<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Exploring the impact of intelligent learning tools on students’ independent learning abilities: a PLS-SEM analysis of grade 6 students in China</title>
        <author>Pan</author>
        <author>Qin</author>
        <author>Zhang</author>
        <author>Lou</author>
        <author>Yu</author>
        <author>Yang</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Exploring the impact of intelligent learning tools on students’ independent learning abilities: a PLS-SEM analysis of grade 6 students in China</title>
          <date>2023</date>
          <publisher>Humanities and Social Sciences Communications</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1057/s41599-023-02065-3</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">pan2023-exploring-the-impact-of-intelligen</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">pan2023-exploring-the-impact-of-intelligen.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">1140d69afa7c21fb357760ec513752ea32ede01b</note>
          <note type="rights">open-access</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>education</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>mechanism</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>intention to use intelligent learning tools and independent learning ability</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>observational-study</label>
        <term>observational-study</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Willingness to use the tools raises how often students actually use them, and sustained repeated use over time creates the conditions under which independent learning abilities develop</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Because current tools are built mainly for one-way knowledge delivery (microlectures, reading materials, practice exercises, problem-solving reviews), their interaction features do not directly stimulate usage intention and instead act only by raising satisfaction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Interaction with classmates, teachers and the system converts into usage intention only indirectly, by first increasing students&#x27; satisfaction with the tool</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>All respondents came from a single school, limiting representativeness.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the population every result speaks for: THE SAMPLES WERE ONLY FROM ONE SCHOOL, SO THE SCOPE WAS LIMITED AND MAY NOT BE REPRESENTATIVE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The interaction-quality construct was not broken down by type of interaction, which may mask differing effects.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the interaction-quality finding: IT DID NOT SPECIFY THE TYPE OF INTERACTION BEING MEASURED, which may mask differing effects</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A verdict of no bias is produced by a conventional cut, and the observed value sits under it by less than four percentage points.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the claim that common method bias is not a problem here: it rests on the largest factor accounting for 46.127% of variance against a 50% threshold</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Model fit is judged against cut-offs taken from another paper rather than derived for this design.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the statement that this model fits: the fit indices are compared with</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The central construct is defined by citation, in terms of what the user happens to need.</label>
        <note>what this limits: information quality as a property of the system: it is defined as the system providing exactly what the user needs, which makes it relative to the user</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The information-quality construct and its role as a determinant of satisfaction and use are taken from the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success and applied to primary-school learning tools</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>A PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARD, NOT AN EXPERIMENTAL ARM: collinearity among the predictor constructs checked by variance inflation factor before the structural model is evaluated, against a threshold of VIF &lt; 5</label>
        <note>eliminates: collinearity as a distorter of the path coefficients - correlated predictors make individual paths unstable in sign and size, so a reported structural effect could be an artefact of the predictors overlapping rather than of the model · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>common method bias</label>
        <term>common method bias</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>information quality</label>
        <term>information quality</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>Harman’s single-factor test</label>
        <term>Harman’s single-factor test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>interaction quality</label>
        <term>interaction quality</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>intention to use</label>
        <term>intention to use</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>satisfaction</label>
        <term>satisfaction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>independent learning ability</label>
        <term>independent learning ability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>interaction quality → intention to use</label>
        <note>A PATH THE PAPER TESTED AND DID NOT FIND: &#x27;interaction quality did not have a significant impact on intention to use&#x27;, coefficient 0.097 marked NS in the structural table. NO EDGE TYPE CAN ASSERT THAT A RELATION IS ABSENT, and this is one of the study&#x27;s three headline results. Second instance in two consecutive papers - arthur2022&#x27;s full mediation is the same shape from the other side.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>common method bias - operationalised as whether one factor exceeds half the variance, so &#x27;no bias&#x27; here means &#x27;below a conventional cut&#x27;, not &#x27;absent&#x27;</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>information quality - defined by reference to the USER&#x27;s need rather than by a property of the information, so two users of the same system can differ on it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>impact - the paper uses it for two different things in one sentence: a DIRECT path that must clear significance, and an INDIRECT influence through a mediator that need not. Interaction quality has the second and not the first</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Radha et al. (2020); Prasetyanto et al. (2022)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Dai et al. (2020); Alzahrani et al. (2022)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>interaction quality —causes→ satisfaction</label>
        <term>interaction quality</term>
        <term>satisfaction</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: The strongest exogenous path in the model, 0.519***, and it is the one that carries interaction quality&#x27;s whole effect - see the unhoused row for the direct path it does NOT have.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes &#x27;ITQ -&gt; ST 0.519***&#x27;; endpoints abbreviated, a path coefficient.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>satisfaction —causes→ intention to use</label>
        <term>satisfaction</term>
        <term>intention to use</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes &#x27;ST -&gt; IU 0.617***&#x27;; endpoints abbreviated, a path coefficient.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>intention to use —causes→ independent learning ability</label>
        <term>intention to use</term>
        <term>independent learning ability</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: 0.727***, the largest coefficient in the model and the paper&#x27;s headline claim.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>information quality —causes→ intention to use</label>
        <term>information quality</term>
        <term>intention to use</term>
        <note>differs in: WHETHER A DIRECT PATH SURVIVES AT ALL: information quality keeps one (0.165***) while interaction quality does not (0.097, non-significant), even though interaction quality has the stronger route into satisfaction (0.519 against 0.282). Reaching the outcome and reaching it DIRECTLY are different questions and this model separates them · strength of the relation: 0.7
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes &#x27;IFQ -&gt; IU 0.165***&#x27;; endpoints abbreviated, a path coefficient.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)</label>
        <term>structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Cronbach&#x27;s alpha</label>
        <term>Cronbach&#x27;s alpha</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>average variance extracted</label>
        <term>average variance extracted</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio</label>
        <term>Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Harman&#x27;s single-factor test</label>
        <term>Harman&#x27;s single-factor test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bootstrap</label>
        <term>bootstrap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variance inflation factor</label>
        <term>variance inflation factor</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cross-validation (blindfolding predictive relevance)</label>
        <term>cross-validation (blindfolding predictive relevance)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>coefficient of determination</label>
        <term>coefficient of determination</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Likert scale</label>
        <term>Likert scale</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mediation analysis</label>
        <term>mediation analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Intention to use intelligent learning tools directly predicted independent learning ability, information quality and satisfaction predicted intention to use, but interaction quality did not directly predict intention to use and instead worked through satisfaction.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Intention to use was a strong positive predictor of independent learning ability, accounting for over half its variance.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Interaction quality had no significant direct influence on intention to use.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Satisfaction with the tools fully mediated the effect of interaction quality on intention to use.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Satisfaction partially mediated the effect of information quality on intention to use.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Students rated the tools&#x27; information quality (M = 4.02) higher than their interaction quality (M = 3.88).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>intelligent learning tools</label>
        <term>intelligent learning tools</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>information quality</label>
        <term>information quality</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>satisfaction with tools</label>
        <term>satisfaction with tools</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>intention to use</label>
        <term>intention to use</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>interaction quality and information quality of intelligent learning tools</label>
        <term>interaction quality and information quality of intelligent learning tools</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>independent learning ability</label>
        <term>independent learning ability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>satisfaction with tools</label>
        <term>satisfaction with tools</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>384 — valid questionnaires collected from Grade 6 students in Hangzhou, China</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>β = 0.727 — path coefficient from intention to use to independent learning ability</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>46.127% — variance captured by the largest single factor in Harman&#x27;s test, below the 50% common-method-bias threshold</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.174 — indirect effect of information quality on intention to use via satisfaction</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>M = 3.82 — mean score for students&#x27; self-reported independent learning abilities</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.672 and 0.804 — range of HTMT values, all below 1, supporting discriminant validity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02065-3.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
