<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool</title>
        <author>Heidi J. Larson</author>
        <author>Caitlin Jarrett</author>
        <author>W Schulz</author>
        <author>Mohuya Chaudhuri</author>
        <author>Yuqing Zhou</author>
        <author>Ève Dubé</author>
        <author>Melanie Schuster</author>
        <author>Noni E. MacDonald</author>
        <author>Rose Wilson</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool</title>
          <date>2015</date>
          <publisher>Vaccine</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.037</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">larson2015-measuring-vaccine-hesitancy-the-de</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">larson2015-measuring-vaccine-hesitancy-the-de.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">d7e486bf7f5a99358ac6e2fbcb540dcd5de56f62</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>social-sciences</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>HOW TO MEASURE &#x27;vaccine hesitancy&#x27; - a construct defined by the same working group, in the adjacent article of the same journal supplement, three months earlier</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>what to ask, of whom, so that the scale and nature of hesitancy can be compared across countries - and how to keep the answer from counting refusal, or access failure, as hesitancy</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>a compendium of survey questions in three forms - closed, Likert and open-ended - mapped onto the Determinants Matrix, plus two indicators piloted in the WHO-UNICEF Joint Reporting Form</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>hesitancy as a SUB-GROUP property rather than a population-wide one, so that the measurement has to answer WHO, WHAT and WHERE separately</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>survey</label>
        <term>survey</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the survey is built to separate three things a raw uptake figure cannot: REFUSAL, ACCESS FAILURE, and HESITANCY. `Counting only vaccine refusers will not capture hesitancy`, and the reasons for being unvaccinated must be assessed to tackle hesitancy `as distinct from access issues`</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>and it is built to be VACCINE-SPECIFIC, because the construct is: hesitancy `may be specific to one or some, but not all, vaccines`, so a survey answer must not be generalised across vaccines unless the question said so</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE DEFINITION IS RESTATED IN A NARROWER FORM THAN ITS OWN SOURCE PAPER USES. macdonald2015 writes `delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite availability of vaccination services`; this paper&#x27;s Discussion writes `delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite availability of vaccine services`. macdonald2015 spent a paragraph choosing the narrower NAME while keeping the broader SENSE, and the breadth lived in exactly those two words</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>and the Introduction&#x27;s block quotation differs from the source too, in two places: `A delay` for `delay`, and `time, place, and vaccines` for `time, place and vaccines`. Small, and they establish that THE DEFINITION IS BEING RE-TYPED RATHER THAN COPIED - which is how the third version becomes possible</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE FIRST INSTRUMENT MEASURED SOMETHING ELSE ON PURPOSE: the 2012 pilot focused on vaccine confidence `rather than on the broader issues driving vaccine hesitancy`, `in order to be in harmony with the Global Vaccine Action Plan indicators`. The instrument was aligned to a programme&#x27;s reporting framework before it was aligned to the construct</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the pilot it reports on had a 14% response rate - 13 of 94 countries - and the paper calls it `SUB-OPTIMAL` in its own first results sentence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE QUESTIONS ARE LARGELY UNVALIDATED AND THE PAPER SAYS SO THREE TIMES: `few have been validated`; `Most are predominately designed for high-income settings`; and the questions `do not address all the determinants in the Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix`</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>and SAGE&#x27;s own final report is quoted saying the compendium has been `assessed and validated only in some high-income countries or not at all` - a validation warning carried inside the paper that ships the instrument</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the items are of MIXED PROVENANCE and it is declared: some `derived from previously validated questionnaires, albeit in high-income countries only`, some from experts, and `others are newly proposed`. Three evidential grades in one compendium, distinguishable nowhere in the instrument itself</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>and the construct is declared UNSTABLE IN TIME, which limits any single measurement: `A survey which reveals little hesitancy this year may have a different result next year`</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the funding disclosure is IDENTICAL to its companion paper&#x27;s, and lands on the same word: the group monitoring `public confidence in Immunization Programs` took Novartis research funding and GSK meeting funding, and the first author consulted for GSK ON VACCINE CONFIDENCE</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>whether the instrument counts refusal, or access failure, as hesitancy</label>
        <note>eliminates: both confounds AT THE LEVEL OF INSTRUCTION - the paper states that refusal is not hesitancy and that hesitancy must be assessed as distinct from access - but no item, scoring rule or threshold is given that would separate them in a returned survey · outcome: partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>whether the questions have been validated</label>
        <note>eliminates: nothing, declared three times over: &#x27;few have been validated&#x27;, &#x27;most are predominately designed for high-income settings&#x27;, and SAGE&#x27;s own report says they are validated &#x27;only in some high-income countries or not at all&#x27; · outcome: failed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>whether the item pool covers the construct it is mapped onto</label>
        <note>eliminates: nothing - the questions &#x27;do not address all the determinants in the Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix&#x27;, and the remedy offered is that more &#x27;will need to be developed and validated&#x27; · outcome: failed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="controls" ana="#controls[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>the two JRF indicators were pilot-tested across the Americas, Europe and East, South and Central Africa, in four languages, before being proposed</label>
        <note>eliminates: single-region wording effects as an explanation of the responses - the paper says the spread &#x27;allowed for input from a broad range of high, middle and low-income countries&#x27; · outcome: partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>vaccine hesitancy</label>
        <term>vaccine hesitancy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines</label>
        <term>delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>refusal</label>
        <term>refusal</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>access issues</label>
        <term>access issues</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>vaccine confidence</label>
        <term>vaccine confidence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix</label>
        <term>Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>JRF</label>
        <term>JRF</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>vaccine hesitancy, AS QUOTED HERE - `refers to a delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite availability of vaccination services ... time, place, and vaccines`. Two words apart from macdonald2015&#x27;s own text, which says `delay` and `place and`</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>vaccine hesitancy, AS RESTATED IN THE DISCUSSION - `delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite availability of vaccine services`. THIS IS THE NARROW READING macdonald2015 EXPLICITLY DECLINED, appearing in the paper that builds the instrument. Three versions of one definition, two of them in this record</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>hesitancy vs REFUSAL vs ACCESS - the three the instrument exists to separate. `Refusal is not the same as hesitancy, i.e. counting only vaccine refusers will not capture hesitancy`, and hesitancy must be assessed `as distinct from access issues`. A raw uptake number confounds all three</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`vaccine confidence` - WHAT THE 2012 INSTRUMENT ACTUALLY MEASURED, chosen `rather than the broader issues driving vaccine hesitancy` and `in order to be in harmony with the Global Vaccine Action Plan indicators`. The 2013 revision widened it back to complacency and convenience</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`a survey question about vaccine hesitancy` - OPERATIONALLY, whatever two keyword searches returned from 2,933 re-screened articles: `Survey` with any of accept/barrier/refus/trust/missed/delay/confidence/partial/unsure/timeliness/hesitan, or Scale/Index/measurement/instrument/Questionnaire with any of Trust/Confidence/Hesitan</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>extends → macdonald2015&#x27;s definition of vaccine hesitancy and its Determinants Matrix - this paper is the instrument for that definition, by the same working group, in the adjacent article of the same supplement</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>supports → the Global Vaccine Action Plan&#x27;s Strategic Objective 2 indicators - which the 2012 pilot was shaped to match before the construct was</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>extends → SAGE&#x27;s own final report, whose validation warning the paper quotes against its own compendium</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>vaccine hesitancy —operationalised-as→ delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines</label>
        <term>vaccine hesitancy</term>
        <term>delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>vaccine hesitancy —distinct-from→ refusal</label>
        <term>vaccine hesitancy</term>
        <term>refusal</term>
        <note>Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: &#x27;hesitancy&#x27; = vaccine hesitancy (previous sentence).</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>vaccine hesitancy —distinct-from→ access issues</label>
        <term>vaccine hesitancy</term>
        <term>access issues</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>vaccine confidence —distinct-from→ vaccine hesitancy</label>
        <term>vaccine confidence</term>
        <term>vaccine hesitancy</term>
        <note>Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says the pilot focused on vaccine confidence rather than the broader issues driving hesitancy; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>one stated form of the definition speaks of vaccines and vaccine services rather than vaccination and vaccination services</label>
        <term>one stated form of the definition speaks of vaccines and vaccine services rather than vaccination and vaccination services</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the quoted definition calls vaccine hesitancy a delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite available services, complex, context specific, and influenced by complacency, convenience and confidence</label>
        <term>the quoted definition calls vaccine hesitancy a delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite available services, complex, context specific, and influenced by complacency, convenience and confidence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>REFUSAL IS NOT HESITANCY, stated as a rule for question selection: `counting only vaccine refusers will not capture hesitancy`</label>
        <term>REFUSAL IS NOT HESITANCY, stated as a rule for question selection: `counting only vaccine refusers will not capture hesitancy`</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>hesitancy must be assessed as distinct from access issues</label>
        <term>hesitancy must be assessed as distinct from access issues</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the 2012 JRF pilot focused on vaccine confidence rather than broader hesitancy, to match the Global Vaccine Action Plan indicators</label>
        <term>the 2012 JRF pilot focused on vaccine confidence rather than broader hesitancy, to match the Global Vaccine Action Plan indicators</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the 2012 JRF pilot response rate was 14% - 13 of 94 countries - and the paper calls it sub-optimal</label>
        <term>the 2012 JRF pilot response rate was 14% - 13 of 94 countries - and the paper calls it sub-optimal</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the item pool came from two keyword searches over 2,933 re-screened articles</label>
        <term>the item pool came from two keyword searches over 2,933 re-screened articles</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the compendium mixes items from previously validated questionnaires (high-income countries only), items from experts, and newly proposed ones</label>
        <term>the compendium mixes items from previously validated questionnaires (high-income countries only), items from experts, and newly proposed ones</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the questions `do not address all the determinants in the Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix` and `few have been validated`</label>
        <term>the questions `do not address all the determinants in the Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix` and `few have been validated`</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>SAGE&#x27;s own final report is quoted warning that the compendium has been `assessed and validated only in some high-income countries or not at all`</label>
        <term>SAGE&#x27;s own final report is quoted warning that the compendium has been `assessed and validated only in some high-income countries or not at all`</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the construct is declared unstable in time: `a survey which reveals little hesitancy this year may have a different result next year`</label>
        <term>the construct is declared unstable in time: `a survey which reveals little hesitancy this year may have a different result next year`</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>and SAGE calls for sociologists, psychologists, anthropologists, social marketers and communication experts - a MULTI-DISCIPLINARY approach to a single construct</label>
        <term>and SAGE calls for sociologists, psychologists, anthropologists, social marketers and communication experts - a MULTI-DISCIPLINARY approach to a single construct</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite availability of vaccination services; complex and context specific, varying across time, place, and vaccines</label>
        <term>vaccine hesitancy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>delay in acceptance or refusal of VACCINES despite availability of VACCINE SERVICES - the narrower form, in the same paper</label>
        <term>Vaccine hesitancy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>articles re-screened to harvest candidate survey items</label>
        <term>2933</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>percent response to the first JRF pilot - 13 of 94 countries</label>
        <term>14</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>vaccine confidence</label>
        <term>vaccine confidence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.037.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
