Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria

Hiroshi Katayama, Yukinori Kurokawa, Kenichi Nakamura, Hiroyuki Ito, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Norikazu Masuda, Yasuhiro Tsubosa, Toyomi Satoh, Akira Yokomizo, Haruhiko Fukuda, Mitsuru Sasako · Surgery Today · 2016 · medicine · 10.1007/s00595-015-1236-x · record katayama2016-extended-clavien-dindo-classificat
tag layer · index · concepts · authors · עברית
Where this record's text came from. 2026-08-22 and 2026-08-26 schema-0.3 passes: every quote verified as an exact substring of the staged text and anchored at merge time; concept terms verified present; every edge endpoint an existing node.
How to read this page. The article text below is reproduced exactly as it was staged; nothing in it has been rewritten. Coloured stretches are tagged. A solid underline means the tag records the paper's own words. A dotted underline means the tag text is the tagger's sentence about the paper — the quotation is the paper's, the wording of the tag is not. Every superscript label links to that tag's row in the table at the foot of the page. The machine-readable edition of the same thing is the TEI file beside this one, where the tags live in standOff. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote shown on the same row, so the borrowing can be checked against the thing borrowed from without leaving this page. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.
Other fields define these differently the same word, defined another way in another discipline
disability 3 fields · intervention 2 fields

Tags on this paper

Every tag the record carries, each linking to every other paper in the corpus that carries it. A tag appears here whether or not its words occur in the article — the spans below are only the ones a sentence in this paper licenses. Of the 13 concept tags on this paper, all 13 are grounded in a quoted sentence. All carry the tagger's gloss of what the term means in this paper, which is not something the article can license.
ileus small bowel obstruction pancreatic fistula pancreatitis NCI-CTC CTCAE JCOG PC criteria gastroenterological complications Clavien-Dindo classification severity intervention disability adverse event other (specify) early postoperative expert-consensus
Method, as described: expert committee: members from nine JCOG surgical study groups named the complications common in their own fields and wrote grading criteria for each under the general rules of the Clavien-Dindo classification

Legend

relation to other workclaim_relationshow this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies
claim typeclaim_typethe shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null
concept edgeconcept_edgesan asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it
conceptconceptsan idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it
content tagcontent_tagsa finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper
contributioncontributionwhat the paper claims to add
controlcontrolsan experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation
limitationlimitationswhat the paper says its evidence cannot support
mechanismmechanismshow the reported effect is said to come about
methodmethodhow the paper produced its evidence
object of studyobject_of_studywhat the paper is about — the thing it investigates
phenomenonphenomenonthe effect or regularity under study
research questionresearch_questionthe question the paper sets itself
sensesensesa distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it

The paper, tagged

The reference list is not part of the text we hold for this paper. Our copy was extracted from the publisher's page and the bibliography did not survive that extraction, so the article below ends before its references. Nothing has been removed by us.

365 springeropen Surgery Today Surg Today PMC4848327 4848327 4848327 26289837 10.1007/s00595-015-1236-x Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria Katayama Hiroshi 1 Kurokawa Yukinori 2 Nakamura Kenichi 1 Ito Hiroyuki 3 Kanemitsu Yukihide 4 Masuda Norikazu 5 Tsubosa Yasuhiro 6 Satoh Toyomi 7 Yokomizo Akira 8 Fukuda Haruhiko 1 Sasako Mitsuru 9 ✉ 1 Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, Center for Research Administration and Support, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan 2 Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan 3 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan 4 Colorectal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan 5 Department of Surgery, Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan 6 Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan 7 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan 8 Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan 9 Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan ✉ Corresponding author.

20 8 2015 46 668 668–685 12 5 2016 © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Abstract

Purpose

mechanismscontent_tagsPrior to publication of the Clavien-Dindo classification in 2004, there were no grading definitions for surgical complications in either clinical practice or surgical trials. This report establishes supplementary criteria for this classification to standardize the evaluation of postoperative complications in clinical trials.

Methods

The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) commissioned a committee. Members from nine surgical study groups (gastric, esophageal, colorectal, lung, breast, gynecologic, urologic, bone and soft tissue, and brain) specified postoperative complications experienced commonly in their fields and defined more detailed grading criteria for each complication in accordance with the general grading rules of the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Results

We listed 72 surgical complications experienced commonly in surgical trials, focusing on 17 gastroenterologic complications, 13 infectious complications, six thoracic complications, and several other complications. The grading criteria were defined simply and were optimized for surgical complications.

Conclusions

The JCOG postoperative complications criteria (JCOG PC criteria) aim to standardize the terms used to define adverse events (AEs) and provide detailed grading guidelines based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. We believe that the JCOG PC criteria will allow for more precise comparisons of the frequency of postoperative complications among trials across many different surgical fields.

Keywords: JCOG postoperative complications criteria (JCOG PC criteria), Clavien-Dindo classification, Postoperative complications

status released display-pdf yes is-in-collection-domain yes is-olf no is-manuscript no is-preprint no is-journal-matter no is-scanned no is-retracted no Received 2015 Apr 24; Accepted 2015 Jun 14; Issue date 2016.

Introduction

The evaluation of postoperative complications in surgical trials is as important as the assessment of toxicities in chemotherapy trials. Prior to the proposal of a therapy-oriented classification scheme, by Clavien PA et al. in 1992 [ 1 ], there were no accepted definitions for the grading of surgical complications in clinical practice. This framework proposed by Clavien et al. was not used widely, because there was no system for the grading of severity of surgical complications [ 2 ] and no uniform definition of these events. mechanismssensescontent_tagscontent_tagscontent_tagsFor instance, some surgeons included a body temperature greater than 38 °C on two consecutive days as being “high”, whereas others included intraoperative complications, postoperative complications (within 30 days), and late events such as dumping syndrome. Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [ 3 ] have used this classification system, with individual parochial definitions of surgical complications being used in most surgical RCTs [ 4 – 6 ].

In cancer clinical trials, adverse events (AEs) are evaluated in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), which is far from exhaustive in terms of surgical complications; thus, some surgeons are not comfortable using grading definitions. The Clavien-Dindo classification, published in 2004 [ 7 ] defined a simple classification of postoperative complications, which has been adopted widely in clinical practice. content_tagsAlthough this classification categorizes postoperative complications broadly into four major groups, it is often desirable to more clearly define the common AEs to avoid the use of different or less precise terms for the same AEs occurring in different clinical trials. More detailed grading criteria for common AEs would also be helpful for surgeons. Therefore, our aim was to establish supplementary criteria for the Clavien-Dindo classification to standardize the evaluation of postoperative complications.

Methods

The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) commissioned a committee to establish more precise criteria for the grading of surgical complications. The committee comprised members from nine JCOG study groups (gastric, esophageal, colorectal, lung, breast, gynecologic, urologic, bone and soft tissue, and brain) who have extensive experience with surgical trials. These groups established the JCOG postoperative complications criteria (JCOG PC criteria). Members identified the postoperative complications experienced commonly in their fields and defined detailed grades for each complication in accordance with the general grading rules of the Clavien-Dindo classification. The JCOG PC criteria were reviewed and approved by the JCOG Executive Committee and published on the JCOG website in October, 2011 (in Japanese) [ 8 ].

Results

object_of_studycontributionclaim_typeconcepts↗concepts↗concept_edgescontent_tags↗content_tagsThe JCOG PC criteria included 72 surgical AEs experienced commonly in surgical trials, including 17 gastroenterological complications, 13 infectious complications, six thoracic complications, and several other complications (Table  1 ). controlscontrolssensescontent_tagscontent_tags↗If no applicable AE terms are found in the JCOG PC criteria, ‘other (specify)’ should be chosen. In such cases, the appropriate AE term should be used, and the overall grading should be performed in accordance with the general rules of the Clavien-Dindo classification. mechanismsBecause the grading definitions follow the general rules of the Clavien-Dindo classification, surgeons can use these original rules to grade AEs, and can also refer to the more detailed definitions in the JCOG PC criteria if necessary. Table  2 lists the differences between CTCAE, the Clavien-Dindo classification, and the JCOG PC criteria.

concepts↗Table 1 List of surgical adverse event (AE) terms and gradings

Principle of grading

I II IIIa IIIb IVa IVb V Supplemental explanation of suffix “d”

AE term mechanismsconcepts↗sensesAny deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, or radiological interventions. Allowed therapeutic regimens include drugs such as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgesics, diuretics, electrolytes, and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside Requirement for pharmacological treatment with drugs other than those allowed for grade I complications Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included Requirement for surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention not under general anesthesia Requirement for surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention under general anesthesia Life-threatening complications (including CNS complications)* requiring IC/ICU management. Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis) Life-threatening complications (including CNS complications)* requiring IC/ICU management. Multiple organ dysfunction Death of the patient mechanismsconcepts↗If the patient suffers from a complication at the time of discharge, the suffix “d” (for “disability”) is added to the respective grade of complication. This label indicates the need for a follow-up to fully evaluate the complication

Stroke Clinical observation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., anticoagulant therapy) Radiological intervention without general anesthesia (e.g., intracerebrovascular treatment) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., drainage, surgical clipping, cerebrovascular bypass, carotid endarterectomy) IC/ICU management indicated IC/ICU management indicated; associated with respiratory failure Death Persistent hemiplegia

Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Aspiration; medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Severe aspiration; food intake almost impossible; medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., vocal cord injection, tracheal puncture) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (including tracheostomy under sedation) Mechanical ventilation indicated Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Hoarseness, difficulty in speaking; communication through writing necessary; discharged with tracheostomy

Upper extremity paresthesia Clinical observation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated Surgical intervention without general anesthesia indicated (e.g., nerve block) – – – – Persistent brachial paresthesia

Paresthesia in resected part (Phantom pain) Clinical observation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated Surgical intervention without general anesthesia indicated (e.g., nerve block) – – – – Persistent phantom pain

Ischemic heart disease Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., anticoagulant therapy) Cardiac catheterization indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (coronary artery bypass) Heart failure associated with low cardiac output syndrome; IC/ICU management indicated Heart failure associated with low cardiac output syndrome and renal failure; IC/ICU management indicated Death Persistent heart failure following myocardial infarction

Pericardial effusion Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated (drainage only through existing drainage tube) Medical management indicated Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (fenestration) Cardiac tamponade; IC/ICU management indicated Cardiac tamponade and renal failure; IC/ICU management indicated Death –

Bradyarrhythmia Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., atropine, β agonists) Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., pacemaker implantation) – Heart failure associated with low cardiac output syndrome; IC/ICU management indicated Heart failure associated with low cardiac output syndrome and renal failure; IC/ICU management indicated Death –

Supraventricular arrhythmia Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antiarrhythmic drugs) Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., catheter ablation, synchronized cardioversion) – Heart failure associated with low cardiac output syndrome; IC/ICU management indicated Heart failure associated with low cardiac output syndrome and renal failure; IC/ICU management indicated Death –

Ventricular arrhythmia Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antiarrhythmic drugs) Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., catheter ablation, external defibrillator, pacemaker implantation) – Heart failure associated with low cardiac output syndrome; IC/ICU management indicated Heart failure associated with low cardiac output syndrome and renal failure; IC/ICU management indicated Death –

Atelectasis/sputum excretion difficulty Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated, except for nebulizers, expectorants, or lung physiotherapy (e.g., postural drainage) Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Bronchoscopic aspiration or surgical intervention indicated (e.g., tracheal puncture) without general anesthesia Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (including tracheostomy under sedation) Mechanical ventilation indicated Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Discharged with tracheostomy

Tracheal fistula, bronchial fistula Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated – Procedure under local anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated Mechanical ventilation indicated Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Discharged with tube drainage, open drainage

Pulmonary fistula Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated (drainage only through existing drainage tube) – Procedure under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., chest tube drainage, pleurodesis) including drain replacement indicated. Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (Closure for pleuroparenchymal defects, pleurodesis) Mechanical ventilation indicated Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Discharged with tube drainage, open drainage

Chylothorax Observation of chylous drainage fluid or thoracentesis fluid only (drainage only through existing drainage tube) Fat-restricted diet, intravenous nutrition indicated Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., thoracic duct ligation) – – Death Persistent respiratory distress, malnutrition

Pleural effusion Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated (drainage only through existing drainage tube) Medical management indicated (e.g., diuretics) Image-guided drain placement/thoracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated Mechanical ventilation indicated Multiple organ failure Death Persistent respiratory distress

Lung torsion – – – Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., detorsion, lobectomy) Mechanical ventilation indicated Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death –

Ascites Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated (drainage only through existing drainage tube) Medical management indicated (e.g., diuretics) Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated – – Death Persistent abdominal fullness

Diarrhea Intestinal fluid excretion ≥2000 ml/day; intervention not indicated Intestinal fluid excretion ≥2000 ml/day associated with dehydration or electrolyte abnormality; intravenous fluids indicated – – At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Significant amount of persistent intestinal fluid excretion

Dysphagia Clinical observation only; intervention not indicated Enteral/intravenous nutrition (Including TPN) indicated Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., tracheal puncture, endoscopic gastrostomy) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated – – Death Gastrostomy

Intestinal fistula Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated (drainage only through existing drainage tube) Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (colostomy) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or renal disorders indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Persistent enterocutaneous fistula

Intestinal ischemia/necrosis Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Radiological intervention/endoscopic/surgical intervention without general anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., intestinal resection) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders indicating mechanical ventilation or renal disorders indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Home enteral/intravenous nutrition

Gastric tube necrosis Observation of a small fistula with oral contrast study or drainage imaging (drainage only through existing drainage tube) Medical management (e.g., antibiotics), enteral/intravenous nutrition indicated Radiological intervention/endoscopic/elective surgical intervention without general anesthesia indicated, including drain replacement Intervention under general anesthesia indicated At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death

Reflux esophagitis Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management (e.g., PPI, pancreatic enzyme inactivators) or enteral/intravenous nutrition indicated – Intervention under general anesthesia indicated – – Death Persistent heartburn

Ileus (paralytic) Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; medical management not indicated except for laxatives and intravenous nutrition Medical management beyond laxatives, NG tube placement, or intravenous nutrition management indicated Nasoenteric tube placement Treatment for ileus under general anesthesia (with or without intestinal resection) Extensive intestinal necrosis, at least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Home intravenous nutrition

Pancreatic fistula On or after postoperative day 3, drainage fluid amylase level ≥3 times the upper limit of institutional criteria, but intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics), enteral/intravenous nutrition indicated Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Residual pancreatic pseudocyst on CT, occasional fever, or abdominal pain

Intestinal obstruction Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; medical management not indicated except for laxatives and intravenous nutrition Medical management beyond laxatives, NG tube placement, or intravenous nutrition management indicated Nasoenteric tube placement Treatment for ileus under general anesthesia (with or without intestinal resection) Extensive intestinal necrosis, at least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Home intravenous nutrition

Delayed gastric emptying Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management (e.g., peristalsis stimulating drugs), NG tube placement, enteral/intravenous nutrition indicated – Intervention under general anesthesia indicated – – Death Persistent postprandial nausea

Dumping syndrome Clinical observation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated – Intervention under general anesthesia indicated – – Death Persistent dumping symptom

Biliary fistula Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated (drainage only through existing drainage tube) Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (drainage) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Residual pseudocyst on CT; occasional fever or abdominal pain

Cholecystitis Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; medical management not indicated except for cholagogues Medical management beyond cholagogues indicated Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (cholecystectomy) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Occasional fever or abdominal pain

Gastrointestinal anastomotic leak Only small fistula observed on oral contrast study or drainage imaging (drainage only through existing drainage tube) Medical management (e.g., antibiotics) or enteral/intravenous nutrition (Including TPN) indicated Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including wound opening or drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., suture, reanastomosis, bypass, drainage, colostomy) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Home enteral/intravenous nutrition

Ureteric injury Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Transurethral ureteral stent insertion or percutaneous nephrostomy Intervention under general anesthesia indicated Acute renal failure, hemodialysis Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Discharged with ureteral stent

Urethral injury Foley catheter placement Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Intervention under local or lumbar anesthesia indicated (e.g., percutaneous cystostomy) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Discharged with Foley catheter placement

Postoperative hemorrhage Controllable with compression only Blood transfusion or medical management indicated Surgical hemostasis under local anesthesia or endoscopic and radiological intervention hemostasis indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (hemostasis) Single organ failure; stepdown ICU/ICU care indicated Multiple organ failure; IC/ICU management indicated Death Persistent anemia

Seroma (Accumulation of serous fluid) Bedside paracentesis only (drainage only through existing drainage tube) – Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Exudate leakage from wound, occasional fever and infection, discharged with drainage tube

Uterine anastomotic leak Clinical or vaginal observation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) – Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (resuturing) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Persistent leakage from uterovaginal anastomosis due to suture failure (surgical union of two different anatomical structures)

Abdominal incisional hernia Clinical observation only; intervention not indicated except for truss and NSAIDs Medical management beyond truss and NSAIDs indicated Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (mesh, fascial resuturing) Extensive intestinal necrosis, at least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Intestinal prolapse upon increased intra-abdominal pressure

Wound dehiscence Clinical observation only; intervention not indicated except for wound irrigation Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., resuturing) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., resuturing) Extensive intestinal necrosis, at least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Discharged with significant wound dehiscence

Gastrointestinal anastomotic stenosis Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Enteral/intravenous nutrition (Including TPN) indicated Balloon dilatation, stenting, magnetic compression anastomosis Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., reanastomosis, bypass) – – Death Frequent outpatient endoscopic dilatation

Intraabdominal abscess Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (drainage) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Residual abscess on CT, occasional fever or abdominal pain

Pelvic abscess Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (drainage) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Residual abscess on CT, occasional fever or abdominal pain

Pneumonia Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated except for nebulizers, expectorants, or lung physiotherapy (e.g., postural drainage) Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Bronchoscopic aspiration, tracheal puncture Tracheostomy under general anesthesia/sedation or mechanical ventilation Mechanical ventilation indicated Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Persistent respiratory distress, occasional fever

Mediastinitis Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (drainage) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Residual abscess on CT images, occasional fever or abdominal pain

Pyothorax Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (drainage) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Residual abscess on CT images or discharged with tube drainage, open drainage

Lower extremity lymphangitis (Lymph node infection) Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (lymphatic anastomosis) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (lymphatic anastomosis) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure – Persistent edema

Infected lymphocele (Retroperitoneal abscess) Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Drainage under local anesthesia or without anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (incision and drainage) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Residual abscess on imaging study, occasional fever or abdominal pain

Infectious cervicitis Clinical or vaginal observation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Drainage under local anesthesia or without anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (drainage, hysterectomy) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Persistent infected vaginal discharge

Uterine infection Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Dilation and curettage under local anesthesia or without anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (drainage, hysterectomy) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Residual abscess on imaging study, occasional fever or abdominal pain

Ovarian infection Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Paracentesis drainage under local anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (drainage, oophorectomy) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Residual abscess on imaging study, occasional fever or abdominal pain

Vulval infection Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Paracentesis drainage under local anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (drainage, skin flap, or musculocutaneous flap) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Residual abscess on imaging study, occasional fever or abdominal pain

Wound infection Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated, except for wound opening and wound irrigation at the bedside Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., drainage) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., drainage, resuturing) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Continued outpatient irrigation

Implant infection Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., incision and drainage, implant removal) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (implant removal) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Discharged with drainage tube placement; persistent infection

Bladder injury Foley catheter placement indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) – Intervention under general anesthesia indicated At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Discharged with Foley catheter placement

Urinary incontinence Intermittent catheterization or Foley catheter placement indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., anticholinergics) Intervention under local or lumbar anesthesia indicated (e.g., clamp, collagen injection) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., artificial urinary sphincter) Acute renal failure, hemodialysis Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Persistent condition requiring Intermittent catheterization; Discharged with Foley catheter placement

Residual urine/Urinary retention Intermittent catheterization or Foley catheter placement indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., cholinergics) Intervention under local or lumbar anesthesia indicated (e.g., endoscopic treatment, urethral dilatation) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., fistula closure) Acute renal failure, hemodialysis Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Persistent condition requiring intermittent catheterization; Discharged with Foley catheter placement

Dyspareunia Discomfort associated with vaginal penetration; intervention not indicated Estrogen administration indicated Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated – – – Persistent pain associated with sexual intercourse, persistent dyspareunia

Erectile dysfunction Erectile dysfunction; intervention not indicated, except for external vacuum device for managing erectile dysfunction Medical management indicated (e.g., Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or intracavernosal injection of vasoactive agonists) Intervention under local or lumbar anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., penile prosthesis) – – – Persistent erectile dysfunction

Cervical atresia (uterine atresia) Clinical or vaginal observation only; intervention not indicated Associated with dysmenorrhea; medical management indicated (e.g., analgesics) Bougienage of cervical duct with or without local anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (cervical dilatation) – – – Persistent stenosis of the cervical os

Vaginal fistula Clinical or vaginal observation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) – Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (vaginal fistula closure, colostomy) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Persistent leakage from vagina

Ovarian deficiency syndrome Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., hormone replacement therapy) – – – – Death Hot flash requiring continued hormone replacement therapy, depression requiring continued psychiatric care

Cervical chylous leakage Observation of chylous drainage fluid or paracentesis fluid only; intervention not indicated (drainage only through existing drainage tube) Fat-restricted diet, intravenous nutrition indicated Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated. Intervention under general anesthesia indicated – – Death Persistent sensation of pressure in the neck

Serous leakage Clinical observation only; intervention not indicated (drainage only through existing drainage tube) Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Exudate leakage from the wound, occasional fever and infection, discharged with drainage tube

Chylous ascites Observation of chylous drainage fluid or paracentesis fluid only; intervention not indicated (drainage only through existing drainage tube) Fat-restricted diet, intravenous nutrition indicated Image-guided drain placement/paracentesis including drain replacement indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated – – Death Persistent abdominal fullness

Subcutaneous phlebitis (Mondor disease) Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated except for NSAIDs Opioid administration, or treatment by pain control specialist indicated Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated Intervention under general anesthesia indicated – – – Surgical site subcutaneous phlebitis; cord-like mass

Thrombosis/embolism Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., anticoagulants) Invasive treatment indicated (e.g., thrombus ablation via catheter, IVC filter) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (pulmonary artery thrombectomy) Single organ failure caused by thrombi (e.g., lung, brain, heart) Multiple organ failure caused by thrombi (e.g., lung, brain, heart) Death Dyspnea following pulmonary infarction, paralysis following cerebral infarction

Restricted shoulder joint range of motion Clinical observation only; intervention not indicated except for NSAIDs Opioid administration, or treatment by pain control specialist indicated Surgical intervention without general anesthesia indicated (e.g., nerve block) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated – – – Continued restriction in the range of motion of the shoulder joint

Fat necrosis Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated except for wound opening and wound irrigation at the bedside Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., incision and drainage) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Wound fat necrosis, occasional cicatrization, fever or infection

Skin necrosis (flap necrosis) Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated Medical management indicated (e.g., antibiotics) Medical intervention under local anesthesia indicated (e.g., debridement, skin grafting) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (skin grafting) At least one organ failure (e.g., pulmonary disorders requiring mechanical ventilation or nephropathy indicating dialysis) Sepsis or multiple organ failure Death Insufficient epithelialization, persistent infection

Subcutaneous emphysema Clinical observation or diagnostic evaluation only; intervention not indicated except for subcutaneous puncture and compression with breast band at the bedside – Radiological intervention treatment without general anesthesia indicated (e.g., subcutaneous drain insertion) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated – – – Discharged with subcutaneous air accumulation

Upper extremity edema Intervention not indicated except for lymphatic massage and elastic stockings Medical management indicated (e.g., diuretics) Intervention under local anesthesia indicated (lymphatic anastomosis) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (lymphatic anastomosis) – – – Continued elastic stocking use

Lower extremity lymphedema (edema of the extremities, lymphedema, localized edema) Intervention not indicated except for lymphatic massage and elastic stockings Medical management indicated (e.g., diuretics) Intervention under local anesthesia indicated (lymphatic anastomosis) Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (lymphatic anastomosis) – – – Continued elastic stocking use

Obturator/femoral neuropathy (Gait disturbance) Intervention not indicated except for walking aid and rehabilitation Medical management indicated (e.g., vitamins) – Intervention under general anesthesia indicated (e.g., nerve suture) – – – Persistent restriction in lower extremity adduction

Wound pain Clinical observation only; intervention not indicated except for NSAIDs Opioid administration, or treatment by pain control specialist indicated Surgical intervention indicated (e.g., nerve block) – – – – Home pain control

Others (No AE term) Deviation from normal postoperative course. Medication, surgical intervention, endoscopic treatment, or radiological intervention treatment not indicated Treatment with antiemetics, antipyretics, analgesics, or diuretics; electrolyte replenishment; or physical therapy is not included in this category (even if these treatments are indicated, the condition is categorized as Grade I); open wound infection at the bedside is Grade I Medication indicated except for antiemetics, antipyretics, analgesics, and diuretics Cases requiring blood transfusion or intravenous hyperalimentation are included Surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention treatment indicated (without general anesthesia) Surgical, endoscopic, radiological intervention treatment indicated (intervention under general anesthesia) IC/ICU management indicated; life-threatening complications (including complications in the central nervous system) AND single organ failure (including dialysis) IC/ICU management indicated; life-threatening complications (including complications in the central nervous system) AND multiple organ failure Death

IC intermediate care, ICU intensive care unit, TPN total parenteral nutrition, PPI proton pump inhibitor, NG tube nasogastric tube, CT computed tomography

limitationsTable 2 Characteristics of the three criteria

CTCAE ver4.0 Clavien-Dindo classification JCOG PC criteria

AE terms Specified Not specified Specified

Grading definitions Defined for each AE Single common definition for all AEs Defined for each AE (following the general definition of the Clavien-Dindo classification)

Discussion

Until Clavien PA et al. published their original classification in 1992, there were no established criteria or framework available to standardize surgical complications in surgical trials. concepts↗concepts↗sensesconcept_edgesIn 2003, the US National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 2.0 [ 9 ] were revised and renamed the CTCAE version 3.0 [ 10 ]. This system has been used widely to evaluate and define the toxicity of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. While terms and definitions for AEs occurring as a result of intraoperative and postoperative complications were not included in the NCI-CTC version 2.0, some surgical AE terms were incorporated in the CTCAE version 3.0. Nevertheless, the CTCAE version 3.0 failed to include many surgical complications and surgeons were frequently unable to objectively classify complications using its grading definitions.

claim_relationscontent_tagsIn 2009, the CTCAE version 4.0 [ 11 ] was released, with considerably more surgical AE terms, but several common surgical complications were still not included. For example, intra-abdominal abscess, pyothorax, delayed gastric emptying, and lung torsion were not listed as AE terms. mechanismsconcepts↗concepts↗sensesconcept_edgescontent_tagsMoreover, grading definitions were not clinically optimized for some surgical AEs. For example, the grading definition of pancreatic fistula in this version of the CTCAE is suitable for pancreatitis, but not for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy. Such inappropriate definitions have made surgeons reluctant to use the CTCAE version 4.0 in surgical trials.

In 2004, the Clavien-Dindo classification was modified to allow for the grading of life-threatening complications and long-term disability caused by a complication. limitationsconcepts↗content_tagscontent_tagsThis revised version defines five grades of severity (Grade I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb, and V) and the suffix “d” (for “disability”) is used to denote any postoperative impairment [ 7 ]. limitationsThis refined Clavien-Dindo classification has been used increasingly in clinical practice and also in clinical trials involving surgical procedures, because it is simple, reproducible, and flexible [ 12 ]. mechanismsconcepts↗claim_relationsRather than providing specific grading criteria for each AE, the Clavien-Dindo classification provides broad-based but general criteria that can be used uniformly for all kinds of surgical AEs. However, several issues have emerged since this classification became more widely used. research_questionphenomenonmechanismsconcepts↗concepts↗sensesconcept_edgescontent_tagscontent_tags↗One controversial issue is that AE terms are not well defined and different AE terms designate the same AEs in different clinical trials. For example, when intestinal obstruction occurs, some investigators could report this AE as “ileus”, but others refer to it as “small bowel obstruction” or “colon obstruction”. Under such circumstances, the incidence of this AE cannot be counted accurately. mechanismscontent_tagsA second issue is that only general grading criteria are defined and therefore, grading can be difficult in some cases and subject to bias by the grader. For example, primary non-operative treatment for intestinal obstruction is gastroenteric tube decompression. Nasogastric tube or nasoenteric tube is utilized depending on the severity, but the original Clavien-Dindo classification does not define what grading should be applied for any type of gastroenteric tube placement for decompression.

The JCOG PC criteria were established to address these issues. The advantages of the JCOG PC criteria are as follows: First, commonly experienced surgical AEs are specified and listed. To compare precisely the frequency of surgical complications between studies, use of the common AE terms specified in the JCOG PC criteria is recommended. Second, grading definitions are straightforward and optimized for surgical complications. With these advantages, the JCOG recommends that the JCOG PC criteria be used to supplement the Clavien-Dindo classification, while maintaining the overall Clavien-Dindo classification. limitationscontrolscontent_tagsIn JCOG, some disease-oriented subgroups are conducting clinical trials including surgery and using both the CTCAE and JCOG PC criteria to evaluate postoperative complications. After these trials are completed, we will evaluate the concordance between the grading by the CTCAE and that by the JCOG PC criteria. We also plan to explore the advantages and disadvantages of the JCOG PC criteria.

method↗limitationscontrolscontent_tagsThe JCOG PC criteria have some limitations. First, these AE terms were chosen somewhat arbitrarily, but by experienced surgeons, and specific grading was decided based on the opinions and experience of our committee members. limitationscontent_tagsA second limitation of the JCOG PC criteria is that they do not include intraoperative complications. Our intent was to further define and clarify the criteria of the Clavien-Dindo classification and we considered that incorporating intraoperative complications would deviate too much from the original concept. Another common classification may be required to define and grade intraoperative complications. limitationscontent_tags↗A third limitation is that all descriptions in the Clavien-Dindo classification pertain to early postoperative complications. sensesHere, ‘early postoperative’ generally indicates the time from surgery to the first hospital discharge, but in theory, the Clavien-Dindo classification can be applied broadly to late postoperative complications after hospital discharge. Within this context, the JCOG PC criteria are mainly intended to be used for early postoperative complications, but they can also be used after hospital discharge, although would require more definitions and AEs.

In conclusion, the goals of the JCOG PC criteria are to standardize the AE terms used for early postoperative complications by providing more detailed grading guidelines based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. We suggest that researchers use the JCOG PC criteria in every surgical trial to allow for precise comparison of the frequency of surgical complications among trials.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (23-A-16, 26-A-4). We thank Hiroaki Hiraga and Yasuji Miyakita for their specialist advice.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Hiroshi Katayama and his coauthors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this research.

Every tag on this page

claim_relations 2 · claim_type 1 · concept_edges 4 · concepts 13 · content_tags 20 · contribution 1 · controls 4 · limitations 7 · mechanisms 9 · method 1 · object_of_study 1 · phenomenon 1 · research_question 1 · senses 7

Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 4 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.

facettagfieldconf.whose words
object_of_studyA SEVERITY CLASSIFICATION BEING EXTENDED BY A SECOND COMMITTEE - 72 named surgical adverse events given per-event grading criteria under somebody else's five-grade scheme, across nine surgical specialitiesobject_of_studythe paper's words
research_questionwhy the Clavien-Dindo classification is hard to apply consistently in surgical trials, and what supplementary criteria would make the counts comparable between trialsresearch_questionthe paper's words
contributionthe JCOG postoperative complications criteria: 72 AE terms with detailed per-term grading, published as a supplement to the Clavien-Dindo classification rather than as a replacementcontributionthe paper's words
claim_typemethodclaim_typethe paper's words
phenomenonan adverse event whose incidence cannot be counted because the same event is reported under three different namesphenomenonthe paper's words
methodexpert-consensusmethodthe paper's words
mechanismsTHREE NAMES, ONE EVENT, AND THE COUNT BREAKS: `different AE terms designate the same AEs in different clinical trials ... some investigators could report this AE as `ILEUS`, but others refer to it as `SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION` or `COLON OBSTRUCTION`. Under such circumstances, the incidence of this AE cannot be counted accurately.` Synonymy stated as a measurement failure, with the mechanism namedmechanisms[0]0.95the tagger's words
mechanismsAND BEFORE THE CLASSIFICATION THERE WAS NOTHING: `Prior to publication of the Clavien-Dindo classification in 2004, there were no grading definitions for surgical complications in either clinical practice or surgical trials` - and what filled the gap was personal: `individual parochial definitions of surgical complications being used in most surgical RCTs`mechanisms[1]0.95the tagger's words
mechanismsand the disagreement is shown rather than asserted: `some surgeons INCLUDED A body temperature greater than 38 C on two consecutive days as being `high`, whereas others included intraoperative complications, postoperative complications (within 30 days), and late events such as dumping syndrome`. One word, two populations of eventsmechanisms[2]0.95the tagger's words
mechanismsA DEFINITION BORROWED FROM THE WRONG OBJECT: `the grading definition of pancreatic fistula in this version of the CTCAE is suitable for pancreatitis, but not for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy. Such inappropriate definitions have made surgeons reluctant to use the CTCAE version 4.0 in surgical trials`. The criterion fits the neighbouring condition, and the vocabulary loses its users over itmechanisms[3]0.95the tagger's words
mechanismsAND A REAL CASE THE CLASSIFICATION SIMPLY DOES NOT GRADE: `primary non-operative treatment for intestinal obstruction is gastroenteric tube decompression ... but the original Clavien-Dindo classification does not define what grading should be applied for any type of gastroenteric tube placement for decompression`. A gap located by trying to use the thingmechanisms[4]0.95the tagger's words
mechanismsand the general/specific trade-off is stated outright: `Rather than providing specific grading criteria for each AE, the Clavien-Dindo classification provides broad-based but general criteria that can be used uniformly for all kinds of surgical AEs`. Generality is what makes it adoptable and what makes it ungradeable in the hard casesmechanisms[5]0.95the tagger's words
mechanismsTHE SCALE IS NAMED FOR ONE THING AND BUILT OUT OF ANOTHER: `five grades of SEVERITY`, and every boundary is an INTERVENTION - `without the need for pharmacological treatment`, then `Requirement for pharmacological treatment`, then a procedure without general anaesthesia, then one under it, then ICU. The instrument measures what the hospital did, and reports it as how bad it was.mechanisms[6]0.95the tagger's words
mechanismsAND THE ONE DIMENSION THAT WILL NOT SIT ON THAT LADDER IS BOLTED ON AS A SUFFIX: `the suffix “d” (for “disability”) is added to the respective grade` - persistence at discharge cannot be ranked against treatment intensity, so it is carried beside the grade instead of inside it.mechanisms[7]0.95the tagger's words
mechanismsTHE FIX FOR GRADER DISAGREEMENT IS ITSELF OPTIONAL: `surgeons can use these original rules to grade AEs, and can also refer to the more detailed definitions in the JCOG PC criteria if necessary`. The paper's stated problem is that graders disagree; its remedy is a supplement they may consult at their discretion, so two graders following this paper correctly can still disagree.mechanisms[8]0.9the tagger's words
limitationsTHE COMMITTEE DECLARES ITS OWN TERM SELECTION ARBITRARY: `these AE terms were chosen somewhat arbitrarily, but by experienced surgeons, and specific grading was decided based on the opinions and experience of our committee members`. No corpus, no frequency count, no vote threshold - stated plainly as the first limitationlimitations[0]0.95the tagger's words
limitationsAND THE AGREEMENT STUDY IS FUTURE WORK: `some disease-oriented subgroups are conducting clinical trials ... using both the CTCAE and JCOG PC criteria ... After these trials are completed, we will evaluate the concordance between the grading by the CTCAE and that by the JCOG PC criteria`. The vocabulary is published first and measured laterlimitations[1]0.95the tagger's words
limitationsAND THE SCOPE IS CLOSED BY FIAT, WITH THE REASON GIVEN: `they do not include intraoperative complications ... we considered that incorporating intraoperative complications would deviate too much from the original concept. Another common classification may be required to define and grade intraoperative complications`. Fidelity to the parent vocabulary chosen over coveragelimitations[2]0.95the tagger's words
limitationsand the temporal boundary is admitted to be conventional rather than principled: `here, EARLY POSTOPERATIVE GENERALLY INDICATES the time from surgery to the first hospital discharge, BUT IN THEORY, the Clavien-Dindo classification can be applied broadly to late postoperative complications after hospital discharge`limitations[3]0.95the tagger's words
limitationsTHE SAME CLASSIFICATION IS COUNTED THREE WAYS IN THIS ONE PAPER: `broadly into four major groups` in the introduction, and `five grades of severity (Grade I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb, and V)` in the discussion - a parenthetical that enumerates SEVEN labels for the five it announces. `Grade` and `class` are different units and one word is doing both jobslimitations[4]0.9the tagger's words
limitationsTHE THREE VIRTUES ARE CITED, NOT MEASURED: `because it is simple, reproducible, and flexible [ 12 ]`. Reproducibility is the exact property this paper's own examples put in doubt - the same fever graded differently by different surgeons - and it is supported here by a reference rather than by a concordance study, which the paper elsewhere says is still future work.limitations[5]0.9the tagger's words
limitationsTHE COMPARISON THAT JUSTIFIES THE PAPER IS A THREE-CELL TABLE: `AE terms Specified Not specified Specified` and `Grading definitions Defined for each AE Single common definition for all AEs Defined for each AE`. The new instrument's advantage over CTCAE 4.0 is stated as a shared row value, with no measurement of either.limitations[6]0.85the tagger's words
controlswriting the new criteria under the existing Clavien-Dindo grading rules rather than as an independent scheme
eliminates: a fourth incompatible vocabulary - 'surgeons can use these original rules to grade AEs, and can also refer to the more detailed definitions ... if necessary' · outcome: held
controls[0]0.95the tagger's words
controlsan 'other (specify)' term for events the list does not name
eliminates: forced mis-classification into the nearest listed term - the failure that creates 'ileus' / 'small bowel obstruction' in the first place · outcome: partial
controls[1]0.95the tagger's words
controlsa concordance study between CTCAE grading and JCOG PC grading of the same events
eliminates: nothing yet - it is announced as future work: 'After these trials are completed, we will evaluate the concordance' · outcome: absent-declared-unreported
controls[2]0.95the tagger's words
controlsa systematic or frequency-based procedure for choosing which 72 AE terms to list
eliminates: nothing - the authors state there was none: 'these AE terms were chosen somewhat arbitrarily ... based on the opinions and experience of our committee members' · outcome: failed
controls[3]0.95the tagger's words
conceptsileus
also in: ileus
concepts[0]0.95the paper's words
conceptssmall bowel obstructionconcepts[1]0.95the paper's words
conceptspancreatic fistulaconcepts[2]0.95the paper's words
conceptspancreatitis
also in: pancreatitis
concepts[3]0.95the paper's words
conceptsNCI-CTC
also in: NCI-CTC
concepts[4]0.95the paper's words
conceptsCTCAE
also in: CTCAE
concepts[5]0.95the paper's words
conceptsJCOG PC criteriaconcepts[6]0.95the paper's words
conceptsgastroenterological complicationsconcepts[7]0.95the paper's words
conceptsClavien-Dindo classificationconcepts[8]0.95the paper's words
conceptsseverity
also in: severity
concepts[9]0.9the paper's words
conceptsintervention
also in: intervention
concepts[10]0.9the paper's words
conceptsdisability
also in: disability
concepts[11]0.95the paper's words
conceptsadverse event
also in: adverse event
concepts[12]0.9the paper's words
senses`ileus` / `small bowel obstruction` / `colon obstruction` - THREE REPORTING NAMES FOR ONE EVENT, and the paper's reason for existing: `Under such circumstances, the incidence of this AE cannot be counted accurately`senses[0]0.95the tagger's words
senses`high` (of a postoperative temperature) - `some surgeons INCLUDED A body temperature greater than 38 C on two consecutive days as being `high`, whereas others` counted an entirely different set of events. The word survived; the referent did notsenses[1]0.95the tagger's words
senses`pancreatic fistula` (CTCAE 4.0 sense) - graded by a definition that `is suitable for pancreatitis, but not for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy`. The term is in the vocabulary and its criteria belong to a different conditionsenses[2]0.95the tagger's words
senses`CTCAE` - the vocabulary that was `NCI-CTC version 2.0` until 2003, when it was `revised and renamed the CTCAE version 3.0`. One instrument, two names, a datesenses[3]0.95the tagger's words
senses`other (specify)` - THE OPEN SLOT THE CONTROLLED VOCABULARY SHIPS WITH: `If no applicable AE terms are found in the JCOG PC criteria, `other (specify)` should be chosen`, after which the general Clavien-Dindo rules applysenses[4]0.95the tagger's words
senses`severity` IS OPERATIONALISED AS TREATMENT INTENSITY. Grade I is `Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, or radiological interventions` - defined by what is NOT required. A patient who suffers greatly and needs nothing is grade I.senses[5]0.95the tagger's words
senses`early postoperative` IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARY, NOT A CLINICAL ONE: `generally indicates the time from surgery to the first hospital discharge` - and the paper adds `but in theory` the classification reaches past it, so the scope moves with discharge policy.senses[6]0.95the tagger's words
claim_relationsextends → the Clavien-Dindo classification (Dindo, Demartines and Clavien 2004), whose general grading rules these 72 per-term criteria are written under rather than replacingclaim_relations[0]0.95the tagger's words
claim_relationscontrasts-with → the CTCAE version 4.0, which the authors say omits common surgical complications and grades others by definitions written for different conditionsclaim_relations[1]0.95the tagger's words
concept_edgesileus —same-as→ small bowel obstruction
strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: NO CUE ATTESTS THIS EDGE AND THE ONLY CUE IN THE SENTENCE POINTS THE OTHER WAY. The sentence is 'different AE terms designate the same AEs', so DIFFERENTIATION fires on 'different' - which describes the TERMS while the relation between the CONCEPTS is identity. A cue-driven typer writes 'distinct-from' here, the exact opposite of what the paper says, and the paper's whole point is that the confusion destroys the count: 'the incidence of this AE cannot be counted accurately'
concept_edges[0]0.95the tagger's words
concept_edgespancreatic fistula —distinct-from→ pancreatitis
strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: 'the grading definition of pancreatic fistula in this version of the CTCAE is suitable for pancreatitis, but not for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy'. The two are distinct and the published criteria for one were written for the other - which is why 'surgeons were RELUCTANT TO USE the CTCAE version 4.0'
concept_edges[1]0.95the tagger's words
concept_edgesNCI-CTC —renamed-across-fields→ CTCAE
strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: 'In 2003, the US National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 2.0 were revised and renamed the CTCAE version 3.0'. THE AXIS IS VERSION AND DATE, NOT FIELD - the second instance in this session, after liu2020's 'clinical decision support systems' -> 'artificial intelligence'. asks for a 'renamed-over-time' type; until it exists this is the closest available and the note carries the correction Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but a criteria set was revised and renamed by one institute; renamed-across-fields overstates.
also in: NCI-CTC · CTCAE
concept_edges[2]0.95the tagger's words
concept_edgesgastroenterological complications —part-of→ JCOG PC criteria
strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: 'The JCOG PC criteria included 72 surgical AEs ... including 17 gastroenterological complications, 13 infectious complications, six thoracic complications, and several other complications'
concept_edges[3]0.95the tagger's words
content_tagsTHREE NAMES, ONE EVENT, AND THE COUNT BREAKS: `some investigators could report this AE as ILEUS, but others refer to it as SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION or COLON OBSTRUCTION. Under such circumstances, the incidence of this AE cannot be counted accurately`content_tags.findings[0]0.95the tagger's words
content_tagsbefore the 2004 Clavien-Dindo classification there were no grading definitions for surgical complicationscontent_tags.findings[1]0.95the tagger's words
content_tagsTHE DISAGREEMENT IS SHOWN, NOT ASSERTED: `some surgeons INCLUDED A body temperature greater than 38 C on two consecutive days as being high, WHEREAS OTHERS INCLUDED intraoperative complications, postoperative complications (within 30 days), and late events such as dumping syndrome`content_tags.findings[2]0.95the tagger's words
content_tagsA DEFINITION BORROWED FROM THE WRONG OBJECT: `the grading definition of pancreatic fistula in this version of the CTCAE is suitable for pancreatitis, but not for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy`content_tags.findings[3]0.95the tagger's words
content_tagsA NAMED LIST OF WHAT THE VOCABULARY LACKS, WITH THE VERSION THAT LACKED IT: CTCAE 4.0 still omitted `intra-abdominal abscess, pyothorax, delayed gastric emptying, and lung torsion`content_tags.findings[4]0.95the tagger's words
content_tagsAND A REAL CASE THE CLASSIFICATION DOES NOT GRADE: `the original Clavien-Dindo classification does not define what grading should be applied for any type of gastroenteric tube placement for decompression`content_tags.findings[5]0.95the tagger's words
content_tagsTHE COMMITTEE CALLS ITS OWN SELECTION ARBITRARY: `these AE terms were chosen somewhat arbitrarily ... based on the opinions and experience of our committee members`content_tags.findings[6]0.95the tagger's words
content_tagsAND THE AGREEMENT STUDY IS FUTURE WORK: `After these trials are completed, we will evaluate the concordance between the grading by the CTCAE and that by the JCOG PC criteria`. Published first, measured latercontent_tags.findings[7]0.95the tagger's words
content_tagsthe revised version defines five grades of severity, listed as I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V, with the suffix d for disabilitycontent_tags.findings[8]0.9the tagger's words
content_tagsAND THE SCOPE IS CLOSED TO PROTECT THE PARENT VOCABULARY: intraoperative complications are excluded because including them `would deviate too much from the original concept. Another common classification may be required`content_tags.findings[9]0.95the tagger's words
content_tagsAND THE CONTROLLED VOCABULARY SHIPS WITH AN OPEN SLOT: `If no applicable AE terms are found ... `OTHER (SPECIFY)` should be chosen`content_tags.findings[10]0.95the tagger's words
content_tags`72 surgical AEs experienced commonly in surgical trials, including 17 gastroenterological complications, 13 infectious complications, six thoracic complications, and several other complications`content_tags.definitions[0]0.95the tagger's words
content_tags`If no applicable AE terms are found in the JCOG PC criteria, `other (specify)` should be chosen`, with the general Clavien-Dindo rules applying to the gradingcontent_tags.definitions[1]0.95the tagger's words
content_tags`generally indicates the time from surgery to the first hospital discharge, but in theory` the classification `can be applied broadly to late postoperative complications after hospital discharge`content_tags.definitions[2]0.95the tagger's words
content_tags72 — the size of the JCOG PC criteria list - 17 gastroenterological, 13 infectious, six thoracic and otherscontent_tags.quantities[0]0.95the tagger's words
content_tags38 — the temperature some surgeons required on two consecutive days before calling a postoperative fever 'high', while others counted entirely different eventscontent_tags.quantities[1]0.95the tagger's words
content_tags30 — the postoperative window other surgeons used instead - one of the boundaries that made the same word cover different populations of eventscontent_tags.quantities[2]0.95the tagger's words
content_tags5 — the number of severity grades the discussion announces, in a sentence whose own parenthetical then lists seven labelscontent_tags.quantities[3]0.9the tagger's words
content_tags4 — the number the introduction gives for the same classificationcontent_tags.quantities[4]0.9the tagger's words
content_tagsthe reported AE term whose incidence cannot be counted because two other terms name the same event
also in: ileus
content_tags.variables[0]0.95the tagger's words

Interpretive choices

Tags that could not be placed in the text:

What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.

© 2026 Shir Sivroni · ORCID 0009-0000-2597-2824