<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Constructivism versus Cognitive Load Theory: In Search for an Effective Mathematics Teaching</title>
        <author>Upu</author>
        <author>Bustang</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Constructivism versus Cognitive Load Theory: In Search for an Effective Mathematics Teaching</title>
          <date>2021</date>
          <publisher></publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.48550/arxiv.2108.04796</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">upu2021-constructivism-versus-cognitive-lo</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">upu2021-constructivism-versus-cognitive-lo.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">bf0f189b844fcd9086f6cab9403af594e4b84c21</note>
          <note type="rights">open-access</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>education</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>constructivist instruction versus cognitive load in mathematics teaching</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>review</label>
        <term>review</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>Scaffolding lowers cognitive load by structuring the task so learners attend only to the parts relevant to the learning goals, which is why constructivist teaching does not overload working memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The author characterises the review of constructivist research as limited in scope.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The empirical dispute rests on a prior question of naming: whether one label covers the other.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the claim that constructivist teaching is or is not effective: the author argues these approaches cannot be equated with minimally guided instruction, so the two sides of the dispute are not necessarily discussing the same class of teaching</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The contradicting result is about a different outcome from the one the original claim measured.</label>
        <note>what this limits: a comparison of direct instruction against constructivist approaches: the opposing finding concerns robust acquisition and maintenance of knowledge over time, which is not the outcome the efficacy claim was made about</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The theory on the other side of the argument rests on a stated assumption about cognitive architecture.</label>
        <note>what this limits: any prediction drawn from cognitive load theory here: it is based on the assumption that human cognitive architecture can process only a limited amount of information in working memory in a given time</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>The paper argues from other people&#x27;s studies rather than from evidence gathered for it.</label>
        <note>what this limits: the support offered here for constructivist approaches: the author discusses guidance and evidence drawn from published studies to argue these approaches cannot be categorised as minimally guided instruction, rather than reporting a new study</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper">
        <label>constructivism</label>
        <term>constructivism</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper">
        <label>minimally guided instruction</label>
        <term>minimally guided instruction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper">
        <label>cognitive load theory</label>
        <term>cognitive load theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper">
        <label>scaffolding</label>
        <term>scaffolding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper">
        <label>working memory</label>
        <term>working memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>constructivism vs minimally guided instruction - THE IDENTIFICATION THE WHOLE DISPUTE TURNS ON: one side treats constructivist teaching as an instance of minimally guided instruction and attacks it on that basis, and this author denies the equation, so both sides can be right about different classes of teaching</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>working memory and long-term memory - TWO DEFINITIONS, BOTH ATTRIBUTED: the first is the memory used for all conscious activities and the only one that can be monitored, the second a large and relatively permanent store, and both are given on the authority of named authors rather than argued for here</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="1.0">
        <label>scaffolding - DEFINED BY CITATION: the process by which a teacher or more knowledgeable peer alters the learning task so the learner can accomplish what would otherwise be out of reach, attributed to a specific author and year rather than stipulated</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>contradicts → Kirschner, Sweller and Clark (2006)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>builds-on → Hmelo-Silver, Duncan and Chinn (2007)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>constructivism —distinct-from→ minimally guided instruction</label>
        <term>constructivism</term>
        <term>minimally guided instruction</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 1</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper argues that constructivist approaches allow flexible adaptation of guidance and so fit how cognitive structures are organised.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Its concluding claim is that scaffolding is what makes constructivist approaches compatible with human cognitive architecture, because scaffolding reduces working memory load.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Constructivist approaches such as problem-based and inquiry learning supply learners with scaffolding covering both how to do the task and why it should be done that way, so learners are not left to construct everything alone.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Reviewing the evidence, the paper concludes the claim that constructivist approaches do not work is not well supported and that evidence points the other way.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>Constructivism is a general theory of learning, while Realistic Mathematics Education is a theory of learning and instruction specific to mathematics.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>The paper does not claim that constructivist approaches are better than other instructional guidance such as direct instruction.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>minimally guided instruction</label>
        <term>minimally guided instruction</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>scaffolding</label>
        <term>scaffolding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>working memory</label>
        <term>working memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>long-term memory</label>
        <term>long-term memory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>cognitive load theory</label>
        <term>cognitive load theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>intrinsic cognitive load</label>
        <term>intrinsic cognitive load</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[6]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>extraneous cognitive load</label>
        <term>extraneous cognitive load</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[7]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>germane cognitive load</label>
        <term>germane cognitive load</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[8]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>constructivist theory</label>
        <term>constructivist theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>five to nine items — Working memory capacity for not-previously-learned information, the limit the paper reasons from (attributed to Miller, 1994)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2108.04796.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
