<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Planck 2018 Results. VI. Cosmological Parameters</title>
        <author>Planck Collaboration (N. Aghanim et al.)</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Planck 2018 Results. VI. Cosmological Parameters</title>
          <date>2020</date>
          <publisher>Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics / arXiv</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1051/0004-6361/201833910</idno>
          <idno type="arXiv">1807.06209</idno>
          <idno type="record">planck2018-cosmology</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">planck2018-cosmology.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">63e54babe7d8e1011931ef1662031fe27108d8fd</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>astronomy</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>cosmic microwave background anisotropies</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>observational-study</label>
        <term>observational-study</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE MODEL EVERY NUMBER IN THE PAPER IS QUOTED AGAINST IS INTRODUCED AS A QUOTED LABEL, WITH A PARAMETER COUNT AND A SCOPE: Quotation withheld The scare quotes and the words `in this paper` are both the collaboration&#x27;s: the label is declared local to the document, and what it denotes is fixed by a count of parameters rather than by a description</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>WHICH PARAMETERS ARE PRIMITIVE IS STATED AS A CHOICE, NOT AS A FACT ABOUT THE UNIVERSE: the first six parameters are THE ONES ON WHICH WE IMPOSE FLAT PRIORS AND USE AS SAMPLING PARAMETERS; the remaining parameters ARE DERIVED FROM THE FIRST SIX. The same physics could be parameterised the other way round, and the paper says which way it chose</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>AN ENTIRE CLASS OF PARAMETERS IS NAMED “nuisance” IN SCARE QUOTES - AND THE QUOTES COME OFF IN THE NEXT SENTENCE, WHERE THEY ARE SAMPLED ON THE SAME FOOTING AS THE COSMOLOGICAL ONES: a physically motivated parametric model containing “nuisance” parameters; these nuisance parameters ARE SAMPLED, ALONG WITH COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS, during MCMC exploration of the likelihood. The hedge is dropped one sentence after it is made, and the objects it hedged about are treated as first-class</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A CEILING ON THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN INTERPRETATION, STATED BY THE PAPER: a total systematic uncertainty of around half a sigma MAY BE MORE REALISTIC, and VALUES SHOULD NOT BE OVERINTERPRETED BEYOND THIS LEVEL. Not a limitation of the data but an instruction to the reader about how far the numbers may be read - issued by the people who produced them</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>TWO WAYS OF DOING ONE CORRECTION ARE NAMED IN A SINGLE SENTENCE, BY CONTRAST WITH EACH OTHER: adopting the estimates from one spectrum for both (we call this the “map-based” APPROACH); or applying independent estimates from each (the “spectrum-based” APPROACH). Neither name would mean anything without the other; the pair is defined by the difference between two procedures</term>
        <note>about this quote: Three sentences later the same term is spelled without its hyphen - “map-based” in the naming sentence, “mapbased” where the approach is adopted. A lost line-break hyphen and an inconsistency by the authors look identical in an extracted PDF, so this records the observation without claiming which it is.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE NULL EXPLANATION IS DECLARED THE BASELINE ASSUMPTION, IN THOSE WORDS: Quotation withheld Which of the competing accounts gets the default is a choice, and it is named as one rather than argued for</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>EVIDENCE IS GRANTED AND THE CLAIM IS DECLINED IN THE SAME SENTENCE: although both likelihoods CLEARLY SHOW A PREFERENCE for a lensing amplitude above one, THIS CANNOT BE CLAIMED TO BE A ROBUST DETECTION at much over two sigma. `Clearly show` and `cannot be claimed` are asserted of the same result, and the line between them is a number</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE COLLABORATION CALLS A PERSISTENT ANOMALY IN ITS OWN DATA A CURIOUS FEATURE: the preference for a lensing amplitude above one within the model IS A CURIOUS FEATURE OF THE PLANCK CMB POWER SPECTRUM DATA, and has already been discussed extensively in three earlier papers, ALTHOUGH IT IS NOW SLIGHTLY MORE SIGNIFICANT. A result that has survived three releases, growing, and the standing description of it is an adjective</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE AUTHORS CHARACTERISE THEIR OWN REVISION AS LARGELY COSMETIC: it is important to emphasize that these changes to the likelihood ARE LARGELY COSMETIC AND HAVE VERY LITTLE IMPACT ON COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS. The word measures a methodological change by its effect on the outputs rather than by what was changed</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A METHOD CHANGE BETWEEN RELEASES IS STATED AS A DIFFERENCE FROM THE PREVIOUS PAPER, WITH THE OLD PROCEDURE DESCRIBED: Quotation withheld The superseded choice is named, so the two releases&#x27; numbers can be read as answers to slightly different questions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A COINED ACRONYM IS MINTED FOR OBJECTS THE ANALYSIS ITSELF PRODUCES, AND THE RULE THAT DECIDES HOW MANY OF THEM COUNT IS LEFT UNNAMED: the rotation diagonalizing the Fisher inverse **DEFINES** the eigenmodes; truncation of the hierarchy, to determine the number used for parameter estimation, is performed ACCORDING TO SOME SUITABLY CHOSEN SELECTION CRITERION - AND WE REFER TO THESE MODES AS “eXeMs”. One sentence defines the objects, the next leaves the rule for counting them to be chosen suitably, and the third gives them a name</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A DISAGREEMENT IS LEFT OPEN WITH ITS THREE POSSIBLE MEANINGS ENUMERATED AND NONE CHOSEN: further work is needed to assess whether the discrepancy IS A STATISTICAL FLUCTUATION, IS CAUSED BY SMALL SYSTEMATIC ERRORS, OR IS A SIGNATURE OF NEW PHYSICS. Noise, error, and discovery are offered as the alternatives, in that order, and the paper declines to rank them</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[12]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>AN ASSUMPTION IS JUSTIFIED BY WHAT THE SIMPLEST MODELS PREDICT, WITH THE PRECISION CAVEAT IN A PARENTHESIS: the base model assumes that the spatial hypersurfaces are flat, SUCH AS WOULD BE PREDICTED (TO WITHIN MEASURABLE PRECISION) BY THE SIMPLEST INFLATIONARY MODELS. The warrant for the assumption is the simplicity of a theory, and the hedge is about what an instrument could see</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[13]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A FEATURE THAT PULLS PARAMETERS AWAY FROM THE MODEL IS REPORTED AND REBUTTED IN THE SAME SENTENCE, BY NAMING THE PROBES THAT DO NOT SEE IT: a feature which pulls some parameters that affect the lensing amplitude away from the model; HOWEVER, THIS IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE LENSING RECONSTRUCTION OR (in models that also change the background geometry) **BAO DATA**. The anomaly&#x27;s own paper supplies the evidence against it</term>
        <note>about this quote: The record&#x27;s limitations[0] quotes this passage and had to stop at “away from the”, one word short of the model&#x27;s name; its tag says “[model]” in brackets to mark the gap. This span reaches the name and the rebuttal that follows it.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>a &gt;2-sigma feature pulls some lensing-amplitude parameters away from the model, not supported by other probes</label>
        <note>what this limits: the lensing-amplitude parameters specifically: a &gt;2-sigma feature PULLS SOME PARAMETERS THAT AFFECT THE LENSING AMPLITUDE AWAY FROM THE [model], unsupported by other probes</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Residual systematic errors in the polarization spectra are not folded into the quoted error bars, because the authors judge any such characterisation would be incomplete and could not be given a proper probabilistic form.</label>
        <note>what this limits: every quoted uncertainty in the paper: WE THEREFORE DO NOT EXPLICITLY MODEL AN INCREASE IN ERROR BARS DUE TO THESE RESIDUAL SYSTEMATIC ERRORS - a known error source is excluded by decision</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Imperfect corrections for polarization efficiency and temperature-to-polarization leakage remain the dominant systematic error in the high-multipole polarization spectra.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the polarization results in particular: INACCURACIES IN THE CORRECTIONS FOR EFFECTIVE POLARIZATION EFFICIENCIES AND TEMPERATURE-TO-POLARIZATION LEAKAGE ARE THE MAIN CONTRIBUTORS TO SYSTEMATIC ERRORS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The origin of the disagreement between Planck and the Lyman-alpha BAO measurements is left unresolved.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the Planck-versus-Lyman-alpha comparison: FURTHER WORK IS NEEDED TO ASSESS WHETHER THE DISCREPANCY ... IS A STATISTICAL FLUCTUATION, IS CAUSED BY SMALL SYSTEMATIC ERRORS, OR IS A SIGNATURE OF new physics</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Residual modelling uncertainty in the small-scale polarization is estimated, not eliminated, and is stated to shift parameters at the half-sigma level.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the small-scale polarization constraints: RESIDUAL MODELLING UNCERTAINTIES ESTIMATED TO AFFECT THEM ONLY AT THE 0.5 SIGMA L[evel] - estimated, not eliminated</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The choice of which external data to combine with is justified partly by a presentational aim, not only an evidential one.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the external-data selection as a purely evidential choice: the paper gives as its second reason that its primary purpose is to present and emphasize the Planck results</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The likelihood used for the 2018 analysis was built on a fiducial model taken from the previous data release.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the 2018 parameter constraints as independent of the 2015 analysis: the likelihood was constructed using a fiducial model adopted from PCP15</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Cluster counts are excluded from the main parameter grid because their mass calibrations are uncertain.</label>
        <note>what this limits: these constraints as incorporating cluster counts: they are deliberately excluded from the main parameter grid</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>The headline late-Universe parameters are marked model-dependent in a single parenthesis - &#x27;the inferred (model-dependent) late-Universe parameters are: Hubble constant H0 = ...&#x27; - while the angular acoustic scale in the preceding sentence is described as only weakly model-dependent. Two classes of number sit in one abstract with very different warrants, separated by one bracketed word that does not survive being quoted.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Bayesian inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo used to estimate cosmological parameters from the cosmic microwave background</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the likelihood built from HALF-MISSION CROSS-spectra rather than auto-spectra</label>
        <note>eliminates: noise bias - an auto-spectrum correlates a map&#x27;s noise with itself and adds a positive term to the power, while two independent halves of the mission have uncorrelated noise that averages away · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>different multipole cuts applied per cross-spectrum</label>
        <note>eliminates: the multipole ranges where the beam&#x27;s limited resolution lets noise dominate, so those scales cannot drive the fit · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>cosmological parameters</label>
        <term>cosmological parameters</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper">
        <label>fiducial model</label>
        <term>fiducial model</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>baryon acoustic oscillation</label>
        <term>baryon acoustic oscillation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>base-ΛCDM</label>
        <term>base-ΛCDM</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>covariance matrices</label>
        <term>covariance matrices</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.85">
        <label>polarization efficiencies</label>
        <term>polarization efficiencies</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Hubble constant</label>
        <term>Hubble constant</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>modified gravity</label>
        <term>modified gravity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>conservative BBN prior</label>
        <term>conservative BBN prior</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>pivot scale</label>
        <term>pivot scale</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>polarization angles → efficiencies</label>
        <note>THE TWO CANNOT BE SEPARATED IN THIS STUDY - the DESIGN form of the negative relation / No edge type can express it: all eight assert that a relation HOLDS. Recorded here because a confounding statement BOUNDS WHAT THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN RESULTS CAN MEAN, and it lives in a methods paragraph where nothing downstream will find it. States the mechanism of the inseparability in one word - DEGENERATE - which is the physics term for exactly the relation we cannot express.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>late-Universe parameter - a quantity the paper marks parenthetically as MODEL-DEPENDENT, inferred by assuming base-LambdaCDM rather than measured directly</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>base LambdaCDM - the six-parameter spatially-flat model with a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations, named for use in this paper</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>fiducial model - a model adopted in order to build the covariance matrices and likelihood, rather than one being tested</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>polarization efficiencies - AS CALIBRATED: by a procedure the paper itself calls model-dependent, and then BOUNDS rather than defends - the fit is restricted to multipoles where the TT spectra are cosmic-variance limited, which is the reason given for the calibration being insensitive to small changes in the cosmology</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>`dark energy` / `modified gravity` - TWO NAMES FOR ONE OBSERVATION, CHOSEN BY WHICH MECHANISM YOU ASSUME: `Quotation withheld` NOT A RENAMING AND NOT A DISAGREEMENT ABOUT A WORD. The measurement is identical either way; the two names record two rival explanations of it, and the sentence assigns a name to each branch before either is established.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>`conservative BBN prior` - A TERM DEFINED BY BEING WIDE ENOUGH NOT TO CHOOSE: `we refer to a “conservative BBN prior,” wb = 0.0222 +/- 0.0005 (68% CL), set to be compatible with each of these three predictions.` The word `conservative` is doing definitional work: the interval is not an estimate of the quantity but a construction that survives three competing determinations. SAME SHAPE AS `brown2020`&#x27;s vocabulary built to REMAIN AGNOSTIC on a live question (typology mechanism 26) - here it is a NUMBER built not to decide one.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A REPORTING CONVENTION STATED IN THE ABSTRACT AND BINDING ON EVERY NUMBER IN IT: `in this abstract we quote 68% confidence regions on measured parameters and 95% on upper limits`. TWO DIFFERENT INTERVALS UNDER ONE `+/-` NOTATION, distinguished only by whether the quantity was measured or bounded. A reader lifting a figure out of this abstract without the convention has a number whose coverage they cannot state.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="senses" ana="#senses[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`base ΛCDM` - A NAME THAT MEANS `THIS PAPER&#x27;S SIX-PARAMETER VERSION`, NOT `THE STANDARD MODEL`. `Quotation withheld` The qualifier `in this paper` is doing real work: `ΛCDM` names a family, and `base` picks out one member by a parameter COUNT. A citing author who writes `ΛCDM` and one who writes `base ΛCDM` are not necessarily referring to the same model, and this sentence is the only thing that fixes which.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="senses" ana="#senses[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>`As` IS NOT A NUMBER UNTIL A SCALE IS CHOSEN. `Quotation withheld`. The amplitude is scale-dependent, so the quoted value carries an unstated convention with it. A parameter defined at a chosen pivot is a quantity plus a convention, and only one of the two travels with the symbol.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Markov chain Monte Carlo (Bayesian inference, statistics)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → earlier Planck cosmological-parameter papers PCP13 (Planck Collaboration XVI 2014) and PCP15 (Planck Collaboration XIII 2016)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Riess et al. (2019) distance-ladder measurement of the Hubble constant</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>67.4±0.5 — inferred Hubble constant H0</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.315±0.007 — matter density parameter</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.120±0.001 — cold dark matter density</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>6 — base spatially-flat LCDM model</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>3.6 — tension with local Hubble-constant measurements</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>&lt; 0.12 — upper bound on total neutrino mass</label>
        <note>about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:80). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>data are consistent with the base 6-parameter LCDM cosmology</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>no compelling evidence for extensions to base LCDM</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>a 3.6 sigma tension persists with local Hubble measurements</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>dark-energy equation of state is consistent with a cosmological constant</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Hubble constant H0</label>
        <term>Hubble constant H0</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>matter density</label>
        <term>matter density</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>optical depth</label>
        <term>optical depth</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>tensor-to-scalar ratio r</label>
        <term>tensor-to-scalar ratio r</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cosmic microwave background (CMB)</label>
        <term>cosmic microwave background (CMB)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO)</label>
        <term>baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>reionization optical depth</label>
        <term>reionization optical depth</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>chi-square</label>
        <term>chi-square</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>confidence-interval</label>
        <term>confidence-interval</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>degrees-of-freedom</label>
        <term>degrees-of-freedom</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard-deviation</label>
        <term>standard-deviation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[9]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>statistical-power</label>
        <term>statistical-power</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[10]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>statistical-significance</label>
        <term>statistical-significance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[11]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variance</label>
        <term>variance</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
