standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; 3 of 3 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | 3' mRNA counting of tens of thousands of individual cells in parallel - and, separately, telling whose cells they are from the same reads Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | whether tens of thousands of single cells can be captured and barcoded without custom microfluidics or plate sorting, and at what multiplet, capture and conversion rates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | a gel-bead-in-emulsion platform capturing ~50% of loaded cells across 8 parallel channels, with its multiplet rate, cross-talk and conversion efficiency each measured against a control of known composition; plus a de novo SNV method that resolves transplant chimerism without either genotype Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | method Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | transcriptomic heterogeneity that population-averaged measurement hides, and the droplet-level artefacts - multiplets, barcode cross-talk, technical variance - that appear once you measure cells one at a time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | omics-profiling Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: omics-profiling | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | cells are loaded far below one per droplet so that two rarely share a barcode; the same dilution that suppresses multiplets is what throws away the cells that are never captured, so the multiplet rate and the capture rate are two readings of one loading decision Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | synthetic RNAs at a known concentration are loaded in place of cells, so every difference between the expected and observed counts must come from the instrument - the variance that remains is technical by construction rather than by argument Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: a droplet with no biology in it | mechanisms[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | a barcode carrying substantial human and mouse counts can only have held two cells, so mixing species converts an invisible failure into a countable one - and the count must then be doubled, because same-species doublets are equally likely and leave no trace Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: two species as a doublet detector | mechanisms[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the ~250 nt of cDNA that gives an expression count also carries sequence variants, so each cell has an expression identity and a genotype identity from the same reads; agreement between them is evidence neither could give alone Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | an observed barcode one Hamming step from known sequences is reassigned by posterior probability from base qualities and the overall barcode count distribution, above 0.975, with lexical order as the stated tie-break rather than a silent one Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the level of detection of the genotype method is given as 3% in Results and as 4% of 6,000 cells in Methods, for the same in silico mixing experiment, and the two are never reconciled Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the same discrepancy, from the Methods side - K=1 is selected when the mixture fraction is below 4% of 6,000 cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | multiplets of identical or highly similar cell types cannot be detected by any of the measures used here, and the authors say more sophisticated methods will be required Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | a 15-20% error in the cell counts feeds directly into the capture efficiency, and the authors name it as a source of the variability in that figure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | imaged multiple-encapsulation was 16% higher than the Poisson expectation, ascribed to subsampling error or to cell-cell clumping seen during the manual count Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | classification blurred the boundaries between T-cell subpopulations, with part of the inferred CD4+ naive population classified as CD8+ T cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the transplant work is a proof of principle on BMMCs from two patients Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the unexpected absence of monocytes after transplant is reported without explanation and left for further study Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the GemCode gel-bead-in-emulsion barcoding platform, carried from genome haplotyping, structural variant analysis and de novo genome assembly into single-cell RNA counting Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the two-genome mixture model with a Gibbs sampler and Stephens relabelling, carried from mixture-model statistics into deciding which transplanted cells are whose Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a mixture of ~1,200 human 293T and ~1,200 mouse 3T3 cells loaded together, so that a droplet holding two cells leaves a two-genome barcode behind it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: multiplets and barcode cross-talk being invisible - in a single-species run a doublet and a large cell produce the same data, and neither rate can be read · outcome: held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a cell titration across six different cell loads, recovering 1,200 to 9,500 cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the 1.6% figure being a fixed property of the instrument - if the rate did not track the load, the mechanism would not be Poisson co-encapsulation at all · outcome: held | controls[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | high-speed imaging of every GEM as it formed, with ~28k frames counted by hand, as a measurement of cell occupancy that does not pass through sequencing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the Poisson loading claim resting on the same data it explains - the imaging can disagree with the sequencing, and it does, by 16% · outcome: partial | controls[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | ERCC synthetic spike-in RNAs at known concentration loaded into GEMs in place of cells, in two mixes and two dilutions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: biological variation as a contributor to the measured variance, and the conversion efficiency being inferred from data with no known answer · outcome: held | controls[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | droplet digital PCR on eight genes in Jurkat cells, against the RNA copy number measured in bulk from the same cell type Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: naked spike-in RNA standing in for a real transcript inside a real cell - ERCC molecules are not lysed out of anything, and could convert at a different rate · outcome: held | controls[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | 293T-only and Jurkat-only samples run through the identical PCA, alongside the mixed ones Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the clustering method itself as the source of the two clusters - a procedure that splits a pure sample would have produced the same picture from nothing · outcome: held | controls[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | cell identity assigned a second time from SNVs alone, independently of any marker gene, and compared cell by cell with the marker-based assignment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the choice of marker genes as the source of the cluster identities - genotype and expression are different measurements and could have disagreed · outcome: held | controls[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | in silico mixing of two donors' reads at 12 ratios from 0 to 50%, where the true label of every cell is known, with sensitivity and PPV computed against it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a detection limit asserted rather than measured - the floor is found by mixing downward until the method stops recovering the minor population · outcome: held | controls[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the same two donors mixed in vitro at 50:50, 90:10 and 99:1 before sequencing, rather than mixed computationally afterwards Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: in silico mixing as the reason the floor holds - reads combined by arithmetic never pass through a shared droplet, a shared PCR or a shared flow cell · outcome: held | controls[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | 11 pairwise genotype comparisons between samples from the same individual and 15 between different individuals, computed before any patient sample was interpreted Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: reading a genotype-overlap percentage with no scale - 97% and 78% are host and donor only because the same-individual and different-individual ranges exist · outcome: held | controls[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the routine clinical chimerism assay, PowerPlex 16 on a genetic analyser, run on the same post-transplant samples Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the new method being its own witness - the chimerism call is checked against the assay currently trusted for that decision, in both patients · outcome: held | controls[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the remaining fresh PBMCs from the same donor frozen and re-run three weeks later, compared with the fresh library gene by gene and cluster by cluster Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: freeze-thaw as an explanation of any composition difference in the frozen repository specimens the method is meant to be used on · outcome: held | controls[11] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | ten bead-enriched, separately profiled subpopulations of PBMCs from the same donor, each clustered on its own and checked against FACS Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: substructure being an artefact of clustering a mixed population - a purified sample that splits would indict the pipeline, and most of them did not split · outcome: held | controls[12] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | Seurat, an independently written clustering package, run on the same 68k gene-barcode matrix Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the cell-type structure being specific to the authors' own PCA and k-means choices - a second package agreeing on some boundaries and not others locates which ones the data supports · outcome: partial | controls[13] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | GEM Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: GEM | concepts[0] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | UMI Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: UMI | concepts[1] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | multiplet rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: multiplet rate | concepts[2] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | multiplets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: multiplets | concepts[3] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | cell capture rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cell capture rate | concepts[4] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | cross-talk Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cross-talk | concepts[5] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | technical variation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: technical variation | concepts[6] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | biological variation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: biological variation | concepts[7] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | ERCC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ERCC | concepts[8] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | SNVs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: SNVs | concepts[9] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | chimerism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: chimerism | concepts[10] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | genotype overlap Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: genotype overlap | concepts[11] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Seurat Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Seurat | concepts[12] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Poisson distribution Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Poisson distribution | concepts[13] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| senses | multiplet rate - AS MEASURED BY SPECIES MIXING: twice the share of barcodes carrying significant UMI counts from both genomes, which can only see cross-species doublets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | multiplet rate - AS MEASURED BY SNV: twice the share of cells whose SNV counts fall between the two cell lines, which still cannot see a doublet of two like cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the method's level of detection - AS STATED IN RESULTS: 3%, with minor genotypes identified at >95% sensitivity and PPV and nothing recovered below it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the method's level of detection - AS STATED IN METHODS: 4% of 6,000 cells, from the same in silico mixing experiment; the paper never reconciles the two Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | variation in UMI counts - IN A DROPLET HOLDING A CELL: biological and technical together, CV2 ~11-19% Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | variation in UMI counts - IN A DROPLET HOLDING SYNTHETIC RNA: technical only, by construction, CV2 ~7% Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → existing scRNA-seq methods - microfluidic approaches with limited throughput, plate methods needing FACS into many plates, and droplet methods requiring custom devices and reagents Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → clinical chimerism testing by PCR on flow-sorted populations, which is bounded by cell-surface markers, needs sufficient cell counts per population, and is not intended to detect minimal residual disease Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → genotype-based cell assignment, by inferring both genomes de novo from the transcriptome rather than requiring DNA sequencing or large copy-number changes known in advance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | confirms → Klein et al.'s estimate that technical variance accounts for about half of the total variance in droplet scRNA-seq Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → its own PBMC classification - the correlation-based assignment blurs T-cell subpopulation boundaries, and an independent package fails on a different pair Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | technical variation —distinct-from→ biological variation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: whether the source of the variance is the cell or the instrument · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): whether the source of the variance is the cell or the instrument · the relation stated: an ERCC droplet contains no cell, so nothing biological can vary in it also in: technical variation · biological variation | concept_edges[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | multiplet rate —operationalised-as→ UMI Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · the relation stated: defined as twice the rate of barcodes carrying significant UMI counts from both genomes
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span defines the multiplet rate FROM UMI counts; operationalised-as is loose. also in: multiplet rate · UMI | concept_edges[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | multiplets —contrasted-with→ Poisson distribution Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: whether cells enter droplets independently, or arrive already stuck together · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): whether cells enter droplets independently, or arrive already stuck together · the relation stated: the imaged rate of multiple encapsulations exceeded the Poisson expectation by 16%
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the multiplet rate exceeded the expected value; contrasted-with 'Poisson distribution' is loose. also in: multiplets · Poisson distribution | concept_edges[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Genotype overlap averages about 98% between samples of the same individual and about 73% between different individuals. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | technical variance accounts for about half of total variance, measured by loading synthetic RNA into droplets in place of cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Detecting multiplets of identical or highly similar cell types will require more sophisticated methods. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | imaged multiple-cell encapsulation ran 16% above the Poisson expectation, with cell clumps seen during the manual count Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | marker-based and SNV-based cell assignment agree at 99% on the 293T/Jurkat mixture Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | The SNV result was consistent with a clinical chimerism assay showing only 12% donor in the post-transplant sample. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | twice the rate of cell barcodes with significant UMI counts from both mouse and human, where the top 1% of UMI counts counts as significant Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: multiplet rate | content_tags.definitions[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the ratio of the number of cells detected by sequencing to the number of cells loaded Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cell capture rate | content_tags.definitions[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Gel bead in EMulsion - one gel bead carrying barcoded oligonucleotides, encapsulated with cells and reagents in an 8-channel microfluidic chip Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: GEM | content_tags.definitions[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the inferred multiplet rate at 1,012 cell-containing GEMs in the species-mixing run Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the mean fraction of UMI counts from the other species - the barcode cross-talk level Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the error in the cell counts that feeds into every capture-efficiency figure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | genotype overlap between samples from the same individual - the positive control that makes 97% readable as host Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. value source note: THE DESCRIPTION DRAWS ON THE PAPER BEYOND THIS QUOTE: the 97% is the transplant result the control is used to read ('the post-transplant sample was 97% similar…'). | content_tags.quantities[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | genotype overlap between different individuals - the negative control that makes 78% readable as donor Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. value source note: THE DESCRIPTION DRAWS ON THE PAPER BEYOND THIS QUOTE: the 78% is the transplant result the control is used to read ('The sample only shared 78% similarity with AML035 host cells'). | content_tags.quantities[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | sensitivity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sensitivity | content_tags.statistics[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | PPV Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: PPV | content_tags.statistics[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Poisson distribution Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Poisson distribution | content_tags.statistics[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | multiplet rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: multiplet rate | content_tags.variables[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | genotype overlap Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: genotype overlap | content_tags.variables[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | technical variation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: technical variation | content_tags.variables[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.