<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>How We Do Things with Words: Analyzing Text as Social and Cultural Data</title>
        <author>Dong Nguyen</author>
        <author>Maria Liakata</author>
        <author>Simon DeDeo</author>
        <author>Jacob Eisenstein</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>How We Do Things with Words: Analyzing Text as Social and Cultural Data</title>
          <date>2020</date>
          <publisher>Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence / arXiv</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.3389/frai.2020.00062</idno>
          <idno type="arXiv">1907.01468</idno>
          <idno type="record">nguyen2020-text-as-data</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">nguyen2020-text-as-data.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">acff3b3b1cb92251590ca039d0cd215e937f5421</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>digital-humanities</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>The research process itself - how a contested social or cultural concept travels from a question, through a definition and an operationalisation, to a measurement that can be validated.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>computational text analysis of social and cultural concepts</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>practice-report</label>
        <term>practice-report</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A concept must be narrowed from the full range of meanings it carries to the single formulation a study adopts, and those are two different objects with two different names</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Computation earns its place where patterns exist only in aggregate and are invisible in any single case</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Where there is no objective standard, accuracy against annotations measures consistency rather than correctness</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Inter-annotator reliability differs from accuracy in taking no coder as correct and discounting agreement expected by chance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Validation without a gold standard proceeds by sampling across the full range of scores and asking whether each case makes sense under the adopted definition</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Reading the texts beside the model output informs the model as much as the model informs the reading</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Annotator disagreement can be a property of the concept rather than a defect of the annotators, and can be carried forward instead of resolved</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A METHODS GUIDE THAT MAKES `FIND THE COMPETING DEFINITIONS` A REQUIRED STEP, IN A CHECKLIST: `Conceptualization: What is this all about? What are the core concepts you are addressing? And are you being true to their core meaning? What are competing definitions? Which is best suited to the task and why? Does the systematized concept you&#x27;ve selected reflect an adequate understanding of the background concept? How do domain experts approach the topic?` This is Adcock and Collier&#x27;s vocabulary turned into a procedure a researcher is told to follow before touching data - and it is the closest thing in the corpus to a specification of what this project does.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>operationalizing rich concepts computationally can raise conceptual-validity concerns and yield shallow conclusions</label>
        <note>what this limits: any computational operationalisation of a rich concept: it raises Quotation withheld</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The guidance is drawn from the authors&#x27; own experience and is explicitly acknowledged as imperfect.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the guidance this paper offers: OUR GUIDANCE IS BASED ON OUR OWN EXPERIENCES AND IS THEREFORE INHERENTLY IMPERFECT</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The proposed set of guiding questions is acknowledged to be incomplete.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the set of guiding questions: WE PROVIDE A SET OF QUESTIONS, THOUGH UNAVOIDABLY INCOMPLETE, THAT CAN SERVE AS A GUIDE FOR THINKING THROUGH CHALLENGES IN EACH STEP OF THE RESEARCH PROCESS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The authors position computational text analysis as an addition to, not a substitute for, other analytic approaches — i.e. it cannot answer such questions alone.</label>
        <note>what this limits: replacement of other methods, named as the use it does not support: COMPUTATIONAL TEXT ANALYSIS IS NOT A REPLACEMENT FOR BUT RATHER AN ADDITION TO THE APPROACHES ONE CAN TAKE TO ANALYZE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL PHENOMENA USING TEXTUAL DATA</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The guidance is offered as the authors&#x27; own experience and explicitly imperfect</label>
        <note>duplicate of: limitations[1] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1] - the guidance, from experience and INHERENTLY IMPERFECT</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>For social and cultural concepts there is no ground truth to appeal to, and definitions are contested and change</label>
        <note>what this limits: validation of any social or cultural concept measure: FOR SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CONCEPTS THERE IS NO ABSOLUTE GROUND TRUTH</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>An operationalisation is never a faithful rendering of the concept it stands for</label>
        <note>what this limits: every measured construct in the paper and the genre: OPERATIONALIZATIONS ARE NEVER PERFECT TRANSLATIONS, AND ARE OFTEN REFINED OVER THE COURSE OF AN INVESTIGATION</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Many of the concepts at issue cannot be observed at all, which is what makes validation hard rather than merely laborious</label>
        <note>what this limits: validation in the humanities and social sciences specifically: MANY RELEVANT CONCEPTS ARE FUNDAMENTALLY UNOBSERVABLE, SUCH AS LATENT TRAITS OF POLITICAL ACTORS - unlike tasks such as SPAM FILTERING</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Human labels are not neutral either - they carry the annotators&#x27; priors and perspectives</label>
        <note>what this limits: any human-labelled ground truth: WHEN THE GROUND TRUTH COMES FROM PEOPLE, IT MAY BE INFLUENCED BY IDEOLOGICAL PRIORS, PRIORS, PRIMING, SIMPLE DIFFERENCES OF OPINION OR PERSPECTIVE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The research process is presented linearly but is not, and later stages feed back into the question itself</label>
        <note>what this limits: the paper&#x27;s own linear presentation of the research process: THE RESEARCH PROCESS SOUNDS MORE OR LESS LINEAR THIS WAY, BUT EACH OF THESE PHASES OVERLAPS, AND IN SOME INSTANCES REQUIRES US TO RETURN TO PREVIOUS STEPS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A poor operationalisation does not merely add noise - it can produce conclusions that are shallow rather than wrong</label>
        <note>what this limits: conclusions drawn from an operationalisation: CHOICES REGARDING HOW TO OPERATIONALIZE AND ANALYZE THESE CONCEPTS CAN RAISE SERIOUS Quotation withheld</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Adcock and Collier&#x27;s background/systematized concept distinction and their notion of content validity, imported to discipline the conceptualization step of computational text analysis</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Close reading carried into computational work not as a rival but as a validation step that informs the model</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>ground truth</label>
        <term>ground truth</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>gold standard</label>
        <term>gold standard</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[20]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>hate speech</label>
        <term>hate speech</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[25]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>insight driven</label>
        <term>insight driven</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[26]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>automating tasks</label>
        <term>automating tasks</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[27]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Domain experts</label>
        <term>Domain experts</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[28]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>dual use</label>
        <term>dual use</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[29]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Born-digital data</label>
        <term>Born-digital data</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[30]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>unobtrusive measurements</label>
        <term>unobtrusive measurements</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[31]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>privacy</label>
        <term>privacy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[32]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>provenance</label>
        <term>provenance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[33]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>black box APIs</label>
        <term>black box APIs</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[34]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>data biases</label>
        <term>data biases</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[35]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>spurious results</label>
        <term>spurious results</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[36]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>generalizability</label>
        <term>generalizability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[37]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>“comparison” set</label>
        <term>“comparison” set</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[38]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>matching design</label>
        <term>matching design</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[39]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>control group</label>
        <term>control group</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[40]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>counterfactual scenario</label>
        <term>counterfactual scenario</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[41]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>metadata</label>
        <term>metadata</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[42]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Discretization</label>
        <term>Discretization</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[43]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>classification scheme</label>
        <term>classification scheme</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[44]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Supervised learning</label>
        <term>Supervised learning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[45]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>unsupervised learning</label>
        <term>unsupervised learning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[46]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>natural structure</label>
        <term>natural structure</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[47]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>unit of text</label>
        <term>unit of text</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[48]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>unit of analysis</label>
        <term>unit of analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[49]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>interpretability</label>
        <term>interpretability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[50]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>human coders</label>
        <term>human coders</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[51]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>annotation examples</label>
        <term>annotation examples</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[52]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>expert annotators</label>
        <term>expert annotators</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[53]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>intra -annotator agreement</label>
        <term>intra -annotator agreement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[54]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Disagreement between annotators</label>
        <term>Disagreement between annotators</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[55]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>racial bias</label>
        <term>racial bias</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[56]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>pre-processing steps</label>
        <term>pre-processing steps</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[57]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>OCR errors</label>
        <term>OCR errors</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[58]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Tokenization</label>
        <term>Tokenization</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[59]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Multi-word terms</label>
        <term>Multi-word terms</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[60]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>normalization</label>
        <term>normalization</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[61]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>word pieces</label>
        <term>word pieces</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[62]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>stoplist</label>
        <term>stoplist</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[63]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Dictionaries</label>
        <term>Dictionaries</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[64]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>domain-specific dictionaries</label>
        <term>domain-specific dictionaries</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[65]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>spurious features</label>
        <term>spurious features</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[66]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>post-hoc explanations</label>
        <term>post-hoc explanations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[67]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Topic models</label>
        <term>Topic models</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[68]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>number of topics</label>
        <term>number of topics</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[69]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>stratified random sample</label>
        <term>stratified random sample</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[70]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>synthetic data</label>
        <term>synthetic data</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[71]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>explanatory power</label>
        <term>explanatory power</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[72]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>predictive performance</label>
        <term>predictive performance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[73]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>opportunities for interpretation</label>
        <term>opportunities for interpretation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[74]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>qualitative analyses</label>
        <term>qualitative analyses</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[75]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>working across disciplines</label>
        <term>working across disciplines</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[76]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>qualitative insights</label>
        <term>qualitative insights</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[77]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>reliable results</label>
        <term>reliable results</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[78]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>reproducibility efforts</label>
        <term>reproducibility efforts</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[79]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>needs of the user</label>
        <term>needs of the user</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[80]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Computational text analysis</label>
        <term>Computational text analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[81]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>models that are already somewhat interpretable</label>
        <term>models that are already somewhat interpretable</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Born-digital data → unobtrusive measurements</label>
        <note>Because born-digital sources do not require direct elicitation, they enable unobtrusive measurement. Enables is absent from the governed types, and the gate correctly refused a causes edge without its governed effect cue.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Domain experts → qualitative insights</label>
        <note>Domain experts identify qualitative insights that can strengthen computational analysis and enrich the answer. Advises/contributes is not a governed relation type.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>black box APIs → data biases</label>
        <note>Closed commercial APIs are likely to introduce biases whose form and severity researchers cannot inspect. Introduces-risk-of is not a governed type, and the wording is probabilistic.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t88" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>matching design → control group</label>
        <note>The matching design populates the control group with untreated forums similar to the treated ones. Constructs/selects is absent from the governed types.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t89" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>control group → counterfactual scenario</label>
        <note>The matched control group is used to estimate what would have happened without the closures. Estimates-counterfactual is absent and should not be forced into operationalised-as without its governed cue.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t90" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Discretization → validity</label>
        <note>Overly broad discretized categories can threaten validity. Threatens is absent from the governed types, and deterministic causation would overstate &#x27;can&#x27;.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t91" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>unit of text → unit of analysis</label>
        <note>The labeled unit of text can differ from the final unit of analysis. Differs-in-level-from is not captured by the governed identity or distinction types.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t92" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>expert annotators → reliable results</label>
        <note>Highly trained or expert annotators tend to produce more reliable results for complex concepts. Suitable-for/tends-to-improve is absent and explicitly hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t93" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>pre-processing steps → reproducibility efforts</label>
        <note>Preprocessing choices have a large impact on reproducibility efforts. Affects is absent from the governed relation types.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t94" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>post-hoc explanations → models that are already somewhat interpretable</label>
        <note>Post-hoc explanations are an alternative to restricting analysis to models that are already somewhat interpretable, but may be unfaithful. Alternative-to-with-fidelity-risk is absent.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t95" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>number of topics → needs of the user</label>
        <note>The appropriate topic count is determined by the needs of the user rather than the collection. Determined-by-analytical-purpose is absent from the governed types.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t96" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>explanatory power → predictive performance</label>
        <note>For insight-driven studies, improving explanatory power can be more useful than small predictive-performance gains. Preferred-over-for-purpose is absent from the governed types.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t97" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>qualitative analyses → Computational text analysis</label>
        <note>Moving between large-scale computational text analysis and small-scale qualitative analysis combines their strengths. Complements is absent from the governed types.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t98" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Tokenization → Multi-word terms</label>
        <note>Deciding whether multi-word terms are tokenized as one unit can dramatically alter textual patterns. Treatment-of is absent and causation would misstate the relevant agent.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t99" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>concept - BACKGROUND: everything the term has meant across the literature, contested and changing</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t100" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>concept - SYSTEMATIZED: the one definition this study adopts, chosen for its question and framework</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t101" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>accuracy - as VALIDITY: what it is usually presented as, and what it cannot be without an objective standard</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t102" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>accuracy - as RELIABILITY: consistency against a human sample, which is what it actually measures when no ground truth exists</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t103" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>ambiguity - in computational linguistics: a problem to be solved, on the assumption that one correct interpretation exists</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t104" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>ambiguity - in literary criticism: prized, alongside interpretation and argumentation, above definitive conclusions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t105" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>annotator disagreement - as NOISE: a failure of the scheme or the coders, to be reduced</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t106" type="senses" ana="#senses[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>annotator disagreement - as SIGNAL: a property of the concept, which can be carried into the analysis rather than resolved away</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t107" type="senses" ana="#senses[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Insight-driven analysis - describes or explains a phenomenon rather than optimizing a prediction task</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t108" type="senses" ana="#senses[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Dual use - a protective hate-speech method may also be adapted to suppress marginalized speech or dissent</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t109" type="senses" ana="#senses[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Born-digital evidence - massive and unobtrusive, yet ethically constrained by contextual privacy and absent consent</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t110" type="senses" ana="#senses[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Black-box collection - commercial APIs can introduce unknown biases into research inference</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t111" type="senses" ana="#senses[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Restricted generalization - biased data can support within-population comparison when claims stay within that population</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t112" type="senses" ana="#senses[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Counterfactual control - matched untreated forums estimate what would have happened without platform closure</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t113" type="senses" ana="#senses[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Discretization tradeoff - categories facilitate nonlinear analysis but overly broad bins threaten validity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t114" type="senses" ana="#senses[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Supervised versus unsupervised learning - labels learned from annotated data versus structure learned from unlabeled data</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t115" type="senses" ana="#senses[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Annotation disagreement - can reveal either scheme weaknesses or inherent ambiguity and may itself be retained as signal</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t116" type="senses" ana="#senses[17]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Preprocessing provenance - operationally consequential choices should be documented like editorial or biomedical protocols</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t117" type="senses" ana="#senses[18]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Tokenization - seemingly basic segmentation that can fail on creative orthography and transform multi-word patterns</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t118" type="senses" ana="#senses[19]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Word-piece segmentation - effective for prediction but potentially unsuitable when linguistic-unit interpretation matters</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t119" type="senses" ana="#senses[20]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Domain dictionary construction - automation proposes candidates and human theory filters spurious features</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t120" type="senses" ana="#senses[21]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Post-hoc explanation - interprets individual predictions without guaranteeing fidelity to the underlying model</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t121" type="senses" ana="#senses[22]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Topic count - a user-selected analytical scale like map scale or microscope magnification, not an intrinsic truth</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t122" type="senses" ana="#senses[23]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Content revalidation - jointly interrogates concept, indicators, and scores and may force recoding or method replacement</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t123" type="senses" ana="#senses[24]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Computational and qualitative analysis - complementary scales for trends and individual stories</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t124" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.claim_type" resp="#tagger">
        <label>claim_type: method</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: method — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t125" type="alternatives" ana="#alternatives.phenomenon" resp="#tagger">
        <label>phenomenon: computational text analysis of social and cultural concepts</label>
        <note>a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: computational text analysis of social and cultural concepts — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t126" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → natural language processing (computational text methods)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t127" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Bender and Friedman (2018), Gebru et al. (2018) on dataset documentation and Mitchell et al. (2019) on model documentation</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t128" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>critiques → the gold-standard framing of evaluation when applied to contested social and cultural concepts</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t129" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → Adcock and Collier (2001) on measurement validity in political science</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t130" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>supports → Piper&#x27;s account of validation as further discovery in two directions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t131" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → the datasheets and model-cards line of work on documenting datasets and models</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t132" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>gold standard —same-as→ ground truth</label>
        <term>gold standard</term>
        <term>ground truth</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t133" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ground truth —distinct-from→ unobservable</label>
        <term>ground truth</term>
        <term>unobservable</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span calls some concepts fundamentally unobservable; distinct-from ground truth is inferred.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t134" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>reliability —distinct-from→ validity</label>
        <term>reliability</term>
        <term>validity</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span defines reliability only; the contrast with validity is not in it.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t135" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>inter-annotator agreement —operationalised-as→ reliability</label>
        <term>inter-annotator agreement</term>
        <term>reliability</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span glosses inter-annotator agreement as &#x27;intercoder reliability&#x27;; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t136" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Krippendorff&#x27;s alpha —operationalised-as→ inter-annotator agreement</label>
        <term>Krippendorff&#x27;s alpha</term>
        <term>inter-annotator agreement</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: the span answers &#x27;how inter-annotator agreement will be measured&#x27; (previous sentence); operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t137" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>content validity —operationalised-as→ annotation scheme</label>
        <term>content validity</term>
        <term>annotation scheme</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes &#x27;the codebook&#x27;; &#x27;annotation scheme&#x27; is a variant, and operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t138" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>close reading —operationalised-as→ validity</label>
        <term>close reading</term>
        <term>validity</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says validation takes the form of close reading for some; the direction of operationalised-as is reversed.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t139" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ambiguity —contrasted-with→ ground truth</label>
        <term>ambiguity</term>
        <term>ground truth</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but attributed: the span quotes Kirschenbaum.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t140" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>deductive —part-of→ annotation scheme</label>
        <term>deductive</term>
        <term>annotation scheme</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span describes deductive coding rules; part-of the annotation scheme is inferred.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t141" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[14]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>insight driven —contrasted-with→ automating tasks</label>
        <term>insight driven</term>
        <term>automating tasks</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The article explicitly contrasts insight-driven social inquiry with task automation and prediction.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t142" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[15]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>data biases —causes→ spurious results</label>
        <term>data biases</term>
        <term>spurious results</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.5 — the record marks this weak · note: The paper says biases may lead to spurious results; weight reflects &#x27;may&#x27;.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says data biases MAY lead to spurious results; hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t143" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[16]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Supervised learning —distinct-from→ unsupervised learning</label>
        <term>Supervised learning</term>
        <term>unsupervised learning</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The contrast is labeled data versus unlabeled data.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t144" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.80 or above — the conventional threshold for acceptable intercoder agreement in communication research</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t145" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>450 18th-century novels — the corpus in which close reading beside model output found an unrecognised genre</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t146" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>A human reader is better equipped than a computer to make logical inferences, resolve ambiguities and apply cultural knowledge.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t147" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>a concept often has several valid definitions, and definitions may be contested over time</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t148" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>validity then has to be judged by other techniques</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t149" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>this kind of validation is rare in NLP, yet matters most when it is hard to tell what drives a model</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t150" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>disagreement between annotators can reveal weaknesses in the annotation scheme or the inherent ambiguity of what is being measured</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t151" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>annotation carries bias: tweets in African American English, and by self-identified African Americans, were more often labelled offensive</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t152" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>close reading of 450 eighteenth-century novels alongside model output revealed a genre absent from literary history&#x27;s own categories</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t153" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>conceptual validity</label>
        <term>conceptual validity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t154" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ground truth</label>
        <term>ground truth</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t155" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>background concept</label>
        <term>background concept</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t156" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>systematized concept</label>
        <term>systematized concept</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t157" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>reliability</label>
        <term>reliability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t158" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>validity</label>
        <term>validity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t159" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>annotation scheme</label>
        <term>annotation scheme</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t160" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>content validity</label>
        <term>content validity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t161" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>sample-size</label>
        <term>sample-size</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t162" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Krippendorff&#x27;s alpha</label>
        <term>Krippendorff&#x27;s alpha</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t163" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>inter-annotator agreement</label>
        <term>inter-annotator agreement</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t164" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F-score</label>
        <term>F-score</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00062.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
