<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Purely organic electroluminescent material realizing 100% conversion from electricity to light.</title>
        <author>Hironori Kaji</author>
        <author>Hajime Suzuki</author>
        <author>Tatsuya Fukushima</author>
        <author>Katsuyuki Shizu</author>
        <author>Katsuaki Suzuki</author>
        <author>Shosei Kubo</author>
        <author>Takeshi Komino</author>
        <author>Hajime Oiwa</author>
        <author>Furitsu Suzuki</author>
        <author>Atsushi Wakamiya</author>
        <author>Yasujiro Murata</author>
        <author>Chihaya Adachi</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Purely organic electroluminescent material realizing 100% conversion from electricity to light.</title>
          <date>2015</date>
          <publisher>Nature Communications</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms9476</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">kaji2015-purely-organic-electroluminescent-material</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">kaji2015-purely-organic-electroluminescent-material.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">ca1420135801cb82616cda7491a46cf05f0aa745</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>materials-science</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">69 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" from="#a3" to="#a4" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">the purely organic TADF emitter DACT-II and OLEDs built from it</span>
      <span xml:id="t1" from="#a1" to="#a2" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">whether an emitter of abundant materials can reach full conversion of charge to light</span>
      <span xml:id="t2" from="#a3" to="#a4" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">a TADF material with ~100% PLQY and ~100% triplet up-conversion, giving OLEDs of 29.6% EQE</span>
      <span xml:id="t3" from="#a3" to="#a4" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">existence</span>
      <span xml:id="t4" from="#a27" to="#a28" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">near-complete electricity-to-light conversion in a purely organic TADF emitter</span>
      <span xml:id="t5" from="#a37" to="#a38" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">experiment<term>experiment</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t6" from="#a17" to="#a18" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">Triplet excitons up-convert to singlets, so all excitons can emit light.<term>reverse intersystem crossing</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t7" from="#a5" to="#a6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">Fine-tuning frontier orbital distributions overcomes the emission/up-conversion trade-off.<term>HOMO-LUMO overlap tuning</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t8" from="#a29" to="#a30" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">Rapidly converting excitons to photons suppresses annihilation, the origin of roll-off.<term>exciton removal suppresses annihilation</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t9" from="#a47" to="#a48" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.75">In real devices the singlet-triplet gap may fluctuate across amorphous conformations.</span>
      <span xml:id="t10" from="#a51" to="#a52" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">Out-coupling, not internal efficiency, now limits EQE.</span>
      <span xml:id="t11" from="#a9" to="#a10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">OLEDs<term>OLEDs</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t12" from="#a9" to="#a10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.7">organic light-emitting diodes<term>organic light-emitting diodes</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t13" from="#a11" to="#a12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">EQE<term>EQE</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t14" from="#a9" to="#a10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.7">external EL quantum efficiency<term>external EL quantum efficiency</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t15" from="#a11" to="#a12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">IQE<term>IQE</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t16" from="#a11" to="#a12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.7">internal quantum efficiency<term>internal quantum efficiency</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t17" from="#a19" to="#a20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">TADF<term>TADF</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t18" from="#a19" to="#a20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">thermally activated delayed fluorescence<term>thermally activated delayed fluorescence</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t19" from="#a19" to="#a20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.7">normal fluorescence<term>normal fluorescence</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t20" from="#a15" to="#a16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">ISC<term>ISC</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t21" from="#a15" to="#a16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">Intersystem crossing<term>Intersystem crossing</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t22" from="#a17" to="#a18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">RISC<term>RISC</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t23" from="#a17" to="#a18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">reverse ISC<term>reverse ISC</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t24" from="#a21" to="#a22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">HOMO<term>HOMO</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t25" from="#a21" to="#a22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[14]" resp="#paper" cert="0.7">highest occupied molecular orbital<term>highest occupied molecular orbital</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t26" from="#a21" to="#a22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[15]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">LUMO<term>LUMO</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t27" from="#a21" to="#a22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[16]" resp="#paper" cert="0.7">lowest unoccupied molecular orbital<term>lowest unoccupied molecular orbital</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t28" from="#a23" to="#a24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[17]" resp="#paper" cert="0.75">HOMO–LUMO separation<term>HOMO–LUMO separation</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t29" from="#a23" to="#a24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[18]" resp="#paper" cert="0.75">oscillator strength<term>oscillator strength</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t30" from="#a29" to="#a30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[19]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">TTA<term>TTA</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t31" from="#a29" to="#a30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[20]" resp="#paper" cert="0.7">triplet–triplet annihilation<term>triplet–triplet annihilation</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t32" from="#a29" to="#a30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[21]" resp="#paper" cert="0.65">rapid removal<term>rapid removal</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t33" from="#a39" to="#a40" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[22]" resp="#paper" cert="0.7">Phosphorescence<term>Phosphorescence</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t34" from="#a39" to="#a40" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[23]" resp="#paper" cert="0.7">delayed fluorescence<term>delayed fluorescence</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t35" from="#a25" to="#a26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[24]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">DACT-II<term>DACT-II</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t36" from="#a11" to="#a12" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">EQE - external quantum efficiency, the product of internal quantum efficiency and out-coupling</span>
      <span xml:id="t37" from="#a35" to="#a36" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">roll-off - the fall in EQE as luminance increases</span>
      <span xml:id="t38" from="#a9" to="#a10" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">OLEDs —same-as→ organic light-emitting diodes<note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95</note><term>OLEDs</term><term>organic light-emitting diodes</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t39" from="#a9" to="#a10" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">EQE —same-as→ external EL quantum efficiency<note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95</note><term>EQE</term><term>external EL quantum efficiency</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t40" from="#a11" to="#a12" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">IQE —same-as→ internal quantum efficiency<note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95</note><term>IQE</term><term>internal quantum efficiency</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t41" from="#a19" to="#a20" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">TADF —same-as→ thermally activated delayed fluorescence<note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95</note><term>TADF</term><term>thermally activated delayed fluorescence</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t42" from="#a15" to="#a16" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">ISC —same-as→ Intersystem crossing<note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95</note><term>ISC</term><term>Intersystem crossing</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t43" from="#a17" to="#a18" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">RISC —same-as→ reverse ISC<note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95</note><term>RISC</term><term>reverse ISC</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t44" from="#a21" to="#a22" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">HOMO —same-as→ highest occupied molecular orbital<note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95</note><term>HOMO</term><term>highest occupied molecular orbital</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t45" from="#a21" to="#a22" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">LUMO —same-as→ lowest unoccupied molecular orbital<note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95</note><term>LUMO</term><term>lowest unoccupied molecular orbital</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t46" from="#a29" to="#a30" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">TTA —same-as→ triplet–triplet annihilation<note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95</note><term>TTA</term><term>triplet–triplet annihilation</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t47" from="#a19" to="#a20" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">normal fluorescence —contrasted-with→ thermally activated delayed fluorescence<note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.85 · the relation stated: unlike</note><term>normal fluorescence</term><term>thermally activated delayed fluorescence</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t48" from="#a39" to="#a40" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">Phosphorescence —distinct-from→ delayed fluorescence<note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.85 · the relation stated: distinguished</note><term>Phosphorescence</term><term>delayed fluorescence</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t49" from="#a23" to="#a24" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">HOMO–LUMO separation —causes→ oscillator strength<note>direction on the measure: reduces · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.85 · the relation stated: decreases</note><term>HOMO–LUMO separation</term><term>oscillator strength</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t50" from="#a29" to="#a30" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">rapid removal —causes→ triplet–triplet annihilation<note>direction on the measure: reduces · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.8 · the relation stated: suppresses</note><term>rapid removal</term><term>triplet–triplet annihilation</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t51" from="#a27" to="#a28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">DACT-II OLEDs reach 29.6% EQE without out-coupling treatment, implying ~100% IQE.</span>
      <span xml:id="t52" from="#a7" to="#a8" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">An out-coupling sheet raises EQE to 41.5%.</span>
      <span xml:id="t53" from="#a37" to="#a38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">Doped films reach ~100% PLQY.</span>
      <span xml:id="t54" from="#a41" to="#a42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">Delayed emission is thermally activated, confirming TADF.</span>
      <span xml:id="t55" from="#a45" to="#a46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">DACT-II&#x27;s Boltzmann factor far exceeds that of 4CzIPN.</span>
      <span xml:id="t56" from="#a49" to="#a50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">Simulated and measured maximum EQE agree.</span>
      <span xml:id="t57" from="#a11" to="#a12" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">the product of the internal quantum efficiency (IQE) and light out-coupling factor<term>EQE</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t58" from="#a19" to="#a20" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">delayed fluorescence resulting from triplet-singlet transition<term>thermally activated delayed fluorescence</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t59" from="#a27" to="#a28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">maximum EQE without out-coupling</span>
      <span xml:id="t60" from="#a7" to="#a8" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">EQE with out-coupling sheet</span>
      <span xml:id="t61" from="#a31" to="#a32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">EQE at high luminance</span>
      <span xml:id="t62" from="#a37" to="#a38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">PLQY of 9 wt% doped CBP films</span>
      <span xml:id="t63" from="#a13" to="#a14" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">limit on exciton generation factor for fluorescent OLEDs</span>
      <span xml:id="t64" from="#a43" to="#a44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">theoretical limit on β via TTA</span>
      <span xml:id="t65" from="#a45" to="#a46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">Boltzmann factors of DACT-II and 4CzIPN at 300 K</span>
      <span xml:id="t66" from="#a33" to="#a34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">maximum EQE of reference Alq3 / Ir(ppy)3 devices</span>
      <span xml:id="t67" from="#a27" to="#a28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">EQE<term>EQE</term></span>
      <span xml:id="t68" from="#a37" to="#a38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">PLQY<term>PLQY</term></span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
        <p><anchor xml:id="a0"/> Purely organic electroluminescent material realizing 100% conversion from electricity to light.</p>
        <p>Abstract</p>
        <p>Efficient organic light-emitting diodes have been developed using emitters containing rare metals, such as platinum and iridium complexes. <anchor xml:id="a1"/>However, there is an urgent need to develop emitters composed of more abundant materials.<anchor xml:id="a2"/> <anchor xml:id="a3"/>Here we show a thermally activated delayed fluorescence material for organic light-emitting diodes, which realizes both approximately 100% photoluminescence quantum yield and approximately 100% up-conversion of the triplet to singlet excited state.<anchor xml:id="a4"/> The material contains electron-donating diphenylaminocarbazole and electron-accepting triphenyltriazine moieties. <anchor xml:id="a5"/>The typical trade-off between effective emission and triplet-to-singlet up-conversion is overcome by fine-tuning the highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital distributions.<anchor xml:id="a6"/> The nearly zero singlet–triplet energy gap, smaller than the thermal energy at room temperature, results in an organic light-emitting diode with external quantum efficiency of 29.6%. <anchor xml:id="a7"/>An external quantum efficiency of 41.5% is obtained when using an out-coupling sheet.<anchor xml:id="a8"/> The external quantum efficiency is 30.7% even at a high luminance of 3,000 cd m −2 .</p>
        <p>Electroluminescence (EL) was initially studied for fundamental interest 1 , 2 , 3 . <anchor xml:id="a9"/>Tang and VanSlyke 4 subsequently applied EL in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), obtaining an external EL quantum efficiency (EQE) of 1% for a double-layer fluorescent OLED.<anchor xml:id="a10"/> OLEDs have since been studied extensively, with particular focus on increasing their efficiency in display and lighting applications. <anchor xml:id="a11"/>EQE ( η EQE ) is the product of the internal quantum efficiency (IQE) and light out-coupling factor ( η out ), η EQE =IQE × η out .<anchor xml:id="a12"/> η out is typically 20–30% (refs 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ). IQE is obtained from IQE= β × γ × Φ PL , where β is the exciton generation factor resulting in photons, γ is the carrier balance ratio of holes and electrons, and Φ PL is the photoluminescence (PL) quantum yield (PLQY). Singlet and triplet excitons are theoretically generated in a 1:3 ratio by electronic excitation 3 . Triplet excitons typically dissipate as heat rather than being converted into photons. <anchor xml:id="a13"/>Because only singlet excitons generate photons, the resulting β for fluorescent OLEDs is limited to 25%.<anchor xml:id="a14"/> Even under conditions where γ and Φ PL are 100%, the theoretical maximum η EQE of the resulting OLED is only 5–7.5%.</p>
        <p>Increasing β and η out are therefore important challenges to maximize EQE. β can be increased directly using triplet excitons. The heavy-atom effect can convert triplet excitons into phosphorescence. <anchor xml:id="a15"/>Intersystem crossing (ISC) involves transition from the singlet to triplet state, and can theoretically result in 100% of excitons being extracted as photons.<anchor xml:id="a16"/> The EQE of the first device based on such a concept in 1998 was 4% (ref. 9 ), and subsequently reached 19% in 2001 (ref. 10 ). EQEs exceeding 20% are now frequently reported for optimized devices incorporating well-designed materials 11 . However, phosphorescent materials for OLEDs are currently restricted to Pt and Ir complexes, which have limited availability and are expensive.</p>
        <p><anchor xml:id="a17"/>Triplet excitons can also potentially be exploited by reverse ISC (RISC), which involves transition from the lowest energy triplet state (T 1 ) to the lowest excited singlet state (S 1 ) 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 .<anchor xml:id="a18"/> Converting triplet excitons to singlet excitons allows all excitons to be used to generate photons. This strategy has typically not been effective, because S 1 is at a much higher energy than T 1 . Spin inversion is also required for this transition. However, fabrications of efficient OLEDs based on RISC have been attempted in recent years 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 . <anchor xml:id="a19"/>Unlike normal fluorescence, the fluorescence resulting from triplet–singlet transition is delayed, so we term it thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF).<anchor xml:id="a20"/></p>
        <p>TADF occurs by two successive processes, shown in Fig. 1a as green arrows; RISC from T 1 to S 1 , and subsequent radiative decay from S 1 to the ground state (S 0 ). RISC is effective when the energy difference between S 1 and T 1 (Δ E ST ) is small. <anchor xml:id="a21"/>The theoretical background ( Supplementary Note 1 ) reveals that small Δ E ST is achieved by separating highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) distributions.<anchor xml:id="a22"/> <anchor xml:id="a23"/>However, this HOMO–LUMO separation decreases the oscillator strength ( f ) between S 1 and S 0 , which lowers PLQY 21 .<anchor xml:id="a24"/></p>
        <p>DACT-II. ( a ) Schematic illustration of the TADF process. ( b ) Structure of DACT-II. ( c ) HOMO and LUMO distributions in DACT-II calculated at the PBE0/6-31G(d) level of theory. ( d ) Device structure and energy band diagram of DACT-II- x OLEDs . For the DACT-II-100 OLED , the EML consisted of DACT-II without CBP. Energy band diagrams of the reference fluorescent and phosphorescent OLEDs and other DACT-II- x OLEDs are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4 .</p>
        <p>Here we report an organic TADF material, 9-[4-(4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)phenyl]- N , N , N ′, N ′-tetraphenyl-9 H -carbazole-3,6-diamine, named DACT-II ( Fig. 1b ). <anchor xml:id="a25"/>DACT-II consists of electron-donating diphenylaminocarbazole and electron-accepting triphenyltriazine moieties, chemically bonded at a torsion angle α ( Fig. 1b ).<anchor xml:id="a26"/> We will demonstrate that both nearly zero Δ E ST , which is smaller than the thermal energy at room temperature, and large f , resulting in a PLQY of 100%, are simultaneously achieved by precisely controlling the HOMO and LUMO distributions ( Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1 , the geometries were optimized at the PBE0/6-31G(d) level 22 , 23 using the Gaussian 09 software package 24 ), although the two factors are considered to be in a trade-off relationship. The small Δ E ST and large f of DACT-II allow ‘all injected holes and electrons to be used in fluorescence&#x27;, resulting in an IQE of 100%. <anchor xml:id="a27"/>DACT-II-based OLEDs exhibit a maximum EQE of 29.6% in the absence of out-coupling treatment, indicating an IQE of ∼100%.<anchor xml:id="a28"/> The only loss of quantum efficiency in the device is via light out-coupling. A maximum EQE of 41.5% is obtained simply using an out-coupling sheet. Importantly, DACT-II also allows the typical substantial decrease in EQE with increasing luminance (efficiency roll-off) to be overcome. In DACT-II, S 1 and T 1 excitons are rapidly converted to photons because of its large f and small Δ E ST . <anchor xml:id="a29"/>The rapid removal of both S 1 and T 1 excitons in the optimized DACT-II-based OLEDs suppresses triplet–triplet annihilation (TTA) and singlet–triplet annihilation, which are an origin of roll-off.<anchor xml:id="a30"/> <anchor xml:id="a31"/>Very high EQE up to 30.7% is achieved at 3,000 cd m −2 .<anchor xml:id="a32"/></p>
        <p>Results</p>
        <p>Organic light-emitting diodes</p>
        <p>DACT-II, which consists only of C, H and N, was synthesized as described in Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2 . DACT-II has favourable thermal properties, with melting and decomposition temperatures of 266 °C and 484 °C, respectively. The sublimation temperature under vacuum was 308 °C. The glass transition temperature ( T g ) of bulk amorphous DACT-II (∼6 mg) measured by conventional differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at heating rates of 1–100 K min −1 was 151–159 °C. We also attempted DSC measurements for DACT-II in vacuum-deposited amorphous thin films with a thickness of 100 nm (∼20 ng). The ultrasensitive measurements were successful using very fast heating rates of 500–3,000 K s −1 , giving T g of 192–197 °C. T g of the thin films was higher than that of bulk samples, although it would be decreased by extrapolating to a lower heating rate. The higher T g probably reflects the higher thermal stability of vacuum-deposited thin films than bulk samples 25 ( Supplementary Note 3 ). DACT-II was then used as an emitting material for OLEDs ( DACT-II devices ). Supplementary Fig. 3 shows the materials for the devices; N , N ′-di(naphthalen-1-yl)- N , N ′-diphenyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diamine (NPD) or 4,4′-(cyclohexane-1,1-diyl)bis( N , N -di- p -tolylaniline) (TAPC) was used for the hole-transport layer (HTL), ([1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yloxy)bis((2-methylquinolin-8-yl)oxy)aluminium (BAlq) or 3,3′′,5,5′′-tetra(pyridin-3-yl)-1,1′:3′,1′′-terphenyl (BmPyPhB) for the electron-transport layer (ETL), lithium quinolin-8-olate (Liq) for the electron-injection layer (EIL) and 4,4′-di(9 H -carbazol-9-yl)-1,1′-biphenyl (CBP) for the host material of the emitter layer (EML). The device structure was indium tin oxide (ITO)/HTL (100 nm)/EML (40 nm)/ETL (30 nm)/Liq/Al ( Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 4 ). CBP doped with x wt% DACT-II was used for the EML. The devices are termed DACT-II- x devices , where x corresponds to the respective wt% of DACT-II. Hereafter, the DACT-II- x devices , containing TAPC and BAlq as HTL and ETL, respectively, are discussed unless otherwise stated. The energy-level diagram of the devices is shown in Fig. 1d . A neat DACT-II layer was also used for the EML in the DACT-II-100 device . The results and band diagrams for devices containing NPD or BmPyPhB are included in Table 1 , Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 , and Supplementary Figs 4 and 5 . Typical fluorescent and phosphorescent devices were also fabricated for reference using mer tris(8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum(III) (Alq 3 ) and fac tris(2-phenylpyridine) iridium(III) (Ir(ppy) 3 ) as emitters, respectively. The structures of the Alq 3 device and Ir(ppy) 3 device are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4 .</p>
        <p>EQE values for selected DACT-II- x devices.</p>
        <p>Figure 2a shows EL spectra of DACT-II devices at a current density of 1 mA cm −2 . The OLEDs, containing DACT-II concentrations of 1 to 23 wt%, all emit green EL. The emission maxima ( λ max ) range from 516 to 537 nm, with a small red shift observed with increasing DACT-II concentration. λ max of PL spectra has a stronger concentration dependence, as shown in Fig. 2b (see Supplementary Note 4 ). EL spectra with a logarithmic EL intensity scale are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6 . The DACT-II-1 device contains emission from TAPC and/or CBP ( Supplementary Figure 6 also shows the PL spectra of the respective materials). However, no obvious radiative emission from any other layer is detected for any of the other devices. This indicates that excitons are confined within the emission layer, despite the absence of blocking layers. In addition, no emission originating from CBP is observed, except for the DACT-II-1 device . This indicates that excitons are well-confined on DACT-II molecules, by direct charge injection and/or complete energy transfer from the CBP host. In Fig. 2c , EQE is shown as a function of luminance. The EQE for representative DACT-II- x devices are given in Table 1 (Data for all OLEDs without and with out-coupling sheets are listed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 , respectively). The maximum EQE of 29.6% is obtained at 5 cd m −2 (5 μA cm −2 ) for the DACT-II-9 device (filled black circles in Fig. 2c ). EQEs of a typical fluorescent Alq 3 device and phosphorescent Ir(ppy) 3 device are also shown in Fig. 2c , as black dot-dashed and solid lines, respectively. <anchor xml:id="a33"/>Maximum EQEs of the Alq 3 and Ir(ppy) 3 devices are 1.3% and 13.0%, respectively.<anchor xml:id="a34"/> Maximum EQEs of all fabricated DACT-II devices exceed those of the Alq 3 and Ir(ppy) 3 devices , except for the DACT-II-1 device . EQE values of the DACT-II-9 device are extremely large, even at the luminance levels of practical applications; 22.8% at 500 cd m −2 (for display applications) and 16.2% at 3,000 cd m −2 (for lighting applications) ( Table 1 ). <anchor xml:id="a35"/>Although EQE decreases with increasing luminance, the efficiency roll-off is overcome by increasing the concentration of DACT-II in the EML.<anchor xml:id="a36"/> Figure 2c and Table 1 show that EQE values of 26.9% and 21.8% are obtained at 500 cd m −2 and 3,000 cd m −2 , respectively, for the DACT-II-19 device .</p>
        <p>EL and PL of DACT-II. ( a ) EL spectra for the DACT-II- x devices . A photograph of EL emission for the DACT-II-9 device is also shown. ( b ) PL spectra of DACT-II in CBP films and a neat DACT-II film. Photographs of PL emission are also shown. ( c ) EQE versus luminance for the DACT-II- x devices . EQE values of the Alq 3 device and Ir(ppy) 3 device are also shown.</p>
        <p>Although the devices are relatively thick ( Fig. 1d ), the DACT-II devices exhibit low power consumption, especially at high DACT-II concentrations. The turn-on voltage (voltage at 1 cd m −2 ) decreased with increasing DACT-II concentration and was 2.6 V for the DACT-II-19 device . This suggests that with increasing DACT-II concentration, charges tend to be injected directly into DACT-II molecules rather than via the CBP host, as supposed from Fig. 1d .</p>
        <p>Photoluminescence quantum yield</p>
        <p>We investigate the origin of the excellent EQE of DACT-II by first discussing the PLQY ( Supplementary Note 5 ). The PLQY of DACT-II in toluene is 46.0%, which decreases to 26.6% on bubbling O 2 through the solution. Bubbling with Ar excludes O 2 and results in a PLQY of 63.7%. This suggests that some excitons, transferred to T 1 via ISC, are quenched by dissolved O 2 (refs 17 , 18 ). In the Ar-purged system, excitons in T 1 are not quenched and revert to S 1 through RISC, resulting in a higher PLQY. Phosphorescence can be discounted as demonstrated below. <anchor xml:id="a37"/>The PLQY of the neat film is only 43.6±4%, but PLQY values of 101.1±4% are obtained for the 9 wt% DACT-II-doped CBP thin films, when DACT-II is directly excited.<anchor xml:id="a38"/> The PLQYs are 100.3±4% for the 9 wt% doped films even when CBP is excited, indicating that all the excitons transfer from CBP to DACT-II without any loss (ultraviolet–visible spectra of DACT-II and CBP films are given in Supplementary Fig. 7 ).</p>
        <p>Exciton generation factor</p>
        <p>Another important factor influencing EQE is β , that is, the singlet/triplet branching ratio. In PL experiments, excitation produces excitons in S 1 . Figure 3a shows the transient PL decay of DACT-II in toluene. When O 2 is removed by Ar bubbling, two components with prompt and delayed PL decays are observed. This differs from the result for the as-prepared solution containing O 2 , in which only the prompt decay component is observed. The results indicate that the prompt decay arises from fluorescence directly from the S 1 -to-S 0 transition. The delayed component arises from phosphorescence from T 1 via ISC, or delayed fluorescence from S 1 through ISC and subsequent RISC, because it is quenched by the O 2 triplet state in the presence of O 2 (refs 17 , 18 ). Continuous transitions between S 1 and T 1 are theoretically possible, but also result in either phosphorescence or delayed fluorescence.</p>
        <p>TADF characteristics of DACT-II. ( a ) Transient PL decay characteristics of DACT-II in toluene at room temperature. ( b ) Doping concentration dependence of transient PL decay of DACT-II doped into CBP thin films at room temperature. ( c ) Arrhenius plot of the RISC rate constant ( k RISC ). Δ E ST of 9.0 meV was obtained from least-squares fitting (solid line). ( d ) Temperature dependence of Boltzmann factor for DACT-II (Δ E ST =9.0 meV) and 4CzIPN (Δ E ST =82.6 meV).</p>
        <p>Prompt and delayed PL decay components are also observed for thin films. Figure 3b shows the doping concentration dependence of the transient PL decays for DACT-II-doped CBP thin films (The temperature dependence is shown in Supplementary Fig. 8 ). Both prompt and delayed components are observed for all films, and the delayed component increases with increasing DACT-II concentration. <anchor xml:id="a39"/>Phosphorescence and delayed fluorescence are easily distinguished from the temperature dependence of the transient PL decay.<anchor xml:id="a40"/> Delayed fluorescence exhibits an increase in delayed emission with increasing temperature. Conversely, inverse temperature dependence is found in the case of phosphorescence. <anchor xml:id="a41"/>The intensity of the delayed component is absent at 10 K but gradually increases with increasing temperature ( Supplementary Fig. 8 ), indicating that the delayed emission is thermally activated.<anchor xml:id="a42"/> Thus, the delayed component originates from TADF.</p>
        <p>TTA is another possible origin of delayed fluorescence, which can also improve OLED efficiency 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 . <anchor xml:id="a43"/>However, β obtained by TTA is theoretically limited to 62.5%.<anchor xml:id="a44"/> The IQE, and therefore β , in this study reached 100% as clearly shown below, confirming that the delayed fluorescence originates from RISC.</p>
        <p>The radiative rate constants for the prompt ( k p ) and delayed ( k d ) components, rate constants for ISC ( k ISC ) and RISC ( k RISC ), and total ( Φ PL ) and fraction of delayed ( Φ PL d ) emission quantum yields are shown in Table 2 (see Supplementary Note 6 for the analysis). Δ E ST determined from the Arrhenius plot of k RISC is 9.0 meV ( Fig. 3c ). The currently reported TADF emitting material with the highest efficiency is the carbazolyldicyanobenzene derivative 4CzIPN 19 , whose experimental Δ E ST is 82.6 meV. Δ E ST of DACT-II is markedly smaller, reflecting the temperature dependence of k RISC .</p>
        <p>Temperature dependence of various rate constants and PLQYs for CBP films doped with 6 wt% DACT-II.</p>
        <p>Δ E ST of DACT-II is smaller than the thermal energy at 300 K (25.9 meV). Figure 3d compares the temperature dependence of the Boltzmann factors, exp(–Δ E ST / k B T ), for DACT-II and 4CzIPN. <anchor xml:id="a45"/>The Boltzmann factor of DACT-II at 300 K is 0.71, much larger than that of 4CzIPN, 0.041.<anchor xml:id="a46"/> This indicates that RISC occurs more readily in DACT-II than 4CzIPN. The temperature dependence of the Boltzmann factors suggests effective up-conversion from T 1 to S 1 for DACT-II even at low temperature. This is supported by the total PLQY remaining at ∼100% at lower temperatures, as shown in Table 2 . T 1 excitons are more easily up-converted to S 1 at higher temperature. This is an advantage of DACT-II TADF systems over other TADF and phosphorescent systems, the latter two systems cannot exhibit high PLQY across a wide temperature range.</p>
        <p>The PL spectra of the prompt and delayed PL decay components are shown in Supplementary Fig. 9 . These spectra are indistinguishable within experimental error, irrespective of temperature. This supports the fact that the delayed component originates from TADF, not phosphorescence. In phosphorescent OLEDs, the energy corresponding to Δ E ST is lost during ISC. Although this does not affect the quantum yield, such energy loss is avoided (or there is even an energy gain) during RISC in TADF systems by exploiting the thermal energy at room temperature. This results in lower power consumption.</p>
        <p>Time-dependent density functional theory 30 , 31 (TD-DFT) calculations indicate that the torsion angle ( α ) between the donor and acceptor moieties affects the spatial overlap of the HOMO and LUMO ( Supplementary Fig. 1 , α =0° for planar configuration and 90° for perpendicular configuration). The value of f decreases with increasing α , so precise control of f by adjusting α is important in designing highly luminescent TADF compounds. The value of f for DACT-II (0.2400) is higher than that for 4CzIPN (0.0708). S 0 , T 1 and S 1 have energy minima at α of 48°, 85° and 89°, respectively. Subtracting the energy minimum of T 1 (at α =85°) from that of S 1 (at α =89°) gives a calculated Δ E ST of 5.2 meV (using TD-DFT with the PBE0/6-31G(d) basis set 22 , 23 ). This is smaller than the Δ E ST of 11.3 meV calculated for 4CzIPN at the same level of theory. We realized both ∼100% up-conversion from T 1 to S 1 and ∼100% radiative emission, that is to say, 100% conversion from electricity to light, through the fine-tuning of Δ E ST and f , by precisely controlling the overlap of the HOMO and LUMO distributions in DACT-II. <anchor xml:id="a47"/>In real OLEDs, the energy levels of S 1 and T 1 likely have distributions, and Δ E ST may fluctuate.<anchor xml:id="a48"/> This is due to the distributions of conformations and environments of individual DACT-II molecules because they are in an amorphous state.</p>
        <p>Orientation of transition dipole moment</p>
        <p>The orientation of transition dipole moments of emitter molecules greatly affects out-coupling efficiency 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 . Here the orientation of DACT-II was quantified by two methods, variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (VASE) 36 , 37 , 38 and angular-dependent PL measurements 32 , 33 , 39 , 40 ( Supplementary Note 7 ). Figure 4a shows the results of VASE measurements. The ordinary and extraordinary optical constants differ in the spectra, indicating that the orientation of DACT-II molecules is not random. Quantitative analysis indicates that DACT-II tends to be parallel to the substrate with an order parameter S of −0.32±0.01. The result is confirmed by the angular-dependent PL measurements ( Fig. 4b ), which gave S =−0.29±0.05, agreeing well with the above VASE result.</p>
        <p>Orientation of transition dipole moment and out-coupling. ( a ) Results of VASE measurements; extinction coefficient k (black) and refractive index n (red). The solid and dashed lines represent spectra for the ordinary and extraordinary optical constants, respectively. ( b ) Results of angular-dependent PL experiments. ( c ) Optical simulations for the DACT-II-9 device . The numbers in parentheses for respective modes are obtained by the integration with respect to emission wavelengths with weighting of the PL intensity. ( d ) Dependence of the out-coupling mode on the thicknesses of hole and electron-transport layers.</p>
        <p>Out-coupling and carrier balance ratio</p>
        <p>We performed electrical and optical simulations 41 , 42 , 43 for the DACT-II-9 device ( Supplementary Note 8 ). Electrical simulations revealed that the injected electrons and holes effectively recombine in the EML near the interface with the HTL. Figure 4c shows the results of optical simulations for the DACT-II-9 device . IQE=100% and S =−0.29 were used for the simulation. The contributions of respective optical modes are given as a function of emission wavelengths. EQE can be calculated by integrating the fraction of out-coupled mode with respect to emission wavelengths with weighting of the PL intensity in Fig. 2b . Figure 4d shows the dependence of EQE on HTL and ETL thicknesses (see Supplementary Fig. 10 for all modes). The maximum EQE of 29.0±0.9% was obtained for HTL and ETL thicknesses of 100 nm and 30 nm, respectively (for S =−0.29±0.05). <anchor xml:id="a49"/>The simulation results agree well with the experimental maximum EQE of 29.6%.<anchor xml:id="a50"/> The agreement clearly confirms the IQE≈100%; that is, β ≈ γ ≈ Φ PL ≈100% for the conditions of maximum EQE.</p>
        <p>Thus far, we have made no effort to improve the out-coupling efficiency. The current OLEDs have a high η out = η EQE /( γ × β × Φ PL )=29.6/(1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0)=29.6%. <anchor xml:id="a51"/>The IQE is already ∼100%, so an increase in out-coupling efficiency is required to further increase EQE.<anchor xml:id="a52"/> Several methods have been reported to achieve this 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 . We opted for a simple, economical attachment of an out-coupling sheet to the OLED. Using an out-coupling sheet ( Supplementary Fig. 11 and Supplementary Note 9 ) with a microlens array that also contained light-scattering particles yielded EQE values of 41.5% at maximum (filled blue circles in Fig. 2c ), and 37.6% and 30.7% at 500 cd m −2 and 3,000 cd m −2 , respectively (filled green circles in Fig. 2c , see also Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2 ).</p>
        <p>Discussion</p>
        <p>We obtained a TADF material, DACT-II. OLEDs containing DACT-II have ∼100% IQE, that is, 100% conversion from electricity to light. DACT-II has excellent thermal properties, and devices containing DACT-II are expected to perform well across a wide temperature range. By further optimizing device structures and surrounding materials, as seen for phosphorescent 11 , 49 and TADF-based 40 OLEDs, DACT-II devices are expected to deliver much higher performance, such as higher EQE at high luminance and lower power consumption. Improving the out-coupling efficiency will further increase the EQE of DACT-II-based OLEDs .</p>
        <p>Methods</p>
        <p>Summary of DACT-II synthesis</p>
        <p>DACT-II was synthesized according to Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 2 with a 26% total yield. 1 H and 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded using JEOL ECA 600 MHz (Japan) and Bruker Avance III 800 MHz (Germany) spectrometers. DACT-II was purified by silica gel column chromatography using dichloromethane/hexane as an eluent, recrystallization and temperature-gradient sublimation.</p>
        <p>Device fabrication and characterization</p>
        <p>OLEDs with active areas of 4 mm 2 were fabricated by vacuum deposition at ∼10 −5 Pa on clean ITO-coated glass substrates with a deposition apparatus (SE-4260, ALS Technology, Japan). The deposition rates of HTL, EML, ETL, EIL, and Al were 0.1–0.2, 0.3–0.4, 0.1–0.2, 0.01, and 0.1–0.2 nm s −1 , respectively. After fabrication, devices were encapsulated with a glass cap using epoxy glue in a N 2 -filled glove box. Calcium oxide was incorporated into the encapsulated package as a desiccant. OLED characteristics were measured with a source meter (2400, Keithley, Japan) and an absolute EQE measurement system (C9920-12, Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan). The integrating sphere for the measurements was calibrated before the experiments.</p>
        <p>Additional information</p>
        <p>How to cite this article: Kaji, H. et al . Purely organic electroluminescent material realizing 100% conversion from electricity to light. Nat. Commun . 6:8476 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9476 (2015).</p>
        <p>Supplementary Material</p>
        <p>Supplementary Figures 1-11, Supplementary Tables 1-2, Supplementary Notes 1-9 and Supplementary References</p>
        <p>Acknowledgments</p>
        <p>This research was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) through the ‘Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R&amp;D on Science and Technology (FIRST Program)&#x27;, initiated by the Council for Science and Technology Policy (CSTP). This research was also supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) and by the Collaborative Research Program of Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University (grant # 2015- 14). Out-coupling sheets were kindly provided by Yuji Hotta, Optmate Corporation. Computation time on a supercomputer system was provided by the Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Japan, and the Academic Center for Computing and Media Studies (ACCMS), Kyoto University, Japan. NMR measurements were supported by the Joint Usage/Research Center (JURC) at the Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Japan.</p>
        <p>Footnotes</p>
        <p>References</p>
        <p>Associated Data</p>
        <p>Supplementary Materials</p>
        <p>Supplementary Figures 1-11, Supplementary Tables 1-2, Supplementary Notes 1-9 and Supplementary References<anchor xml:id="a53"/></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
