<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Money Priming Can Change People’s Thoughts, Feelings, Motivations, and Behaviors: An Update on 10 Years of Experiments</title>
        <author>Kathleen D. Vohs</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Money Priming Can Change People’s Thoughts, Feelings, Motivations, and Behaviors: An Update on 10 Years of Experiments</title>
          <date>2013</date>
          <publisher></publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1037/xge0000091</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">money2013-money-priming-can-change-people-s</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">money2013-money-priming-can-change-people-s.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">5c6f1c024bfb462c46c8e08da5040c11c151c2e6</note>
          <note type="rights">personal-copy</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>social-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>money priming</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Priming works by supplying an interpretation for an ambiguous outcome situation, so the more constrained and unambiguous the outcome, the less room the prime has to shift the response and the smaller the effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Frequent real-world contact with money keeps the concept chronically accessible, so that even subtle cues suffice to activate it and change behaviour</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Money cues set two opposing forces in motion - one routing from money to free markets to endorsement of the systems supporting them, the other routing from money to personal agency and self-sufficiency, which removes the need to endorse those systems - and the two cancel</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Money primes act by activating the phenomenological self as an owner of money, which is why primes tying money to the participant personally produce parallel and stronger effects</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The review is explicitly partial: it does not cover the full body of money-priming experiments.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The author&#x27;s own proposed mediator (independence/interdependence) was only weakly supported.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The originally hypothesised mechanism, feelings of power, was not supported by the authors&#x27; own measurements.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the paper claims the subject of money has been left to economists and argues that the psychological side of it explains events economics could not</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>money priming</label>
        <term>money priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>ambiguity</label>
        <term>ambiguity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>priming effect</label>
        <term>priming effect</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>accessibility</label>
        <term>accessibility</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>system justification</label>
        <term>system justification</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A THEORY OF WHEN PRIMING WORKS AT ALL, OFFERED IN REPLY TO A FAILED REPLICATION. `Variations in a prime&#x27;s meaning, the ease with which primed content comes to mind, the prime&#x27;s motivational importance, and the ambiguity of the outcome situation influence the impact of the prime.` Four moderators, stated in the abstract of a paper whose third sentence is that Rohrer, Pashler and Harris failed to replicate. The provenance matters as much as the content: these are conditions named AFTER a null, which is the weakest position from which to name them and also the position in which the field most needs them named</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AMBIGUITY OF THE OUTCOME IS OFFERED AS THE REASON COGNITIVE PRIMING EFFECTS ARE SMALLER THAN SOCIAL ONES, WHICH INVERTS THE USUAL READING. `Quotation withheld.` The usual account of that same effect-size gap is that social priming effects are inflated. This says they are large because the outcome is loose - a property of the MEASURE, not of the phenomenon - and it makes the gap a prediction rather than an embarrassment. Both readings fit the same numbers, and this corpus holds papers from both sides of the gap</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND IT IS FALSIFIABLE, WITH THE TEST SUPPLIED: `Quotation withheld.` The same outcome task was given two NAMES - Kay et al. (2004) called it either a bland `situation` or a `community game` - and `business priming led to more competitive behaviors than neutral primes when the task was blandly called a situation, there was no effect of prime condition when the task was called the community game`. Ambiguity manipulated by renaming, with a null in the constrained arm. That is a much stronger form of the claim than a post-hoc moderator, and it is the paper&#x27;s best evidence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN SUMMARY OF 165 EXPERIMENTS IS TWO EFFECTS, BOTH STATED AS DIRECTIONS RATHER THAN SIZES: people reminded of money `are less interpersonally attuned. They are not prosocial, caring, or warm. They eschew interdependence.` And they `shift into professional, business, and work mentality. Quotation withheld` A count that large (`165 to date, from 18 countries`) with no pooled effect size is itself a fact about the literature - the defence is breadth of replication rather than magnitude</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Caruso, Vohs, Baxter, and Waytz (2013)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Rohrer, Pashler, and Harris (2015)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>ambiguity —causes→ priming effect</label>
        <term>ambiguity</term>
        <term>priming effect</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: THE DIRECTION IS STATED AS ITS CONTRAPOSITIVE - less room, smaller effect - and the axis quote carries it that way rather than being paraphrased into the positive form. Weight 0.85: the first clause is cited to Higgins &amp; Brendl and Loersch &amp; Payne rather than demonstrated here, and this paper&#x27;s own status is a reply to a null. The Kay et al. manipulation is the evidence, and it is in the senses.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but attributed: the span cites Higgins &amp; Brendl and Loersch &amp; Payne for ambiguity determining priming effects.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>effect size (Cohen&#x27;s d)</label>
        <term>effect size (Cohen&#x27;s d)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>sample size</label>
        <term>sample size</term>
        <note>about this quote: THE QUOTE STOPS WHERE THE EXTRACTED TEXT IS INTERRUPTED: after its last word the text runs into the publisher&#x27;s copyright line - the quote&#x27;s last word, &#x27;This&#x27;, is that line&#x27;s first word (&#x27;This document is copyrighted…&#x27;), so the words that completed the sentence are not continuous with it and are not quoted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The 165 money-priming experiments from 18 countries point to at least two major effects.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>People reminded of money are less interpersonally attuned than after neutral primes.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>People reminded of money work harder on difficult tasks, perform better on objective outcomes, and report feeling efficacious.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Feelings of power were tested repeatedly as the explanation for money-priming effects and were not supported: money primes did not change measured power.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The independence-interdependence self-construal account fared only marginally better: scores moved in the predicted direction but only weakly.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>People reminded of new money make more moral decisions and seek fairness, compared with used money or neutral primes.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Cash cues heighten sensitivity to costs: more attention to price and less desire to spend.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>College students, working adults, managers and children as young as 4 show similar effects.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Different delivery methods for the money prime - images, physical handling, even play money - yield comparable effects.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Withdrawing cash from a machine reduced helpfulness more than walking past a cash dispenser.</label>
        <note>WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: studies in France showed - THE SUBJECT OF THIS RESULT IS AN INDEFINITE STUDY, NOT THIS PAPER. &#x27;Previous studies reported&#x27;, &#x27;studies in guinea pig showed&#x27;, &#x27;recent studies have reported&#x27; - somebody else&#x27;s work under a common noun rather than a name, with a citation in the sentence and no first-person marker. The quote is verbatim and the claim is true; only the attribution is wrong. FOUND BY MEASURING MY OWN CUE&#x27;S RECALL: the first sweep required a NAMED author as the subject (&#x27;Sperling (1960) demonstrated&#x27;) and found 17. Reading eleven citation-bearing findings on &#x27;Plakke2016&#x27; by hand showed four the cue could not see - &#x27;A study examining recognition found&#x27;, &#x27;studies of typical human subjects have demonstrated&#x27;, &#x27;A follow up study found&#x27; - so the named cue&#x27;s 17 was a floor and not a count. A CUE&#x27;S FALSE POSITIVES TELL YOU NOTHING ABOUT ITS FALSE NEGATIVES, and the only way to find these was to read a record&#x27;s whole layer.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The proposed reason the Caruso et al. system-justification result failed to replicate is that money priming induces self-sufficiency, which works against the defensive motive that normally drives system justification.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>exchange mentality</label>
        <term>exchange mentality</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>low control</label>
        <term>low control</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>independence</label>
        <term>independence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>interdependence</label>
        <term>interdependence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>feelings of power</label>
        <term>feelings of power</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ambiguity of the outcome situation</label>
        <term>ambiguity of the outcome situation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>accessibility</label>
        <term>accessibility</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>motivational relevance</label>
        <term>motivational relevance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>165 — total number of money-priming experiments counted to date, run in 18 countries</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>200% — increase in intended donations produced by a credit card prime relative to no prime</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>113% — increase in bids in a real binding auction for a credit card prime versus a cash prime</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000091.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
