<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Procedural priming effects on spontaneous inference formation</title>
        <author>Kirmani</author>
        <author>Lee</author>
        <author>Yoon</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Procedural priming effects on spontaneous inference formation</title>
          <date>2004</date>
          <publisher>Journal of Economic Psychology</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.joep.2003.09.003</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">kirmani2004-procedural-priming-effects-on-spon</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">kirmani2004-procedural-priming-effects-on-spon.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">361ca73440c0e12937d31f6a3fde14c2634a93de</note>
          <note type="rights">open-access</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>consumer-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>procedural priming of spontaneous inference formation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>The facilitative prime makes the effort-belief production accessible, so the quality inference is drawn at the moment the ad cost information is encoded; at judgment the subject only retrieves the stored evaluation instead of computing one.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Retrieval consumes less cognitive capacity than computation, so a load imposed at judgment slows computed judgments much more than retrieved ones - which is what makes response time a diagnostic of spontaneity.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>The suppressive prime installs a rival attribution (effort signals personal gain), which competes with and blocks later use of the effort investment rule.</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. Update, 15 September 2026: CLEARED evidence status=&#x27;quote-not-in-current-staged-text&#x27; - the quote now locates in the current staged text, so the condition the marker recorded no longer holds.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The demonstration covers only one context, so generalisation is cautioned against.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Response latency showed no prime effect under high cognitive capacity, which the authors concede sits awkwardly with their hypotheses.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The procedural priming paradigm, developed and used in psychology, is imported into consumer/marketing research as a tool for inducing and detecting spontaneous product inferences.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a CONFOUND CHECK: perceived advertising cost was measured on three seven-point scales and compared across conditions</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the procedural prime also changed how expensive the campaign LOOKED, so that any effect is a cost inference rather than a procedural one · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a separate undergraduate pretest of the cost cue before the main study</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the cost cue does not do what the design assumes it does · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>procedural priming</label>
        <term>procedural priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>cognitive procedures</label>
        <term>cognitive procedures</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>effort investment rule</label>
        <term>effort investment rule</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>spontaneous inference</label>
        <term>spontaneous inference</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>facilitative prime</label>
        <term>facilitative prime</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>suppressive prime</label>
        <term>suppressive prime</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>no prime</label>
        <term>no prime</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>cognitive capacity</label>
        <term>cognitive capacity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>retrieval</label>
        <term>retrieval</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>computation</label>
        <term>computation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>demand effects</label>
        <term>demand effects</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>spontaneous inferencing</label>
        <term>spontaneous inferencing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>quality perceptions</label>
        <term>quality perceptions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>response times</label>
        <term>response times</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>cognitive procedure - defined by the paper as the `how` of a task rather than its content, which is the move that lets a prime about charitable giving reach a judgment about advertising</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>spontaneous, of an inference - occurring without explicit prompting and often without conscious intention; a property of HOW the inference arose, not of what it says</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the effort investment rule - the advertising claim with the advertising removed: a rule about persons and undertakings, which is what makes it primeable in a charity scenario and testable in an advertising one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>indirect measurement of spontaneity - chosen because THE MEASUREMENT WOULD CREATE THE THING IT TESTS: asking directly whether the inference was made can produce an inference that would otherwise not have been made</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>prime, facilitative versus suppressive - a distinction drawn by the prime&#x27;s relation to a target rule rather than by its subject matter. Both scenarios describe the same donation; only the reason offered for the effort differs</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Kirmani and Wright (1989)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Broniarczyk and Alba (1994b)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>cognitive procedures —part-of→ procedural priming</label>
        <term>cognitive procedures</term>
        <term>procedural priming</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: The definitional relation, and the reason the effect crosses domains: what carries over is the procedure, so the second task need not share the first&#x27;s content.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>retrieval —distinct-from→ computation</label>
        <term>retrieval</term>
        <term>computation</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: THE PAPER&#x27;S INFERENTIAL ENGINE, stated before it is used. Every hypothesis is this one asymmetry applied to a different condition, which is why the pair is a node pair here rather than background.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>procedural priming —causes→ spontaneous inferencing</label>
        <term>procedural priming</term>
        <term>spontaneous inferencing</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: The paper&#x27;s headline claim, and the sentence after it names the mediator: the primed procedures are the effort investment rule, not anything about advertising.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>suppressive prime —causes→ effort investment rule</label>
        <term>suppressive prime</term>
        <term>effort investment rule</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: reduces · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Suppression here is not the absence of a prime but the presence of a COMPETING attribution - the same effort, explained by personal gain.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>suppressive prime —causes→ quality perceptions</label>
        <term>suppressive prime</term>
        <term>quality perceptions</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: reduces · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: The confirmed half of Hypothesis 1: priming a competing attribution lowers the quality inference relative to both other conditions.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>facilitative prime —same-as→ no prime</label>
        <term>facilitative prime</term>
        <term>no prime</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: THE NULL THE PAPER DID NOT WANT, and it is recorded here rather than left to the limitations layer: the facilitative prime did not raise quality ratings at all. Subjects draw the inference unprompted, so there was no headroom - which is why the paper&#x27;s evidence for spontaneity has to come from response times instead.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>procedural priming —causes→ demand effects</label>
        <term>procedural priming</term>
        <term>demand effects</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: reduces · strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: A METHODOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE AS AN EDGE. The prime is set in an interpersonal context and the test in a marketing one, so a subject is unlikely to connect them - which is the argument for procedural over explicit priming.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Cronbach&#x27;s alpha</label>
        <term>Cronbach&#x27;s alpha</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>planned comparison</label>
        <term>planned comparison</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Quality perceptions were more favourable after the facilitative prime and no prime than after the suppressive prime.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Only in the facilitative prime condition was the speed of the quality judgment unaffected by a concurrent memory load, indicating the quality inference had already been made spontaneously at encoding.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>In the suppressive prime and no prime conditions, constraining cognitive capacity slowed quality judgments significantly, as expected if the judgment had to be computed on the spot.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The advertising cost-quality inference is not normally spontaneous, but becomes spontaneous once the cognitive procedures that underlie it are primed.</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Priming the effort investment rule led subjects to make product quality evaluations without being prompted.</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>When cognitive capacity was high, response times did not differ across prime conditions.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors suggest the ad cost-quality inference may come not from a perceived real-world correlation but from a general principle that effort reflects belief.</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>procedural priming</label>
        <term>procedural priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cognitive procedure</label>
        <term>cognitive procedure</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>effort investment rule</label>
        <term>effort investment rule</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>facilitative prime</label>
        <term>facilitative prime</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>spontaneous inference</label>
        <term>spontaneous inference</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Cognitive capacity at judgment</label>
        <term>Cognitive capacity at judgment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>product quality</label>
        <term>product quality</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>response time for the quality judgment</label>
        <term>response time for the quality judgment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>perceived advertising cost</label>
        <term>perceived advertising cost</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mood</label>
        <term>mood</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>84 — number of undergraduate subjects in the main experiment</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>76 — number of subjects in the pretest that checked the primes produced the intended effort attributions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>5.74 vs 4.04 — pretest ratings of Marian&#x27;s true belief in the cause after the facilitative versus suppressive prime scenario</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Xfacilitative prime= 5.52, Xsuppressive prime= 4.54, Xno prime= 5.42 — mean seven-point quality ratings of the target product in the three prime conditions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Xhigh=11.92, Xlow=11.80 — quality-judgment response times in seconds under high and low cognitive capacity in the facilitative prime condition, which did not differ</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>$7.2 million vs $10 million — average advertising spend subjects expected for the bottled water category, against the $10 million campaign stated for the target product</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>X=4.75 vs. X=4.25, t(46)=1.56, p&lt;0.06 — pretest quality ratings with versus without the $10 million advertising cost cue</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>seven — number of digits held in memory in the concurrent rehearsal task used to constrain cognitive capacity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2003.09.003.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
