<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Facilitation in Recognizing Pairs of Words: Evidence of a Dependence Between Retrieval Operations</title>
        <author>David E. Meyer</author>
        <author>Roger W. Schvaneveldt</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Facilitation in Recognizing Pairs of Words: Evidence of a Dependence Between Retrieval Operations</title>
          <date>1971</date>
          <publisher>Journal of Experimental Psychology</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1037/h0031564</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">meyer1971-lexical</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">meyer1971-lexical.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">fc347daec3fb4ddca05a2f2b08601483b5a7ec47</note>
          <note type="rights">personal-copy</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>cognitive-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>associative priming in lexical decision</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>The data cannot decide between the spreading-excitation and location-shifting accounts of the dependence.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>The authors have no way to test all candidate explanations of the association effect.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>Experiment II&#x27;s reaction times cannot directly test the serial-decision model.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>half of the practice and test trials required a &#x27;yes&#x27; response</label>
        <note>eliminates: that a reaction-time difference is a response bias - subjects favouring one key because it is used more often · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>each subject was randomly assigned one of the lists in one of the orders, so that every list-order combination was used exactly once</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the effect depends on a particular list or a particular presentation order · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>lexical decision</label>
        <term>lexical decision</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>association</label>
        <term>association</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>dependence</label>
        <term>dependence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>spreading excitation</label>
        <term>spreading excitation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>location shifting</label>
        <term>location shifting</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE FIRST MEASUREMENT OF THE EFFECT, WITH ITS ERROR BAR: `Quotation withheld (1, 11) = 20.6, p &lt; .001.` Two strings shown at once, one above the other, decide whether both are words. There is no prime and no target - the design is simultaneous and symmetric, which is worth holding onto, because everything downstream assumes a sequence and an asymmetry that this experiment did not have</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE PAPER DECLINES THE INFERENCE ITS OWN NAME WOULD LATER REST ON: `Quotation withheld.` The founding result of semantic priming, and its authors say in the discussion that it does not establish semantic retrieval. The word `semantic` in `semantic priming` is a claim this sentence explicitly withholds - and the withholding is not hedging, it is followed by a worked alternative in which association affects RT through the organisation of memory locations rather than through meaning</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>TWO MECHANISMS, NO TEST, AND THE PAPER SAYS SO RATHER THAN PICKING: `Quotation withheld.` It then does something better than choosing - it asks what survives the choice: `Quotation withheld.` The result is stated at the level the data supports and the mechanism is left open, which is exactly what neely1977 spends 28 pages building an experiment to settle six years later</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>AND THE LIMITATION IS STATED IN ONE FLAT SENTENCE WITH NO SOFTENING: `Quotation withheld.` No `future work will`, no `it remains to be seen`. This corpus has 539 records and I have read few limitation sentences this short - and it belongs to the paper that started the literature, which is the opposite of the order one would expect confidence to arrive in</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>contradicts → Schaeffer and Wallace (1969, 1970)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>builds-on → Meyer (1971)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>spreading excitation —distinct-from→ location shifting</label>
        <term>spreading excitation</term>
        <term>location shifting</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: THE EDGE IS CARRIED BY A LIST, WHICH IS WHY IT IS 0.85 AND NOT HIGHER. The sentence that draws the contrast explicitly - &#x27;the present data…&#x27; - writes both names hyphenated, and the concept nodes are the unhyphenated forms. So the triple is built from the sentence that lists them as alternatives instead. Distinctness is genuinely asserted there - &#x27;regardless of whether X, Y, Z, or some other process&#x27; only makes sense if they are different processes - but it is asserted in passing, on the way to saying the effect survives the question. The stronger sentence exists; a hyphen keeps it out, exactly as a plural kept the logogen edge out of neely1977 an hour ago. Two edges lost to orthography in one evening is worth recording as a pattern rather than as two accidents.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span lists spreading excitation and location shifting as alternative processes; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>semantic priming: associated word pairs are recognized faster than unassociated pairs</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the association effect is consistent and sizeable across subjects</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>association</label>
        <term>association</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>p-value</label>
        <term>p-value</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>standard-error</label>
        <term>standard-error</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>statistical-significance</label>
        <term>statistical-significance</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031564.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
