<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>What is Presupposition Accommodation, Again?</title>
        <author>Kai von Fintel</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>What is Presupposition Accommodation, Again?</title>
          <date>2008</date>
          <publisher>Philosophical Perspectives</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1520-8583.2008.00144.x</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">vonfintel2008-what-presupposition-accommodation-again</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">vonfintel2008-what-presupposition-accommodation-again.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">fee82c14bac78b3ad500389597313fc3159d7adc</note>
          <note type="rights">author-posting-not-redistributable</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>linguistics</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>presupposition accommodation - the adjustment a conversation&#x27;s common ground undergoes so that a sentence whose requirements it does not yet satisfy can still update it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>whether accommodation is mysterious, magical or needed, how hard it is, where it happens, and what exactly gets accommodated</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>defends the common-ground-plus-accommodation theory against the charges of magic and superfluity, and separates accommodation proper from two things routinely confused with it - grammatical presupposition cancellation, and reconstructing a conversation one is not a party to</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>informative presupposition - a sentence presupposing something the hearer demonstrably does not yet believe, and succeeding anyway</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>conceptual-analysis</label>
        <term>conceptual-analysis</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>an utterance changes the common ground in TWO steps - first the bare fact that it was made becomes common ground, and only then is the asserted proposition added; accommodation happens in the first step</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the prior context relevant to interpretation is the context AS CHANGED BY the fact that the speech act was made, which is why the pronoun I has a referent at all</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>what makes the common ground adjustable is that it is constituted entirely by the participants&#x27; beliefs, and beliefs move in response to other people&#x27;s actions</label>
        <note>about this quote: A FOOTNOTE IS JOINED INTO THIS QUOTE after &#x27;actions, the common ground is&#x27;: footnote 8 and a page number are spliced in, and the paper&#x27;s sentence resumes after them (&#x27;more easily changed…&#x27;).</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>hearers do not weigh candidate PROPOSITIONS to add; they weigh candidate NEW COMMON GROUNDS by how plausibly the speaker intended them - which is what resolves the Proviso Problem</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>accommodation fails when the presupposition concerns a fact no mental adjustment can bring into being, such as what the conversation has actually made salient</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>a present-tense presupposition can be too early to accommodate: since we all know demands that the knowledge hold AT utterance time, which later accommodation cannot supply</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A DATED COINAGE WITH THE DEFINITION ATTACHED: `Lewis in his score-keeping paper named the phenomenon “Accommodation”: The Rule of Accommodation for Presupposition - If at time t something is said that requires presupposition P to be acceptable, and if P is not presupposed just before t, then ... presupposition P comes into existence at t. (Lewis 1979)` The naming act, the year, and the rule in one place.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>AND THE TERM WAS BORN AS A SPECIAL CASE OF SOMETHING WIDER, WHICH IS WHY IT COULD TRAVEL: `For Lewis, presupposition accommodation was A SPECIAL CASE OF OTHER ADJUSTMENTS TO THE CONTEXT that are done quietly and without fuss when required.` A narrow technical term carved out of a general conversational phenomenon - and Thomason later takes it back to the general case.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A NAMED MISREADING OF A DEFINITION, QUOTED AND REBUTTED IN PRINT: `GAUKER (2008) MISUNDERSTANDS the proposal that presuppositions are preconditions that need to be satisfied before the common ground can be updated`, followed by Gauker&#x27;s own words and then `This is an error`. The corpus rarely catches one author telling another that he has the definition wrong, with both statements quoted.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the paper cannot explain the very principle it relies on - why new information may be presupposed only when it is uncontroversial - and says so</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>declared and left open: the author hands the challenge to future work rather than answering it here</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the account assumes hardwired semantic presuppositions and declines to defend that assumption against pragmatic-derivation approaches</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>it is agnostic about the semantic implementation, taking either a three-valued or a ccp-based wiring</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the analysis of the grammatical process it separates off is explicitly not given</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the cases from Thomason of assuming leadership in a group and switching to the familiar pronoun, accommodation as a SOCIAL move imported to explain the conversational one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="transfers" ana="#transfers[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.8">
        <label>the local and intermediate accommodation dispute is aligned with the embedded-implicature debate, and the same grammatical-versus-Gricean split is proposed for both</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the pretense account, on which the speaker merely acts as if the proposition is already common ground</label>
        <note>eliminates: the possibility that informative presupposition needs no accommodation because nothing is really being presupposed · outcome: failed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>utterance presupposition, which relocates the requirement from the speaker to the utterance</label>
        <note>eliminates: the possibility that the problem dissolves by redefining who or what does the presupposing · outcome: failed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>a set of candidate common grounds ordered by plausibility, as in Beaver 2001</label>
        <note>eliminates: the possibility that uncertainty about the common ground, rather than adjustment of it, explains the data · outcome: partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="controls" ana="#controls[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the survey of alternatives to accommodation in Part 1 section 4</label>
        <note>eliminates: the possibility that accommodation is superfluous because some other account does the same work · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>common ground</label>
        <term>common ground</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>context set</label>
        <term>context set</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>accommodation</label>
        <term>accommodation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>Rule of Accommodation</label>
        <term>Rule of Accommodation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>local accommodation</label>
        <term>local accommodation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>intermediate accommodation</label>
        <term>intermediate accommodation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>Utterance Presupposition</label>
        <term>Utterance Presupposition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Proviso Problem</label>
        <term>Proviso Problem</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>context change potential</label>
        <term>context change potential</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>Common Ground Target</label>
        <term>Common Ground Target</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>pretense</label>
        <term>pretense</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Informative Presuppositions</label>
        <term>Informative Presuppositions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>common ground → context set</label>
        <note>A FORMAL DEFINITION WITH NOTHING MEASURED, AND THE EIGHT-TYPE VOCABULARY HAS NO SLOT FOR IT. The context set IS the common ground stated extensionally - the paper restates one as the other in its own words. I tagged it &#x27;operationalised-as&#x27; and the gate refused: that type requires a MEASUREMENT OR DEFINITION cue, and it was right, because nothing here is measured. &#x27;same-as&#x27; is wrong too - a set of propositions and a set of worlds are different objects. What is needed is &#x27;defined-in-terms-of&#x27;, which does not exist. Dropped from concept edges 2026-08-26 rather than forced into the nearest type.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>intermediate accommodation → local accommodation</label>
        <note>A RENAMING INSIDE ONE FIELD, AND THE ONLY SENTENCE THAT STATES IT IS DAMAGED. The paper says the process &#x27;was sometimes called “local accommodation” but is now more usually termed “intermediate accommodation”&#x27; - and the staged text carries the page number 30 wedged inside the phrase, &#x27;termed “intermediate 30 accommodation”&#x27;. Quoted as an edge label that would read as a tagging error forever. &#x27;renamed-across-fields&#x27; is also the wrong type: this is one field renaming its own term, not a name crossing between fields. Evidence here is Berman&#x27;s formulation instead, which states the process without naming it. A DAMAGED SENTENCE IS NOT THE ONLY SENTENCE - except when it is the only one that says the thing, and then the relation goes here.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>accommodation - Lewis&#x27;s rule, where the presupposition COMES INTO EXISTENCE on demand and the process therefore looks like magic</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>accommodation - the timing account, where nothing appears from nowhere because the requirement falls due at UPDATE time, not before the utterance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.85">
        <label>accommodation - Thomason&#x27;s SOCIAL sense, the same move by which a person assumes authority or intimacy by acting as if they already had it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`presupposition` (Stalnaker&#x27;s own usage) - AND HE SAYS HIS OWN DEFINITION DOES NOT COVER IT: under pretense `the speaker&#x27;s presuppositions, in the sense of the term I SHALL USE, WILL NOT FIT THE DEFINITION SKETCHED ABOVE ... THAT IS WHY THE DEFINITION IS ONLY AN APPROXIMATION.` An author stipulating a usage that exceeds the definition he has just given, and labelling the definition an approximation rather than repairing it.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>contradicts → Burton-Roberts (1989) and Gauker (1998), that informative presuppositions are fatal to the common ground theory</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>critiques → Soames (1982), that informative presuppositions undermine every definition requiring the presupposed proposition to be present before the utterance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>builds-on → Stalnaker (1998) on the time-dependence of context</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>critiques → the definitional repair by Soames via utterance presupposition</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>critiques → Beaver (2001), that a set of candidate common grounds handles informative presupposition</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>contradicts → Berman (1991), that nuclear-scope presuppositions are accommodated into the restrictor</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>contradicts → Geurts (1996), that the Proviso Problem should be solved by abandoning weak conditional presuppositions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>local accommodation —distinct-from→ accommodation</label>
        <term>local accommodation</term>
        <term>accommodation</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: the sharpest claim in the paper - the two share a name and not a mechanism · the relation stated: the paper denies that the local process is the same kind of thing as accommodation proper</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>pretense —contrasted-with→ accommodation</label>
        <term>pretense</term>
        <term>accommodation</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.85 · the relation stated: presupposing is recast as a disposition to behave rather than a belief, which is what pretense makes of it
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says pretense is not a mental attitude; contrasted-with &#x27;accommodation&#x27; is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>accommodation is not mysterious once the presupposition is understood as falling due at update time rather than before the utterance</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>there is no local accommodation; what is called that is either a grammatical process or global accommodation about the quantifier domain</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>no alternative to the common ground plus accommodation picture survived examination</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>what gets accommodated is fixed by the best guess of the hearers at the intended new common ground, not by minimality</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the stronger unconditional proposition cannot be accommodated for being more plausible, because it asymmetrically entails the weaker conditional one</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>pragmatic presupposition as a requirement imposed on the common ground</label>
        <term>pragmatic presupposition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the bridge principle licensing a partial proposition to update a body of information</label>
        <term>bridge principle</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the rule of accommodation as originally stated by Lewis</label>
        <term>Rule of Accommodation for Presupposition</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the free domain-restriction variable C on a quantifier, presupposed to be familiar</label>
        <term>C variable</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2008.00144.x.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
