<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores</title>
        <author>Jon Kleinberg</author>
        <author>Sendhil Mullainathan</author>
        <author>Manish Raghavan</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores</title>
          <date>2016</date>
          <publisher>ITCS / arXiv</publisher>
          
          <idno type="arXiv">1609.05807</idno>
          <idno type="record">kleinberg2016-fairness</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">kleinberg2016-fairness.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">4de38059f62cdb6e1407e16ae061c9e630f2853d</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>law</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>fairness conditions for probabilistic risk scores</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>mathematical-proof</label>
        <term>mathematical-proof</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>an impossibility theorem: calibration and balanced error rates across groups cannot all hold simultaneously except when base rates are equal or prediction is perfect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the incompatibility holds except in highly constrained special cases</label>
        <note>what this limits: the incompatibility result itself: it holds EXCEPT IN HIGHLY CONSTRAINED SPECIAL CASES</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The computational tractability of finding a minimum-loss fair assignment (or even deciding whether a non-trivial one exists) is left open.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any algorithmic use of the fairness conditions: IT IS AN OPEN QUESTION WHETHER THERE IS A POLYNOMIAL-TIME ALGORITHM TO FIND A FAIR ASSIGNMENT OF MINIMUM LOSS, OR EVEN TO DETERMINE WHETHER A NON-TRIVIAL FAIR SOLUTION EXISTS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The NP-completeness result covers only the integral case, not the general model where a feature vector may be split across bins.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the NP-completeness result only: IT APPLIES ONLY TO THE CASE IN WHICH EVERYONE WITH A GIVEN FEATURE VECTOR MUST BE ASSIGNED TO THE SAME BIN</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper deliberately does not analyse which fairness definitions are violated in real applications or datasets.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any applied reading of the impossibility result: NOR IS OUR INTENTION TO ANALYZE WHICH DEFINITIONS OF FAIRNESS ARE VIOLATED IN PARTICULAR APPLICATIONS OR DATASETS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The exposition is restricted to two groups.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the two-group presentation: WE FOCUS ON THE CASE OF TWO GROUPS FOR SIMPLICITY OF EXPOSITION, with extension described as straightforward</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The model assumes the true positive-class rate for each feature vector is known to the procedure; the unknown case is not analysed.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the known-p-sigma assumption, and the direction it cuts: THE CASE IN WHICH THE VALUE OF p-sigma IS UNKNOWN IS AN IMPORTANT VERSION OF THE PROBLEM AS WELL; HOWEVER, SINCE OUR MAIN RESULTS ESTABLISH STRONG LIMITATIONS ON WHAT IS ACHIEVABLE, THESE LIMI[tations carry over]</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Withholding the group attribute from the procedure does not stop it exhibiting bias between groups, and the paper says so in a parenthesis as it defines the model.</label>
        <note>what this limits: a claim that a procedure is unbiased because it never sees group membership: this model&#x27;s rule has access only to the feature vector, and the authors state that this does not mean the rule is incapable of exhibiting bias between the two groups</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The modelling assumption that group membership adds nothing beyond the feature vector is defended by a construction in which the feature vector conveys group perfectly.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the generality claimed for this model: the assumption that group adds no information beyond the feature vector is justified by allowing instances where people of different groups never share a feature vector, so that the feature vector implicitly conveys the group</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A fourth and legally mandated notion of fairness is set aside as often neither feasible nor desirable, so the impossibility result does not speak to it.</label>
        <note>what this limits: this theorem as covering fairness generally: statistical parity is excluded from the three conditions, on the stated ground that classification and risk assessment are broader activities where it is often neither feasible nor desirable</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>probabilistic fairness criteria (calibration, error-rate balance) applied to risk scores used in consequential legal / policy decisions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>calibration</label>
        <term>calibration</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>risk score</label>
        <term>risk score</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper">
        <label>balance for the positive class</label>
        <term>balance for the positive class</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>balance for the negative class</label>
        <term>balance for the negative class</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>statistical parity</label>
        <term>statistical parity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper">
        <label>base rates</label>
        <term>base rates</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper">
        <label>Balance for the positive and negative classes</label>
        <term>Balance for the positive and negative classes</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper">
        <label>statistical parity</label>
        <term>statistical parity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>fairness - AS CALIBRATION WITHIN GROUPS (condition A): within each group, the people in a bin scored v really do belong to the positive class at rate v, i.e. the scores mean what they claim to mean when read separately in each group</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>fairness - AS BALANCE FOR THE NEGATIVE CLASS (condition B): people who do NOT have the property get the same average score whichever group they are in, so the errors are not systematically worse for one group&#x27;s negative instances</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>fairness - AS BALANCE FOR THE POSITIVE CLASS (condition C): people who DO have the property get the same average score whichever group they are in - the condition the COMPAS critique turned on</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the impossibility - AS A FACT ABOUT BASE RATES, NOT ABOUT A DOMAIN: the authors state that the trade-off is not a fact about medicine but about risk estimates whenever base rates differ, which is the paper stating its own transfer condition</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the assumption that fairness criteria can be jointly satisfied</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Dietrich et al.&#x27;s empirical observation that error-rate symmetry across groups is hard to achieve when base rates differ</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the Angwin et al. critique of the COMPAS risk tool and its counter-arguments</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → the concurrent binary-classifier analysis of Hardt et al. [19]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>balance for the positive class —distinct-from→ statistical parity</label>
        <term>balance for the positive class</term>
        <term>statistical parity</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>balance for the negative class —distinct-from→ statistical parity</label>
        <term>balance for the negative class</term>
        <term>statistical parity</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Balance for the positive and negative classes —distinct-from→ statistical parity</label>
        <term>Balance for the positive and negative classes</term>
        <term>statistical parity</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: RE-GROUNDS another row of this record: span stated the relation, endpoint names did not match its words. · the relation stated: the balance conditions are a goal that can be pursued INDEPENDENTLY of statistical parity</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>three — the number of fairness conditions proven jointly unsatisfiable</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Except in highly constrained special cases, no method can satisfy the three fairness conditions simultaneously.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Even satisfying all three conditions approximately requires the data to lie in an approximate version of one of the constrained special cases.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>base rates</label>
        <term>base rates</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>balance for the positive class</label>
        <term>balance for the positive class</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05807.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
