<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Statistical image properties of print advertisements, visual artworks and images of architecture</title>
        <author>Julia Braun</author>
        <author>Seyed A. Amirshahi</author>
        <author>Joachim Denzler</author>
        <author>Christoph Redies</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Statistical image properties of print advertisements, visual artworks and images of architecture</title>
          <date>2013</date>
          <publisher></publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00808</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">statistical-image-properties-of-print-advertisements</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">statistical-image-properties-of-print-advertisements.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">796c92452f47aa4d0fcc040659c825813487d977</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>empirical-aesthetics</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>higher-order (global) statistical image properties of print advertisements, visual artworks and images of architecture, measured with computer-vision algorithms</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether images of advertisements (and architecture) share the statistical image properties characteristic of artworks - high self-similarity, intermediate complexity, low anisotropy - and whether the measures discriminate image categories</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>the first analysis of higher-order global statistical image properties of print advertisements, showing that man-made visually pleasing images share specific higher-order properties that distinguish them from other image types</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>man-made visually pleasing images (artworks, advertisements, architecture) share a specific pattern of higher-order statistical image properties that distinguishes them from other types of images</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>corpus-analysis</label>
        <term>corpus-analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>The human visual system is adapted to process natural-scene statistics efficiently, so visually pleasing images that follow universal regularities can be processed efficiently.</label>
        <term>efficient visual processing of natural-scene statistics</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>It has been proposed that stimuli which can be processed fluently are more aesthetic in general.</label>
        <term>processing fluency</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>Higher-order image features may be processed fast at a lower level of the visual system, similar to gist perception of scenes, possibly before advertisement content is recognised.</label>
        <term>fast gist-level processing</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Advertisements can activate the brain&#x27;s reward circuitry, which is also involved in the perception of other visually pleasing images such as artworks.</label>
        <term>reward-circuitry activation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>Berlyne&#x27;s u-shaped dependence of hedonic value on complexity was explained by the differing activation of two antagonistic brain systems, a reward system and an aversion system.</label>
        <term>Berlyne two-system account of complexity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>Humans may prefer fractal, self-similar geometry in architecture and urban scenes, possibly because ancestral natural surroundings had fractal characteristics.</label>
        <term>biophilic preference for fractal geometry</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.82">
        <label>Higher anisotropy in advertisements may arise from vertical text and image divisions along cardinal (horizontal and vertical) orientations.</label>
        <term>anisotropy from cardinal orientations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.97">
        <label>Whether these image properties are necessary or sufficient to induce aesthetic perception, and how they correlate with brain activation, remains to be investigated.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>The measured properties are not independent, so the precise relation between the different measures remains to be determined.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>The dependence of beauty on complexity is not straightforward, and there is a general lack of well-controlled studies that manipulate complexity in such images.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>Monochrome artworks are not equivalent to grayscale versions of colored paintings, because conversion to grayscale may destroy their aesthetic appeal.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>The role of anisotropy in architectural aesthetics remains unclear.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>Whether the specific pattern of the three measures is required or sufficient for aesthetic perception remains to be studied.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.97">
        <label>statistical image properties</label>
        <term>statistical image properties</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.96">
        <label>higher-order image properties</label>
        <term>higher-order image properties</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.97">
        <label>self-similarity</label>
        <term>self-similarity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.97">
        <label>complexity</label>
        <term>complexity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.97">
        <label>anisotropy</label>
        <term>anisotropy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Birkhoff-like measure</label>
        <term>Birkhoff-like measure</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.96">
        <label>fractal dimension</label>
        <term>fractal dimension</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Fourier slope</label>
        <term>Fourier slope</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.96">
        <label>PHOG method</label>
        <term>PHOG method</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.94">
        <label>gradient image</label>
        <term>gradient image</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.94">
        <label>box-counting method</label>
        <term>box-counting method</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>aesthetic perception</label>
        <term>aesthetic perception</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>experimental aesthetics</label>
        <term>experimental aesthetics</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.93">
        <label>reward circuitry</label>
        <term>reward circuitry</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[14]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>visually pleasing images</label>
        <term>visually pleasing images</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[15]" resp="#paper" cert="0.94">
        <label>man-made images</label>
        <term>man-made images</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[16]" resp="#paper" cert="0.97">
        <label>advertisements</label>
        <term>advertisements</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[17]" resp="#paper" cert="0.97">
        <label>artworks</label>
        <term>artworks</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[18]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>architecture</label>
        <term>architecture</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[19]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>single-product advertisements</label>
        <term>single-product advertisements</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[20]" resp="#paper" cert="0.93">
        <label>leaflets</label>
        <term>leaflets</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[21]" resp="#paper" cert="0.93">
        <label>urban scenes</label>
        <term>urban scenes</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[22]" resp="#paper" cert="0.93">
        <label>buildings</label>
        <term>buildings</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[23]" resp="#paper" cert="0.94">
        <label>natural scenes</label>
        <term>natural scenes</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[24]" resp="#paper" cert="0.93">
        <label>aesthetic value</label>
        <term>aesthetic value</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[25]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>order</label>
        <term>order</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[26]" resp="#paper" cert="0.92">
        <label>biophilia</label>
        <term>biophilia</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>higher-order image properties → aesthetic perception</label>
        <note>The paper speculates that specific higher-order image properties may enhance visual effectiveness and play a causative role in judging stimuli pleasing, but whether they do remains to be investigated. — the relation stated: higher-order image properties may play a causative role in perceiving stimuli as pleasing</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>processing fluency → aesthetic value</label>
        <note>Stimuli that can be processed fluently are proposed to be more aesthetic in general. — the relation stated: fluent processing is proposed to increase aesthetic response</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>complexity → fractal dimension</label>
        <note>Complexity and the fractal dimension are the most strongly correlated of the measures studied. — the relation stated: complexity is strongly correlated with the fractal dimension</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>self-similarity → complexity</label>
        <note>Self-similarity and complexity are also relatively strongly correlated across all images. — the relation stated: self-similarity correlates with complexity</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>self-similarity → PHOG method</label>
        <note>Self-similarity, complexity and anisotropy are the measures obtained with the PHOG method. — the relation stated: self-similarity is one of the measures</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>complexity - measured sense: the mean of all gradient strengths in the gradient image, an objective image statistic</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>complexity - hedonic/conceptual sense: Berlyne&#x27;s information content, whose intermediate level is judged more aesthetic</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>complexity - fractal-dimension sense: the density of edges in a binarized image</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>self-similarity - measured sense: PHOG histogram-intersection similarity of image sections to a reference section across pyramid levels</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>self-similarity - fractal/aesthetic sense: fractal-like self-similar structure that can evoke aesthetic experience</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>anisotropy - measured sense: statistical variance of image-feature strength across orientations, distinguishing artworks (low) from advertisements (higher)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>aesthetic value - Birkhoff sense: a function of the ratio of order (here self-similarity) to complexity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="senses" ana="#senses[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>aesthetics - computational sense: statistical image properties relatable to visual perception, as against the perceptual experience of pleasingness</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>builds-on → the computational/statistical-image-properties approach to visual aesthetics (Redies, Amirshahi, Graham and colleagues)</label>
        <note>note: Applies previously developed PHOG measures and Fourier/fractal analyses to advertisements and architecture.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>extends → prior PHOG analyses that distinguish artworks from other image categories</label>
        <note>note: Adds advertisements and architecture to the categories distinguished by the PHOG measures.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>supports → the idea that visually pleasing man-made images share specific higher-order statistical properties allowing efficient visual processing</label>
        <note>note: Speculative extension of the idea to print advertising.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>supports → the biophilia hypothesis that humans prefer fractal, self-similar geometry in architecture</label>
        <note>note: Self-similarity and complexity similarities support it, but anisotropy is much higher than in natural scenes.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>qualifies → Berlyne&#x27;s link between intermediate complexity and aesthetic preference</label>
        <note>note: Support is qualified by the lack of well-controlled complexity-manipulation studies.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>contrasts-with → prior studies of basic print-advertisement features (color, size, spacing)</label>
        <note>note: This work targets higher-order global properties not previously studied.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>advertisements —is-a→ man-made images</label>
        <term>advertisements</term>
        <term>man-made images</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: Flat categorical kindhood, cue &#x27;another type of&#x27;. · the relation stated: Advertisements are another type of man-made images that attract human attention.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>complexity —operationalised-as→ gradient image</label>
        <term>complexity</term>
        <term>gradient image</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: Measurement/definition of complexity via the gradient image. · the relation stated: Complexity is operationalised as the mean of all gradient strengths in the gradient image.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>fractal dimension —operationalised-as→ box-counting method</label>
        <term>fractal dimension</term>
        <term>box-counting method</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: Fractal dimension operationalised via the box-counting method. · the relation stated: The fractal (box-counting) dimension is estimated by fitting a line to the box-counting plot.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>advertisements —contrasted-with→ artworks</label>
        <term>advertisements</term>
        <term>artworks</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: Differentiator: anisotropy; the two share most other properties. · the relation stated: Median anisotropy is higher for advertisements than for artworks, which are distinctively low in anisotropy.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>single-product advertisements —contrasted-with→ leaflets</label>
        <term>single-product advertisements</term>
        <term>leaflets</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Differentiator: complexity. · the relation stated: Single-product advertisements are generally less complex than leaflets that promote multiple products per page.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>urban scenes —contrasted-with→ buildings</label>
        <term>urban scenes</term>
        <term>buildings</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Differentiator: self-similarity. · the relation stated: In contrast to buildings and facades, urban scenes contain more diverse elements and are less self-similar.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span is about buildings&#x27; self-similarity; &#x27;urban scenes&#x27; is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>On average, images of advertisements and artworks share a similar degree of complexity (fractal dimension) and self-similarity and similarities in the Fourier spectrum, but advertisements are more anisotropic than artworks.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>Images of advertisements are characterized by a specific combination of higher-order image properties: high self-similarity, intermediate complexity and intermediate anisotropy.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>For single-product advertisements, the measured image properties do not depend on the type of product promoted (cars, cosmetics, fashion or other).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Median anisotropy is higher for advertisements than for artworks and natural scenes, and nearly all categories are significantly more anisotropic than artworks except the natural categories.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>The measured properties are not independent; the strongest correlation is between complexity and the fractal dimension.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>The PHOG measures (self-similarity, complexity and anisotropy) allow distinguishing artworks from many other image categories on average.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>Statistical testing showed overall differences between all 15 image groups on all six measures (p &lt; 0.001).</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>Images of architecture share statistical properties with images of advertisements to a large extent.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>The three PHOG approaches to self-similarity (parent, neighbor, ground) give different absolute values but are robust for the relative differences between image categories.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>the statistical variance (heterogeneity) of image-feature strength across orientations in an image; low anisotropy means uniform strengths across orientations, high means orientations differ in prominence</label>
        <term>anisotropy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>the mean of all gradient strengths in the gradient image; low for uniform images, high for images with large pixel changes</label>
        <term>complexity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the density of edges in a binarized image, an indicator of complexity closely related to it</label>
        <term>fractal dimension</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the degree to which image sections resemble a reference section - the parent section, the neighboring sections, or the whole image at ground level - across pyramid levels, computed with the PHOG method</label>
        <term>self-similarity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>an aesthetic-value proxy defined as self-similarity divided by complexity, substituting self-similarity for order in Birkhoff&#x27;s order/complexity ratio</label>
        <term>Birkhoff-like measure</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.93">
        <label>the concept that urban planning and architectural design should be based on fractal (self-similar) geometry, which humans are held to prefer in their environment</label>
        <term>biophilia</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t86" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>the slope of the log-log plot of the radially averaged Fourier power spectrum; about -2 for scale-invariant, fractal-like monochrome artworks and natural scenes</label>
        <term>Fourier slope</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t87" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.97">
        <label>about 200 color images per dataset — size of each of the 15 image-category datasets</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t88" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.98">
        <label>15 image categories — number of image categories analysed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t89" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.98">
        <label>197 paintings — size of the artworks dataset</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t90" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>self-similarity 0.62 (advertisements) vs 0.68 (artworks), ground approach — PHOG self-similarity, advertisements compared to artworks</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t91" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>complexity 9.00 (advertisements), 7.23 (artworks), 28.25 (branches) — PHOG complexity values across categories</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t92" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>anisotropy 0.70x10-3 (advertisements) vs 0.49x10-3 (artworks) — anisotropy is higher for advertisements than artworks</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t93" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Fourier slope -2.57 (advertisements), -2.45 to -2.53 (architecture), -2.77 (artworks) — slope of the radially averaged Fourier power spectrum by category</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t94" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.97">
        <label>100,000 pixels — image size to which all images were reduced for the PHOG analysis</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t95" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>16 bins covering 360 degrees — orientation bins used to compute the HOG features</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t96" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[9]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>level 3 (64 sub-sections) — highest pyramid level used in the analysis</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t97" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>self-similarity</label>
        <term>self-similarity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t98" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>complexity</label>
        <term>complexity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t99" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>anisotropy</label>
        <term>anisotropy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t100" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>fractal dimension</label>
        <term>fractal dimension</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t101" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Fourier slope</label>
        <term>Fourier slope</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t102" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Birkhoff-like measure</label>
        <term>Birkhoff-like measure</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t103" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.96">
        <label>image category</label>
        <term>image category</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t104" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>type of product</label>
        <term>type of product</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t105" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>resolution of the images</label>
        <term>resolution of the images</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00808.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
