<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Detection theory and psychophysics</title>
        <author>Marill</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Detection theory and psychophysics</title>
          <date>1956</date>
          <publisher></publisher>
          
          
          <idno type="record">marill1956-detection-theory-and-psychophysics</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">marill1956-detection-theory-and-psychophysics.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">60621f6ee5af993eef4eaf16bc7b28d649dde324</note>
          <note type="rights">open-access</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>psychophysics</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>auditory signal detection in gaussian noise</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A bandpass filter in the auditory system whose passband is about 13.5 db wider than the ideal filter admits proportionally more noise power, so the detector behaves exactly like the ideal detector but requires a correspondingly higher signal-to-noise ratio.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>When two signal components fall in non-overlapping auditory filters, the two filter outputs are statistically independent, so the two detectors&#x27; decisions are independent as well.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A decision based on the signs of two independent detector outputs can never beat the better single detector, which is why the 500+1100 cps signal is only as detectable as its more detectable component.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The theoretical curves were fitted to the data by eye rather than by a least-squares procedure.</label>
        <note>what this limits: every parameter read off the theoretical curves: THE CURVES WERE FITTED BY EYE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The displacement values are only as accurate as the report&#x27;s noise spectrum-level measurements, themselves accurate to about 0.8 dB.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the displacement values: THESE VALUES ARE, OF COURSE, ONLY AS ACCURATE AS OUR NOISE SPECTRUM-LEVEL MEASUREMENTS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A planned statistical analysis, for which the number of runs per signal had been deliberately varied, was never completed.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the statistical analysis the design was built for: THIS ANALYSIS PROVED MORE LENGTHY THAN REWARDING AND WAS ABANDONED - the runs per signal were varied to support a result the paper does not contain</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The zero point of the sensitivity scale is set arbitrarily, because the scale itself is stated to be unknown and abstract.</label>
        <note>what this limits: a d&#x27; value as an absolute quantity: the paper states the scale is unknown and abstract and its zero is set arbitrarily</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Fixing the variance at one is described as choosing a unit of measurement, not as an empirical finding.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the unit-variance assumption as a property of the observer: the paper says it is a choice of measurement unit on an arbitrary scale</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The definition of the detection situation is stipulated for this report, with the author noting other formulations are possible.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the detection situation as a standard construct: the report stipulates one of several possible formulations for its own use</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Only some of the weaknesses identified in the existing models are claimed to be removed.</label>
        <note>what this limits: detection theory as resolving the criticisms of earlier models: the abstract claims only some weaknesses are eliminable</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The goodness-of-fit test used is stated to be inapplicable when the data points are not equally spaced.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the fit test on unequally spaced data: the report says makeshift repairs may be needed or the test considered inapplicable</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Introducing catch-trials turns the psychophysical experiment into a detection situation, so the whole apparatus of detection theory can be applied to psychophysical problems.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The likelihood-ratio distribution functions already computed for signals in uniform gaussian noise are taken over directly to derive the psychophysical function for a human listener.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The sampling theorem is imported so that a band-limited receiver input over an interval can be represented as a finite set of 2TW random variables.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>every measurement replicated on each of two subjects, HF and PFL</label>
        <note>eliminates: an idiosyncrasy of one observer&#x27;s hearing standing in for a general detection result - two subjects is small, and replicating everything on both is what the paper can say · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>d&#x27;</label>
        <term>d&#x27;</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>detectability</label>
        <term>detectability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>detection situation</label>
        <term>detection situation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper">
        <label>forced-choice method</label>
        <term>forced-choice method</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper">
        <label>detection theory</label>
        <term>detection theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>traditional psychophysical models</label>
        <term>traditional psychophysical models</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>subject&#x27;s criterion</label>
        <term>subject&#x27;s criterion</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>detectors</label>
        <term>detectors</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>value</label>
        <term>value</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>forced-choice → yes-no</label>
        <note>PROVED INDISTINGUISHABLE - the FORMAL form / The strongest version of the claim we cannot express: not &#x27;we could not tell them apart&#x27; but &#x27;they cannot be told apart&#x27;, established by argument and holding for a whole class of methods. THE CASE THAT JOINS THE TWO GAPS. &#x27;do not differ at all as far as the fundamental theorem is concerned&#x27; is a non-difference SCOPED TO A NAMED RESPECT. We cannot say a relation fails, and we cannot say what a relation is relative to; this one clause needs both. If differs in is built, design against this sentence.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>detectors → the paper&#x27;s own definition of detection</label>
        <note>A METALINGUISTIC SELF-CAUTION, AND THE VOCABULARY HAS NO TYPE FOR A CLAIM ABOUT A WORD. `Quotation withheld` The author uses a term his own definition forbids and says so. The relation is not between two concepts in the paper - it is between A USAGE and THE DEFINITION THAT USAGE VIOLATES. I first wrote `detectors --distinct-from--&gt; value` and the gate refused it for want of a differentiation cue, correctly: those two are not comparable things, and the edge was a bad rendering of a real observation. The observation survives here; the edge does not. Note that the term reaches signal-detection engineering with the caution stripped off. Reached 2026-08-26 by the project.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>d&#x27; - a sensitivity measure on an unknown abstract scale, whose zero point is assigned by convention rather than measured</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>detectability - the name given to the probability of a correct response, not to a property of the observer alone</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>threshold - a momentary quantity treated as a random variable, taking a different value on each trial</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`the subject&#x27;s criterion` - A NAME THAT MAKES A PREDICTION, AND THE PAPER SAYS SO AS IT COINS IT. `the central-tendency term, c, is called &quot;the subject&#x27;s criterion.&quot; This suggests a &quot;psychological&quot; quantity which may, as psychological quantities sometimes do, change its value from psychophysical experiment to experiment.` The name is a parameter of a model; calling it the subject&#x27;s turns a fitted constant into a property of a person, and the paper flags the consequence rather than the word.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>`detectors` - THE AUTHOR USES A WORD HIS OWN DEFINITION FORBIDS, AND LABELS IT AS LOOSE. `Quotation withheld` Detection is defined in this paper through payoff, and a machine has no payoffs. The term survives into signal-detection engineering with the caution stripped off - which is the ordinary fate of a hedged coinage. NO EDGE PROPOSED. The natural endpoints would be `detectors` and `organisms`, and the gate refused `detectors --distinct-from--&gt; value` for want of a differentiation cue - correctly, since those two are not comparable things. The claim is metalinguistic (a word is being used loosely), and the sense layer is where a claim about a word belongs.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>`value` - A TECHNICAL TERM PINNED BY AN EVERYDAY ANALOGY INSTEAD OF A DEFINITION. `Quotation withheld` No utility function, no axioms - an appeal to shared usage, in a paper that is otherwise formal to the point of listing its notation. The looseness is deliberate and local.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Tanner and Swets&#x27; model and traditional threshold/criterion psychophysical models</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Peterson and Birdsall (15)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Fletcher&#x27;s critical-band theory</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>detection theory —contrasted-with→ traditional psychophysical models</label>
        <term>detection theory</term>
        <term>traditional psychophysical models</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says weaknesses of the traditional models are eliminable by detection theory; contrasted-with is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>least squares</label>
        <term>least squares</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>proportion of variance explained</label>
        <term>proportion of variance explained</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The subjects were not ideal detectors.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Once the ideal-detector curve was shifted rightward by a single constant, it fitted the observed psychophysical functions closely, accounting for 99.3 per cent of the variance in the best case and 97.3 per cent in the worst.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Apart from a constant loss of about 13.5 db in sensitivity, the subjects&#x27; detection behaviour matched the ideal detector&#x27;s predicted psychophysical function for pure tones.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>For two-component signals at 1060 and 1100 cps, detectability was set by the total energy of the signal, exactly as for the ideal detector, and the energy-summation prediction accounted for 96.5 per cent of the observed variance.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>For the 500+1100 cps signals the energy-summation prediction accounted for only 25 per cent of the variance.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Predicting the 500+1100 cps two-tone detectability from the better single component alone accounted for 93.5 per cent of the variance and a t-test found no difference between that component&#x27;s detectability and the two-tone detectability.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Two-component signals at 500 and 540 cps fell between the two extremes, with the energy-summation prediction accounting for 73.6 per cent of the variance.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>For the 1060/1100 and 500/540 pairs, adding the weaker component raised the detectability of the whole signal above that of the stronger component alone, a difference that was highly significant.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The 13.5 db loss cannot be internal noise adding linearly to external noise, because detection accuracy stays constant whenever the external signal-to-noise ratio is constant, no matter how loud the noise.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Auditory filters near 1100 cps have wider bandwidths than those near 500 cps.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>detectability</label>
        <term>detectability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ideal detector</label>
        <term>ideal detector</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>symmetrical payoff matrix</label>
        <term>symmetrical payoff matrix</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>two-category forced-choice method</label>
        <term>two-category forced-choice method</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>uniform gaussian noise</label>
        <term>uniform gaussian noise</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>equivalent rectangular bandwidth</label>
        <term>equivalent rectangular bandwidth</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>detectability</label>
        <term>detectability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>13 db — how much less sensitive the subjects were than the ideal detector, as stated in the abstract</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>75 per cent at r = 1.4 — accuracy of the ideal detector at a signal-energy to noise-spectrum-level ratio of 1.4</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>99.3 / 97.3 per cent — variance in the psychophysical data accounted for by the best- and worst-fitting displaced ideal-detector curves</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>96. 5 per cent — variance in observed two-tone detectability (1060+1100 cps) accounted for by the total-energy prediction</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>73. 6 per cent — variance accounted for by the total-energy prediction for the 500+540 cps pair</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>25 per cent — variance accounted for by the total-energy prediction for the 500+1100 cps pair</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>93.5 per cent — variance accounted for when the 500+1100 cps two-tone detectability is predicted from the more detectable component alone</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>61 — total number of signals whose detectability was measured</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>810 — total number of experimental runs made</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>two — subjects, both male MIT students, on whom all measurements were replicated</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>180 trials / 10 minutes — length of a single run, each trial lasting 3 1/3 seconds</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>-66 db — measured noise spectrum-level near 500 and 1100 cps, accurate to about 0.8 db</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at .</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
