributes and predicted from a different set</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>String similarity is stated to be inapplicable to the attribute that looks most like a key, with a worked counterexample.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any use of string-similarity metrics on addresses: the paper states they cannot be used, giving two addresses with a Levenshtein similarity of 0.963 that are 650 meters apart</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Coordinates fail as an identifier in both directions at once.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any linkage of these sources on coordinates: different spatial entities may share coordinates, as with shops in a shopping mall, and one entity may appear at coordinates 82 meters apart in two sources</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The methods this work builds on were fitted to a different kind of entity, and the authors say the resemblance cannot be assumed.</label>
        <note>what this limits: carrying an entity-resolution method over to spatial entities: the authors state such solutions are learned on human entity datasets and that the resemblance of behaviours between the two cannot merely be assumed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>manual checking of the labels on a sample of the pairs - 1,500 in the sample dataset and about 10,000 overall - against the automatic labels inferred from shared website or phone number</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the automatic labelling is wrong in the two ways the paper names: the same entity holding a different phone number or website, and different entities sharing a phone number · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>spatial entity linkage</label>
        <term>spatial entity linkage</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>spatial entity</label>
        <term>spatial entity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper">
        <label>spatial object</label>
        <term>spatial object</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper">
        <label>ground truth</label>
        <term>ground truth</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper">
        <label>spatial blocking</label>
        <term>spatial blocking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>QuadFlex</label>
        <term>QuadFlex</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>pairwise comparisons</label>
        <term>pairwise comparisons</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>SkyRank</label>
        <term>SkyRank</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>QuadSky</label>
        <term>QuadSky</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>spatial entity vs spatial object - THE DISTINCTION THE WHOLE PAPER RESTS ON: an object is identified by its coordinates alone, an entity is not, so the two words name things that need different identity conditions even though both sit at a point on a map</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>identity - AS A COMBINATION OF ATTRIBUTES, NOT A KEY: the paper states outright that what makes a spatial entity itself is several attributes together, and that inconsistency between sources makes that combination hard to infer</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>similarity - SYNTACTIC AND SPATIAL COME APART: a one-character change in an address is a 0.963 string similarity and 650 metres on the ground, which is why the paper refuses ordinary string metrics for exactly the field that looks most like an identifier</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>`QuadSky` - A PIPELINE WHOSE FOUR PARTS ARE NAMED TWICE OVER, ONCE BY FUNCTION AND ONCE BY ALGORITHM. `Quotation withheld` Three of the four carry a coined proper name in a parenthesis and one does not - `pairwise comparisons` is the stage the authors did not invent anything for, and the naming records that asymmetry exactly. A reader tracking `SkyRank` and a reader tracking `ranking the pairs` are following the same stage under a name that belongs to a different level.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → the authors&#x27; earlier conference paper [38] (QuadFlex + SkyEx)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the skyline computation method of [38] for spatial blocking and pairwise comparison</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the lattice-based skyline algorithm of [42]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → WordNet [20] and the Wu &amp; Palmer semantic similarity measure [21]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the spatial entity matching tools of Karam et al. [17], Berjawi et al. [18] and Morana et al. [19]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · spatial entity —distinct-from→ spatial object</label>
        <term>spatial entity</term>
        <term>spatial object</term>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span named only &#x27;spatial object&#x27; and began mid-contrast (&#x27;However, while ...&#x27;). This sentence names both AND CARRIES THE DIFFERENTIA: an object is fully determined by its coordinates, an entity is geo-located AND has more. A distinction with its criterion. — strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>spatial entity —distinct-from→ spatial object</label>
        <term>spatial entity</term>
        <term>spatial object</term>
        <note>differs in: THE AXIS IS WHETHER IDENTITY BEYOND POSITION IS PART OF THE THING. &#x27;Quotation withheld&#x27; Both are located; only one carries an identity, and that is the whole of the distinction. · strength of the relation: 1 · note: RE-GROUNDS another row of this record: the old span named ONE endpoint.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>spatial blocking —part-of→ QuadSky</label>
        <term>spatial blocking</term>
        <term>QuadSky</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: &#x27;consists of&#x27; is the containment cue and it is in the gate&#x27;s list, so this edge is cue-tested. The whole is named first and the parts second - CONTAINER_FIRST order. · the relation stated: QuadSky consists of four main parts: spatial blocking (QuadFlex), pairwise comparisons, ranking the pairs (SkyRank), and labelling the pairs</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>QuadFlex —part-of→ QuadSky</label>
        <term>QuadFlex</term>
        <term>QuadSky</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: &#x27;consists of&#x27; is the containment cue and it is in the gate&#x27;s list, so this edge is cue-tested. The whole is named first and the parts second - CONTAINER_FIRST order. · the relation stated: QuadSky consists of four main parts: spatial blocking (QuadFlex), pairwise comparisons, ranking the pairs (SkyRank), and labelling the pairs</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>pairwise comparisons —part-of→ QuadSky</label>
        <term>pairwise comparisons</term>
        <term>QuadSky</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: &#x27;consists of&#x27; is the containment cue and it is in the gate&#x27;s list, so this edge is cue-tested. The whole is named first and the parts second - CONTAINER_FIRST order. · the relation stated: QuadSky consists of four main parts: spatial blocking (QuadFlex), pairwise comparisons, ranking the pairs (SkyRank), and labelling the pairs</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>SkyRank —part-of→ QuadSky</label>
        <term>SkyRank</term>
        <term>QuadSky</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: &#x27;consists of&#x27; is the containment cue and it is in the gate&#x27;s list, so this edge is cue-tested. The whole is named first and the parts second - CONTAINER_FIRST order. · the relation stated: QuadSky consists of four main parts: spatial blocking (QuadFlex), pairwise comparisons, ranking the pairs (SkyRank), and labelling the pairs</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · Sources describing the same physical world disagree: each covers only part of it, with different attributes, sometimes contradicting each other.</label>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The published string was not verbatim in EITHER copy of the paper. A quote field promises the author&#x27;s words; this held a copy with the line-break hyphen closed in &#x27;at- tributes&#x27;. Re-cut from the paper as it stands; the closing was correct scholarship and silently unverifiable.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · The SkyEx-* algorithms reach 0.85 precision and 0.85 recall on a manually labeled set of 1,500 pairs.</label>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The published string was not verbatim in EITHER copy of the paper. A quote field promises the author&#x27;s words; this held &#x27;QuadSky achieves 0.85 precision and 0.85 recall&#x27;. The paper attributes those figures to &#x27;our novel SkyEx-* family of algorithms&#x27;, which is the LABELLING STEP of QuadSky - one of its four parts, beside QuadFlex, pairwise comparison and SkyRank. Naming the pipeline where the paper names the classifier moves a measured result onto a larger object than the one measured.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>spatial entity linkage</label>
        <term>spatial entity linkage</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · 0.85 precision / 0.85 recall — QuadSky on a manually labelled set of 1,500 pairs</label>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The published string was not verbatim in EITHER copy of the paper. A quote field promises the author&#x27;s words; this held &#x27;QuadSky achieves 0.85 precision and 0.85 recall&#x27;. The paper attributes those figures to &#x27;our novel SkyEx-* family of algorithms&#x27;, which is the LABELLING STEP of QuadSky - one of its four parts, beside QuadFlex, pairwise comparison and SkyRank. Naming the pipeline where the paper names the classifier moves a measured result onto a larger object than the one measured.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.87 precision / 0.6 recall — QuadSky on a semi-manually labelled set of 777,452 pairs</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · precision</label>
        <term>precision</term>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The published string was not verbatim in EITHER copy of the paper. A quote field promises the author&#x27;s words; this held &#x27;QuadSky achieves 0.85 precision and 0.85 recall&#x27;. The paper attributes those figures to &#x27;our novel SkyEx-* family of algorithms&#x27;, which is the LABELLING STEP of QuadSky - one of its four parts, beside QuadFlex, pairwise comparison and SkyRank. Naming the pipeline where the paper names the classifier moves a measured result onto a larger object than the one measured.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · recall</label>
        <term>recall</term>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The published string was not verbatim in EITHER copy of the paper. A quote field promises the author&#x27;s words; this held &#x27;QuadSky achieves 0.85 precision and 0.85 recall&#x27;. The paper attributes those figures to &#x27;our novel SkyEx-* family of algorithms&#x27;, which is the LABELLING STEP of QuadSky - one of its four parts, beside QuadFlex, pairwise comparison and SkyRank. Naming the pipeline where the paper names the classifier moves a measured result onto a larger object than the one measured.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1145/3340964.3340979.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
