<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>What can science and technology studies learn from art and design? Reflections on Synthetic Aesthetics</title>
        <author>Jane Calvert</author>
        <author>Pablo Schyfter</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>What can science and technology studies learn from art and design? Reflections on Synthetic Aesthetics</title>
          <date>2017</date>
          <publisher></publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1177/0306312716678488</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">what-can-science-and-technology-studies-learn</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">what-can-science-and-technology-studies-learn.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">932e811d5cd9e3e47ec47a6b6e0927af0e407dfe</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>philosophy-of-art</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>the collaborations between STS researchers and artists/designers who engaged synthetic biology on the Synthetic Aesthetics project, focused on three paired residencies</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>what science and technology studies can learn from art and design</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>the argument that engaging closely with art and design can enrich STS by helping it develop an emergent, co-produced form of critique, rather than by treating art/design instrumentally</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>critique</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>the similarities (shared objectives of &#x27;opening up&#x27; and &#x27;critique&#x27;) and differences (making tangible artefacts, play and humour) between STS work and art/design work in engagements with synthetic biology</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>field-study</label>
        <term>field-study</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>The exchanges were made reciprocal - artists/designers spent time in the science lab and scientists/engineers spent an equal time in the art studio - so obligation ran both ways and the creative process was shared.</label>
        <term>reciprocal residencies</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>&#x27;Opening up&#x27; works by drawing attention to the implicit assumptions underlying a technology, letting new questions be asked and marginalised perspectives and alternative pathways be surfaced.</label>
        <term>opening up implicit assumptions</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Critical designers produce speculative objects that make abstract ideas tangible and open to discussion, using design to provoke reflection rather than to sell.</label>
        <term>speculative objects make ideas discussable</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>By using the same tools and materials as the laboratory and getting one&#x27;s hands &#x27;wet&#x27;, the maker becomes implicated in manipulating life and cannot take a distanced stance.</label>
        <term>getting hands wet implicates the maker</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>An emergent critique is generated because it is co-produced by people from different disciplines, so what results is more than and different from what any single discipline could produce.</label>
        <term>co-production of critique</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>Because the artefacts have a materiality and an immediacy, they can travel and be discussed more widely than academic papers, driving conversations well beyond the objects themselves.</label>
        <term>tangible artefacts travel</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>There is a danger of putting art and design into an instrumental role that merely performs a service for STS, which the authors are wary of.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Warmer uptake of art/design by the field raises the risk that their critical interventions are co-opted, assimilated and neutralised.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>&#x27;STS&#x27; is notoriously heterogeneous, so any account of what STS can learn rests on a contestable characterisation of the field.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>The paper explicitly declines to set up a hierarchy with art/design above STS or to claim art/design has nothing to learn from STS.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Experimental collaborations of the kind advocated are necessarily risky, because their outcomes are not obvious from the outset.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Non-verbal artistic work carries a heightened danger of being misunderstood, misframed or misused against the artist&#x27;s intentions.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>science and technology studies</label>
        <term>science and technology studies</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>STS</label>
        <term>STS</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.93">
        <label>art</label>
        <term>art</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.93">
        <label>design</label>
        <term>design</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.94">
        <label>synthetic biology</label>
        <term>synthetic biology</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.94">
        <label>critical design</label>
        <term>critical design</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>speculative design</label>
        <term>speculative design</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>commercial design</label>
        <term>commercial design</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.92">
        <label>critique</label>
        <term>critique</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.92">
        <label>emergent form of critique</label>
        <term>emergent form of critique</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>opening up</label>
        <term>opening up</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>making</label>
        <term>making</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.88">
        <label>critical making</label>
        <term>critical making</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>tangible artefacts</label>
        <term>tangible artefacts</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[14]" resp="#paper" cert="0.88">
        <label>matters of concern</label>
        <term>matters of concern</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[15]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>logic of ontology</label>
        <term>logic of ontology</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[16]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>logic of innovation</label>
        <term>logic of innovation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[17]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>logic of accountability</label>
        <term>logic of accountability</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[18]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>interdisciplinarity</label>
        <term>interdisciplinarity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[19]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>Constructive Technology Assessment</label>
        <term>Constructive Technology Assessment</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[20]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>Responsible Research and Innovation</label>
        <term>Responsible Research and Innovation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[21]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>upstream governance</label>
        <term>upstream governance</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[22]" resp="#paper" cert="0.88">
        <label>problem finding</label>
        <term>problem finding</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[23]" resp="#paper" cert="0.88">
        <label>problem solving</label>
        <term>problem solving</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[24]" resp="#paper" cert="0.88">
        <label>epistemic partners</label>
        <term>epistemic partners</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[25]" resp="#paper" cert="0.88">
        <label>participants</label>
        <term>participants</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[26]" resp="#paper" cert="0.88">
        <label>spectators</label>
        <term>spectators</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>logic of ontology → collaboration</label>
        <note>On the logic of ontology, something that would not have happened otherwise comes about through the collaboration. — the relation stated: The logic of ontology holds that the genuinely new emerges through collaboration.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>emergent form of critique → collaboration</label>
        <note>An emergent form of critique requires an experimental, necessarily risky type of collaboration. — the relation stated: An emergent form of critique requires experimental collaboration.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>art and design → STS</label>
        <note>Engaging more closely with art and design can enrich STS work by enabling an emergent form of critique. — the relation stated: Art and design can enrich STS work.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="unhoused_relations" ana="#unhoused_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>critical design → Constructive Technology Assessment</label>
        <note>Critical design has much in common with upstream-governance approaches such as Constructive Technology Assessment. — the relation stated: Critical design closely resembles CTA-style upstream governance.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>critique - the familiar debunking sense (lifting a veil of appearances) versus Latour&#x27;s sense of the critic as one who assembles and offers participants arenas in which to gather</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>opening up - Stirling&#x27;s policy sense (surfacing the implicit assumptions behind a technology) as against the artists&#x27; sense of opening new areas to artistic exploration</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>making - the object sense (producing tangible artefacts) versus the &#x27;critical making&#x27; process sense (shared construction, conversation and reflection)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>design - the mainstream problem-solving/solutions sense versus critical and speculative design&#x27;s use of design to pose questions and open debate</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="senses" ana="#senses[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>success - &#x27;success&#x27; in engaging synthetic biology is itself contested, since a warmer welcome for designers may equal co-option rather than influence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="senses" ana="#senses[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>&#x27;matters of concern&#x27; versus &#x27;objects&#x27;/&#x27;facts&#x27; - Latour&#x27;s contrast, in which design foregrounds the disputed assemblages behind an artefact</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="senses" ana="#senses[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>interdisciplinarity - three senses/logics: accountability, innovation, and ontology (the production of new objects and practices of knowledge)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="senses" ana="#senses[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>the researcher&#x27;s stance - &#x27;participant&#x27; versus &#x27;spectator&#x27; in technoscientific worlds (Barad)</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>builds-on → Barry et al.&#x27;s three &#x27;logics of interdisciplinarity&#x27; (accountability, innovation, ontology)</label>
        <note>note: The three logics inform the paper&#x27;s analysis of the collaborations.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>builds-on → Michael&#x27;s account of the emergent potential of speculative design</label>
        <note>note: The &#x27;emergent form of critique&#x27; is inspired by Michael&#x27;s reading of speculative design.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>builds-on → Latour&#x27;s reconception of critique as assembling rather than debunking</label>
        <note>note: The word &#x27;critique&#x27; is drawn from Latour (2010): the critic assembles rather than debunks.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>builds-on → Ratto&#x27;s &#x27;critical making&#x27; movement</label>
        <note>note: The emphasis on process over object resonates with critical making.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>qualifies → Michael&#x27;s strict distinction between speculative and critical design</label>
        <note>note: The authors question whether speculative and critical design can be distinguished so strictly.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>recommends → bringing STS&#x27;s upstream-governance work and critical design together</label>
        <note>note: There is rich potential to bring these areas of investigation together.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.94">
        <label>critical design —distinct-from→ commercial design</label>
        <term>critical design</term>
        <term>commercial design</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: Differentiator stated: critical design provokes reflection about technology&#x27;s complexity; commercial design does not. · the relation stated: Critical designers distinguish their work from commercial design by using design to provoke reflection rather than to sell.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>art —contrasted-with→ design</label>
        <term>art</term>
        <term>design</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Actor-stated contrast that recurs across three participants. · the relation stated: Sascha and Oron draw a distinction between art (opening, posing questions) and design (finding solutions, problem-solving).
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but attributed: the span reports Sascha&#x27;s distinction (interview).</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>speculative design —distinct-from→ critical design</label>
        <term>speculative design</term>
        <term>critical design</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.75 · note: Michael&#x27;s distinction; the authors elsewhere question whether it holds so strictly (q93). · the relation stated: Speculative design&#x27;s object is coproduced with publics and open-ended, whereas a critical designer&#x27;s work is often produced alone for a gallery.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>problem finding —distinct-from→ problem solving</label>
        <term>problem finding</term>
        <term>problem solving</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: The differentiator is finding versus solving; &#x27;problem finding&#x27; is aligned with inventive problem making. · the relation stated: Dunne and Raby distinguish their interest in &#x27;problem finding&#x27; from the &#x27;problem solving&#x27; of commercial design.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>logic of ontology —contrasted-with→ logic of innovation</label>
        <term>logic of ontology</term>
        <term>logic of innovation</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Barry et al.&#x27;s three logics provide different rationales. · the relation stated: The logic of ontology (producing new objects and practices) gives a different rationale for interdisciplinarity from the logic of innovation (economic growth).
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span lists three logics side by side; contrasted-with is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>participants —contrasted-with→ spectators</label>
        <term>participants</term>
        <term>spectators</term>
        <note>the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: A proposed reframing, hedged (&#x27;may also have to&#x27;). · the relation stated: The authors argue researchers may have to think of themselves as &#x27;participants&#x27; rather than &#x27;spectators&#x27;.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>The three art/design pairs and the STS researchers shared two objectives - &#x27;opening up&#x27; synthetic biology and &#x27;critique&#x27;.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>Engaging more closely with art and design can enrich STS work by enabling an emergent form of critique.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>The most important difference is that artists and designers make tangible artefacts, which the STS researchers&#x27; academic texts lack.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>A speculative object can be embraced by the very field it critiques - the Scatalog was taken up by the Beijing Genomics Institute to represent a desired research end-point.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t73" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.89">
        <label>Many synthetic biologists appear happier to collaborate with designers than with social scientists, and those collaborations show less divergence in expectations.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t74" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>Michael separates speculative design (open-ended) from critical design on the grounds that critical design has a pre-defined target of critique.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t75" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>How art/design work is labelled matters less than whether it provokes ongoing exploration and discussion.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t76" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the application of engineering principles to living systems (Endy)</label>
        <term>synthetic biology</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t77" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.92">
        <label>using design as a tool to provoke reflection about the social, political and economic complexity of technology, rather than for commercial ends</label>
        <term>critical design</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t78" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>drawing attention to the often implicit assumptions that underlie discussions of a technology (Stirling)</label>
        <term>opening up</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t79" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>a necessarily co-produced critique that is the outcome of a shared cross-disciplinary endeavour, not one group imposing its tools</label>
        <term>emergent form of critique</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t80" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.88">
        <label>Latour&#x27;s &#x27;things&#x27; - the disputed assemblages that constitute artefacts and are usually overlooked as mere &#x27;objects&#x27; or &#x27;facts&#x27;</label>
        <term>matters of concern</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t81" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>a rationale for interdisciplinarity that produces new objects and practices of knowledge, so something that would not otherwise have happened comes about</label>
        <term>logic of ontology</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t82" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>$10 million — funding made available by the US NSF and the UK EPSRC at the sandpit, from which five projects were funded</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t83" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>over 200 applications — responses received to the 2010 call for participants</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t84" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>six artists and designers and six synthetic biologists — participants selected and paired for the residencies</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t85" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>12 residents — interviewees, each interviewed on at least two occasions</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716678488.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
