standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 1 relation here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | social representation in medial prefrontal cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The social/nonsocial distinction is a distinction between two sets of odours. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any claim that this mPFC activity encodes social information: the tuning measure is the normalised odor-evoked response magnitude, and it was higher for male and female cues than for all nonsocial odors | limitations[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Two of the three behavioural measures did not differ between social and nonsocial stimuli. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any behavioural evidence that the mice treated social cues differently: orientation probability was higher for social cues, while response latency and the stimulus-evoked increase in locomotion did not significantly differ | limitations[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The paper's central quantity is a log ratio of distances between activity patterns. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any social distinction index quoted from this work: it was calculated to quantify the separation between the representations of social and nonsocial stimuli for each mouse | limitations[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | baseline firing rate and locomotion as explanations for the elevated noise Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the reading that the knockouts' higher baseline noise is a rate or movement artefact · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | social distinction index Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: social distinction index | concepts[0] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | nonsocial odors Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: nonsocial odors | concepts[1] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | odor-evoked response magnitude Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: odor-evoked response magnitude | concepts[2] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | separation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: separation | concepts[3] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | baseline noise levels Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: baseline noise levels | concepts[4] | the paper's words | |
| senses | a social stimulus, here - AN ODOUR FROM A CONSPECIFIC: the tuning measure is odor-evoked response magnitude, higher for male and female cues than for all nonsocial odors regardless of odor identity, so every 'social' difference reported is a difference between two sets of smells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the social distinction index - A LOG RATIO OF POPULATION DISTANCES: introduced to quantify the separation between social and nonsocial representations per mouse, so a phrase that reads as a faculty names a ratio between distances among activity patterns - and the paper prints the formula beside the name Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the behavioural evidence - ONE DIFFERENCE OUT OF THREE MEASURES: orientation probability was higher for social cues while response latency and locomotion increase did not significantly differ, so the animals' overt behaviour separates the categories on one axis and not on two Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → prior work on experience-dependent divergence of conspecific sex representations in hypothalamus and medial amygdala Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Lazaro et al., "Reduced prefrontal synaptic connectivity and disturbed oscillatory population dynamics in the CNTNAP2 model of autism" (bioRxiv 2018) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | separation —operationalised-as→ social distinction index Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 also in: separation · social distinction index | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Friedman test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Friedman test | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Wilcoxon signed-rank test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Wilcoxon signed-rank test | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-test | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | chi-squared Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: chi-squared | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standardized residuals Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standardized residuals | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | z-score Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: z-score | content_tags.statistics[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Bonferroni correction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Bonferroni correction | content_tags.statistics[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Levene's test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Levene's test | content_tags.statistics[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | principal component analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: principal component analysis | content_tags.statistics[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | cross-validation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cross-validation | content_tags.statistics[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | multiple regression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: multiple regression | content_tags.statistics[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | maximum likelihood classification Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: maximum likelihood classification | content_tags.statistics[12] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard error of the mean Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard error of the mean | content_tags.statistics[13] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | In the mouse medial prefrontal cortex, nearly a quarter of recorded units were selective for social odours, twice as many as were selective for nonsocial odours or showed mixed responses. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The mPFC population code is organised by social versus nonsocial category rather than by odour identity or valence: responses to the two social cues were more similar to each other than to any nonsocial odour. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Average unit tuning was stronger for both male and female social cues than for any of the three nonsocial odours, independent of odour identity. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | In wild-type mice the social distinction index rose significantly from the first to the second recording day, showing experience-dependent refinement of the social representation. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Cntnap2 knockout mice showed no experience-dependent change: their social distinction index was unchanged between the two recording sessions. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The autism-model deficit is specific to categorisation rather than to stimulus encoding: single-odour decoding was equally accurate in both genotypes, but social/nonsocial category decoding was significantly worse in Cntnap2 knockouts. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Baseline (ongoing) population activity was noisier in Cntnap2 knockout mice than in wild-type littermates, with the two genotypes almost completely non-overlapping on this measure. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Mean baseline firing rates of mPFC units were higher in Cntnap2 knockout mice than in wild-type littermates. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Across both genotypes, the level of baseline neuronal noise was strongly negatively correlated with the social distinction index. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Baseline cortical noise predicted how much a mouse's social representation refined with experience: higher noise went with a smaller day-to-day gain in the social distinction index. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The neural preference for social cues was not explained by behaviour: latency to orient and stimulus-evoked locomotion did not differ between social and nonsocial odours. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | social distinction index Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: social distinction index | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Jensen-Shannon divergence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Jensen-Shannon divergence | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | cortical noise Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cortical noise | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | unit tuning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: unit tuning | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | evoked firing rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: evoked firing rate | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | cortical noise level Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cortical noise level | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | locomotion level Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: locomotion level | content_tags.variables[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | n = 194 — number of mPFC single units recorded in the first cohort of six mice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 44% — proportion of recorded mPFC units that responded to at least one odour stimulus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 51% — proportion of responsive units that responded to only one specific stimulus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | from 44% on day 1 to 58% on day 2 — rise in the share of non-responsive units in Cntnap2 knockout mice across the two sessions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 269 / 237 — total units recorded in Cntnap2 knockout mice versus wild-type littermates across both days Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 75% — variance in population activity captured by the first two principal components in the example projection Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | social = 98.33 ± 1.05, nonsocial = 87.22 ± 3.03, clean air = 65 ± 7.63 — mean probability of an odour-evoked orientation response by stimulus class Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | t(103) = 3.285, P < 0.01 — test of the higher evoked response magnitude to social versus nonsocial stimuli Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.