phenomenon · claim-type · cross-domain-transfer · mechanism · claim-relation · replication-status · limitation — grounded in the full text| phenomenon | memory for the temporal order of events— “Memory formation includes knowledge about temporally dated events and the temporal relations of these events to each other.” | |
| claim-type | existence— “We found that neuronal activity in successive time segments became gradually correlated, and, as a result, activity in a given time window became a faithful predictor of the activity to follow.” | |
| method — evidence | — “Here we used recordings from single cells in the human brain obtained while subjects viewed repeated presentations of cinematic episodes.” | |
| object of study — evidence | — “However, it remains unclear how single cells and networks of cells can signal this temporal relationship between events.” | |
| research question — evidence | — “However, it remains unclear how single cells and networks of cells can signal this temporal relationship between events.” | |
| contribution — evidence | — “Importantly, this neuronal measure of temporal binding successfully predicted subjects’ ability to recall and verbally report the viewed episodes later.” | |
| transfer | from information theory: mutual information and its decomposition into marginal and conditional entropy, used both as the measure and as the control on it— “Finally, we received further confirmation that our results stem from a developing relationship between successive time segments rather than from changes in the statistics of the firing rates by separately calculating the two components of the MI: the marginal entropy and the conditional entropy ( 31 ) Marginal entropy tests for changes in the… | transfers[0] |
| transfer | from rodent hippocampal physiology: the paradigms requiring memory for temporal order, against which this free-viewing design is explicitly contrasted— “Moreover, most animal studies use paradigms in which learning takes many trials, and the animals typically are overtrained, but human memory can form following a single experience ( 1 – 4 ). Here, the neuronal changes already were seen during the second viewing, namely after only one viewing, as happens in real life episodic memory… | transfers[1] |
| mechanism | Because the hippocampus alone integrates successive events together with the context in which they occurred, it can build context-specific branching representations, which is why the developing temporal linkage appears there and not in amygdala or cingulate cortex— “the hippocampus is unique in its ability to integrate and take into account the successive events and the context in which they appeared ( 3 , 4 ), and thus it is capable of creating such branching representations.” | mechanisms[0] |
| mechanism | Memory formation is the internal convergence of one network state onto the network state representing the stimulus that followed it in time, so that each state comes to lead reliably to the next— “The formation of memory here means that the representation of an external stimulus (a network state) would now converge internally and lead more reliably to the representation of other external stimuli (other network states) that followed in time.” | mechanisms[1] |
| mechanism | mutual information between successive time bins measures how much knowing activity now reduces uncertainty about activity next, which linear correlation cannot capture— “However, the relationship between subsequent activities does not have to be linear (i.e., low activity entails low activity and high entails high activity), and we therefore used a more appropriate measure: the mutual information (MI) ( 31 , 32 ) between subsequent time bins. This measure allowed us to unveil more complex relationships and… | mechanisms[2] |
| mechanism | the analysis deliberately avoids assuming a constant representation, looking at a neuron's relation to itself over time rather than to the stimulus— “Another important aspect of our analysis is that it does not assume a constancy of the representation in a single neuron (i.e., linking a reproducible firing pattern to a repeated external event). Rather, it explores the relationship of a neuron to itself in consecutive times, thus taking into account the global state of the neural network at… | mechanisms[3] |
| mechanism | the increase comes from reduced conditional entropy rather than raised marginal entropy, so it is the relationship changing and not the firing statistics— “Finally, we received further confirmation that our results stem from a developing relationship between successive time segments rather than from changes in the statistics of the firing rates by separately calculating the two components of the MI: the marginal entropy and the conditional entropy ( 31 ) Marginal entropy tests for changes in the… | mechanisms[4] |
| mechanism | the hippocampus is proposed to be the site because it alone can integrate successive events with the context in which they occurred, allowing branching representations— “This neuronal correlate was detected in the hippocampus but not in other areas, probably due to the distinctive properties of the hippocampus: The temporal relationships we observed were context (clip)-specific. In real life, an event/stimulus can lead to many possible events/stimuli in different contexts and so can the specific neuronal… | mechanisms[5] |
| mechanism | memories are framed as stable network states, with formation meaning one state leads more reliably to the next— “To conclude, our results support the conjecture that the brain encodes temporal information as changes in the state of the network ( 39 ) and that memories are encoded as stable states of neural networks ( 40 ). In this interpretation, the changes we see in the activity are changes in the internal representation of the external stimuli. The… | mechanisms[6] |
| builds-on | Hebb's original proposal (ref. 33) that neuronal assemblies can be linked temporally— “This finding is in line with Hebb's original proposal ( 33 ) that neuronal assemblies can be linked temporally and subserve the evolution of internal states in general ( 34 ) and episodic memory in particular ( 28 ).” | claim_relations[0] |
| extends | the same group's report of hippocampal reactivation during free recall, from the same experiments - a paper independently tagged in this corpus | claim_relations[1] |
| supports | Hebb's proposal that neuronal assemblies can be linked temporally | claim_relations[2] |
| supports | fMRI evidence that hippocampal activation tracks retrieval of temporal order in naturalistic scenes Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | claim_relations[3] |
| qualifies | the interpretation that the effect is growing visual familiarity Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | claim_relations[4] |
| sense | temporal relationships is defined operationally as mutual information between spike counts in successive time windows, expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible information Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | senses[0] |
| sense | two rival sources of the same correlation are named and separately estimated: context-independent drift, measured in blank periods, and pure-stimulus structure, measured by shuffling across repetitions Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | senses[1] |
| sense | the free-viewing paradigm is defended as closer to real memory formation than animal paradigms, because it uses no reinforcement and needs no overtraining Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | senses[2] |
| sense | memory formation is recast as a change in which network state reliably follows which, rather than as a change in what a neuron represents Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | senses[3] |
| control | the clips re-shuffled so that the six viewings came from ENTIRELY DIFFERENT movie clips while staying within the same repetition number — held Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. — rules out the experimental context - the room - and the mere passage of time as the source of the temporal relationships, both of which advance identically whichever clip is shown Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[0] |
| evidential status | fMRI evidence that hippocampal activation tracks retrieval of temporal order in naturalistic scenes — the paper's own words: we cannot rule out Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | claim_relations[3] |
| audit | temporal relationships —operationalised-as→ mutual information — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes 'the relationship between subsequent activities', not 'temporal relationships'. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[0] |
| audit | temporal relationships —causes→ free recall — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but temporal relationships are 'RELATED DIRECTLY TO' memory performance across subjects; causes overstates an association. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[1] |
| note | temporal relationships —causes→ free recall — the paper says related directly to rather than causes; r = 0.87 across subjects. the weight carries the correlational status Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[1] |
| weight | temporal relationships —causes→ free recall — 0.7 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[1] |
| audit | hippocampus —distinct-from→ amygdala — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span reports a gradual increase in the hippocampus but not other structures; distinct-from is loose. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[2] |
| note | hippocampus —distinct-from→ amygdala — regional specificity is itself the control: an effect present only in hippocampus cannot be general arousal Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[2] |
| note | temporal relationships —distinct-from→ context-independent — estimated separately in blank periods and subtracted, rather than assumed absent Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[3] |
| weight | temporal relationships —distinct-from→ context-independent — 0.95 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[3] |
| audit | temporal relationships —distinct-from→ pure-stimulus — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span describes stimulus correlations to be controlled; distinct-from is loose. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[4] |
| note | temporal relationships —distinct-from→ pure-stimulus — estimated by shuffling across repetitions of the same clip Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[4] |
| weight | temporal relationships —distinct-from→ pure-stimulus — 0.95 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[4] |
| outcome | control — held Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[0] |
| for which use | limitation — the learning interpretation: WE CANNOT RULE OUT THESE POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTIONS COMPLETELY - growing visual familiarity and improving retrieval both remain available Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[0] |
| for which use | limitation — the assembly analysis: NEURAL ASSEMBLIES OF n > 3 REQUIRE MUCH LARGER AMOUNTS OF DATA AND COULD NOT BE MEASURED IN THE CURRENT PARADIGM Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[1] |
| duplicate of | limitation — limitations[0] Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[2] |
| for which use | limitation — the same scope as limitations[0] - the two alternative accounts are argued against, not excluded Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[2] |
| for which use | limitation — the familiarity rebuttal specifically, whose evidence is external: IT WAS SHOWN RECENTLY THAT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SPIKES ELICITED IN A HIPPOCAMPAL [response does not grow with familiarity] - a result from another paper, not a control here Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[3] |
| for which use | limitation — the correlation with subsequent memory: THIS INTERPRETATION ALSO WOULD FIT WITH THE REMARKABLE CORRELATION WE FOUND BETWEEN THE NEURONAL MEASURE AND THE SUBSEQUENT INDIVIDUAL MEMORY, so the headline result does not discriminate between the accounts Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[4] |
| for which use | limitation — any count of independent studies: THE SAME EXPERIMENTS WERE USED RECENTLY TO SHOW REACTIVATION OF NEURONAL ACTIVITY DURING FREE RECALL Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[5] |
| for which use | limitation — the population and the recording sites: SINGLE AND MULTIUNITS WERE RECORDED (27 SESSIONS IN 13 INDIVIDUALS) in epilepsy patients whose implants follow clinical need Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[6] |
| replication | untested | |
| limitation | Alternative accounts in terms of growing visual familiarity or improved retrieval cannot be ruled out completely. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[0] |
| limitation | Assemblies larger than three neurons could not be analysed with the data the paradigm yielded. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[1] |
| limitation | two alternative interpretations - growing familiarity and improving retrieval - cannot be completely ruled out, and the authors say so Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[2] |
| limitation | the familiarity account is argued against by an external finding rather than by a control in this dataset Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[3] |
| limitation | the retrieval account would also fit the recall correlation, which the authors acknowledge Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[4] |
| limitation | the data come from the same experiments already reported for a different finding Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[5] |
| limitation | subjects are epilepsy patients implanted on purely clinical criteria Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[6] |
finding · quantity · variable · definition · key-term — grounded in the full text| finding | With repeated viewing, activity in successive time segments became gradually correlated, so activity in one window came to predict the activity that followed. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[0] |
| finding | This linkage appeared after only two or three viewings of an episode and was stronger than both context-independent and stimulus-driven correlations. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[1] |
| finding | The gradual growth of temporal relationships across clip repetitions occurred in the hippocampus only, not in amygdala, anterior cingulate or entorhinal cortex at the single-cell level. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[2] |
| finding | The strength of hippocampal temporal relationships during viewing predicted how many clips a subject later recalled freely, with a correlation of 0.87 across subjects. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[3] |
| finding | The effect was not an artifact of changing firing rates, because mean firing rate was stable across both clip repetition and clip duration. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[4] |
| finding | Decomposing mutual information showed the rise came from falling conditional entropy (better prediction of the next window) rather than from rising marginal entropy (changed firing statistics). Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[5] |
| finding | When simultaneously recorded pairs and triplets of cells were analysed, a significant increase in temporal relationships appeared in entorhinal cortex as well. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[6] |
| finding | Just over half of all recorded neurons (362 of 671) showed a significant increase in temporal relationships for at least one clip. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[7] |
| finding | activity in successive time windows became mutually predictive across clip repetitions Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[8] |
| finding | the effect emerged within two to three presentations Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[9] |
| finding | the gradual increase appeared in hippocampus and not in amygdala, entorhinal cortex or anterior cingulate Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[10] |
| finding | only in hippocampus did the effect exceed both rival sources of correlation Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[11] |
| finding | the measure correlated with each subject's later free recall at r = 0.87, and in no other structure Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[12] |
| finding | the same result held with ordinary Pearson correlation instead of mutual information Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[13] |
| finding | the rise in mutual information came from falling conditional entropy, not from changing firing statistics Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[14] |
| finding | overall firing rate was stable across repetitions and along clip duration Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[15] |
| finding | no evidence of developing slow oscillations that could mimic the effect Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[16] |
| quantity | r = 0.87, P < 0.01 — across-subject correlation between hippocampal temporal relationships and free-recall success Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[0] |
| quantity | 54% (362/671) — proportion of all recorded neurons showing significant temporal relationships for at least one clip Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[1] |
| quantity | 52% (349/671) — proportion of recorded units classified as single units rather than multiunits Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[2] |
| quantity | AH, n = 180; amygdala n = 160; EC n = 224; AC n = 107 — number of units recorded in each brain structure across 27 sessions in 13 patients Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[3] |
| quantity | AH, 49%; EC, 34%; amygdala, 23%; AC, 25% — proportion of neurons per structure whose temporal relationships exceeded the pure-stimulus baseline Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[4] |
| quantity | 22% — proportion of neurons whose during-clip temporal relationships exceeded their context-independent (blank-period) relationships Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[5] |
| quantity | 250 ms — width of the time window into which spikes were binned for the main analysis Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[6] |
| quantity | n = 4,884 pairs and n = 2,1061 triplets — number of simultaneously recorded cell pairs and triplets analysed for assembly-level temporal relationships Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[7] |
| quantity | 671 units in 27 sessions from 13 individuals; hippocampus 180, amygdala 160, entorhinal 224, anterior cingulate 107 — the recorded sample Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[8] |
| quantity | r = 0.87, P < 0.01 — correlation between the hippocampal measure and individual recall Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[9] |
| quantity | 10 to 16 clips of 5 to 10 s, each repeated six times — the viewing design Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[10] |
| quantity | within two to three presentations — how fast the effect emerged Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[11] |
| variable | brain structure (moderator) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[1] |
| variable | mutual information (dependent) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[2] |
| variable | memory performance (dependent) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[3] |
| variable | number of spikes (control) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[4] |
| definition | temporal relationships Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[0] |
| definition | pure-stimulus relationships Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[1] |
| definition | context-independent correlations Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[2] |
| definition | responsive neurons Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[3] |
| definition | temporal relationships Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[4] |
| key-terms | temporal relationships, mutual information, conditional entropy, marginal entropy, hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, amygdala, anterior cingulate, free recall, free-viewing, cell assemblies, episodic memory, temporal binding, single units, epilepsy, clip, repetition, Hebb, shuffling, linear regression |
| mutual information MI | as written: mutual information (MI) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[0] |
| correlation | as written: Pearson correlation coefficient Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[1] |
| regression | as written: linear regression Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[2] |
| t-test | as written: t tests Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[3] |
| multiple-comparison correction | as written: Bonferron-corrected Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[4] |
| chi-squared χ 2 | as written: χ 2 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[5] |
| ANOVA | as written: two-way ANOVA Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[6] |
| Fisher's exact test | Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[7] |
| Fisher's combined probability test | as written: Fisher's combined test Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[8] |
| permutation (shuffle) test | as written: we shuffled the time windows within each clip Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[9] |
| Mann-Whitney U test | as written: Mann–Whitney nonparametric test Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[10] |
| bias correction of an estimator | as written: analytical bias correction Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[11] |
| mutual information between successive time windows | Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[12] |
| shuffling across repetitions | Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[13] |
| Fisher's combined test | Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[14] |
| marginal and conditional entropy decomposition | Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[15] |
| method | single-unit recording in epilepsy patients freely viewing repeated audiovisual clips, with mutual information between successive time windows as the measure — a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value; recorded: electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | alternatives.method |
| phenomenon | temporal binding during episodic memory formation — a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value; recorded: memory for the temporal order of events Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | alternatives.phenomenon |
When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.
Tag layer © the Meta-Tagging Project, CC BY 4.0. The paper text is © its authors/publisher
and is linked, not reproduced. Excerpts shown are short quotations for identification and verification.
· back to index
· concepts · authors
· עברית
© 2026 Shir Sivroni · ORCID 0009-0000-2597-2824