<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Confronting the Need for Conceptual Change in Pre-Service Science Education</title>
        <author>Marc S. Schwartz</author>
        <author>I. I. Shapiro</author>
        <author>Bruce Gregory</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Confronting the Need for Conceptual Change in Pre-Service Science Education</title>
          <date>2013</date>
          <publisher>Higher Education Studies</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.5539/hes.v3n5p11</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">schwartz2013-confronting-the-need-for-conceptua</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">schwartz2013-confronting-the-need-for-conceptua.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">a31af4c7c527a76b1f54e03d9fb619535852946c</note>
          <note type="rights">open-access</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>science-education</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>pre-service science teachers&#x27; understanding of scientific models</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>practice-report</label>
        <term>practice-report</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>years of schooling built on algorithm-centred worksheets and tests instil the belief that the algorithm is what matters in science, so students attend to the algebra rather than to the model behind it</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>expanding state standards make students and teachers accountable for ever more content, which cuts the time available for building conceptual understanding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the failure on the final demonstration is attributed to the difficulty of transferring an idea into a new problem or context</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Data from the first two years of the course were not kept, so the reported distributions cover only three of the five years</label>
        <note>what this limits: the reported distributions: TABLE 1 DISPLAYS THE SUMS OF THESE DISTRIBUTIONS FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS ... WE DID NOT RETAIN DATA FROM THE FIRST TWO YEARS</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The intervention&#x27;s own effect was positive but limited, and only for some students</label>
        <note>what this limits: the size of the intervention&#x27;s effect: OUR APPROACH DID HAVE A POSITIVE BUT LIMITED IMPACT ON DEVELOPING IN SOME STUDENTS A RICHER UNDERSTANDING</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The expectation held and then reversed: the motivation the design depended on appeared as predicted and did not last, which the authors report as a surprise.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the motivational premise of this kind of intervention: the students were disturbed and motivated as assumed, but the authors report the interest was often short-lived</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The conditions the field&#x27;s standard model of conceptual change rests on are reported as necessary but insufficient, with three named reasons.</label>
        <note>what this limits: designing instruction on Posner et al.&#x27;s conditions for conceptual change: this paper quotes the position that the conditions may be necessary but are insufficient, that experiments often fail to generate the requisite data, and that cognitive limitations eclipse experimental evidence</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>The evidence for the central claim is a teaching observation over five years rather than a measurement: students with undergraduate science degrees failed to generate correct predictions from a model they could otherwise manipulate, illustrated by one worked case (Archimedes&#x27; principle, floating and sinking).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>the students&#x27; own first-questionnaire answers presented back to them, confirming the degree of agreement on each answer</label>
        <note>eliminates: the researchers&#x27; reading of a consensus that the students would not recognise - showing them their own answers is the check that the agreement is theirs · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>nature of science</label>
        <term>nature of science</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>conceptual change</label>
        <term>conceptual change</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>measurement error</label>
        <term>measurement error</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>algorithms</label>
        <term>algorithms</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>evidence</label>
        <term>evidence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="1.0">
        <label>inference</label>
        <term>inference</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>understanding - AS THE STUDENTS EVALUATED IT: recalling terms, recognising a principle, and demonstrating algebraic competency with mathematical representations</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>understanding - AS THE COURSE REQUIRED IT: something reachable only by giving up those criteria, so the intervention asks students to change what counts as understanding, not just to learn more</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>using a model - distinguished here from knowing one: students with science degrees found it &#x27;especially difficult to use a model to correctly generate predictions&#x27;, which is the capacity the course tested and the degrees did not</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>evidence - AS THIS PAPER FIXES IT: Nature&#x27;s behavior itself, the thing a model is about and not any statement about it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>inference - AS THIS PAPER FIXES IT: our models of Nature&#x27;s behavior; the paper&#x27;s whole teaching problem is that students collapse this into evidence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Posner, Strike, Hewson and Gertzog (1982) conceptual change framework; Kuhn (1962); Vosniadou (2008)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Potgieter and colleagues (2012)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → McGoey and Ross (1999)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>algorithms —distinct-from→ conceptual change</label>
        <term>algorithms</term>
        <term>conceptual change</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: THE PAPER NAMES THE INFERENCE IT IS ATTACKING AND CALLS IT DECEPTIVE: &#x27;the DECEPTIVE…&#x27;. The record already carries the two readings of &#x27;understanding&#x27; as senses - as the students evaluated it, and as the course required it - and this edge is the gap between them stated as a relation the paper denies.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span calls the belief that algorithm success leads to conceptual change deceptive; distinct-from is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>evidence —distinct-from→ inference</label>
        <term>evidence</term>
        <term>inference</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE DISTINCTION IS THE PAPER&#x27;S SUBJECT AND NOTHING CARRIED IT. The record already held &#x27;algorithms -distinct-from-&gt; conceptual change&#x27; and two readings of &#x27;understanding&#x27;, but the pair those rest on - evidence against inference - had no concept, no sense and no edge. The parenthetical IS the definition: &#x27;evidence (Nature&#x27;s…&#x27;. Weight 1.0 because the sentence is unhedged and the goal statement at @3738 names the same distinction as objective (1) of the course. · the relation stated: the paper makes the separation a precondition of understanding science at all, not a nicety</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>frequency distribution</label>
        <term>frequency distribution</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Students averaged 91% on Questionnaire I.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Students averaged 49% on Questionnaire II over the course&#x27;s final three years.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Despite nearly six class hours on Archimedes&#x27; principle, nearly all students reverted to other ideas about forces and buoyancy.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Of all the predictions and justifications offered in the final demonstration, exactly one invoked Archimedes&#x27; principle.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Almost all the students, despite holding undergraduate science degrees, did not understand the basic structure of science.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Students&#x27; interest was often short-lived; many grew frustrated at not closing the algorithm-conceptual gap quickly.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Most students were relieved when the floating-and-sinking unit ended, though they said it raised more questions than answers.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Archimedes&#x27; principle</label>
        <term>Archimedes&#x27; principle</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>disequilibrium</label>
        <term>disequilibrium</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>kind of knowledge</label>
        <term>kind of knowledge</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>student predictions</label>
        <term>student predictions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>over 100 students — number of graduate students taught in the Nature of Science course over the five-year period</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>around 20 students — typical class size each year, with roughly equal numbers of women and men</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>12 hours — total instruction time of the floating-and-sinking unit: eight 90-minute classes spread over four weeks</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>91% — average score on Questionnaire I (density/algorithm items) over the final three years</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>49% — average score on Questionnaire II (conceptual floating-and-sinking items) over the final three years</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>approximately 32% — score that random guessing would have produced on Questionnaire II, i.e. the chance baseline</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>only one — number of student responses in the final demonstration that referred to Archimedes&#x27; principle</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Roughly half the class — share of students predicting the glass would go down when a finger was placed in the water</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>No student — number of students who predicted that the balanced glass would rise</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v3n5p11.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
