<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Conscious and Unconscious Perception: Experiments on Visual Masking and Word Recognition</title>
        <author>Anthony J. Marcel</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Conscious and Unconscious Perception: Experiments on Visual Masking and Word Recognition</title>
          <date>1983</date>
          <publisher>Cognitive Psychology</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1016/0010-0285(83)90009-9</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">marcel1983-masked-priming</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">marcel1983-masked-priming.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">e9e5d252239fa8761908b4fdcfe8e836c03fd8ac</note>
          <note type="rights">personal-copy</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>cognitive-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>semantic processing of pattern-masked words without awareness</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The null effect of repetition on the semantics of forced guesses may reflect an insensitive measure rather than a real absence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The reported phenomena may depend on unexplored experimental factors, since some replication attempts failed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Conclusions comparing graphic and semantic judgements rest on an unverified assumption that the two similarity scales are equivalent</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>thirty-six EXTRA pairs used for practice, distributed in the same proportions as the experimental pairs</label>
        <note>eliminates: that practice on an unrepresentative set biases the strategy subjects bring to the experiment · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>ninety practice trials before each experimental session</label>
        <note>eliminates: that performance early in a session reflects unfamiliarity with the procedure · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>detection</label>
        <term>detection</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>semantic judgments</label>
        <term>semantic judgments</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>masking</label>
        <term>masking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>iconic memory</label>
        <term>iconic memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Central Masking</label>
        <term>Central Masking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Peripheral masking</label>
        <term>Peripheral masking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>pattern-masking</label>
        <term>pattern-masking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>energy-masking</label>
        <term>energy-masking</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE ORDERING RESULT, AND IT RUNS THE WRONG WAY FOR THE STANDARD ACCOUNT: `Quotation withheld` The received view was that masking interrupts the icon and that without the icon there is nothing left to analyse for meaning - which predicts semantic judgments failing first, or at latest with the rest. They are the most robust of the three. Three measures, one manipulation, a fixed order, and the order is the argument</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE CONTROL IS WHAT MAKES IT A DISSOCIATION RATHER THAN A FAILED MASK: `Quotation withheld` `They could not see it and were primed anyway` invites `then your mask did not work`. Marcel&#x27;s reply is a second mask that also abolishes awareness and also abolishes the priming - awareness held constant at zero, priming moved from 56 msec to 4. Compare erb2019 and eckstein2007 in this corpus: the same manoeuvre, thirty years later, still being reinvented</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE POSITION BEING OVERTURNED, STATED IN ITS OWN WORDS BEFORE IT IS DISMANTLED: `Quotation withheld` Worth holding as a record of what the field believed in 1983, and worth marking as a view the paper REJECTS - a triple built from this sentence would enter the graph asserting the opposite of the record&#x27;s finding, which is the fault I dropped an edge for on eckstein2007 this afternoon</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`Central Masking` / `Peripheral masking` - DISTINGUISHED BY AN ENUMERATION OF PROPERTIES, NOT BY A DEFINITION. `Several characteristics distinguish Peripheral and Central Masking` - then four contrasts run in parallel across the two, and the pair is never given a mechanism. The dichoptic test is the one that separates them cleanly: Central `is possible both monoptically and dichoptically`, Peripheral `cannot be obtained dichoptically`.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>`pattern-masking` / `energy-masking` - TWO PROCEDURES THAT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE, AND THE PAPER USES THE DIFFERENCE TO EXPLAIN A LITERATURE. `Quotation withheld`. The second clause is a NULL RESULT about a method, which is why the edge below is a contrast and not a causal claim.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Wickens (1972)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Turvey&#x27;s (1973) distinction between Peripheral and Central Masking</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Shallice (1972) and Morton (1970, 1979a)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>detection —distinct-from→ semantic judgments</label>
        <term>detection</term>
        <term>semantic judgments</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: A DISSOCIATION STATED AS AN ORDERING, WHICH IS STRONGER THAN A DIFFERENCE. Not &#x27;semantic judgments were better&#x27; - a fixed sequence in which the three measures fail as one parameter is turned down. Weight 0.95: both endpoints are named as words, the sentence is a result rather than a framing, and the relation asserted is exactly distinctness - if detection and semantic judgment drew on one representation they could not come apart in a repeatable order. This is the rare case where the sentence carrying the mechanism also carries the edge, and it does so because the author chose to state the finding as a list of three named measures.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span gives the order in which judgments fail as SOA is reduced; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Central Masking —distinct-from→ Peripheral masking</label>
        <term>Central Masking</term>
        <term>Peripheral masking</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: &#x27;Several characteristics distinguish&#x27; - asserted outright and then itemised four ways, so weight 1.0.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>pattern-masking —contrasted-with→ energy-masking</label>
        <term>pattern-masking</term>
        <term>energy-masking</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1 · note: NOT typed &#x27;causes&#x27;. The clause about energy-masking is a FAILURE to produce an effect - &#x27;fails to produce unconscious priming effects&#x27; - and a null result is not a causal relation. The contrast is what the paper asserts; the null sits in this note where it cannot be read as a mechanism.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>chi-square</label>
        <term>chi-square</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>false-discovery-rate</label>
        <term>false-discovery-rate</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>hypothesis-testing</label>
        <term>hypothesis-testing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p-value</label>
        <term>p-value</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>statistical-significance</label>
        <term>statistical-significance</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variance</label>
        <term>variance</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90009-9.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
