<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The nature of semantic priming by subliminal spatial words: Embodied or disembodied?</title>
        <author>Roberto Bottini</author>
        <author>Madalina Bucur</author>
        <author>Davide Crepaldi</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The nature of semantic priming by subliminal spatial words: Embodied or disembodied?</title>
          <date>2016</date>
          <publisher>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1037/xge0000197</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">unknownnd-the-nature-of-semantic-priming-by</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">unknownnd-the-nature-of-semantic-priming-by.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">763454b36c0113b4b41506b30d580b54e4fcd545</note>
          <note type="rights">open-access</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>cognitive-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>null-result</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>masked semantic priming by spatial words</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>behavioural-experiment</label>
        <term>behavioural-experiment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Sensorimotor activation during comprehension arises from integrating linguistic information with non-linguistic information held in modality-specific cortices, and that integration requires conscious access, so subliminal words stay confined to segregated linguistic networks.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Without awareness, processing remains restricted to specialised, segregated neural networks, which is why distant sensorimotor and association areas are not recruited.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Primes that are low-prototypical members of their category trigger disembodied centre-surround inhibition, which reverses the sign of masked priming and explains the negative effects reported elsewhere.</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Prime duration and stimulus onset asynchrony were confounded, so the paper cannot say which drove the effect.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Why this paper found facilitation where Dudschig et al. found inhibition is left unresolved and handed to future work.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the response keys were always described by COLOUR (green or red, counterbalanced across subjects) and never by spatial position</label>
        <note>eliminates: that the effect is spatial stimulus-response compatibility rather than semantic priming · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a practice block of 32 trials preceded the experiment</label>
        <note>eliminates: that early experimental trials are contaminated by learning the task · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>embodied semantic priming</label>
        <term>embodied semantic priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>symbolic priming</label>
        <term>symbolic priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>sensorimotor</label>
        <term>sensorimotor</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>conscious access</label>
        <term>conscious access</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A NULL WITH ITS OWN POSITIVE CONTROL, IN THE SAME APPARATUS: `when symbolic and nonsemantic mechanisms were prevented, allowing only for a genuinely embodied semantic priming, no effect was found. Conversely, facilitation emerged in the same experimental paradigm when embodied priming was prevented and symbolic priming was allowed.` Six experiments, and the machine works when you leave the other route open. A failed manipulation cannot selectively succeed - which is the objection every unconscious-priming null has to answer, and this one answers it by construction rather than by argument. Same structure as hesselmann2016 at three times the scale</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE LEVEL CLAIM IS EXACT: `Quotation withheld.` Unconscious words reach meaning and stop before simulation. The `although` is the whole value: this is not a claim that unconscious processing is shallow - the words got to semantics - but that the chain BREAKS at a specific link. A corpus of masked-priming records mostly argues about whether meaning was reached at all; this one grants that and asks what comes after</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>AND THE CONCLUSION IS OFFERED AS A CONDITION, NOT A MECHANISM: `Quotation withheld.` `might need` is inside the quote. What makes this more than a hedge is that it is falsifiable in an obvious way - show sensorimotor activation from an unconscious word under any conditions and it is gone - and the authors have just spent six experiments failing to do that themselves</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>AND IT SITS AGAINST dehaene1998 IN THIS CORPUS, WITHOUT CONTRADICTING IT. dehaene1998 concluded that an unreportable numeral was `unconsciously processed according to task instructions, ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE MOTOR SYSTEM`. This paper finds no sensorimotor activation from unconscious words at all. Both can be right, because `reaches the motor system` names two things: dehaene1998&#x27;s is a TRAINED RESPONSE MAPPING - a digit compared to 5, a hand prepared, an arbitrary rule applied - and Bottini&#x27;s is SIMULATION OF MEANING, the claim that understanding `up` re-enacts upward experience. An unconscious stimulus can drive the first and fail the second. Same shape as the two senses of `nonconscious`, and the corpus currently indexes both pairs under one heading</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>replicates → Ansorge et al. (2010), Experiment 1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Dudschig et al. (2014)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → the elaborate processing hypothesis (Kunde, Kiesel, &amp; Hoffmann, 2003)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → radical theories of Embodied Semantics</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>embodied semantic priming —contrasted-with→ symbolic priming</label>
        <term>embodied semantic priming</term>
        <term>symbolic priming</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: THE CONTRAST IS THE EXPERIMENT. The two routes are pitted against each other by closing one and opening the other in the same paradigm, and the asymmetry of the result - null for embodied, facilitation for symbolic - is the paper. Weight 0.95: explicit in the quote, and the design exists for nothing else.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>ANOVA</label>
        <term>ANOVA</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>effect size</label>
        <term>effect size</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>t-test</label>
        <term>t-test</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>correlation</label>
        <term>correlation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>regression</label>
        <term>regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>standard deviation</label>
        <term>standard deviation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>median split</label>
        <term>median split</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>confidence interval</label>
        <term>confidence interval</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>arcsine transformation</label>
        <term>arcsine transformation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>In Experiment 2 no priming effect emerged with spatial words.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED - THE POINTER WAS WRONG, NOT THE CLAIM) · Experiment 3 raised the prime duration from 33 to 50 ms to test whether priming emerges while primes stay outside awareness.</label>
        <note>EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED - THE POINTER WAS WRONG, NOT THE CLAIM. The old evidence was verbatim, anchored and correctly cut, and it contained NONE of this claim&#x27;s numbers (33, 50). The paper states the claim in one sentence elsewhere and the tagger did not use it. the project, 2026-08-23: &#x27;WE HAVE SPENT THE DAY VERIFYING THAT QUOTES ARE REAL AND NONE OF IT ASKS WHETHER THEY ARE RELEVANT.&#x27; Confirmed by reading the claim, the old span and the candidate together; the candidate carries every number AND the claim&#x27;s own content words.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Primes and targets need not be semantically related for an effect to appear.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>When the task made the response mapping non-spatial so that only embodied priming could operate, no priming appeared at all — neither facilitation nor inhibition.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>In the identical paradigm with gender primes and gender symbols, where embodiment was impossible but evidence accumulation was possible, facilitatory priming reappeared.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The pattern gives a case where unconscious words are processed semantically yet activate no sensorimotor representation, so motor activation is not an automatic or necessary part of semantic processing.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>masked priming</label>
        <term>masked priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>spreading activation account</label>
        <term>spreading activation account</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>source confusion</label>
        <term>source confusion</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Stimulus-Response Mapping mechanism</label>
        <term>Stimulus-Response Mapping mechanism</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Embodied Priming</label>
        <term>Embodied Priming</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>d-prime</label>
        <term>d-prime</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Congruity</label>
        <term>Congruity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>duration of the prime display</label>
        <term>duration of the prime display</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>response time</label>
        <term>response time</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>error rate</label>
        <term>error rate</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>response speed</label>
        <term>response speed</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>orientation of the colored buttons</label>
        <term>orientation of the colored buttons</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>number of syllables</label>
        <term>number of syllables</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>frequency of occurrence</label>
        <term>frequency of occurrence</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>695ms vs 714ms — mean RT for congruent versus incongruent trials in Experiment 1, the baseline replication</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p= 0.28 — the null congruity effect in Experiment 2, where primes and targets came from separate word sets</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>p= 0.41 — the null congruity effect in Experiment 5, the condition that isolated embodied priming</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>5 ms — size of the congruity effect for the faster half of RTs in Experiment 6, where only symbolic evidence-accumulation priming was possible</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>0.04, SD= 0.27 — mean d-prime for prime visibility in Experiment 1, not different from zero</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>480 trials — number of experimental trials each participant completed</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Twenty-four — number of participants recruited for Experiment 1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000197.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
