<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity</title>
        <author>Juan M. Maldacena</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity</title>
          <date>1998</date>
          <publisher>Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics / arXiv</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1</idno>
          <idno type="arXiv">hep-th/9711200</idno>
          <idno type="record">maldacena1997-adscft</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">maldacena1997-adscft.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">7f5f3bd8d486eb781bebab426a1b51414e554247</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>physics</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>duality between large-N conformal field theories and supergravity on anti-de Sitter spacetimes</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>theory</label>
        <term>theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the AdS/CFT (holographic) duality: a string/gravity theory in an anti-de Sitter spacetime is equivalent to a conformal field theory living on its lower-dimensional boundary</term>
        <note>status: the paper&#x27;s own words: We conjecture that</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the supergravity description is trustworthy only in the large-N limit</label>
        <note>what this limits: every supergravity result in the paper: Quotation withheld</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The boundary conditions that the AdS side requires are not specified.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the AdS side of the correspondence as stated here: WE ARE NOT GOING TO SPECIFY THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN ADS, WE LEAVE THIS INTERESTING PROBLEM FOR THE FUTURE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The predictions offered were not checked.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the status of the paper&#x27;s predictions: WE CAN MAKE VERY NONTRIVIAL PREDICTIONS (THOUGH WE WERE NOT ABLE TO CHECK THEM)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The numerical mismatch between black hole entropy and the perturbative Yang-Mills calculation is unresolved.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the entropy comparison specifically: IT IS EXPECTED THAT LARGE g_YM EFFECTS CHANGE THIS NUMERICAL FACTOR, THIS PROBLEM REMAINS UNSOLVED</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The lower-supersymmetry cases are treated sketchily and incompletely understood by the author.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the lower-supersymmetry cases: THERE ARE SEVERAL DETAILS OF THE CONFORMAL FIELD THEORIES INVOLVED WHICH I DO NOT COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A necessary condition of the five-dimensional black string conjecture is left open.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the five-dimensional black string conjecture: IT IS NOT CLEAR TO ME WHETHER THIS IS TRUE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The Reissner-Nordstrom section contains an unresolved puzzle.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the Reissner-Nordstrom section: IT IS MORE SKETCHY AND CONTAINS AN UNRESOLVED PUZZLE, SO THE READER WILL NOT MISS MUCH IF HE SKIPS IT</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The programme as a whole is preliminary.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the programme as a whole: WE ARE ONLY SCRATCHING THE SURFACE AND THERE ARE MANY THINGS TO BE WORKED OUT</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A published statement by others is flagged as needing caution, with the geometric reason given.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the cited U-duality between the AdS spacetime and the full black hole solution: this paper says that statement should be taken with caution, because in those cases the spacetime has identifications on circles that are becoming null</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A distinction the author states is the correct one is then deliberately not made anywhere in the rest of the paper.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the group-theoretic statements in this paper: the author notes the representation includes spinor objects so the group should be SU(4), and states that this and similar distinctions are not made in what follows</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper">
        <label>conformal field theory</label>
        <term>conformal field theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper">
        <label>string theory</label>
        <term>string theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>supergravity</label>
        <term>supergravity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>near horizon geometry</label>
        <term>near horizon geometry</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the central result - AS A CONJECTURE, and one whose statement requires boundary conditions that are called suitable without being given: the author&#x27;s word is conjecture, not correspondence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>trust - THE PAPER&#x27;S EPISTEMIC VERB, and it never appears without a range: a solution is not valid or proved but trusted, and trusted only as long as a stated condition holds</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the duality - ASYMMETRIC IN WHAT CAN BE COMPUTED: the regime where one side becomes untrustworthy is exactly the regime where the other can be trusted, which is what makes the pairing useful</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → string theory and conformal field theory</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → ref. [1], the finite-temperature study of the NS fivebrane theory</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the calculations for the 1D+5D system in refs [39, 53, 54]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED (RETRACTED AND RE-ADDED WITH THE IMPORTED DESCRIPTION REMOVED) · extends → the matrix model of ref. [61], which proposed the large N limit of D0 brane quantum mechanics as a definition of eleven dimensional M-theory</label>
        <note>WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED: RETRACTED AND RE-ADDED WITH THE IMPORTED DESCRIPTION REMOVED. The target described ref [61] as &#x27;WHICH PROPOSED THE LARGE N LIMIT OF D0 BRANE QUANTUM MECHANICS AS A DEFINITION OF ELEVEN DIMENSIONAL M-THEORY&#x27;. That is TRUE of ref [61] and this paper never says it; the span says only that JV is not the momentum along a compact direction. Being true is what made it hard to see - the same fault as putting the CO2/C mass ratio in a tag.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → the matrix model of ref. [61]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>supergravity —part-of→ conformal field theory</label>
        <term>supergravity</term>
        <term>conformal field theory</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says the large N limit of certain CFTs includes a sector describing supergravity; part-of is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>32 — maximal supersymmetry fixing the probe action</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>(0,2) — six-dimensional theory dual to AdS7 x S4</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the large N limit of certain CFTs contains supergravity in its Hilbert space</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>M/string theory on Anti-deSitter backgrounds is conjectured dual to conformal field theories</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the correspondence is a strong-weak coupling correspondence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>for small g and large N, the Yang-Mills theory is predicted to contain strings</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>N</label>
        <term>N</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>U</label>
        <term>U</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>gN</label>
        <term>gN</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>superconformal group</label>
        <term>superconformal group</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>decoupling limit</label>
        <term>decoupling limit</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>R-symmetry</label>
        <term>R-symmetry</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
