<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Structure and Tie Strengths in Mobile Communication Networks</title>
        <author>J.-P. Onnela</author>
        <author>J. Saramäki</author>
        <author>J. Hyvönen</author>
        <author>A.-L. Barabási</author>
        <author>et al.</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Structure and Tie Strengths in Mobile Communication Networks</title>
          <date>2007</date>
          <publisher>PNAS / arXiv</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0610245104</idno>
          <idno type="arXiv">physics/0610104</idno>
          <idno type="record">onnela2007-tie-strengths</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">onnela2007-tie-strengths.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">da4c15edb7ef9df0eca7a4ce1cc89e1fadb2d3aa</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>sociology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>tie strength and local topology in mobile communication networks</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>network-analysis</label>
        <term>network-analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>weak ties bridge otherwise-separate communities, so removing them fragments the network via a percolation-like phase transition (a societal-scale confirmation of Granovetter strength-of-weak-ties)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The reconstructed graph covers only mobile voice calls, not the full range of interactions between people.</label>
        <note>what this limits: every claim about social ties from this graph: THE MCG CAPTURES ONLY A SUBSET OF ALL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS, [excluding] FACE-TO-FACE, EMAIL AND LANDLINE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The reciprocity requirement used to define a link may discard genuine social ties (false negatives).</label>
        <note>what this limits: the link definition: the reciprocity requirement INDUCES SOME FALSE NEGATIVES, I.E. SOME LINKS CORRESPONDING TO GENUINE SOCIAL INTERACTION MAY GO UNDETECTED</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The data are a single-operator sample of the underlying national call network, not the whole population network.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any population-level reading: ALTHOUGH THE DATASET COVERS SOME SEVEN MILLION USERS, IT IS NEVERTHELESS A SAMPLE OF THE UNDERLYING PHONE CALL NETWORK - scale is not coverage</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The strength of a social tie is measured as the total time two people spent on the phone.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any claim here about the strength of social ties: strength is defined as the aggregated duration of calls between two users, after one-way calls have been eliminated by a reciprocity requirement</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The network studied is a stand-in for the communication network, and the paper says so.</label>
        <note>what this limits: conclusions drawn here about human communication: the mobile call graph is used as a proxy for the communication network between users, being skewed toward trusted interactions because people share mobile numbers only with those they trust</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Three incompatible accounts of what drives tie strength were on the table before the measurement.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the interpretation of the correlation reported here: the paper sets out a dyadic hypothesis, in which strength is independent of the surrounding network, against the strength of weak ties hypothesis, in which strength increases with friendship-circle overlap</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The conclusion sits between the positions rather than choosing one.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the finding as support for any single theory of tie strength: the authors state it is in part driven by local network structure, in contrast with both a purely dyadic view and a global view</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>percolation and network analysis (robustness, phase transitions) applied to a society-scale communication network</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the same spreading simulation re-run on the SAME network with every tie strength replaced by the average, giving a constant transmission probability on every link</label>
        <note>eliminates: the network&#x27;s TOPOLOGY as the explanation of the spreading result - the graph is held fixed and only the weights are flattened, so any difference must come from the distribution of tie strengths rather than from who is connected to whom · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper">
        <label>tie strength</label>
        <term>tie strength</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>dyadic hypothesis</label>
        <term>dyadic hypothesis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>global efficiency principle</label>
        <term>global efficiency principle</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper">
        <label>mobile call graph</label>
        <term>mobile call graph</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper">
        <label>betweenness centrality</label>
        <term>betweenness centrality</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>tie strength - AS AGGREGATED CALL DURATION: the sociological construct is measured by total air time between two people, over links that survive a reciprocity filter, so a strong tie here means many minutes and nothing else</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>what determines tie strength - THREE NAMED AND INCOMPATIBLE ANSWERS: a global efficiency principle in which strengths are optimised for overall flow, a dyadic hypothesis in which strength is independent of the surrounding network, and the strength of weak ties hypothesis in which it rises with friendship-circle overlap</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the mobile call graph - AS A PROXY, AND A SKEWED ONE BY DESIGN: it stands in for the communication network and is biased toward trusted interactions, because people share mobile numbers only with individuals they trust</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Granovetter weak-ties hypothesis (1973)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → the strength of weak ties hypothesis (Granovetter)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the dyadic hypothesis and the global efficiency principle</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the received account of weak ties as the conduits of novel information (Granovetter; Csermely)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>millions — scale of the society-wide communication network studied</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Phone-communication records of millions of users let the study examine a society-wide network&#x27;s local and global structure together.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Social networks are robust to the removal of strong ties but fall apart in a phase transition if weak ties are removed, and this coupling significantly slows diffusion, trapping information in communities.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>diffusion process</label>
        <term>diffusion process</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>local bridge</label>
        <term>local bridge</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>weak ties hypothesis</label>
        <term>weak ties hypothesis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bootstrap</label>
        <term>bootstrap</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p-value</label>
        <term>p-value</term>
        <note>about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:31). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>sample-size</label>
        <term>sample-size</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard-deviation</label>
        <term>standard-deviation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>statistical-significance</label>
        <term>statistical-significance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610245104.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
