<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization</title>
        <author>Diederik P. Kingma</author>
        <author>Jimmy Ba</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization</title>
          <date>2014</date>
          <publisher>ICLR / arXiv</publisher>
          
          <idno type="arXiv">1412.6980</idno>
          <idno type="record">kingma2014-adam</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">kingma2014-adam.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">685c8f034ec860c572d0d9d8b467427c5617ea28</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>artificial-intelligence</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>stochastic gradient-based optimization</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>system-or-tool-building</label>
        <term>system-or-tool-building</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>The moment estimates start at zero, so early estimates are biased toward zero; the correction divides by one minus the decay rate raised to the timestep.</label>
        <term>initialisation bias from zero-initialised moving averages</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>As an optimum is approached the ratio falls, so the effective step shrinks with no schedule imposed.</label>
        <term>automatic annealing via the signal-to-noise ratio</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Rescaling the gradient by c scales the first moment by c and the second by c squared, and the two cancel in the ratio.</label>
        <term>invariance of the update to gradient rescaling</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The convergence analysis covers only convex objectives, not the non-convex problems on which Adam is mostly used.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the convergence guarantee, which does not cover the setting the method is used in: Quotation withheld</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The Lp-norm generalisation of the update rule is numerically unstable except in the infinity-norm limit.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the Lp-norm generalisation of the update rule: SUCH VARIANTS BECOME NUMERICALLY UNSTABLE FOR LARGE p, leaving the infinity-norm limit as the usable case</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>In convolutional nets the second moment estimate vanishes and poorly approximates the cost surface.</label>
        <note>what this limits: convolutional networks specifically: THE SECOND MOMENT ESTIMATE IS THEREFORE A POOR APPROXIMATION TO THE GEOMETRY OF THE COST FUNCTION IN CNNs</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>On the CNN experiment the gain over SGD with momentum is only marginal.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the size of the advantage on the CNN experiment: THOUGH ADAM SHOWS MARGINAL IMPROVEMENT OVER SGD WITH MOMENTUM, IT ADAPTS LEARNING RATE SCALE FOR DIFFERENT LAYERS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>The convergence guarantee is proved only for convex objectives, and the paper says so in the same sentence in which it reports the non-convex results.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>the optimiser comparison run both with and without dropout noise</label>
        <note>eliminates: an advantage that holds only in the absence of the regularisation practitioners actually use · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>AdaGrad</label>
        <term>AdaGrad</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>RMSProp</label>
        <term>RMSProp</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>Sum-of-Functions Optimizer (SFO)</label>
        <term>Sum-of-Functions Optimizer (SFO)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>signal-to-noise ratio</label>
        <term>signal-to-noise ratio</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>trust region</label>
        <term>trust region</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>regret</label>
        <term>regret</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>second raw moment</label>
        <term>second raw moment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>diagonal of the Fisher information matrix</label>
        <term>diagonal of the Fisher information matrix</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>adaptive moment estimation</label>
        <term>adaptive moment estimation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>effective stepsize</label>
        <term>effective stepsize</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[14]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>initialization bias correction</label>
        <term>initialization bias correction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>signal-to-noise ratio - here the ratio of the two bias-corrected moment estimates, used as confidence in the gradient DIRECTION, not a power ratio</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>regret - the summed gap between the online prediction and the best fixed parameter in hindsight, over the whole sequence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>second raw moment - the UNCENTERED variance of the gradient, not the variance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>trust region - the region within which the current gradient estimate is taken to carry enough information, bounded here by the stepsize hyper-parameter</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → AdaGrad (Duchi et al., 2011) and RMSProp (Tieleman &amp; Hinton, 2012)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → RMSProp (Tieleman &amp; Hinton, 2012)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the online learning framework of (Zinkevich, 2003)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>AdaGrad —is-a→ Adam</label>
        <term>AdaGrad</term>
        <term>Adam</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: A LIMITING-CASE MEMBERSHIP, typed &#x27;is-a&#x27; not &#x27;same-as&#x27; because the span says &#x27;corresponds to a version of&#x27;, not that the two are the same thing. The paper scopes it itself one sentence later: the correspondence &#x27;does not hold when removing…&#x27; the bias-correction terms. Schema 0.3 has nowhere to put that scope - holds for in an internal file. Filing it in differs in would mis-state a scope as an axis.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but AdaGrad &#x27;corresponds to a version of Adam&#x27; under limiting settings; is-a is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.7">
        <label>effective stepsize —is-a→ trust region</label>
        <term>effective stepsize</term>
        <term>trust region</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.6 — the record marks this weak · note: Typed &#x27;is-a&#x27;, not &#x27;renamed-across-fields&#x27;: &#x27;trust region&#x27; is optimisation vocabulary in an optimisation paper, so nothing crosses a field boundary. The paper hedges - &#x27;can be understood as establishing a trust region&#x27; - hence 0.7.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the stepsize &#x27;can be understood as establishing a trust region&#x27;; is-a is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Adam —contrasted-with→ RMSProp</label>
        <term>Adam</term>
        <term>RMSProp</term>
        <note>differs in: whether a bias-correction term is present, and the paper names the regime in which it decides the outcome: beta2 close to 1, which is what sparse gradients require · strength of the relation: 0.8
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: &#x27;RMSProp also lacks&#x27; continues the list of differences between RMSProp and Adam (previous sentence).</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Adam —contrasted-with→ Sum-of-Functions Optimizer (SFO)</label>
        <term>Adam</term>
        <term>Sum-of-Functions Optimizer (SFO)</term>
        <note>differs in: memory scaling: SFO&#x27;s requirement is linear in the number of minibatch partitions · strength of the relation: 0.8</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Adam —same-as→ adaptive moment estimation</label>
        <term>Adam</term>
        <term>adaptive moment estimation</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.5 — the record marks this weak · note: An acronym and its expansion, so &#x27;same-as&#x27;. NOT derived from name: in this corpus that field marks compound names whose head noun is the parent concept (&#x27;radical reductionism is-a reductionism&#x27;, 11 of 18 uses).</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Bayesian</label>
        <term>Bayesian</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>regression</label>
        <term>regression</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variance</label>
        <term>variance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
