<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy</title>
        <author>Alex J. Wood</author>
        <author>Mark Graham</author>
        <author>Vili Lehdonvirta</author>
        <author>Isis Hjorth</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy</title>
          <date>2018</date>
          <publisher>Work Employment and Society</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.1177/0950017018785616</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">wood2018-good-gig-bad-gig-autonomy-and-algo</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">wood2018-good-gig-bad-gig-autonomy-and-algo.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">1214250a094cf296452c59b3ab360b7627952de0</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>sociology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>job quality in the remote gig economy - digital services sold through online labour platforms by workers in Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa to clients in high-income countries</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>what the job quality of remote gig work is, and which organisational forms of control explain the commonalities across platforms and countries</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>evidence that algorithmic control, unlike Taylorism, delivers high autonomy AND low pay, isolation and overwork at once; and the identification of platform reputation as a symbolic form of marketplace bargaining power</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>remote gig workers experiencing genuine autonomy and severe overwork as two effects of the same system of control</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>field-study</label>
        <term>field-study</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>CONTROL AT THE END OF THE LABOUR PROCESS, NOT DURING IT. Only the delivered product is judged, so the worker is genuinely free in method, hours and place - and the same fact means the rating that governs all future work is assigned after the work is done and cannot be argued with</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>NON-PROXIMITY DEFEATS SUPERVISION AND THE RATING RESTORES IT: clients in high-income countries cannot watch workers in SEA and SSA, so direct monitoring fails - and platform rating and ranking overcome exactly the spatial and temporal barriers that defeated it</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>RANKING IS THE SANCTION: platforms do not dismiss low-rated workers, they filter work away from them, so the penalty is invisible, gradual and unappealable - continuing on the platform simply stops being a viable living</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>DIRECT MONITORING WAS EASILY CIRCUMVENTED - keystroke counts and screenshots were worked around by timing and by a second monitor - which is why the reputational mechanism, not the surveillance mechanism, is the effective one</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>WORKERS WELCOMED THE MONITORING because the platform guaranteed payment for monitored work: surveillance was traded for protection against wage theft, so the same mechanism is a safeguard and a control depending on who is short of power</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>FORMAL CONTROL WITHOUT REAL CHOICE: workers hold genuine authority over where and when they work and have little real alternative to home and to unsocial hours, because client demand and weak structural power set the terms</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>mechanisms</label>
        <term>AN UNREGULATED GLOBAL OVERSUPPLY OF LABOUR is what the platform connects clients to, and it is the source of the weak structural power that turns autonomy into overwork</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>probability sampling is stated to be impossible on an online labour platform, because the chance of any member seeing the survey task is unequal and unknown</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>response rates were 30% and 7% on the two platforms, which the authors call low by conventional social survey standards</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the sample resembles a quota sample except that subsample sizes were not predefined - they depended on how easy each subpopulation was to find</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the population of remote gig workers is called an ambiguous concept, since engagement runs from a registered account to a full-time income and changes over time; the authors define it by a work threshold instead</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the survey is used only to show that interview themes are shared more widely, not to estimate population quantities</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>research on remote gig work quality is limited in both the number of studies and the breadth of platforms and countries covered, which bounds what the findings can be compared against</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>40 of the 147 workers interviewed were excluded because they did not use either of the two platforms under study</label>
        <note>eliminates: workers with no experience of the two platforms under study contributing to findings about those platforms - 40 of 147 interviewees were excluded on that ground · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>174 of 853 survey responses were excluded - wrong region, incomplete job-quality modules, or a failed attention check - leaving 679</label>
        <note>eliminates: inattentive or mis-targeted responses as a source of the survey results - 174 of 853 were removed for wrong region, incomplete modules, or a failed attention check · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>participants were told the interview was research and not a job, and that no platform feedback would be left either way - removing the reputational stake that would otherwise shape what a rated worker says</label>
        <note>eliminates: the reputational stake as an influence on what workers said - participants were told it was research, not a job, and that no platform feedback would be left either way · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="controls" ana="#controls[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>purposive invitation across countries, genders and skills was used in place of an open task, which the authors argue mitigates self-selection on task-type preference and reservation wage</label>
        <note>eliminates: self-selection on task-type preference and reservation wage, which an open posted task would have introduced - purposive invitation across countries, genders and skills was used instead · outcome: partial</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>algorithmic control</label>
        <term>algorithmic control</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>algorithmic management</label>
        <term>algorithmic management</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>gig economy</label>
        <term>gig economy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>remote gig work</label>
        <term>remote gig work</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>job quality</label>
        <term>job quality</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>online labour platforms</label>
        <term>online labour platforms</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>autonomy</label>
        <term>autonomy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[7]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>Taylorist</label>
        <term>Taylorist</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[8]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>work intensity</label>
        <term>work intensity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[9]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>symbolic power</label>
        <term>symbolic power</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[10]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>marketplace bargaining power</label>
        <term>marketplace bargaining power</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[11]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>structural power</label>
        <term>structural power</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[12]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>platform reputation</label>
        <term>platform reputation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[13]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>social isolation</label>
        <term>social isolation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[14]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>customer management</label>
        <term>customer management</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[15]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>labour process</label>
        <term>labour process</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[16]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>discretion</label>
        <term>discretion</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[17]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>overwork</label>
        <term>overwork</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[18]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>non-proximity</label>
        <term>non-proximity</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[19]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>theory elaboration</label>
        <term>theory elaboration</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[20]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>purposive</label>
        <term>purposive</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[21]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>self-selection biases</label>
        <term>self-selection biases</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>autonomy - IN THIS PAPER A REAL AND MEASURED FREEDOM THAT DOES NOT IMPLY GOOD WORK. 72% could choose the order of tasks and 74% their methods, and the same workers report overwork, sleep deprivation and exhaustion. The paper&#x27;s whole argument is that autonomy and job quality come apart, so reading `autonomy` as a job-quality outcome inverts the finding</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>algorithmic control - CONTROL EXERCISED AT THE END OF THE LABOUR PROCESS RATHER THAN DURING IT. That single structural fact generates the whole pattern: because only the output is judged, the worker is free in how they work, and because the rating governs future work, the freedom is unusable</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>algorithmic management - NOT SUPERVISION BY MACHINE BUT CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT EXTENDED: the client is placed in the management circuit, and the platform&#x27;s ranking turns their rating into a sanction. The controller is another user, not an algorithm with a policy</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="senses" ana="#senses[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>platform reputation - AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE IN THE LABOUR MARKET, alongside skills, rather than a signal about past work. It is what the paper means by reputation having `symbolic power`: it is held by the worker, cannot be transferred between platforms, and determines what work is reachable at all</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>contradicts → accounts which hold that ICTs bring Taylorist organisational forms to white-collar work - the &#x27;assembly line in the head&#x27; and &#x27;electronic sweatshop&#x27; readings - which this study&#x27;s remote gig workers do not fit</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>contradicts → Shapiro&#x27;s characterisation of gig-work autonomy as &#x27;autonomy over minute decisions&#x27;, which the authors find far from minute for remote gig work</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>extends → Silver&#x27;s and Wright&#x27;s concept of marketplace bargaining power, which this article extends with a symbolic form neither of them considers</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>qualifies → the literature on Taylorist informational control, which is predominantly based on call-centre research and was generalised into theories of effort-biased technology adoption</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[0]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>algorithmic control —distinct-from→ Taylorist</label>
        <term>algorithmic control</term>
        <term>Taylorist</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.95
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span lists Taylorist and algorithmic controls as forms; it does not assert a distinction.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[1]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>algorithmic management —is-a→ customer management</label>
        <term>algorithmic management</term>
        <term>customer management</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.95
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span calls algorithmic management an EXTENSION of customer management; is-a is loose.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[2]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>algorithmic control —causes→ autonomy</label>
        <term>algorithmic control</term>
        <term>autonomy</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: &#x27;This form of control&#x27; = algorithmic control (previous sentence); the span says algorithmic management FACILITATES autonomy.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[3]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>algorithmic control —causes→ overwork</label>
        <term>algorithmic control</term>
        <term>overwork</term>
        <note>direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says algorithmic control CAN lead to overwork; hedged.</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t57" type="concept_edges" ana="#concept_edges[4]" resp="#tagger">
        <label>symbolic power —is-a→ marketplace bargaining power</label>
        <term>symbolic power</term>
        <term>marketplace bargaining power</term>
        <note>strength of the relation: 0.95</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t58" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Algorithmic control is central to online labour platforms, bringing autonomy and flexibility but also low pay, isolation, unsocial hours, overwork and exhaustion.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t59" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>control operates at the end of the labour process rather than during it, which is what distinguishes it from Taylorist informational control</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t60" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Online labour platforms filter work away from low-rated workers.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t61" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Workers often welcomed monitoring because the platform guaranteed payment for monitored work.</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t62" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>skills and platform reputation are the individual resources that matter most; workers lacking them suffered low incomes and insecurity</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t63" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>gig economy</label>
        <term>gig economy</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t64" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>remote gig work</label>
        <term>remote gig work</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t65" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>algorithmic management</label>
        <term>algorithmic management</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t66" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>Taylorist informational control</label>
        <term>Taylorist informational control</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t67" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>107 interviews across six countries (36 in Southeast Asia, 71 in Sub-Saharan Africa) over seven months of fieldwork — None</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t68" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>679 survey respondents after exclusions, 40% female and 60% male, 51% SEA and 49% SSA — None</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t69" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>72% could choose or change the order of their tasks and 74% their methods of work — None</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t70" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>survey response rates of 30% and 7% on the two platforms — None</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t71" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>skills</label>
        <term>skills</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t72" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>platform reputation</label>
        <term>platform reputation</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
