<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Control</title>
        <author>Benjamin Recht</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Control</title>
          <date>2019</date>
          <publisher>Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems / arXiv</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-control-053018-023825</idno>
          <idno type="arXiv">1806.09460</idno>
          <idno type="record">recht2019-continuous-control</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">recht2019-continuous-control.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">baa933675a51fbdf0b7975b31a59ea3e11d33487</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>control-theory</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>reinforcement learning for continuous control</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A DEFINITION IS OFFERED AND THE OBJECTION TO IT IS VOICED IN THE SAME BREATH, IN ANOTHER FIELD&#x27;S VOICE: a control engineer MIGHT BE PUZZLED by the definition and interject that this is PRECISELY THE SCOPE OF CONTROL THEORY - and the consequence named is that the two communities remaining PRACTICALLY DISJOINT has led to the CO-DEVELOPMENT OF VASTLY DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE SAME PROBLEMS</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE SURVEY&#x27;S STATED PURPOSE IS TO SUPPLY A LANGUAGE, NOT A RESULT: it aims to provide A LANGUAGE for the two communities TO BEGIN COMMUNICATING, highlighting what each can learn from the other. The deliverable is a shared vocabulary between fields that already work on the same problems</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>EACH FIELD IS CHARACTERISED IN A SINGLE CLAUSE AND THE CONTRAST IS PUT IN THE MODELS: controls is the theory of designing complex actions FROM WELL-SPECIFIED MODELS, while reinforcement learning often makes intricate MODEL-FREE predictions FROM DATA ALONE - and the sentence immediately after says that YET BOTH aim at systems doing the same three things</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>ONE FIELD IS DEFINED AS ANOTHER FIELD&#x27;S PROBLEM WITH A SINGLE CONDITION CHANGED: the main view of the survey is of Quotation withheld - so the whole of one discipline is recast as a special case of another, and the difference between them is reduced to what is known about the system</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE EVALUATION WORD IS DECLARED NOT CLEARLY DEFINED AND THE COMPETING OPERATIONALISATIONS ARE SPELLED OUT: is an algorithm BEST if it crosses some reward threshold in the fewest samples, or if it achieves the highest reward given a fixed budget of samples, OR MAYBE THERE IS A MIDDLE GROUND. The word by which methods are ranked is shown to have at least three readings that would rank them differently</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE SAME OPERATION HAS A DIFFERENT NAME IN THE OTHER FIELD, AND THE DIFFERENCES THAT SURVIVE THE TRANSLATION ARE NAMED: estimation of dynamical systems IS CALLED SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION IN THE CONTROL COMMUNITY - and it DIFFERS from conventional estimation because the inputs must be chosen to excite various degrees of freedom and because dynamical outputs are correlated. The translation is given AND its residue is stated</term>
        <note>about this quote: EXTENDED, not trimmed: the first cut stopped one clause short of &quot;and because dynamical outputs are correlated&quot;, which the tag depends on. Where the next clause carries the claim, widening the span beats weakening the tag.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A SHORT NAME IS CHOSEN OVER THE COMMUNITY&#x27;S OWN, AND THE COMMUNITY&#x27;S IS CALLED VERBOSE: the estimated model is called THE NOMINAL MODEL and designing control as if it were true is called NOMINAL CONTROL - which is COMMONLY VERBOSELY REFERRED TO AS control under the principle of certainty equivalence. The author renames an existing concept for economy and says that is what he is doing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A FIELD&#x27;S OWN CATEGORY TERM IS PUT IN SCARE QUOTES WHILE ITS CONTENTS ARE TESTED: the SO-CALLED MODEL-FREE methods popular in deep reinforcement learning are found CONSIDERABLY LESS EFFECTIVE in both theory and practice than simple model-based schemes on the baseline problem - so the label is held at arm&#x27;s length in the same sentence that reports the result</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A FIELD&#x27;S CENTRAL DICHOTOMY IS ANNOUNCED AS SOMETHING TO BE DISSOLVED RATHER THAN ADJUDICATED: having laid out the split between model-free and model-based methodologies, the author states that he will argue the two perspectives CAN BE UNIFIED, COMBINING THEIR RELATIVE MERITS - the contribution is to remove the opposition, not to win it</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE COMPARISON IS MADE POSSIBLE BY FORCING BOTH FIELDS ONTO ONE SHARED PROBLEM: the two sets of techniques are put ON THE SAME FOOTING through a case study of the linear quadratic regulator with unknown dynamics, and that baseline is what is said to ILLUMINATE THE VARIOUS TRADE-OFFS. A common benchmark is the instrument that makes two vocabularies commensurable</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[10]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>THE ORACLE MODEL IS NAMED, AND ITS COMPLEXITY RELATIVE TO THE NEIGHBOURING FIELD IS STATED: the query protocol IS CALLED EPISODIC REINFORCEMENT LEARNING, and it is described as CONSIDERABLY MORE COMPLICATED than the oracle models typically considered in optimization, because each episode returns a complex feedback signal of states and rewards</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[11]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>A WHOLE FIELD&#x27;S COLLOQUIAL MEANING IS NAMED AND THEN SET ASIDE: most of the time when the term MACHINE LEARNING is used colloquially it refers to PREDICTION, and from that perspective even niche topics are prediction tasks - after which the paper states what makes its own subject different, that there are TWO SPECIAL VARIABLES</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>significant challenges remain at the control-learning interface</label>
        <note>what this limits: the practical readiness of the whole area: significant CHALLENGES AT THE CONTROL-LEARNING INTERFACE remain</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The survey deliberately stays at the level of conceptual ideas and omits the technical detail needed to make its statements precise.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the implementability of anything described: MY AIM WILL BE TO HIGHLIGHT THE MAIN CONCEPTUAL IDEAS ... AND TO AVOID EMBROILING MYSELF IN A THOROUGH DISCUSSION OF THE MYRIAD OF TECHNICAL DETAILS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The scope is restricted to episodic RL and excludes the harder adaptive-control setting.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the scope of every conclusion: THIS SURVEY HAS FOCUSED ON EPISODIC REINFORCEMENT LEARNING AND HAS STEERED CLEAR OF A MUCH HARDER PROBLEM: ADAPTIVE CONTROL</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The theoretical comparison between value-function estimation and model estimation rests on worst-case upper bounds, which the author concedes is not a valid comparison.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the model-versus-value comparison: WHILE COMPARING WORST-CASE UPPER BOUNDS IS CERTAINLY NOT VALID, IT IS SUGGESTIVE THAT - declared invalid and offered as suggestive only</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Function approximation, and deep RL specifically, is set aside rather than analysed.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any reading of the survey as covering deep RL: I HAVE SPENT NO TIME DISCUSSING DEEP REINFORCEMENT LEARNING</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The empirical evidence rests on a small set of simulation benchmarks that invite overfitting.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the empirical evidence for every method surveyed: HAVING ONLY A FEW SIMULATION BENCHMARKS ENCOURAGES OVERFITTING TO THESE BENCHMARKS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The label model-free does not mean the method is free of modelling; the author says modelling is heavily built into its assumptions.</label>
        <note>about this quote: THE &#x27;7&#x27; IN THE QUOTE IS NOT A WORD OF THE SENTENCE - it is layout furniture (a page number or note mark) that this copy leaves between &#x27;that&#x27; and &#x27;modeling&#x27;. · what this limits: a comparison presented as model-free versus model-based: the author states that modelling is heavily built into the assumptions of model-free RL algorithms, so the label does not mark the absence of a model</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>A discounting device had to be introduced to obtain a tractable equation, and the author names that as troubling.</label>
        <note>what this limits: results that depend on the discounted formulation: the discount factor was introduced in order to obtain a simple Bellman equation, which the author flags as troubling rather than as a property of the problem</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The scope claimed for the field is stated to be precisely the scope of a different, older field.</label>
        <note>what this limits: a definition of reinforcement learning as the study of learning to act: a control engineer would say this is precisely the scope of control theory, so the boundary between the two fields is a matter of vocabulary rather than of subject</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>framing and analyzing reinforcement learning with the tools of optimal control, using the Linear Quadratic Regulator as the baseline</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>reinforcement learning</label>
        <term>reinforcement learning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>random search</label>
        <term>random search</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>Evolution Strategy</label>
        <term>Evolution Strategy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper">
        <label>discount factor</label>
        <term>discount factor</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper">
        <label>Bellman equation</label>
        <term>Bellman equation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>random search - THE SAME METHOD UNDER FOUR NAMES: pure random search in RL, a (mu,lambda) Evolution Strategy in evolutionary computation, and studied again under stochastic approximation and under bandits - four literatures, one procedure, and this paper is where they are listed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>model-free - A LABEL THAT DENIES WHAT THE METHOD CARRIES: the name marks the absence of an explicit dynamics model while the modelling assumptions remain, built into the algorithm</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>state-action pair - TWO NOTATIONS FOR ONE OBJECT: (x, u) in control and (s, a) in reinforcement learning, reconciled here by the author choosing one on purpose and saying so</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → reinforcement learning and optimal control theory</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the System Level Synthesis (SLS) framework [50, 84]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → the high-variance findings of Henderson et al. and Islam et al. for deep RL [35, 36]</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>random search —renamed-across-fields→ Evolution Strategy</label>
        <term>random search</term>
        <term>Evolution Strategy</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>discount factor —causes→ Bellman equation</label>
        <term>discount factor</term>
        <term>Bellman equation</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says the discount factor had to be introduced IN ORDER TO get a simple Bellman equation; causes is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>2 — the extra variables u and r distinguishing RL</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>N — horizon over which expected reward is maximized</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mL — total cost of m queries at horizon length L</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>model-free RL is less effective than simple model-based schemes on LQR</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>RL is best viewed as optimal control when the dynamics are unknown</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>RL is harder than supervised learning but can be more valuable</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>model-free and model-based perspectives can be unified</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>policy</label>
        <term>policy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>reward</label>
        <term>reward</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>horizon length L</label>
        <term>horizon length L</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>state of the system</label>
        <term>state of the system</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>control action</label>
        <term>control action</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>disturbance</label>
        <term>disturbance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>reinforcement learning (RL)</label>
        <term>reinforcement learning (RL)</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>control policy</label>
        <term>control policy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>trajectory</label>
        <term>trajectory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>episodic reinforcement learning</label>
        <term>episodic reinforcement learning</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>bootstrap</label>
        <term>bootstrap</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>regression</label>
        <term>regression</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>variance</label>
        <term>variance</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-053018-023825.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
