<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The Structure and Function of Complex Networks</title>
        <author>M. E. J. Newman</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The Structure and Function of Complex Networks</title>
          <date>2003</date>
          <publisher>SIAM Review / arXiv</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1137/S003614450342480</idno>
          <idno type="arXiv">cond-mat/0303516</idno>
          <idno type="record">newman2003-complex-networks</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">newman2003-complex-networks.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">e7dd29ebf2f8abce31efe6baeb0016b3a910aea4</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>network-science</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>structure and function of complex networks</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>generative network models - random graphs and growth with preferential attachment - reproduce the observed structure of real networks (skewed degree distributions, small-world, clustering)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the crucial theoretical developments in the field remain open</label>
        <note>what this limits: the theoretical claims of the review: IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN WHAT THE CRUCIAL THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE IN THIS AREA</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The review acknowledges that the study of networks is incomplete and that only some of the described network variants are covered by the work it reviews.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the coverage of the survey: THE STUDY OF NETWORKS IS BY NO MEANS A COMPLETE SCIENCE YET, AND MANY OF THE POSSIBILITIES HAVE YET TO BE EXPLORED IN DEPTH</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The field reviewed has no systematic programme for characterising network structure, so the measures surveyed may not be the important ones.</label>
        <note>what this limits: every structural measure surveyed: WE DO NOT YET, AS WE DO IN SOME OTHER FIELDS, HAVE A SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM FOR CHARACTERIZING NETWORK STRUCTURE - the measures are ad hoc by the review&#x27;s own account</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Little can be reported on the third aim of the field - the effect of structure on system behaviour - because that work is only beginning.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any structure-to-behaviour claim: STUDIES OF THE EFFECTS OF STRUCTURE ON SYSTEM BEHAVIOR ... ARE STILL IN THEIR INFANCY</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The review closes by stating that the whole subject it surveys is at an early stage.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the settledness of everything the review surveys: THE STUDY OF COMPLEX NETWORKS IS STILL IN ITS INFANCY</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The name in general use is stated to overreach: only the degree distribution is scale-free, while other properties of the same networks do have scales.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the term scale-free network as a description of the whole network: the review states only the degree distribution is scale-free and other properties usually do have scales</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Two different exponents for the same citation network were published by the same author: 2.5 to 3, then 3.04.</label>
        <note>what this limits: a published power-law exponent for a citation network: this review records the same author revising his own value in a later paper</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>building the study of complex networks on the foundation of mathematical graph theory, with statistical-physics methods</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>scale-free network</label>
        <term>scale-free network</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>degree distribution</label>
        <term>degree distribution</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>network</label>
        <term>network</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>clustering coefficient</label>
        <term>clustering coefficient</term>
        <note>about this quote: THE TERM IS NOT IN THE QUOTE - the quote&#x27;s &#x27;C&#x27; is the clustering coefficient, which the paper defines two paragraphs earlier (&#x27;defining a clustering coefficient C thus&#x27;). That definition is not quoted because the equation it introduces did not survive text extraction.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>connectivity</label>
        <term>connectivity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>assortative mixing</label>
        <term>assortative mixing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>homophily</label>
        <term>homophily</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>fraction of transitive triples</label>
        <term>fraction of transitive triples</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Vertex</label>
        <term>Vertex</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Edge</label>
        <term>Edge</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[14]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>network transitivity</label>
        <term>network transitivity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[15]" resp="#paper" cert="0.75">
        <label>site</label>
        <term>site</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[16]" resp="#paper" cert="0.75">
        <label>node</label>
        <term>node</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[17]" resp="#paper" cert="0.75">
        <label>actor</label>
        <term>actor</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[18]" resp="#paper" cert="0.75">
        <label>bond</label>
        <term>bond</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[19]" resp="#paper" cert="0.75">
        <label>link</label>
        <term>link</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[20]" resp="#paper" cert="0.75">
        <label>tie</label>
        <term>tie</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[21]" resp="#paper" cert="0.8">
        <label>clustering</label>
        <term>clustering</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>scale-free network - the term in general use, which the review says applies only to the degree distribution and not to the network&#x27;s other properties</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>network - the stipulated vocabulary of the review: a set of items called vertices, with connections between them called edges</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>`connectivity` - A NAME THIS REVIEW REFUSES, AND IT SAYS WHY: `Quotation withheld` A refusal grounded in COLLISION WITH A NEIGHBOURING FIELD rather than in the term being wrong - the new usage is intelligible and is declined because the word is already taken.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>`network density` - THE SAME WORDS NAMING A DIFFERENT QUANTITY BY FIELD: in sociology it names the LOCAL clustering coefficient Ci of a single vertex, which is what this passage records. Elsewhere `density` names the global edge count over possible edges. A reader who imports the sociological sense into the physics literature is reading a per-vertex quantity as a whole-graph one.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>`assortative mixing` / `homophily` / `assortative matching` - ONE PHENOMENON, THREE NAMES, AND THE REVIEW ATTRIBUTES EACH TO ITS FIELD: `called assortative mixing or homophily` in social networks and epidemiology, while `the term ASSORTATIVE MATCHING is also seen in THE ECOLOGY LITERATURE, particularly in reference to mate choice among animals`. The ecological name carries a narrower referent - mate choice - inside the same concept.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`clustering coefficient` / `fraction of transitive triples` - ONE QUANTITY, TWO FIELD-LOCAL NAMES, and the review is explicit that the DEFINITION is the same one: `The definition of C given here has been widely used in the sociology literature, where it is referred to as the “fraction of transitive triples”.` FILED AS A SENSE AND NOT AS A `renamed-across-fields` EDGE ON PURPOSE: the gate requires a renaming clause to contain BOTH names, and this one calls the physics-side quantity `C` rather than `clustering coefficient`. The only span naming both runs back through Eq. (3). A CLAUSE NAMING ONE NAME IS A DEFINITION, NOT A RENAMING - the gate is right, and the reading survives at the sense layer where it is grounded in what the sentence actually says.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`Vertex` / `site` / `node` / `actor` - ONE OBJECT, FOUR NAMES, AND THE PAPER PRINTS THE DISCIPLINE BESIDE EACH. `The fundamental unit of a network, also called a site (physics), a node (computer science), or an actor (sociology).` This is the corpus&#x27;s cleanest instance of renaming-across-fields: not reconstructed from two papers that never cite each other, but asserted in a glossary by an author who works in all three literatures. The same sentence does it AGAIN for `Edge` / `bond` / `link` / `tie`, with the same three fields in the same order.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="senses" ana="#senses[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>`clustering` - A NAME THAT COLLIDES INSIDE ITS OWN FIELD, AND THE PAPER SAYS SO WHILE USING IT. `Quotation withheld` The other meaning is community detection. The alias is not across fields - it is a collision WITHIN one, and the author records the ambiguity rather than resolving it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>qualifies → Barabási and Albert, preferential attachment</label>
        <note>differs in: WHICH NAME THE MODEL TRAVELS UNDER, AND THE REVIEW SAYS THE EARLIER ONE DID NOT: &#x27;The work of PRICE himself, however, is LARGELY UNKNOWN in the scientific community, and CUMULATIVE ADVANTAGE did not achieve currency as a model of network growth until its REDISCOVERY some decades later by Barabási and Albert, Quotation withheld.&#x27; One mechanism, two names, and the currency followed the second - so a search on either name finds only half the literature</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>contradicts → the preferential-attachment model as a model of the Web</label>
        <note>differs in: WHETHER THE MODEL&#x27;S OWN PREDICTION APPEARS IN THE DATA IT IS APPLIED TO. The model implies older vertices have higher degree; &#x27;This correlation between degree and age has been used by Adamic and Huberman to argue against the model as a model of the World Wide Web - Quotation withheld.&#x27; The refutation is of the model AS APPLIED TO THE WEB, not of the mechanism in general</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>reinterprets → Milgram&#x27;s small-world experiment</label>
        <note>differs in: WHAT THE SAME EXPERIMENT IS EVIDENCE FOR. &#x27;there is another conclusion that can be drawn from this experiment which Milgram apparently failed to notice; it was pointed out in 2000 by Kleinberg&#x27; - roughly three decades later. The finding was in the data the whole time and needed a different question asked of it, which is the strongest kind of case for a layer that records what a result was taken to show</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>scale-free network —operationalised-as→ degree distribution</label>
        <term>scale-free network</term>
        <term>degree distribution</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says only the degree distributions of such networks are scale-free; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>assortative mixing —same-as→ homophily</label>
        <term>assortative mixing</term>
        <term>homophily</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: &#x27;called assortative mixing OR homophily&#x27; - a bare disjunction, no hedge, and the review uses both terms interchangeably thereafter. · the relation stated: the review names them as alternatives for one another in the same clause</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Vertex —renamed-across-fields→ site</label>
        <term>Vertex</term>
        <term>site</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE PAPER NAMES THE DISCIPLINE ITSELF - &#x27;site (physics)&#x27; - so the field boundary is the paper&#x27;s claim, not our inference. &#x27;site&#x27; on its own is an ordinary English word; the discipline label is what makes this edge safe to traverse, and it lives here. · the relation stated: also called a site (physics)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Vertex —renamed-across-fields→ node</label>
        <term>Vertex</term>
        <term>node</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE PAPER NAMES THE DISCIPLINE ITSELF - &#x27;node (computer science)&#x27; - so the field boundary is the paper&#x27;s claim, not our inference. &#x27;node&#x27; on its own is an ordinary English word; the discipline label is what makes this edge safe to traverse, and it lives here. · the relation stated: also called a node (computer science)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Vertex —renamed-across-fields→ actor</label>
        <term>Vertex</term>
        <term>actor</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE PAPER NAMES THE DISCIPLINE ITSELF - &#x27;actor (sociology)&#x27; - so the field boundary is the paper&#x27;s claim, not our inference. &#x27;actor&#x27; on its own is an ordinary English word; the discipline label is what makes this edge safe to traverse, and it lives here. · the relation stated: also called a actor (sociology)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Edge —renamed-across-fields→ bond</label>
        <term>Edge</term>
        <term>bond</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE PAPER NAMES THE DISCIPLINE ITSELF - &#x27;bond (physics)&#x27; - so the field boundary is the paper&#x27;s claim, not our inference. &#x27;bond&#x27; on its own is an ordinary English word; the discipline label is what makes this edge safe to traverse, and it lives here. · the relation stated: also called a bond (physics)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Edge —renamed-across-fields→ link</label>
        <term>Edge</term>
        <term>link</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE PAPER NAMES THE DISCIPLINE ITSELF - &#x27;link (computer science)&#x27; - so the field boundary is the paper&#x27;s claim, not our inference. &#x27;link&#x27; on its own is an ordinary English word; the discipline label is what makes this edge safe to traverse, and it lives here. · the relation stated: also called a link (computer science)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Edge —renamed-across-fields→ tie</label>
        <term>Edge</term>
        <term>tie</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE PAPER NAMES THE DISCIPLINE ITSELF - &#x27;tie (sociology)&#x27; - so the field boundary is the paper&#x27;s claim, not our inference. &#x27;tie&#x27; on its own is an ordinary English word; the discipline label is what makes this edge safe to traverse, and it lives here. · the relation stated: also called a tie (sociology)</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>network transitivity —renamed-across-fields→ clustering</label>
        <term>network transitivity</term>
        <term>clustering</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: AN ALIAS THE PAPER SUPPLIES AND SIMULTANEOUSLY WARNS AGAINST: &#x27;although the latter…&#x27;. Weight 0.8, not 1.0 - &#x27;sometimes also called&#x27; is itself a hedge, and the paper is recording usage it does not endorse. · the relation stated: sometimes also called clustering
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says transitivity is &#x27;sometimes also called clustering&#x27;, a term with another meaning; renamed-across-fields is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A review of network science covering the small-world effect, degree distributions, clustering, network correlations, random graph models, models of growth and preferential attachment, and dynamical processes on networks.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Inspired by empirical studies of the Internet, social networks and biological networks, researchers have developed techniques and models to understand or predict the behavior of these systems.</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>network</label>
        <term>network</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>hypothesis-testing</label>
        <term>hypothesis-testing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>sample-size</label>
        <term>sample-size</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>statistical-significance</label>
        <term>statistical-significance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
