<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation by Anyons</title>
        <author>Alexei Yu. Kitaev</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation by Anyons</title>
          <date>2003</date>
          <publisher>Annals of Physics / arXiv</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0</idno>
          <idno type="arXiv">quant-ph/9707021</idno>
          <idno type="record">kitaev2003-anyons</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">kitaev2003-anyons.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">efc6ee02529c20d67012c32af5ec777972199d94</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>physics</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>anyonic excitations in two-dimensional lattice spin models</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>theory</label>
        <term>theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A PHYSICAL SYSTEM IS RE-DESCRIBED AS A COMPUTER, AND THE RE-DESCRIPTION IS MARKED AS ONE: Quotation withheld, with unitary transformations performed BY MOVING THE EXCITATIONS AROUND EACH OTHER and measurements BY JOINING EXCITATIONS IN PAIRS. `Can be considered as` is a way of regarding, not an identity, and the whole paper rests on it</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE PHYSICS RATHER THAN IN THE PROTOCOL: such computation is said to be FAULT-TOLERANT BY ITS PHYSICAL NATURE - so what is elsewhere achieved by a procedure is here claimed as a feature of the material. The same word, fault-tolerance, is being attached to a different kind of thing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A PHYSICAL PROCESS IS RE-DESCRIBED AS AN ALGORITHM AND THE HEDGE IS LEFT IN: the spins&#x27; mutual interaction forcing a flipped spin back is said to be QUITE SIMILAR TO THE STANDARD ERROR CORRECTION PROCEDURE FOR THE REPETITION CODE, after which - WE MAY SAY THAT ERRORS ARE BEING CORRECTED AT THE PHYSICAL LEVEL. The identification is offered as a manner of speaking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE ARGUMENT PROCEEDS BY ASKING WHY AN EXISTING PRACTICE IS UNNECESSARY: classical computation CAN ALSO be performed fault-tolerantly, HOWEVER IT IS RARELY DONE IN PRACTICE BECAUSE CLASSICAL GATES ARE RELIABLE ENOUGH - and the next sentence is WHY IS IT POSSIBLE. The paper&#x27;s question is generated by noticing that a technique is available and unused</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE EXPLANATION IS SOUGHT IN THE EASIEST CASE FIRST AND THE CHOICE IS ANNOUNCED: LET US TRY TO UNDERSTAND THE EASIEST THING - why classical information can be stored reliably on magnetic media - before the quantum case is attempted. The order of explanation is stated rather than left implicit, and the chosen starting point is a fact about ordinary technology</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A THRESHOLD IS REPORTED AS THE OBSTACLE, AND ITS SIZE IS WHAT MATTERS RATHER THAN ITS EXISTENCE: an arbitrary circuit CAN be simulated with imperfect gates PROVIDED they are close to ideal up to a constant precision - and UNFORTUNATELY THE THRESHOLD VALUE IS RATHER SMALL, IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE THIS PRECISION. The theoretical solution is granted and then declared impractical by a number</term>
        <note>about this quote: The span contains &#x27;small1;&#x27; - a footnote marker glued to the preceding word by the extraction. The quote is an exact substring and anchors correctly.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A PROBLEM IS DECLARED SOLVED FROM ONE STANDPOINT AND OPEN FROM ANOTHER, WITH BOTH NAMED: physical realization is A BIG CHALLENGE and decoherence is one important problem - but FROM THE PURELY THEORETICAL POINT OF VIEW, THIS PROBLEM HAS BEEN SOLVED. Solved and unsolved at once, distinguished by which standpoint the word is being used from</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>AN EXPLICIT CAUTION AGAINST CONFLATING TWO THINGS THE SAME MATHEMATICS DESCRIBES: the local operators SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS symmetry transformations - the true symmetry transformations are a different set, and MATHEMATICALLY THEY ARE DESCRIBED BY THE SAME ALGEBRA, BUT THEIR ACTION ON PHYSICAL STATES IS DIFFERENT. One formalism, two referents, and the paper stops to say so</term>
        <note>about this quote: DAMAGE SHAPE 5 INSIDE THIS SPAN, and it removes a name. The sentence reads &quot;described by the same algebra , but their action on physical states is different&quot; - with a space before the comma where the algebra&#x27;s symbol should be. The symbol was displaced past the end of the sentence by the extraction: &quot;...is different. D 15 a b Figure 7:&quot;. So the quote says &quot;the same algebra [ ]&quot; and the algebra it names is unrecoverable from the span. The tag does not name it. Found by reading; no guard sees this.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A TERM OF ART IS CONCEDED AND THEN SET ASIDE AS NOT THE RELEVANT PROPERTY: ONE MAY SAY that these codes have QUITE POOR PARAMETERS, and WELL, THEY ARE NOT GOOD CODES IN THE SENSE OF a cited definition - HOWEVER the code corrects almost any multiple error of a stated size, SO THESE CODES WORK. The established criterion is granted, and then shown not to be the criterion that matters here</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>real quantum systems suffer decoherence and systematic errors</label>
        <note>what this limits: every fault-tolerance claim: DECOHERENCE AND SYSTEMATIC ERRORS IN UNITARY TRANSFORMATIONS OCCUR IN REAL QUANTUM SYSTEMS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>For the abelian toric-code memory the author has no way to read information into or out of the protected space.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the abelian toric-code memory as a usable memory: UNFORTUNATELY, I DO NOT KNOW ANY WAY THIS QUANTUM INFORMATION CAN GET IN OR OUT</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The gate set obtainable by braiding abelian anyons is not universal.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any universality claim for braiding abelian anyons: TOO FEW THINGS CAN BE DONE BY MOVING ABELIAN ANYONS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The group used for the universal-computation construction is physically implausible.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the universal-computation construction: (THE GROUP S5 IS QUITE UNREALISTIC FOR PHYSICAL IMPLEMENTATION)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>No general theory underlies the constructions given.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the generality of the constructions: A GENERAL THEORY OF ANYONS AND TOPOLOGICAL QUANTUM ORDER IS LACKING</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The universal-computation results are stated without full derivation, to appear elsewhere.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the universal-computation results as presented here: (THIS SECTION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS AN ABSTRACT OF RESULTS TO BE PRESENTED ELSEWHERE)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The number the whole fault-tolerance argument depends on is declared unknown in a footnote, with estimates three orders of magnitude apart.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any use of the fault-tolerance threshold cited here: a footnote states the threshold is not known and that published estimates vary across several orders of magnitude</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The case that errors can be corrected by physics rather than by procedure is made by analogy with magnetic storage, and hedged.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the claim that this scheme corrects errors at the physical level: the supporting argument is an analogy with spins on magnetic media, which the author introduces with &#x27;we may say&#x27;</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The protection is degeneracy of a ground state on a surface, so the quantity protected depends on the topology chosen.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the amount of protected quantum information claimed here: the protected space is the ground state of the Hamiltonian and is 4g-fold degenerate, where g is the genus of the surface the lattice is placed on</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>1-homologies and 1-cohomologies over Z2 used to describe the protected subspace of the lattice model, so that the stored information is a topological invariant rather than a local one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>protected space</label>
        <term>protected space</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>ground state</label>
        <term>ground state</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper">
        <label>stabilizer operators</label>
        <term>stabilizer operators</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper">
        <label>anyonic excitations</label>
        <term>anyonic excitations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper">
        <label>fault-tolerant</label>
        <term>fault-tolerant</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>fault tolerance - BY PHYSICS RATHER THAN BY PROCEDURE: Shor&#x27;s construction simulates a circuit with imperfect gates given a precision threshold, whereas here the computation is said to be fault-tolerant by its physical nature, so the two uses of the phrase name a software guarantee and a property of a material</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the threshold - A NUMBER THE ARGUMENT NEEDS AND NOBODY HAS: the text calls it rather small and very difficult to achieve, and the footnote says outright that it is not known, giving estimates that differ by orders of magnitude</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the protected space - AS A DEGENERATE GROUND STATE: it coincides with the ground state of a Hamiltonian built from local stabilizer operators, and its size is set by the genus of the surface rather than by anything about the computation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger" cert="0.7">
        <label>claim_type: method</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: method — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.method" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>method: formal-model</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: theory — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>phenomenon: decoherence and systematic gate error as the obstacle to physically realising a quantum computer</label>
        <note>a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: anyonic excitations in two-dimensional lattice spin models — note: A BLIND second reading by the project on 2026-08-25: the record&#x27;s own claim type/method/phenomenon were not looked at until every value here was written and substring-verified. Not applied - a person decides. Sampling frame: the 504 staged records carrying no alternatives block, so this never re-measures the 202. All 11 records with 130+ tags were taken as a census and 19 more spread one per discipline across 22 disciplines - the dense non-neuroscience cell is the one the 202 do not contain (inside them, 94-100% of the densest bands are neuroscience; among these 11, one is).,</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → quantum error-correcting codes (stabilizer codes)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → stabilizer quantum codes on lattices on the torus and other 2-D surfaces [6, 8]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → G. Castagnoli and M. Rasetti&#x27;s use of one-dimensional anyons for quantum computation [14]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Einarsson&#x27;s proof that ground state degeneracy on the torus follows from the existence of anyons [19]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>protected space —same-as→ ground state</label>
        <term>protected space</term>
        <term>ground state</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>anyonic excitations —causes→ fault-tolerant</label>
        <term>anyonic excitations</term>
        <term>fault-tolerant</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>4g-fold — ground-state degeneracy of the toric-code Hamiltonian, g = genus of the surface</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ΔE = 2 — energy gap separating excited states (eigenvalue difference of the stabilizer operators)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A two-dimensional quantum system with anyonic excitations can serve as a quantum computer, with unitary transformations performed by moving the excitations around each other.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The ground-state degeneracy persists under local perturbation.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>braiding</label>
        <term>braiding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>degenerate state</label>
        <term>degenerate state</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>nonabelian anyons</label>
        <term>nonabelian anyons</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>braiding</label>
        <term>braiding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard-error</label>
        <term>standard-error</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
