<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learning</title>
        <author>Pranav Rajpurkar</author>
        <author>Jeremy Irvin</author>
        <author>Andrew Y. Ng</author>
        <author>et al.</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learning</title>
          <date>2017</date>
          <publisher>arXiv preprint</publisher>
          
          <idno type="arXiv">1711.05225</idno>
          <idno type="record">rajpurkar2017-chexnet</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">rajpurkar2017-chexnet.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">a8d2157991e27e34585f78989e78a452b01ac7f8</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>medicine</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>pneumonia detection on chest radiographs</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>system-or-tool-building</label>
        <term>system-or-tool-building</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the binary cross entropy is weighted by the prevalence of the OPPOSITE class - w+ is the negative share and w- the positive share - so the rarer label carries the larger weight</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>dense connections improve the flow of information and gradients through the network, which is what the paper credits for making the optimization of a very deep network tractable</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the network is not trained from scratch: the final layer is replaced and the rest starts from ImageNet weights</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the learning rate is cut only when the validation loss stops improving, and the returned model is the best validation checkpoint rather than the last</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>that this makes reader agreement the standard rather than the presence of disease is already recorded on this record as a limitation, not claimed here</label>
        <term>each radiologist and the model are scored against the OTHER FOUR radiologists&#x27; labels, taken as ground truth, and the reported figure is the mean of those four scores</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>significance is taken from the DIFFERENCE between the two averages computed on the same bootstrap samples, and read off whether the 95% CI on that difference contains zero</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the heatmap is the weighted sum of the final convolutional feature maps, weighted by the final classification layer&#x27;s own weights for that pathology, then upscaled and overlaid</term>
        <note>about this quote: 2026-08-16: FAILED GLYPH INSIDE THIS QUOTE. The staged text reads &quot;Formally, Mc = (cid:88) k wc,kfk&quot; - (cid:88) is the SUMMATION SIGN, so the formula is Mc = sum over k of w_c,k * f_k, the weighted sum of feature maps the sentence has just described in words. The prose on either side is intact and states the mechanism; only the symbol is lost. The quote is an exact substring of the staged file; the file is incomplete here, not the tag.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>the paper identifies three limitations of its radiologist comparison</label>
        <note>what this limits: the radiologist comparison, which the authors themselves qualify: WE IDENTIFY THREE LIMITATIONS OF THIS COMPARISON</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper announces three limitations of the radiologist comparison but enumerates only two (a &#x27;First&#x27; and a &#x27;Third&#x27;); the second is missing from the text.</label>
        <note>duplicate of: limitations[0] · what this limits: the completeness of that qualification: the paper announces three limitations and prints a FIRST and a THIRD with no SECOND. Verified in the version of record, arXiv 1711.05225v3 (25 Dec 2017), not only in our staged copy - so this is the paper&#x27;s own text and not a lost sentence in extraction</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Only frontal radiographs were shown to both model and radiologists, although a share of accurate diagnoses requires the lateral view.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the diagnostic setup for both model and radiologists: ONLY FRONTAL RADIOGRAPHS WERE PRESENTED ... BUT IT HAS BEEN SHOWN THAT UP TO 15% OF ACCURATE DIAGNOSES REQUIRE THE LATERAL VIEW</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Neither model nor radiologists could use patient history, which is known to change radiologist diagnostic performance.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the comparison against clinical practice: NEITHER THE MODEL NOR THE RADIOLOGISTS WERE ... PERMITTED TO USE PATIENT HISTORY, WHICH HAS BEEN SHOWN TO DECREASE RADIOLOGIST DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The standard the model is measured against is the other radiologists&#x27; labels, not the presence of disease.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the claim that this model exceeds practicing radiologists: the F1 score for each radiologist and for the model is computed against each of the other four radiologists&#x27; labels as ground truth, so the comparison is agreement with those four rather than detection of disease</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The training labels were produced by text extraction from reports rather than by anyone looking at the images.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the labels this model was trained on: they were assigned by automatic extraction methods applied to radiology reports, so a label records what a report said rather than what an image shows</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Every image the extractor did not mark becomes a negative example.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the negative class in this task: images are negative when pneumonia is not among the annotated pathologies, so absence of a label is used in place of absence of the condition</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The model reports fourteen findings while the headline number describes one of them.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the performance figure quoted for this model: the network outputs a vector of binary labels over fourteen pathology classes, while the radiologist comparison concerns the pneumonia task alone</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>a deep convolutional network (DenseNet) applied to detect disease from chest X-rays at radiologist level</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>four practising academic radiologists annotating the same test set, used as the comparison for the model</label>
        <note>eliminates: a number that looks good against no reference - the baseline here is people doing the task on the same images · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper">
        <label>F1 score</label>
        <term>F1 score</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>ground truth</label>
        <term>ground truth</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>pneumonia detection task</label>
        <term>pneumonia detection task</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper">
        <label>pathology labels</label>
        <term>pathology labels</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper">
        <label>automatic extraction methods</label>
        <term>automatic extraction methods</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>&#x27;exceeding practicing radiologists&#x27; - AS AGREEMENT WITH FOUR OF THEM: the F1 for the model and for each radiologist is computed against the other four radiologists&#x27; labels, so the claim is about concordance with a particular panel and not about detecting pneumonia in a patient</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>a pathology label - AS A FACT ABOUT A REPORT, NOT AN IMAGE: the fourteen labels are assigned by automatic extraction from radiology reports, so the target the network learns is what a radiologist wrote down, filtered through a text-mining tool</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>&#x27;negative&#x27; - AS NOT-LABELLED: every image without pneumonia among its annotated pathologies becomes a negative example, so the class means the extractor found nothing rather than that nothing was there</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → convolutional neural networks (deep learning)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → DenseNet (Huang et al., 2016)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the ChestX-ray14 dataset of Wang et al. (2017)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the evaluation protocol of Wang et al. (2017) and Yao et al. (2017)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>pathology labels —operationalised-as→ automatic extraction methods</label>
        <term>pathology labels</term>
        <term>automatic extraction methods</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says labels were annotated USING automatic extraction methods; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>121 — depth of the DenseNet CNN (CheXNet)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>112,120 — chest X-ray images in the ChestX-ray14 dataset</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>14 — thoracic disease labels detected</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>420 — size of the radiologist-annotated test set</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>&gt; 0.05 — margin over previous state of the art (emphysema)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED - THE POINTER WAS WRONG, NOT THE CLAIM) · CheXNet is a 121-layer CNN, trained on the ChestX-ray14 dataset of over 100,000 frontal-view X-rays covering 14 diseases.</label>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED - THE POINTER WAS WRONG, NOT THE CLAIM. The old evidence was verbatim, anchored and correctly cut, and it contained NONE of this claim&#x27;s numbers (121, 14). The paper states the claim in one sentence elsewhere and the tagger did not use it. the project, 2026-08-23: &#x27;WE HAVE SPENT THE DAY VERIFYING THAT QUOTES ARE REAL AND NONE OF IT ASKS WHETHER THEY ARE RELEVANT.&#x27; Confirmed by reading the claim, the old span and the candidate together; the candidate carries every number AND the claim&#x27;s own content words. — about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Extended to all 14 thoracic diseases, CheXNet achieves state-of-the-art results on every one.</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>chest X-ray image</label>
        <term>chest X-ray image</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>F1 metric</label>
        <term>F1 metric</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>CheXNet</label>
        <term>CheXNet</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ChestX-ray14 dataset</label>
        <term>ChestX-ray14 dataset</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bootstrap</label>
        <term>bootstrap</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>confidence-interval</label>
        <term>confidence-interval</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard-deviation</label>
        <term>standard-deviation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>statistical-significance</label>
        <term>statistical-significance</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05225.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
