<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The Information Bottleneck Method</title>
        <author>Naftali Tishby</author>
        <author>Fernando C. Pereira</author>
        <author>William Bialek</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The Information Bottleneck Method</title>
          <date>1999</date>
          <publisher>Allerton Conference / arXiv</publisher>
          
          <idno type="arXiv">physics/0004057</idno>
          <idno type="record">tishby1999-information-bottleneck</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">tishby1999-information-bottleneck.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">8520923960fceb55c1b08fe27fbe705c9b5dfdb6</note>
          <note type="rights">arxiv-open</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>information-theory</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>method</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>relevant information extraction under lossy compression</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>mathematical-proof</label>
        <term>mathematical-proof</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>relevance is supplied by a SECOND VARIABLE with positive mutual information, in place of a chosen distortion function, and the joint distribution of the two is assumed available</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>one Lagrange multiplier carries the whole tradeoff, and its two limits are stated: at zero everything collapses to a single codeword, and as it grows the quantization becomes arbitrarily fine</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the Markov condition is stated NOT to be a modelling assumption - the compressed variable is not a hidden variable in a model of the data - and the paper names the different condition a model would have required instead</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>the compressed representation and its representatives are solved for TOGETHER, which is what separates this from rate distortion theory, where choosing representatives is a separate problem</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>that the alternation runs over THREE convex sets is stated in Theorem 5, a different span, not in this one</label>
        <term>convergence of the alternating iterations is argued from each step minimising the same functional independently, that functional being bounded below as a sum of two non-negative terms</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>raising the multiplier traces convex curves in the information plane, and pairs of curves separate at a finite critical value through a second order phase transition, producing a hierarchy of quantizations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The convergence proof does not establish that the solution is unique, since the functional is convex in each distribution separately but not jointly.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any claim that the method finds the solution: THUS OUR CONVERGENCE PROOF DOES NOT IMPLY UNIQUENESS OF THE SOLUTION</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The solution is formal: the conditional distribution appearing in the exponent is defined only implicitly in terms of the mapping being solved for.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the solution as something to compute with: IT IS A FORMAL SOLUTION SINCE p(y|x~) IN THE EXPONENTIAL IS DEFINED IMPLICITLY IN TERMS OF THE ASSIGNMENT MAPPING</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The structure and cardinality of the compressed representation still have to be specified externally and are not determined by the theory.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the claim that the method determines the representation: THE FORMAL SOLUTION ... STILL REQUIRES A SPECIFICATION OF THE STRUCTURE AND CARDINALITY OF X~, AS IN RATE DISTORTION THEORY</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The method assumes access to the joint distribution; how to obtain an adequate sample of it is left outside the paper.</label>
        <note>what this limits: every application to finite data: THE PROBLEM OF ACTUALLY OBTAINING A GOOD ENOUGH SAMPLE OF THIS DISTRIBUTION IS AN INTERESTING ISSUE IN LEARNING THEORY, BUT IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS PAPER</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The convergence proof for the bottleneck iterations is only sketched in this paper for reasons of length.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the convergence result as a proved theorem in this paper: FOR LACK OF SPACE WE CAN ONLY OUTLINE THE PROOF</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The problem the paper addresses is stated to be ill-posed until someone supplies a definition of relevance, which is a choice and not a measurement.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any claim that a compressed representation keeps the relevant information: the problem is not well posed without a suitable definition of relevance, so the definition is supplied by the analyst before any result exists</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>Choosing the distortion function is choosing which features matter, and the paper says the correct one is virtually impossible to obtain for a real signal.</label>
        <note>what this limits: a rate-distortion result as a statement about which parts of a signal matter: the distortion function is an implicit feature selection, and the paper states it is virtually impossible to come up with the correct one for acoustic signals</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The trade-off the method exposes has no uniquely right setting; the balance point is a parameter the analyst turns.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any single information-bottleneck solution: compression is traded against preserved meaningful information, there is no single right solution for that trade-off, and the balance is set by the Lagrange multiplier</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>the rate-distortion trade-off curve and its cardinality specification, taken from lossy source coding and re-drawn in the information plane as the bottleneck curve</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>mutual information</label>
        <term>mutual information</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper">
        <label>relevant information</label>
        <term>relevant information</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper">
        <label>distortion function</label>
        <term>distortion function</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper">
        <label>relevance variable</label>
        <term>relevance variable</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper">
        <label>meaningful information</label>
        <term>meaningful information</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>relevant information - DEFINED BY A CHOSEN SECOND VARIABLE: what a signal tells you about another signal Y, so relevance is never a property of the signal alone and the choice of Y fixes which features count</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>relevance - AS SET BY THE ANALYST&#x27;S PURPOSE: the same speech signal has different relevant features depending on whether the task is recognition or speaker identification, and the paper lists the choice per domain</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>meaning - WHAT SHANNON DELIBERATELY LEFT OUT: information theory was formulated about transmitting information rather than judging its value to the recipient, and this paper returns to the excluded question</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>the distortion measure - EMERGENT, NOT ASSUMED: the KL divergence falls out of the variational principle rather than being chosen in advance, which is the paper&#x27;s answer to the arbitrariness it identifies</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → rate-distortion theory (Shannon)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the arbitrary choice of distortion function in rate-distortion theory</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → rate distortion theory</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extends → the Blahut–Arimoto algorithm</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → the convergence lemma of Csiszár and Tusnády</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>relevant information —operationalised-as→ distortion function</label>
        <term>relevant information</term>
        <term>distortion function</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says the distortion function IMPLICITLY specifies the relevant aspects; operationalised-as is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The information X gives about Y is squeezed through a bottleneck of codewords, a constrained optimization that generalizes rate-distortion theory with the distortion measure emerging from the joint statistics of X and Y.</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The method yields an exact set of self-consistent equations solvable by a convergent re-estimation generalizing the Blahut–Arimoto algorithm.</label>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>information about Y</label>
        <term>information about Y</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>relevant information</label>
        <term>relevant information</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE REPAIRED: the extractor split a hyphen-space and the quote was recorded faithfully with the damage in it, which made it unanchorable. The repaired string is an EXACT SUBSTRING of the staged text - that is why it was accepted, not because a rule produced it. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>information bottleneck</label>
        <term>information bottleneck</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Bayesian</label>
        <term>Bayesian</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mean</label>
        <term>mean</term>
        <note>about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER&#x27;S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file&#x27;s own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0004057.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
