standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 3 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
This record holds no controls. A layer is empty when the tagger recorded nothing in it — which is not the same as the paper having nothing to record.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | neural correlates of consciousness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | review Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: review | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The review restricts itself to visual and auditory studies and does not cover other modalities or metacognition. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the modality coverage of the review: THIS REVIEW FOCUSES ON VISUAL AND AUDITORY STUDIES; FOR ACCOUNTS OF THE NCC FOR METACOGNITION, BODY, TACTILE AND OLFACTORY EXPERIENCES, SEE REFS | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The authors state that the empirical NCC research programme has inherent limits. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the empirical programme as a route to the question: WE OUTLINE THE INHERENT LIMITS OF SUCH AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH PROGRAMME | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | NCC evidence cannot settle whether consciousness is present in brain-damaged patients, infants, animals or machines. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: every clinical, developmental, comparative and machine application: THE NCC BY THEMSELVES CAN PROVIDE LITTLE INFORMATION ABOUT CONSCIOUSNESS IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE, INFANTS, FETUSES, NON-HUMAN SPECIES OR INTELLIGENT MACHINES | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The conclusion that V1 is not part of the content-specific NCC may not generalise to untested visual attributes. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the conclusion that V1 is outside the content-specific NCC: IT IS NOT KNOWN WHETHER THIS CONCLUSION APPLIES TO OTHER VISUAL ATTRIBUTES, SUCH AS PRECISE SPATIAL TOPOGRAPHY, LUMINOSITY AND DETAILED CONTOURS | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The field's central definition is stated by its own authors to admit two interpretations. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any use of the NCC as a single construct: the authors define it as the minimum neuronal mechanisms jointly sufficient for any one specific conscious percept, and state that there are two possible interpretations of that definition | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Two popular candidate markers are reported to have no predictive power. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any use of gamma activity or the P3b wave as a marker of consciousness: the authors state these two popular candidates have not shown any predictive power | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Consciousness is stated to be possible without reliable behavioural responses, with the misclassification named. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any inference from absent behaviour to absent consciousness: the authors state consciousness can be present even without reliable behavioural responses, and that minimally conscious patients can be misclassified as vegetative | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | full NCC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: full NCC | concepts[0] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | contentspecific NCC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: contentspecific NCC | concepts[1] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | gamma activity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: gamma activity | concepts[2] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | P3b wave Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: P3b wave | concepts[3] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | behavioural responses Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: behavioural responses | concepts[4] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | consciousness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: consciousness | concepts[5] | the paper's words | |
| senses | the NCC - ONE DEFINITION, TWO READINGS, FLAGGED BY ITS AUTHORS: the minimum neuronal mechanisms jointly sufficient for any one specific conscious percept, with the review stating there are two possible interpretations depending on whether the specific content or the state is meant; the definition does not determine its own referent Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the full NCC - A UNION OVER A SET STILL BEING ENUMERATED: it is constituted by the union of all content-specific NCC, so the whole is complete exactly when the enumeration is, and the enumeration is the research programme itself Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | gamma activity and the P3b wave - CANDIDATE MARKERS WITHDRAWN: both were popular and neither has shown predictive power, so two named quantities that circulated as indices of consciousness are reported as failing the role Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the proposal that the P3b/global ignition of fronto-parietal cortex is a signature of consciousness (REF. 142) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → earlier proposals that gamma activity or synchrony, and the P3b event-related potential, are signatures of consciousness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | contentspecific NCC —part-of→ full NCC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 also in: contentspecific NCC · full NCC | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | gamma activity —causes→ consciousness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: no-change · strength of the relation: 1 also in: gamma activity · consciousness | concept_edges[1] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | P3b wave —causes→ consciousness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: no-change · strength of the relation: 1 also in: P3b wave · consciousness | concept_edges[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Both the full and the content-specific NCC sit in a restricted temporo-parieto-occipital posterior hot zone rather than in the wide fronto-parietal network that earlier work emphasised. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Paradigms in which participants make no overt report yield a narrower content-specific NCC that contains posterior cortical areas but excludes prefrontal cortex. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Gamma synchrony survives or grows during early NREM sleep, anaesthesia and seizures and accompanies unconscious emotional stimuli, so it occurs without consciousness. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The P3b is missing in most clearly conscious brain-damaged patients and detects minimally conscious patients very poorly, so it fails as a signature of consciousness. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Primary visual cortex V1 is not part of the content-specific NCC for any visual attribute tested so far. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Consciousness survives removal of prefrontal cortex: complete bilateral frontal lobectomy and large bilateral prefrontal resections leave it intact. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Cerebellar lesions have little effect on consciousness and its contents. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Local rather than global EEG activation, especially over the posterior hot zone, may be what matters for consciousness. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The perturbational complexity index is the first measure that tracks the level of consciousness across sleep stages, anaesthetics and disorders of consciousness and does so for individual participants. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | No single brain area turns out to be necessary for being conscious, though areas of the posterior cortical hot zone are the best candidates for both full and content-specific NCC. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | content-specific NCC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: content-specific NCC | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | full NCC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: full NCC | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | background conditions for consciousness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | posterior cortical hot zone Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: posterior cortical hot zone | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | no-report paradigm Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: no-report paradigm | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | perturbational complexity index (PCI) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.definitions[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | neuronal avalanches Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: neuronal avalanches | content_tags.definitions[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | P3b Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: P3b | content_tags.definitions[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.14 — sensitivity of the P3b for identifying minimally conscious patients Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 40% — proportion of unresponsive, sedated and hypothermic coma patients in whom multivariate decoding still finds a P3b-like component Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 143 — number of severely brain-injured patients with disorders of consciousness in the structural imaging study of thalamic atrophy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | more than one-third — share of awakenings from NREM sleep after which participants report having been conscious, despite reduced neuromodulatory activity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | >75 μV — amplitude threshold for the repeated EEG slow waves used to assess loss of consciousness in humans Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 120– 140 ms — latency of cortical responses to visual stimuli attributed to a feedforward sweep from V1 to extrastriate and inferior temporal cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | close to 1 million — number of nerve cells in a bee brain, cited when asking whether insects can be conscious Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.