standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 12 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | the mental health of 1257 physicians and nurses in 34 Chinese hospitals with fever clinics or COVID-19 wards, surveyed over six days at the start of the outbreak Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | what is the magnitude of depression, anxiety, insomnia and distress among health care workers treating patients with COVID-19, and which occupational and geographic factors are associated with it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | a prevalence-and-risk-factor survey filling a gap the authors name: psychological assistance was already being deployed nationally while evidence-based evaluation of frontline workers was scarce Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | psychological burden in health care workers during an epidemic: 50.4% reported symptoms of depression, 44.6% anxiety, 34.0% insomnia and 71.5% distress Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | survey Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: survey | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | the authors' account of why frontline nurses fare worst - close, frequent contact and longer hours than usual, which is exposure to the hazard and exposure to the workload at once Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: exposure intensity | mechanisms[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | human-to-human transmissibility and potential fatality are offered as intensifying the perception of personal danger - a belief about the disease rather than a dose of it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: perceived personal danger | mechanisms[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | predictable shortages of supplies together with rising case influx are named as contributors to pressure, separately from contact with patients Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: resource shortage | mechanisms[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | 71.5% of nurses held junior titles, which the authors read as fewer years of work experience - offered as why the most exposed group is also the least practised Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: inexperience | mechanisms[3] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | a list of distress sources taken from the SARS literature: vulnerability or loss of control, concern for self and family, changed work, isolation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: loss of control | mechanisms[4] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | limited in scope - 81.2% of participants were from Hubei province, so the findings do not generalise to less affected regions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | six days of collection and no longitudinal follow-up, so nothing here speaks to how the symptoms developed or resolved; the authors expect they worsened Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | NO COMPARATOR GROUP. The study cannot separate being a clinician in the region from living in the region, and cannot separate preexisting symptoms from new ones Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | response bias may remain at a 68.7% response rate, in either direction - the nonrespondents may have been too stressed to answer or not stressed enough to care Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the headline prevalences and the stated detection cutoffs are two different thresholds and the paper does not reconcile them in the abstract, where only the lower one appears Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[4] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| controls | multivariable logistic regression adjusting for sex, age, marital status, educational level, technical title, place of residence, working position and type of hospital Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the crude frontline-versus-second-line difference being an artefact of the front line's composition - sex, age, marital status, education, technical title, residence and hospital type are each held fixed, and those are the ones this quote names · outcome: held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | all tests two-tailed at a significance level fixed in the Statistical Analysis section Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a one-tailed test chosen after the direction of an effect was already visible · outcome: held | controls[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis) after checking that none of the four score distributions was normal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a normality assumption the data do not meet - the authors report the check and then choose the test that does not need it · outcome: held | controls[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | four previously validated Chinese-language instruments with published band boundaries and cutoffs, rather than questions written for this study Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: instrument novelty as the source of the prevalence figures, and makes the numbers comparable with other studies using the same scales · outcome: held | controls[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | occupational and geographic data of the nonrespondents compared with those of respondents Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: nonresponse being concentrated in one occupation or one region - but NOT response bias itself, which the authors say may still exist because the two things it would turn on, stress and interest, are exactly what was not measured in the people who declined · outcome: partial | controls[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | target sample size set from a stated formula, a stated margin of error and a 35% prior from the SARS literature, then amplified by 50% for subgroup analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the subgroup comparisons being underpowered by accident - the amplification is declared in advance and for that purpose · outcome: held | controls[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | reporting followed the AAPOR guideline for survey research Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: selective reporting of how the survey was conducted - a reporting standard is named in advance, which fixes the disclosures rather than leaving them to the authors' choice after the fact · outcome: held | controls[6] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a comparator group of people living in the same regions who were not clinicians Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: living in the region rather than working in it as a clinician - the paper says plainly there was no comparator group, so the two cannot be separated · outcome: absent-declared-unreported · would have ruled out, had it been run: nothing - THE CONTROL WAS NOT AVAILABLE. The authors state they cannot separate being a clinician in this region from simply living in it, so the entire prevalence finding is uncontrolled against the background rate in Wuhan at the same moment | controls[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | ethics committee approval, verbal informed consent, the right to terminate at any time, anonymity and assured confidentiality Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: responses given under professional pressure during an outbreak being treated as freely given, when the respondents are staff of the reporting institution's own hospitals · outcome: held | controls[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | frontline workers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: frontline workers | concepts[0] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | second-line workers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: second-line workers | concepts[1] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | nurses Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: nurses | concepts[2] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | physicians Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: physicians | concepts[3] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | depression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: depression | concepts[4] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | anxiety Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: anxiety | concepts[5] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | insomnia Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: insomnia | concepts[6] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | distress Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: distress | concepts[7] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | PHQ-9 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: PHQ-9 | concepts[8] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | GAD-7 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: GAD-7 | concepts[9] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | ISI Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ISI | concepts[10] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | IES-R Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: IES-R | concepts[11] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | COVID-19 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: COVID-19 | concepts[12] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | SARS Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: SARS | concepts[13] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Wuhan Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Wuhan | concepts[14] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Hubei province Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Hubei province | concepts[15] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | tertiary hospital Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: tertiary hospital | concepts[16] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | secondary hospitals Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: secondary hospitals | concepts[17] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | multivariable logistic regression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: multivariable logistic regression | concepts[18] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | odds ratios Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: odds ratios | concepts[19] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | confounders Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: confounders | concepts[20] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | 2-stage cluster sampling Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: 2-stage cluster sampling | concepts[21] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | response bias Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: response bias | concepts[22] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | comparator group Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: comparator group | concepts[23] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | longitudinal follow-up Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: longitudinal follow-up | concepts[24] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| senses | symptoms of depression / anxiety / insomnia / distress, AS USED IN THE FOUR HEADLINE PREVALENCES - a count of everyone scoring above NORMAL on each scale, which is a far lower bar than the cutoff the same paper defines for detecting each disorder. Read this figure with the band boundaries tagged under definitions and with the two statistics rows that quote Table 2's own band counts; the number is right and the sense is milder than the words suggest Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| senses | severe symptoms - A SECOND AND HIGHER THRESHOLD IN THE SAME PAPER: a score greater than 10, 7, 15 or 26. For distress that cutoff of 26 falls at the boundary of the moderate band, while the 71.5% headline counts from the mild band up. SO `distress' IN THIS PAPER NAMES TWO DIFFERENT POPULATIONS DEPENDING ON WHICH SENTENCE YOU READ, and both are correct Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| senses | distress - A SCORE ON THE IMPACT OF EVENT SCALE-REVISED, an instrument for the psychological impact of a specific event, not a clinical diagnosis and not general unhappiness. The same instrument carries the same sense in wang2020, where the label is `psychological impact` instead Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | frontline - SELF-REPORTED AND BINARY. It is a yes/no answer to whether the respondent was directly engaged in diagnosing, treating or nursing patients with fever or confirmed COVID-19; it carries no measure of hours, caseload or duration of exposure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | risk factor / associated with - AN ADJUSTED CROSS-SECTIONAL ODDS RATIO. Confounders are named and controlled, which is more than wang2020's univariate analysis does, but the design still observes no temporal order: nobody was measured before becoming frontline Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the SARS-outbreak literature on health care workers (Maunder 2003, Bai 2004, Lee 2007, Chua 2004), which reported 89% with psychological symptoms in high-risk situations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | confirms → the SARS emergency-department finding that nurses developed more distress and more behavioural disengagement than physicians Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. note: the paper's own word is 'also showed', which is agreement reported after the fact and not a replication attempt - 'confirms' rather than 'replicates' for that reason | claim_relations[1] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → the national deployment of psychological assistance hotlines and counselling during the outbreak, which this paper says ran ahead of any evidence base for frontline workers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | frontline workers —causes→ insomnia Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: the paper's word is 'independent risk factor', which is an adjusted cross-sectional association and not a demonstrated cause; the weight is below 1.0 for that reason and the largest of the four odds ratios is this one
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span reports frontline work as an independent risk factor (odds ratio); an observational association typed as cause. also in: frontline workers · insomnia | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | frontline workers —causes→ depression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: adjusted association, CI lower bound 1.11 - the weakest of the four and the closest to no effect
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span reports frontline work as an independent risk factor (odds ratio); an observational association typed as cause. also in: frontline workers · depression | concept_edges[1] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | frontline workers —causes→ anxiety Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.8
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span reports frontline work as an independent risk factor (odds ratio); an observational association typed as cause. also in: frontline workers · anxiety | concept_edges[2] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | frontline workers —causes→ distress Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.8
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span reports frontline work as an independent risk factor (odds ratio); an observational association typed as cause. also in: frontline workers · distress | concept_edges[3] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | depression —operationalised-as→ PHQ-9 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 also in: depression · PHQ-9 | concept_edges[4] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | anxiety —operationalised-as→ GAD-7 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 | concept_edges[5] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | insomnia —operationalised-as→ ISI Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 | concept_edges[6] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | distress —operationalised-as→ IES-R Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: the IES-R measures the psychological impact of a named event; 'distress' in this paper means nothing wider than that | concept_edges[7] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | frontline workers —distinct-from→ second-line workers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: the distinction is the paper's independent variable and it is a self-reported yes/no also in: frontline workers · second-line workers | concept_edges[8] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | nurses —contrasted-with→ physicians Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but attributed: the span reports a SARS-outbreak study's finding about nurses and physicians. also in: nurses · physicians | concept_edges[9] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | secondary hospitals —contrasted-with→ tertiary hospital Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95 also in: secondary hospitals · tertiary hospital | concept_edges[10] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | Wuhan —part-of→ Hubei province Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: and the paper's three strata are Wuhan, Hubei outside Wuhan, and outside Hubei, so the containment matters to how the comparison reads
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span compares working outside Hubei with working in Wuhan; part-of rests on world knowledge, not the span. also in: Wuhan · Hubei province | concept_edges[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 50.4% reported symptoms of depression, 44.6% anxiety, 34.0% insomnia, 71.5% distress Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | frontline work was an independent risk factor for all four outcomes after adjustment; insomnia carried much the largest odds ratio at 2.97 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | being a woman and holding an intermediate professional title were associated with severe depression, anxiety and distress Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Working outside Hubei was associated with a lower risk of distress than working in Wuhan. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | secondary-hospital staff reported more severe depression and anxiety than tertiary-hospital staff Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | but frontline workers in secondary and tertiary hospitals scored equally high on all four scales - the hospital-type difference disappears at the front line Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | nurses, women, frontline workers and those in Wuhan reported more severe symptoms on every measurement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | frontline worker = answered yes to being directly engaged in diagnosing, treating or nursing patients with fever or confirmed COVID-19; everyone else is second-line Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: frontline workers | content_tags.definitions[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cutoffs for detecting major depression, anxiety, insomnia and distress: 10, 7, 15 and 26; above the cutoff is called severe Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cutoff score | content_tags.definitions[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 1257 of 1830 contacted individuals completed the survey, a participation rate of 68.7% Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 1257 health care workers in 34 hospitals, over six days from 29 January to 3 February 2020 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 20 hospitals in Wuhan, 7 elsewhere in Hubei, 7 in other provinces - 34 in total Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | median scores: PHQ-9 5.0, GAD-7 4.0, ISI 5.0, IES-R 20.0 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | target sample of at least 1070 completed questionnaires, from a 35% prior and a 50% amplification for subgroups Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | frontline vs second-line, adjusted: depression OR 1.52 (1.11-2.09), anxiety 1.57 (1.22-2.02), insomnia 2.97 (1.92-4.60), distress 1.60 (1.25-2.04) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | outside Hubei vs Wuhan, distress OR 0.62 (0.43-0.88), P = .008 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | secondary vs tertiary hospital: depression OR 1.65 (1.17-2.34), anxiety OR 1.43 (1.08-1.90) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | severe depression among women OR 1.94 (1.26-2.98); severe anxiety with an intermediate title OR 1.82 (1.38-2.39) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE 71.5% DISTRESS FIGURE IS EVERY IES-R BAND ABOVE NORMAL: 459 mild + 308 moderate + 132 severe = 899 of 1257. The severe band alone is 132, or 10.5%, and the paper's own stated cutoff for detecting distress is 26 - the boundary of the moderate band, not of the mild one Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the same shape on the PHQ-9: 448 mild + 108 moderate + 78 severe = 634 of 1257 = the reported 50.4%, while the stated cutoff for detecting major depression is 10 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | all tests 2-tailed with the significance level fixed in advance; group comparisons by Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis because none of the four distributions was normal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.