<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey</title>
        <author>Bao‐Liang Zhong</author>
        <author>Wei Luo</author>
        <author>Hai-Mei Li</author>
        <author>Qian-Qian Zhang</author>
        <author>Xiao-Ge Liu</author>
        <author>Wen-Tian Li</author>
        <author>Yi Li</author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <p>Tag layer of the DHSS Meta-Tagging Project. The article text is reproduced from the
           staged copy named in sourceDesc and is not altered; the tags are held separately in
           standOff so that overlapping and nested spans are preserved.</p>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey</title>
          <date>2020</date>
          <publisher>International Journal of Biological Sciences</publisher>
          <idno type="DOI">10.7150/ijbs.45221</idno>
          
          <idno type="record">zhong2020-knowledge-attitudes-and-practices</idno>
          <note type="staged-file">zhong2020-knowledge-attitudes-and-practices.txt, the project's staged copy</note>
          <note type="text-sha1">431fe16b87dded1dfe88839f033578339ff6f268</note>
          <note type="rights">cc-by-nc</note>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <textClass><keywords><term>health-psychology</term></keywords></textClass>
      <particDesc>
        <person xml:id="paper"><p>the paper's own words</p></person>
        <person xml:id="tagger"><p>the tag layer; a sentence written by the tagger about the
          paper, always anchored to a quotation but not itself a quotation</p></person>
      </particDesc>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change when="2026-10-06"
              who="build_paper_edition.py">0 spans located by searching the stored text for the quote's exact words, allowing any whitespace between them</change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <standOff>
    <spanGrp type="tags">
      <span xml:id="t0" type="object_of_study" ana="#object_of_study" resp="#paper">
        <label>knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid-rise period of the outbreak</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t1" type="research_question" ana="#research_question" resp="#paper">
        <label>what Chinese residents knew, felt and did about COVID-19 while the epidemic was accelerating, and whether knowledge predicted the other two</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t2" type="contribution" ana="#contribution" resp="#paper">
        <label>a 6,910-respondent online KAP survey, reported with the DIRECTION of its own sampling bias on each headline figure</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t3" type="claim_type" ana="#claim_type" resp="#paper">
        <label>existence</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t4" type="phenomenon" ana="#phenomenon" resp="#paper">
        <label>high self-reported knowledge, optimism and mask-wearing in a self-selected online sample during an accelerating epidemic</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t5" type="method" ana="#method" resp="#paper">
        <label>survey</label>
        <term>survey</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t6" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the proposed pathway is knowledge -&gt; attitude and practice: a higher COVID-19 knowledge score is associated with a LOWER likelihood of negative attitudes and of poor preventive practices, OR 0.75-0.90, P&lt;0.001</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t7" type="mechanisms" ana="#mechanisms[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>knowledge and attitudes act on transmission indirectly through panic, which the paper says can itself complicate prevention</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t8" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A SIGNED ERROR TERM, NOT A LIMITATIONS PARAGRAPH. The sample is over-representative of women, the well-educated and mental labourers, and the paper states the consequence per figure: `we may have OVERESTIMATED knowledge and rates of preventive practices and UNDERESTIMATED rates of positive attitudes`</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t9" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the population the findings apply to is narrowed explicitly - `strictly speaking, our findings can only be generalized to Chinese populations of a relatively high socioeconomic status, particularly women`</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t10" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE MEASURE IS DECLARED INADEQUATE BY THE PEOPLE WHO USED IT: the assessment of attitudes and practices is `unstandardized and inadequate` and, for want of time, `both were measured with two simple questions only`</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t11" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>and the paper names who is missing and why: vulnerable populations - older adults, rural people - have limited access to internet and online health information, which is the same channel the survey recruited through</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t12" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>community-based national sampling was not feasible during the lockdown, so the survey is an online convenience sample and the paper says so</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t13" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>recruitment ran through the authors&#x27; own social networks and local media reposts, which decides who could see the poster at all</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t14" type="limitations" ana="#limitations[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>attitudes rest on two questions and practices on two behaviours, against twelve for knowledge - the three KAP components are not measured at comparable depth</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t15" type="controls" ana="#controls[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the achieved sample is compared against the most recent NATIONAL POPULATION STATISTICS of China, rather than described on its own terms</label>
        <note>eliminates: a self-selected sample being read as a population sample - the comparison is what turns &#x27;our respondents&#x27; into &#x27;over-representative of women, well-educated people, and people engaging in mental labor&#x27; · outcome: failed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t16" type="controls" ana="#controls[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the DIRECTION of the resulting bias is worked out per outcome, using the associations the study itself measured between the demographic variables and KAP</label>
        <note>eliminates: a caveat that says only &#x27;may not generalise&#x27; - here the reader is told which numbers are too high and which are too low · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t17" type="controls" ana="#controls[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>whether attitudes and practices were measured adequately</label>
        <note>eliminates: nothing - the assessment is called &#x27;unstandardized and inadequate&#x27; by the authors, who state that both should have been developed via focus group and interview and built as multi-dimensional measures · outcome: failed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t18" type="controls" ana="#controls[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>whether the populations most likely to score poorly are in the sample at all</label>
        <note>eliminates: nothing - older adults and rural people have limited internet access, which is the channel the survey recruited through, and the paper says so · outcome: failed</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t19" type="controls" ana="#controls[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>excluding the nine respondents who reported having been infected before analysing the sample</label>
        <note>eliminates: the possibility that people who already had the disease answer knowledge and practice items from experience rather than from public information · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t20" type="controls" ana="#controls[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>backward stepwise selection in the regression models rather than entering all variables</label>
        <note>eliminates: associations that survive only because a correlated demographic is held in the model · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t21" type="controls" ana="#controls[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>a yes/no consent item that had to be answered before the questionnaire opened, under ethics approval</label>
        <note>eliminates: participation without informed consent in a survey distributed by social media reposting · outcome: held</note>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t22" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[0]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>knowledge questionnaire</label>
        <term>knowledge questionnaire</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t23" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[1]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>attitudes</label>
        <term>attitudes</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t24" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[2]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>practices</label>
        <term>practices</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t25" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[3]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>socioeconomic status</label>
        <term>socioeconomic status</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t26" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[4]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>KAP theory</label>
        <term>KAP theory</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t27" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[5]" resp="#paper" cert="0.9">
        <label>panic emotion</label>
        <term>panic emotion</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t28" type="concepts" ana="#concepts[6]" resp="#paper" cert="0.95">
        <label>case fatality rate</label>
        <term>case fatality rate</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t29" type="senses" ana="#senses[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>KAP - AS OPERATIONALISED HERE, AND THE THREE ARE NOT EQUAL. Knowledge is 12 items with a correct answer. Attitudes and practices are ONE QUESTION EACH: confidence that China can win, and whether a mask was worn recently. A three-part construct measured 12 : 1 : 1</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t30" type="senses" ana="#senses[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the sample - `recruited via the authors&#x27; networks with residents and popular media in Hubei`. THE RECRUITMENT CHANNEL IS ALSO THE EXCLUSION CRITERION: it reaches people with internet access, and the paper says the populations most at risk are the ones without it</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t31" type="senses" ana="#senses[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>`most Chinese residents` in the conclusion, WITH ITS QUALIFIER ATTACHED IN THE SAME sentence - `of a relatively high socioeconomic status, in particular women`. The qualifier is inside the claim rather than in a caveat afterwards, which is what makes it survive being quoted</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t32" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>supports → health education programmes as a lever on attitudes and behaviour, on the strength of the knowledge-score association</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t33" type="claim_relations" ana="#claim_relations[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>critiques → generalising KAP findings from an online sample to the Chinese population, which the paper refuses to do for its own results</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t34" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>A SIGNED ERROR TERM: the paper states that it MAY HAVE OVERESTIMATED knowledge and preventive practices and UNDERESTIMATED positive attitudes, deriving the direction from its own measured associations</label>
        <term>A SIGNED ERROR TERM: the paper states that it MAY HAVE OVERESTIMATED knowledge and preventive practices and UNDERESTIMATED positive attitudes, deriving the direction from its own measured associations</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t35" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>THE MEASURE IS DECLARED INADEQUATE BY THE PEOPLE WHO USED IT - attitudes and practices were each measured with TWO SIMPLE QUESTIONS ONLY, for want of time</label>
        <term>THE MEASURE IS DECLARED INADEQUATE BY THE PEOPLE WHO USED IT - attitudes and practices were each measured with TWO SIMPLE QUESTIONS ONLY, for want of time</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t36" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the overall correct rate on the knowledge questionnaire was 90%, 97.1% had confidence China would win, and 98.0% wore masks when going out</label>
        <term>the overall correct rate on the knowledge questionnaire was 90%, 97.1% had confidence China would win, and 98.0% wore masks when going out</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t37" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>a higher knowledge score is associated with a LOWER likelihood of negative attitudes and poor practices, OR 0.75-0.90, P&lt;0.001</label>
        <term>a higher knowledge score is associated with a LOWER likelihood of negative attitudes and poor practices, OR 0.75-0.90, P&lt;0.001</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t38" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the sample is over-representative of women, the well-educated and mental labourers against national population statistics</label>
        <term>the sample is over-representative of women, the well-educated and mental labourers against national population statistics</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t39" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>with limited internet access, vulnerable groups such as older adults and rural people are more likely to have poor knowledge, negative attitudes and inappropriate practices</label>
        <term>with limited internet access, vulnerable groups such as older adults and rural people are more likely to have poor knowledge, negative attitudes and inappropriate practices</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t40" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[6]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>COVID-19&#x27;s case fatality rate in China was far below SARS, MERS and H7N9, which is the comparison the paper opens with</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t41" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[7]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the final sample was 65.7% women, 63.5% held a bachelor&#x27;s degree or above, and 56.2% did mental labour</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t42" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.findings[8]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.9">
        <label>the knowledge instrument reached acceptable internal consistency, which the paper states with the coefficient</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t43" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>12 questions regarding the clinical characteristics and prevention of COVID-19</label>
        <term>knowledge questionnaire</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t44" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.definitions[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the knowledge instrument&#x27;s construction - twelve items split across clinical presentation, transmission, and prevention, scored 0 to 12</label>
        <term>knowledge questionnaire</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t45" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>survey completers, of whom 65.7% women, 63.5% with a bachelor degree or above, 56.2% in mental labour</label>
        <term>6910</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t46" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>items in the knowledge questionnaire - against one question each for attitudes and for practices</label>
        <term>12</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t47" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>per cent overall correct rate on the knowledge questionnaire</label>
        <term>90</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t48" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[3]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>case fatality of COVID-19 against SARS, MERS and H7N9</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t49" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[4]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the share of Chinese COVID-19 patients progressing to the severe stage</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t50" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.quantities[5]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the analysed sample and its demographic composition</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t51" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>logistic regression</label>
        <term>logistic regression</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t52" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>OR</label>
        <term>OR</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t53" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.statistics[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the modelling strategy: linear regression for knowledge score, logistic for attitudes and practices, reported as beta and odds ratios with confidence intervals</label>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t54" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[0]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>socioeconomic status</label>
        <term>socioeconomic status</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t55" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[1]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>knowledge score</label>
        <term>knowledge score</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
      <span xml:id="t56" type="content_tags" ana="#content_tags.variables[2]" resp="#tagger" cert="0.95">
        <label>the demographic variables entered as predictors, including place of residence as Hubei against other provinces</label>
        <term>demographic variables</term>
        <note type="quotation-withheld">Quotation withheld because this record is not cleared for redistribution.</note>
      </span>
    </spanGrp>
  </standOff>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p><note type="rights">The full text of this article is not redistributable, so it is
      not included here. The evidence sentences are withheld with it; the tag layer and its
      grounding status remain. The article itself is at https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.45221.</note></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
