UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021 — TEI-tagged view

Alex Bateman, María Martin, Sandra Orchard, Michele Magrane, Rahat Agivetova, Shadab Ahmad, Emanuele Alpi, Emily Bowler-Barnett, Ramona Britto, Borisas Bursteinas, Hema Bye‐A‐Jee, Ray Coetzee, Austra Cukura, Alan Da Silva, Paul Denny, Tunca Doğan, ThankGod E. Ebenezer, Jun Fan, Leyla Jael Castro, Penelope Garmiri, George P. Georghiou, Leonardo Jose da Costa Gonzales, Emma Hatton-Ellis, Abdulrahman Hussein, Alexandr Ignatchenko, Giuseppe Insana, Rizwan Ishtiaq, Petteri Jokinen, Vishal Joshi, Dushyanth Jyothi, Antonia Lock, Rodrigo López, Aurélien Luciani, Jie Luo, Yvonne Lussi, Alistair MacDougall, Fábio Madeira, Mahdi Mahmoudy, M. Menchi, Alok Mishra, Katie Moulang, Andrew Nightingale, Carla Susana Oliveira, Sangya Pundir, Guoying Qi, Shriya Raj, Daniel L Rice, M. Rodríguez-López, Rabie Saidi, J. H. Sampson, Tony Sawford, Elena Speretta, E. B. Turner, Nidhi Tyagi, Preethi Vasudev, Vladimir Volynkin, Kate Warner, Xavier Watkins, Rossana Zaru, Hermann Zellner, Alan Bridge, Sylvain Poux, Nicole Redaschi, Lucila Aimo, Ghislaine Argoud‐Puy, Andrea H Auchincloss, Kristian B. Axelsen, Parit Bansal, Delphine Baratin, Marie-Claude Blatter, Jerven Bolleman, Emmanuel Boutet, Lionel Breuza, Cristina Casals‐Casas, Edouard de Castro, Kamal Chikh Echioukh, Elisabeth Coudert, Beatrice Cuche, Mikael Doche, Dolnide Dornevil, Anne Estreicher, Maria Livia Famiglietti, Marc Feuermann, Elisabeth Gasteiger, Sébastien Géhant, Vivienne Baillie Gerritsen, Arnaud Gos, Nadine Gruaz-Gumowski, Ursula Hinz, Chantal Hulo, Nevila Hyka‐Nouspikel, Florence Jungo, G. Keller, Arnaud Kerhornou, V. Lara, Philippe Le Mercier, Damien Lieberherr, Thierry Lombardot, Xavier Martín, Patrick Masson, Anne Morgat, Teresa Batista Neto, Salvo Paesano, Ivo Pedruzzi, Sandrine Pilbout, Lucille Pourcel, Monica Pozzato, Manuela Pruess, Catherine Rivoire, Christian J A Sigrist, Karin Sonesson, André Stutz, Shyamala Sundaram, Michael Tognolli, Laure Verbregue, Cathy Wu, Cecilia N. Arighi, Leslie Arminski, Chuming Chen, Yongxing Chen, John S. Garavelli, Hongzhan Huang, Kati Laiho, Peter B. McGarvey, Darren A. Natale, Karen Ross, C R Vinayaka, Qinghua Wang, Yuqi Wang, Lai-Su Yeh, Jian Zhang, Patrick Ruch, Douglas Teodoro · 2020 · bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · TEI xml · tagged edition · index · concepts · authors
Where this record's text came from. 2026-08-22 and 2026-08-28 schema-0.3 passes: every quote verified as an exact substring of the staged text and anchored at merge time; concept terms verified present; every edge endpoint an existing node.
28 quotations on this page contain a reference number where the paper printed a superscript. This journal style prints citations as raised numerals — parameters12,13 — and the extraction flattened them into the line, so the sentence reads parameters 12 , 13 . The digits are citation markers and not part of what the author wrote. The quotes keep them for the same reason they keep every other extraction fault: a quote is reproduced exactly or it proves nothing.
This record’s own method is system-or-tool-building, and the tags below follow from that. A review’s findings, quantities and statistics are things stated IN this paper, and some of them report results obtained elsewhere. No tag on this page names a different author. Measured across every review in this corpus, 81% of a review’s tags carry no citation at all — most of them are the review speaking. The corpus does not adjudicate the rest: read an unmarked tag as a claim this paper makes, not necessarily one it made first.
Other fields define these differently the same word, defined another way in another discipline
disease 6 fields · standard 3 fields · alternative splicing 2 fields · findability 2 fields · Alzheimer's disease 2 fields · Application Programming Interfaces 2 fields · and 4 more →
Tags on this paper every tag the record carries, whether or not the words occur in the text below — a number is how many papers in the corpus carry that tag; a tag with no number is unique to this paper
UniProt Knowledgebase2 UniProt Archive2 historical obsolete sequences Complete Proteome Detector BUSCO validated Peptide identifications comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein… functional information2 sequence redundancy proteome completeness and quality reviewed entries unreviewed entries credit-based publication submission interface dedicated portal Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA) ARBA complete compendium of all known protein sequence data experimentally verified computationally predicted reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries expert biocuration team automated systems UniRef databases sequence identity2 UniParc2 central hub 180 other resources Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable FAIR3 stable and traceable identifiers Application Programming Interfaces2 File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads proteomes complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism INSDC source databases viral proteomes Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes near-universal single copy orthologs incomplete and poor-quality proteomes different quality and completeness metrics standard6 close to standard outlier3 Reference Proteome Reference Proteome set research community computational clustering best annotated proteome gene-centric subset of representative proteins full proteome isoforms representative proteome redundant proteome sequences stable proteome identifiers findability2 UniRef protein sequence clusters sequence similarity searches gene prediction pan proteomes core and accessory proteomes time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering MMseqs2 algorithm UniRef50 clustering Expert curation hierarchical searches experimental data2 human readable summaries structured vocabularies Gene Ontology (GO) Rhea knowledgebase biochemical reactions chemical ontology ChEBI reaction participants chemical structures2 chemical transformations InChIKeys pseudoenzymes functional impact of human variation clinical significance ACMG-AMP pathogenicity calculator ClinVar alternative splicing5 splice isoform proteins functional diversity of proteins post-translational proteolytic cleavage mature amino-acid chains polyprotein multiple bioactive proteins or peptides machine-readable functional annotations specific isoforms polyprotein cleavage products binary protein interactions IMEx Consortium pre-release dataset COVID-19 disease portal COVID portal protein functionality 3D-structure complex formation standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle disease-centric access points Alzheimer's disease5 disease-related amino-acid variant Automatic annotation InterPro2 UniRule system rule mining techniques UniFIRE2 UniProt Rule Markup Language eight different predictors superfamily, family and subfamily levels functional domains important sites experimentally uncharacterized proteins known experimentally characterized proteins multiclass, self-training annotation system SAAS system concise annotation models data exclusion set human-readable rules ARBA rules combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems uncharacterized protein names domain X containing protein intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions consensus-based prediction of long disorder ProtVista visualisation tool pre-calculated mapping Aligning variants to protein features PSI Extended FASTA Format PEFF Proteins API large-scale datasets genomic coordinates GRCh38 version of the human genome specific variants disease7 resistance to a drug mechanistic insights mass spectrometry proteomic data ProteomeXchange Consortium Community submission controlled list tracker tool ORCID researcher personal ID model organism databases experienced curator community contribution articles and annotations user-centered design process UniProt interaction viewer ProtVista viewer Nightingale lightweight, flexible, and modular components proteome redundancy removal RESTful Application Programming Interface stable URLs SPARQL API SPARQL endpoint eight weeks reference framework for multiscale biomedical data integration and… automatic annotation pipelines template entries information transfer to proteins in related species programmatic access system-or-tool-building173
Method, as described: description of a curated resource: expert biocuration for reviewed entries, rule-based automation for unreviewed ones, BUSCO and an in-house detector for proteome quality

Colour legend

2020<date>A year or date.

Alex BatemanpersName, María MartinpersName, Sandra OrchardpersName, Michele MagranepersName, Rahat AgivetovapersName, Shadab AhmadpersName, Emanuele AlpipersName, Emily Bowler-BarnettpersName, Ramona BrittopersName, Borisas BursteinaspersName, Hema Bye‐A‐JeepersName, Ray CoetzeepersName, Austra CukurapersName, Alan Da SilvapersName, Paul DennypersName, Tunca DoğanpersName, ThankGod E. EbenezerpersName, Jun FanpersName, Leyla Jael CastropersName, Penelope GarmiripersName, George P. GeorghioupersName, Leonardo Jose da Costa GonzalespersName, Emma Hatton-EllispersName, Abdulrahman HusseinpersName, Alexandr IgnatchenkopersName, Giuseppe InsanapersName, Rizwan IshtiaqpersName, Petteri JokinenpersName, Vishal JoshipersName, Dushyanth JyothipersName, Antonia LockpersName, Rodrigo LópezpersName, Aurélien LucianipersName, Jie LuopersName, Yvonne LussipersName, Alistair MacDougallpersName, Fábio MadeirapersName, Mahdi MahmoudypersName, M. MenchipersName, Alok MishrapersName, Katie MoulangpersName, Andrew NightingalepersName, Carla Susana OliveirapersName, Sangya PundirpersName, Guoying QipersName, Shriya RajpersName, Daniel L RicepersName, M. Rodríguez-LópezpersName, Rabie SaidipersName, J. H. SampsonpersName, Tony SawfordpersName, Elena SperettapersName, E. B. TurnerpersName, Nidhi TyagipersName, Preethi VasudevpersName, Vladimir VolynkinpersName, Kate WarnerpersName, Xavier WatkinspersName, Rossana ZarupersName, Hermann ZellnerpersName, Alan BridgepersName, Sylvain PouxpersName, Nicole RedaschipersName, Lucila AimopersName, Ghislaine Argoud‐PuypersName, Andrea H AuchinclosspersName, Kristian B. AxelsenpersName, Parit BansalpersName, Delphine BaratinpersName, Marie-Claude BlatterpersName, Jerven BollemanpersName, Emmanuel BoutetpersName, Lionel BreuzapersName, Cristina Casals‐CasaspersName, Edouard de CastropersName, Kamal Chikh EchioukhpersName, Elisabeth CoudertpersName, Beatrice CuchepersName, Mikael DochepersName, Dolnide DornevilpersName, Anne EstreicherpersName, Maria Livia FamigliettipersName, Marc FeuermannpersName, Elisabeth GasteigerpersName, Sébastien GéhantpersName, Vivienne Baillie GerritsenpersName, Arnaud GospersName, Nadine Gruaz-GumowskipersName, Ursula HinzpersName, Chantal HulopersName, Nevila Hyka‐NouspikelpersName, Florence JungopersName, G. KellerpersName, Arnaud KerhornoupersName, V. LarapersName, Philippe Le MercierpersName, Damien LieberherrpersName, Thierry LombardotpersName, Xavier MartínpersName, Patrick MassonpersName, Anne MorgatpersName, Teresa Batista NetopersName, Salvo PaesanopersName, Ivo PedruzzipersName, Sandrine PilboutpersName, Lucille PourcelpersName, Monica PozzatopersName, Manuela PruesspersName, Catherine RivoirepersName, Christian J A SigristpersName, Karin SonessonpersName, André StutzpersName, Shyamala SundarampersName, Michael TognollipersName, Laure VerbreguepersName, Cathy WupersName, Cecilia N. ArighipersName, Leslie ArminskipersName, Chuming ChenpersName, Yongxing ChenpersName, John S. GaravellipersName, Hongzhan HuangpersName, Kati LaihopersName, Peter B. McGarveypersName, Darren A. NatalepersName, Karen RosspersName, C R VinayakapersName, Qinghua WangpersName, Yuqi WangpersName, Lai-Su YehpersName, Jian ZhangpersName, Patrick RuchpersName, Douglas TeodoropersName (2020date). “UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021.”

Object of study — A KNOWLEDGEBASE THAT DELETES FROM ITSELF AND KEEPS WHAT IT DELETED - 190 million protein sequences in two provenance tiers, with a separate archive holding everything the knowledgebase has dropped

Research question — what UniProt now contains, how completeness and quality are assessed, and how annotations are evidenced

Contribution — a two-year status report: proteometerm completeness metrics, automated annotation, a credit-based community submissionterm route, and a COVID-19 curation portal

Cross-disciplinary analysis
content-tags & facets: phenomenon · claim-type · cross-domain-transfer · mechanism · claim-relation · replication-status · limitation — grounded in the full text
phenomenonprotein knowledge as something that must be tiered by provenance, judged for completeness against neighbours, and deleted without being lost — “As previously described ( 3 ), we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability.”
claim-typemethod — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”
method — evidence — “We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms”
object of study — evidence — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”
research question — evidence — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information.”
contribution — evidence — “To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB.”
mechanismIT SOLVES THE PROBLEM THE GENE ONTOLOGY REFUSES. `aleksander2023` in this corpus: the knowledgebase must be `THE CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE AND NOT JUST AN ARCHIVE OF ALL PUBLIC DATA`. UniProt: `the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences`. GO REFUSES TO BE AN ARCHIVE; UNIPROT RUNS A SEPARATE ONE SO IT NEED NOT BE — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”mechanisms[0]
mechanismand the deletion is reversible by construction: `we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ... The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc ... and stable proteome identifiers ... are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability`. Removed from the knowledgebase, kept in the archive, IDENTIFIER PRESERVED — “As previously described ( 3 ), we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability.”mechanisms[1]
mechanismAND WHETHER A PROTEIN IS KNOWN TO EXIST IS A COUNTING RULE WITH TWO THRESHOLDS: `Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) ... at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more`. The fallback exists because some proteins fail the first rule for reasons that have nothing to do with whether they exist — “Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein).”mechanisms[2]
mechanismand completeness is judged AGAINST THE NEIGHBOURS: the `Complete Proteome Detector` `statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species`, classifying it as `STANDARD`, `close to standard` or an `OUTLIER` — “We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms”mechanisms[3]
extends UniProt's own 2019 update in the same journal, which described the response to growth in microbial sequence records — “Collectively, these have already resulted in the number of entries contained in UniProtKB growing by >65 million records, an increase of >50% in just 2 years.”claim_relations[0]
supports the FAIR data principles - 'providing stable and traceable identifiers ... and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout' — “The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout.”claim_relations[1]
sense`validated` (PE = 1) - A COUNTING RULE: `at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or ... one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein`. Existence, operationalised, with a fallback for proteins the first rule cannot reach — “Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein).”senses[0]
sense`complete proteome` - JUDGED AGAINST THE NEIGHBOURS RATHER THAN AGAINST THE ORGANISM: the CPD compares each proteome `to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species` and returns `standard`, `close to standard` or `outlier` — “We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms”senses[1]
sense`reviewed` vs `unreviewed` - A PROVENANCE TIER: reviewed entries carry data added `by our expert biocuration team`, unreviewed ones are `annotated by automated systems`. The same field in both, with a different warrant behind it — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”senses[2]
sense`UniParc` - THE ARCHIVE THAT KEEPS WHAT THE KNOWLEDGEBASE DROPS, `a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences`. GO declines to be an archive; UniProt separates the two roles — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”senses[3]
sensereviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries: records whose data are added by expert biocurators — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”senses[4]
senseunreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries: records annotated by automated systems — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”senses[5]
senseUniParc: the archive retaining known sequences including obsolete sequences — “the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences”senses[6]
senseproteome: the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”senses[7]
senseReference Proteome: a stably maintained, best-annotated representative selected by community choice or clustering — “A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster”senses[8]
sensegene-centric subset: one algorithmically selected representative protein per gene, unlike the isoform-inclusive full proteome — “This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins”senses[9]
senseexpert curation: evaluation of experimental literature and summarization in reviewed Swiss-Prot records — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”senses[10]
senseARBA: a multiclass self-training system that mines concise automatic-annotation rules — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”senses[11]
senseUniRule: similarity-based semi-automated annotation from experimentally characterized proteins — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”senses[12]
sensePEFF: extended FASTA format carrying variation and sequence metadata for proteomic tools — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”senses[13]
senseORCID: personal researcher identifier used to validate submissions and assign contribution credit — “Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work”senses[14]
senseCOVID-19 disease portal: pre-release disease-centric access updated faster than the ordinary UniProt cycle — “Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomes rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental data as soon as this was published. A pre-release dataset was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portal in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionality, 3D-structure, binary interactions, and complex formation being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle to ensure the research community accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portal is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access points to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's disease, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variant, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed”senses[15]
sensecommunity curation: user-submitted publications and basic annotations minimally checked by an experienced curator — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ). Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ functionality (red box) in the UniProtKB entry. (ii) Partial snapshot of the submission form, a sample available here: https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/sampleform.html . (iii) After submission and review the publication and information are displayed in the relevant UniProtKB entry with attribution to submitter (red box) in a future public release. Submissions are minimally checked by an experienced curator before being added to the Publications section of the record. A tracker tool has also been developed ( https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/bbsubinfo.html ) to enable users to access and search this wealth of additional bibliography. Researchers are encouraged to add relevant publications to entries of interest to them. Since we started the pilot in release 2019_08 we have seen a continuing increase in user submissions. As of release 2020_04 there have been 674 submissions relating to 424 publications and 557 entries, from 149 unique users”senses[16]
senseNightingale components: lightweight modular visualization components reusable in external resources — “Website updates Users are at the center of the UniProt website design and development process. We follow a user-centered design process, conducting regular workshops, user testing, surveys and user research activities involving many users worldwide with varied research backgrounds and use cases. We are currently redesigning the website to take advantage of new technologies and paradigms in web development and welcome the UniProt user community to participate in user feedback and testing activities by contacting us at help@uniprot.org and contributing your user stories and workflows. As part of the redesign process, we have redeveloped both the UniProt interaction viewer (Figure 6A ) and ProtVista viewer, which graphically represents protein sequence features, such as domains, sites, post-translational modifications and variants, and structures. These are now part of the ‘Nightingale’ visualization web component library ( https://ebi-webcomponents.github.io/nightingale/#/ ) and are publicly available as lightweight, flexible, and modular components that can be more easily extended with new features, modified and implemented by users in their own resources (Figure 6B ). The ProtVista viewer has already been implemented by the Open Targets ( 43 ) and the Pharos ( 44 ) databases of unstudied and understudied drug targets amongst others”senses[17]
sensetemplate entries: expert-curated records that support information transfer to related-species proteins — “Expert curation of those proteins biochemically characterized remains a key focus of our activities, to both inform on these well-studied entities and also to act as template entries for information transfer to proteins in related species”senses[18]
controlBUSCO scoring against a defined set of near-universal single-copy orthologs — held — “We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms” — rules out incomplete proteomes passing as complete - and it worked in the destructive direction: 'a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB' — “To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB.”controls[0]
controlthe Complete Proteome Detector, comparing each proteome to at least three closely related species — partial — “UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal” — rules out the absence of a per-organism expectation - there is no independent count of how many proteins an organism should have, so the neighbours supply one — “We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms”controls[1]
controllabelling every automatic annotation with its evidence and source — held — “The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout.” — rules out the confusion of an inferred annotation with a curated one - 'All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source' — “All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source.”controls[2]
weightUniProt's own 2019 update in the same journal, which described the response to growth in microbial sequence records — 0.85 — “Collectively, these have already resulted in the number of entries contained in UniProtKB growing by >65 million records, an increase of >50% in just 2 years.”claim_relations[0]
weightthe FAIR data principles - 'providing stable and traceable identifiers ... and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout' — 0.8 — “The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout.”claim_relations[1]
notehistorical obsolete sequences —part-of→ UniProt Archive — THE ARCHIVE IS DEFINED BY HOLDING WHAT THE KNOWLEDGEBASE DOES NOT. 'aleksander2023' in this corpus says a knowledgebase must NOT be an archive of all public data; UniProt runs both and keeps the identifiers stable across the boundary — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”concept_edges[0]
weighthistorical obsolete sequences —part-of→ UniProt Archive — 0.95 — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”concept_edges[0]
notevalidated —operationalised-as→ Peptide identifications — 'at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more'. Two thresholds and a fallback, and the fallback is there because the first rule fails for reasons unrelated to existence — “Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein).”concept_edges[1]
weightvalidated —operationalised-as→ Peptide identifications — 0.95 — “Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein).”concept_edges[1]
notegene-centric subset of representative proteins —contrasted-with→ full proteome — The paper explicitly contrasts one protein per gene with the isoform-inclusive full proteome. — “This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins”concept_edges[2]
auditalternative splicing —causes→ functional diversity of proteins — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but splicing 'can potentially increase' functional diversity; hedged. — “The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins”concept_edges[3]
effect direction (stated by the tagger, no quotation)alternative splicing —causes→ functional diversity of proteins — increasesconcept_edges[3]
notealternative splicing —causes→ functional diversity of proteins — The paper says splicing can potentially increase functional diversity; weight reflects both modals. — “The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins”concept_edges[3]
weightalternative splicing —causes→ functional diversity of proteins — 0.7 — “The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins”concept_edges[3]
evidence status notepolyprotein —causes→ multiple bioactive proteins or peptides — DOUBTFUL, found by an audit that read the edge against its span: signed 'increases' with no direction word ('may generate'); its effect direction was retired for that reason and is kept under a dated before-key. The edge is kept live; a reader should weigh it with this in mind. — “Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides”concept_edges[4]
notepolyprotein —causes→ multiple bioactive proteins or peptides — A single polyprotein may generate multiple products; weight reflects 'may'. — “Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides”concept_edges[4]
weightpolyprotein —causes→ multiple bioactive proteins or peptides — 0.7 — “Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides”concept_edges[4]
effect direction (stated by the tagger, no quotation)MMseqs2 algorithm —causes→ time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering — reducesconcept_edges[5]
noteMMseqs2 algorithm —causes→ time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering — Adoption decreased production time from four weeks to 60 hours. — “We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours”concept_edges[5]
noteUniProt Archive —same-as→ UniParc — The paper gives UniParc as the parenthetical name of the UniProt Archive. — “the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences”concept_edges[6]
noteBUSCO —same-as→ Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs — Parenthetical acronym expansion. — “adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count”concept_edges[7]
noteFindable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable —same-as→ FAIR — Parenthetical acronym expansion for the data principles. — “Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles”concept_edges[8]
notePEFF —same-as→ PSI Extended FASTA Format — Parenthetical format-name expansion. — “UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools”concept_edges[9]
differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation)COVID portal —contrasted-with→ standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle — update frequencyconcept_edges[10]
noteCOVID portal —contrasted-with→ standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle — The portal is directly compared with the normal release cycle. — “The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle”concept_edges[10]
effect direction (stated by the tagger, no quotation)ARBA rules —causes→ combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems — increasesconcept_edges[11]
noteARBA rules —causes→ combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems — Use of ARBA rules increased combined rule-based coverage from 35% to 49%. — “ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49”concept_edges[11]
evidence status noteconcept — A FIGURE/TABLE CAPTION IS JOINED INTO THE 'evidence' QUOTE, beginning at character 824: 'Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases ove…'. The page prints the caption apart from the paragraph; read the quote as the paragraph, then the caption. — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database. Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases over the last decade. UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB”concepts[38]
evidence status noteconcept — A FIGURE/TABLE CAPTION IS JOINED INTO THE 'evidence' QUOTE, beginning at character 824: 'Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases ove…'. The page prints the caption apart from the paragraph; read the quote as the paragraph, then the caption. — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database. Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases over the last decade. UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB”concepts[39]
evidence status noteconcept — A FIGURE/TABLE CAPTION IS JOINED INTO THE 'evidence' QUOTE, beginning at character 824: 'Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases ove…'. The page prints the caption apart from the paragraph; read the quote as the paragraph, then the caption. — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database. Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases over the last decade. UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB”concepts[40]
evidence status noteconcept — A FIGURE/TABLE CAPTION IS JOINED INTO THE 'evidence' QUOTE, beginning at character 824: 'Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases ove…'. The page prints the caption apart from the paragraph; read the quote as the paragraph, then the caption. — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database. Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases over the last decade. UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB”concepts[41]
evidence status noteconcept — A FIGURE/TABLE CAPTION IS JOINED INTO THE 'evidence' QUOTE, beginning at character 1070: 'Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ function…'. The page prints the caption apart from the paragraph; read the quote as the paragraph, then the caption. — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ). Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ functionality (red box) in the UniProtKB entry. (ii) Partial snapshot of the submission form, a sample available here: https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/sampleform.html . (iii) After submission and review the publication and information are displayed in the relevant UniProtKB entry with attribution to submitter (red box) in a future public release. Submissions are minimally checked by an experienced curator before being added to the Publications section of the record. A tracker tool has also been developed ( https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/bbsubinfo.html ) to enable users to access and search this wealth of additional bibliography. Researchers are encouraged to add relevant publications to entries of interest to them. Since we started the pilot in release 2019_08 we have seen a continuing increase in user submissions. As of release 2020_04 there have been 674 submissions relating to 424 publications and 557 entries, from 149 unique users”concepts[147]
evidence status noteconcept — A FIGURE/TABLE CAPTION IS JOINED INTO THE 'evidence' QUOTE, beginning at character 1070: 'Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ function…'. The page prints the caption apart from the paragraph; read the quote as the paragraph, then the caption. — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ). Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ functionality (red box) in the UniProtKB entry. (ii) Partial snapshot of the submission form, a sample available here: https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/sampleform.html . (iii) After submission and review the publication and information are displayed in the relevant UniProtKB entry with attribution to submitter (red box) in a future public release. Submissions are minimally checked by an experienced curator before being added to the Publications section of the record. A tracker tool has also been developed ( https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/bbsubinfo.html ) to enable users to access and search this wealth of additional bibliography. Researchers are encouraged to add relevant publications to entries of interest to them. Since we started the pilot in release 2019_08 we have seen a continuing increase in user submissions. As of release 2020_04 there have been 674 submissions relating to 424 publications and 557 entries, from 149 unique users”concepts[151]
evidence status noteconcept — A FIGURE/TABLE CAPTION IS JOINED INTO THE 'evidence' QUOTE, beginning at character 1070: 'Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ function…'. The page prints the caption apart from the paragraph; read the quote as the paragraph, then the caption. — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ). Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ functionality (red box) in the UniProtKB entry. (ii) Partial snapshot of the submission form, a sample available here: https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/sampleform.html . (iii) After submission and review the publication and information are displayed in the relevant UniProtKB entry with attribution to submitter (red box) in a future public release. Submissions are minimally checked by an experienced curator before being added to the Publications section of the record. A tracker tool has also been developed ( https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/bbsubinfo.html ) to enable users to access and search this wealth of additional bibliography. Researchers are encouraged to add relevant publications to entries of interest to them. Since we started the pilot in release 2019_08 we have seen a continuing increase in user submissions. As of release 2020_04 there have been 674 submissions relating to 424 publications and 557 entries, from 149 unique users”concepts[152]
outcomecontrol — held — “To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB.” — “We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms”controls[0]
outcomecontrol — partial — “We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms” — “UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal”controls[1]
outcomecontrol — held — “All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source.” — “The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout.”controls[2]
evidence status notesense — A FIGURE/TABLE CAPTION IS JOINED INTO THE 'evidence' QUOTE, beginning at character 1070: 'Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ function…'. The page prints the caption apart from the paragraph; read the quote as the paragraph, then the caption. — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ). Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ functionality (red box) in the UniProtKB entry. (ii) Partial snapshot of the submission form, a sample available here: https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/sampleform.html . (iii) After submission and review the publication and information are displayed in the relevant UniProtKB entry with attribution to submitter (red box) in a future public release. Submissions are minimally checked by an experienced curator before being added to the Publications section of the record. A tracker tool has also been developed ( https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/bbsubinfo.html ) to enable users to access and search this wealth of additional bibliography. Researchers are encouraged to add relevant publications to entries of interest to them. Since we started the pilot in release 2019_08 we have seen a continuing increase in user submissions. As of release 2020_04 there have been 674 submissions relating to 424 publications and 557 entries, from 149 unique users”senses[16]
weightAligning variants to protein features → mechanistic insights — 0.7 — “Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights”unhoused_relations[5]
no type for thisReference Proteome → research community — A Reference Proteome may be selected by the research community; selected-by is absent from the eight edge types. — “A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster”unhoused_relations[0]
no type for thisReference Proteome → computational clustering — A Reference Proteome may be selected by computational clustering; selected-by is absent from the eight edge types. — “A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster”unhoused_relations[1]
no type for thisAssociation-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA) → SAAS system — ARBA replaces the previous SAAS system; replaces is absent from the eight edge types. — “introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system”unhoused_relations[2]
no type for thisredundant proteome sequences → UniParc — Redundant sequences removed from UniProtKB remain available through UniParc; stored/available-through is absent from the eight edge types. — “The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability”unhoused_relations[3]
no type for thiscentral hub → 180 other resources — The central hub links users out to 180 resources; links-to is absent from the eight edge types. — “UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources”unhoused_relations[4]
no type for thisAligning variants to protein features → mechanistic insights — Mapping variants to protein features provides mechanistic insights; supports-inference-of is absent from the eight edge types. — “Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights”unhoused_relations[5]
no type for thisCommunity submission → articles and annotations — The submission page enables users to contribute publications and basic annotations; enables-contribution is absent from the eight edge types. — “The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication”unhoused_relations[6]
no type for thisExpert curation → template entries — Expert curation produces template entries for transferring information to related proteins; produces/serves-as-template is absent from the eight edge types. — “Expert curation of those proteins biochemically characterized remains a key focus of our activities, to both inform on these well-studied entities and also to act as template entries for information transfer to proteins in related species”unhoused_relations[7]
limitationA NEW INSTRUMENT CAUSED DELETIONS FROM THE KNOWLEDGEBASE: `As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB`. The proteomes did not change; the ruler did — “To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB.”limitations[0]
limitationand the object being counted is hedged in its own definition: a proteome is `the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism`. Completeness and belief in the same phrase — “UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal”limitations[1]
limitationTHE TWO TIERS ARE A PROVENANCE DISTINCTION, NOT A QUALITY ONE ON ITS FACE: `UniProtKB COMBINES REVIEWED UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the UNREVIEWED UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems`. A user who does not read the tier reads both as the same kind of claim — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”limitations[2]
limitationand the scale makes the tiering unavoidable: entries grew `by >65 million records, an increase of >50% in just 2 years`. No biocuration team can review that — “Collectively, these have already resulted in the number of entries contained in UniProtKB growing by >65 million records, an increase of >50% in just 2 years.”limitations[3]
Content tags
content-observations: finding · quantity · variable · definition · key-term — grounded in the full text
finding — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”content_tags.findings[0]
finding — “As previously described ( 3 ), we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability.”content_tags.findings[1]
finding — “Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein).”content_tags.findings[2]
finding — “We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms”content_tags.findings[3]
finding — “To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB.”content_tags.findings[4]
finding — “UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal”content_tags.findings[5]
finding — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”content_tags.findings[6]
finding — “All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source.”content_tags.findings[7]
finding — “Collectively, these have already resulted in the number of entries contained in UniProtKB growing by >65 million records, an increase of >50% in just 2 years.”content_tags.findings[8]
finding — “This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain.”content_tags.findings[9]
finding — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information.”content_tags.findings[10]
finding — “The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein.”content_tags.findings[11]
quantity2 peptides — of seven amino acids or more, the primary rule for calling a protein validated at PE=1 — “Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein).”content_tags.quantities[0]
quantity3 species — the minimum size of the comparison group the CPD judges a proteome's completeness against — “We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms”content_tags.quantities[1]
quantity65 million records — growth in UniProtKB entries in two years - an increase of over 50% — “Collectively, these have already resulted in the number of entries contained in UniProtKB growing by >65 million records, an increase of >50% in just 2 years.”content_tags.quantities[2]
variablePeptide identifications — “Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein).”content_tags.variables[0]
definitionvalidated — “Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein).”content_tags.definitions[0]
definitionComplete Proteome Detector — “We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms”content_tags.definitions[1]
definitionUniProt Archive — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”content_tags.definitions[2]
Concepts
terms this paper carries, each with the sentence it was cut from — the layer that joins one paper to another. Terms with no quote yet are on CONCEPTS.html.
conceptUniProt Knowledgebase — not defined in this paper's own words; the curated resource: reviewed Swiss-Prot entries plus unreviewed TrEMBL entries — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”concepts[0]
conceptUniProt Archive — not defined in this paper's own words; the archive holding every known sequence including the obsolete ones — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”concepts[1]
concepthistorical obsolete sequences — not defined in this paper's own words; what the knowledgebase drops and the archive keeps — “The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences.”concepts[2]
conceptComplete Proteome Detector — not defined in this paper's own words; the in-house algorithm classifying a proteome as standard, close to standard or outlier by comparison with related species — “We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms”concepts[3]
conceptBUSCO — not defined in this paper's own words; Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs - the scoring method whose adoption caused proteomes to be removed — “To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB.”concepts[4]
conceptvalidated — not defined in this paper's own words; protein existence level 1 - supported by peptide identifications meeting a stated counting rule — “Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein).”concepts[5]
conceptPeptide identifications — not defined in this paper's own words; the evidence type that validates a protein's existence — “Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein).”concepts[6]
conceptcomprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences — not defined in this paper's own words; resource objective of UniProtKB — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information. In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource. The number of sequences in UniProtKB has risen to approximately 190 million, despite continued work to reduce sequence redundancy at the proteome level. We have adopted new methods of assessing proteome completeness and quality. We continue to extract detailed annotations from the literature to add to reviewed entries and supplement these in unreviewed entries with annotations provided by automated systems such as the newly implemented Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA). We have developed a credit-based publication submission interface to allow the community to contribute publications and annotations to UniProt entries. We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curation of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research community through a dedicated portal”concepts[7]
conceptfunctional information — not defined in this paper's own words; experimentally curated or automatically supplied information attached to protein sequences — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information. In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource. The number of sequences in UniProtKB has risen to approximately 190 million, despite continued work to reduce sequence redundancy at the proteome level. We have adopted new methods of assessing proteome completeness and quality. We continue to extract detailed annotations from the literature to add to reviewed entries and supplement these in unreviewed entries with annotations provided by automated systems such as the newly implemented Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA). We have developed a credit-based publication submission interface to allow the community to contribute publications and annotations to UniProt entries. We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curation of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research community through a dedicated portal”concepts[8]
conceptsequence redundancy — not defined in this paper's own words; repeated proteome-level sequence content targeted for reduction — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information. In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource. The number of sequences in UniProtKB has risen to approximately 190 million, despite continued work to reduce sequence redundancy at the proteome level. We have adopted new methods of assessing proteome completeness and quality. We continue to extract detailed annotations from the literature to add to reviewed entries and supplement these in unreviewed entries with annotations provided by automated systems such as the newly implemented Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA). We have developed a credit-based publication submission interface to allow the community to contribute publications and annotations to UniProt entries. We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curation of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research community through a dedicated portal”concepts[9]
conceptproteome completeness and quality — not defined in this paper's own words; two dimensions newly assessed for proteome records — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information. In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource. The number of sequences in UniProtKB has risen to approximately 190 million, despite continued work to reduce sequence redundancy at the proteome level. We have adopted new methods of assessing proteome completeness and quality. We continue to extract detailed annotations from the literature to add to reviewed entries and supplement these in unreviewed entries with annotations provided by automated systems such as the newly implemented Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA). We have developed a credit-based publication submission interface to allow the community to contribute publications and annotations to UniProt entries. We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curation of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research community through a dedicated portal”concepts[10]
conceptreviewed entries — not defined in this paper's own words; entries supplemented through expert literature curation — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information. In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource. The number of sequences in UniProtKB has risen to approximately 190 million, despite continued work to reduce sequence redundancy at the proteome level. We have adopted new methods of assessing proteome completeness and quality. We continue to extract detailed annotations from the literature to add to reviewed entries and supplement these in unreviewed entries with annotations provided by automated systems such as the newly implemented Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA). We have developed a credit-based publication submission interface to allow the community to contribute publications and annotations to UniProt entries. We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curation of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research community through a dedicated portal”concepts[11]
conceptunreviewed entries — not defined in this paper's own words; entries supplemented by automated annotation systems — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information. In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource. The number of sequences in UniProtKB has risen to approximately 190 million, despite continued work to reduce sequence redundancy at the proteome level. We have adopted new methods of assessing proteome completeness and quality. We continue to extract detailed annotations from the literature to add to reviewed entries and supplement these in unreviewed entries with annotations provided by automated systems such as the newly implemented Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA). We have developed a credit-based publication submission interface to allow the community to contribute publications and annotations to UniProt entries. We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curation of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research community through a dedicated portal”concepts[12]
conceptcredit-based publication submission interface — not defined in this paper's own words; community interface for submitting publications and annotations with credit — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information. In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource. The number of sequences in UniProtKB has risen to approximately 190 million, despite continued work to reduce sequence redundancy at the proteome level. We have adopted new methods of assessing proteome completeness and quality. We continue to extract detailed annotations from the literature to add to reviewed entries and supplement these in unreviewed entries with annotations provided by automated systems such as the newly implemented Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA). We have developed a credit-based publication submission interface to allow the community to contribute publications and annotations to UniProt entries. We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curation of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research community through a dedicated portal”concepts[13]
conceptdedicated portal — not defined in this paper's own words; rapid-access surface used for pandemic protein data — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information. In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource. The number of sequences in UniProtKB has risen to approximately 190 million, despite continued work to reduce sequence redundancy at the proteome level. We have adopted new methods of assessing proteome completeness and quality. We continue to extract detailed annotations from the literature to add to reviewed entries and supplement these in unreviewed entries with annotations provided by automated systems such as the newly implemented Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA). We have developed a credit-based publication submission interface to allow the community to contribute publications and annotations to UniProt entries. We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curation of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research community through a dedicated portal”concepts[14]
conceptAssociation-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA) — not defined in this paper's own words; new automatic protein classification and annotation system — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information. In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource. The number of sequences in UniProtKB has risen to approximately 190 million, despite continued work to reduce sequence redundancy at the proteome level. We have adopted new methods of assessing proteome completeness and quality. We continue to extract detailed annotations from the literature to add to reviewed entries and supplement these in unreviewed entries with annotations provided by automated systems such as the newly implemented Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA). We have developed a credit-based publication submission interface to allow the community to contribute publications and annotations to UniProt entries. We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curation of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research community through a dedicated portal”concepts[15]
conceptARBA — not defined in this paper's own words; short name of the Association-Rule-Based Annotator — “The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebase is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequences annotated with functional information. In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource. The number of sequences in UniProtKB has risen to approximately 190 million, despite continued work to reduce sequence redundancy at the proteome level. We have adopted new methods of assessing proteome completeness and quality. We continue to extract detailed annotations from the literature to add to reviewed entries and supplement these in unreviewed entries with annotations provided by automated systems such as the newly implemented Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA). We have developed a credit-based publication submission interface to allow the community to contribute publications and annotations to UniProt entries. We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curation of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research community through a dedicated portal”concepts[16]
conceptcomplete compendium of all known protein sequence data — not defined in this paper's own words; the database collection goal — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[17]
conceptexperimentally verified — not defined in this paper's own words; evidential status for experimentally supported functional information — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[18]
conceptcomputationally predicted — not defined in this paper's own words; evidential status for automatically inferred functional information — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[19]
conceptreviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries — not defined in this paper's own words; expert-biocurated component of UniProtKB — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[20]
conceptunreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries — not defined in this paper's own words; automatically annotated component of UniProtKB — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[21]
conceptexpert biocuration team — not defined in this paper's own words; human source of data added to reviewed entries — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[22]
conceptautomated systems — not defined in this paper's own words; source of annotation for unreviewed entries — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[23]
conceptUniRef databases — not defined in this paper's own words; sequence collections clustered at multiple identity thresholds — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[24]
conceptsequence identity — not defined in this paper's own words; similarity dimension used to cluster UniRef sequence sets — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[25]
conceptUniParc — not defined in this paper's own words; short name of the UniProt Archive — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[26]
conceptcentral hub — not defined in this paper's own words; UniProt role integrating knowledge and linking users to external resources — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[27]
concept180 other resources — not defined in this paper's own words; external resources reachable through the UniProt hub — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[28]
conceptFindable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable — not defined in this paper's own words; expanded FAIR principles supported by the resource — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[29]
conceptFAIR — not defined in this paper's own words; short name for the data principles — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[30]
conceptstable and traceable identifiers — not defined in this paper's own words; persistent identifiers for sequences and sequence features — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[31]
conceptApplication Programming Interfaces — not defined in this paper's own words; programmatic mechanism for accessing UniProt data — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[32]
conceptFile Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads — not defined in this paper's own words; bulk file-access mechanism — “INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence data linked to a summary of the experimentally verified, or computationally predicted, functional information about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration team, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries that are annotated by automated systems. The UniRef databases cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identity and the UniProt Archive (UniParc) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequences. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hub from which users can link out to 180 other resources. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfaces (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloads, providing stable and traceable identifiers for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout”concepts[33]
conceptproteomes — not defined in this paper's own words; sets of proteins believed to be expressed by organisms — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database.”concepts[34]
conceptcomplete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism — not defined in this paper's own words; explicit proteome description — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database.”concepts[35]
conceptINSDC source databases — not defined in this paper's own words; ENA, GenBank, and DDBJ genome-submission sources — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database.”concepts[36]
conceptviral proteomes — not defined in this paper's own words; manually verified viral protein sets — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database.”concepts[37]
conceptBenchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs — not defined in this paper's own words; expanded name of BUSCO — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database. Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases over the last decade. UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB”concepts[38]
conceptcomplete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes — not defined in this paper's own words; four BUSCO gene-completeness outcomes — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database. Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases over the last decade. UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB”concepts[39]
conceptnear-universal single copy orthologs — not defined in this paper's own words; reference gene set used for BUSCO comparison — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database. Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases over the last decade. UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB”concepts[40]
conceptincomplete and poor-quality proteomes — not defined in this paper's own words; proteomes detected and removed after BUSCO adoption — “PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomes, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organism, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomes portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ ). The majority of these proteomes continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databases—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomes are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database. Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases over the last decade. UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB”concepts[41]
conceptdifferent quality and completeness metrics — not defined in this paper's own words; expanded metrics now exposed for proteomes — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[42]
conceptstandard — not defined in this paper's own words; CPD class for expected protein count — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[43]
conceptclose to standard — not defined in this paper's own words; CPD class near the expected distribution — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[44]
conceptoutlier — not defined in this paper's own words; CPD class outside the expected protein-count distribution — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[45]
conceptReference Proteome — not defined in this paper's own words; stable representative selected by community or clustering — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[46]
conceptReference Proteome set — not defined in this paper's own words; approximately seven percent of proteomes selected as representatives — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[47]
conceptresearch community — not defined in this paper's own words; one source selecting a reference proteome — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[48]
conceptcomputational clustering — not defined in this paper's own words; alternative process selecting a reference proteome — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[49]
conceptbest annotated proteome — not defined in this paper's own words; criterion for representation within a cluster — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[50]
conceptgene-centric subset of representative proteins — not defined in this paper's own words; one algorithmically selected sequence per gene — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[51]
conceptfull proteome — not defined in this paper's own words; all mapped proteins, including isoforms — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[52]
conceptisoforms — not defined in this paper's own words; alternative protein products included in a full proteome — “UniProt proteomes provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomes derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomes with different quality and completeness metrics. To enable researchers to evaluate proteome completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomes portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCO v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genes by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologs. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCO algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomes were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomes webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteome(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detector’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteome by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteome as either ‘standard’, ‘close to standard’ or an ‘outlier’, according to protein count vs. the standard distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomes ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCO or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome set (∼7% of total proteomes) A Reference Proteome is one that has been selected either by the research community or by computational clustering ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteome in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteome is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteome pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteome. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteins for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteome which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoforms) that map to the genome”concepts[53]
conceptrepresentative proteome — not defined in this paper's own words; nonredundant proteome retained within UniProtKB — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[54]
conceptredundant proteome sequences — not defined in this paper's own words; removed duplicate-like sequences retained through UniParc — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[55]
conceptstable proteome identifiers — not defined in this paper's own words; persistent UP identifiers maintained after redundancy removal — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[56]
conceptfindability — not defined in this paper's own words; property maintained for redundant proteomes through stable identifiers — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[57]
conceptUniRef protein sequence clusters — not defined in this paper's own words; clusters supporting similarity search and comparative analysis — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[58]
conceptsequence similarity searches — not defined in this paper's own words; search function facilitated by UniRef clusters — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[59]
conceptgene prediction — not defined in this paper's own words; prediction task facilitated by UniRef clusters — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[60]
conceptpan proteomes — not defined in this paper's own words; cluster-level union proteome computed by updated procedures — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[61]
conceptcore and accessory proteomes — not defined in this paper's own words; shared and variable cluster proteome components — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[62]
concepttime taken to perform UniRef50 clustering — not defined in this paper's own words; production time reduced from four weeks to 60 hours — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[63]
conceptMMseqs2 algorithm — not defined in this paper's own words; algorithm adopted to accelerate UniRef production — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[64]
conceptUniRef50 clustering — not defined in this paper's own words; 50-percent-identity clustering production step — “we continue to remove almost identical proteomes of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteome_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteome in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequences are available through UniParc to researchers and stable proteome identifiers (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteome to ensure findability. UniRef protein sequence clusters facilitate sequence similarity searches, functional annotation, gene prediction, and genome and proteome comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clustering from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteome clusters and identify representative proteomes, pan proteomes, and core and accessory proteomes”concepts[65]
conceptExpert curation — not defined in this paper's own words; evaluation and summarization of experimental literature in reviewed entries — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[66]
concepthierarchical searches — not defined in this paper's own words; ontology-indexed searches returning reactions involving chemical descendants — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[67]
conceptexperimental data — not defined in this paper's own words; published observations evaluated by curators — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[68]
concepthuman readable summaries — not defined in this paper's own words; narrative representation of curated function — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[69]
conceptstructured vocabularies — not defined in this paper's own words; computable representation of curated function — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[70]
conceptGene Ontology (GO) — not defined in this paper's own words; structured vocabulary used for functional annotation — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[71]
conceptRhea knowledgebase — not defined in this paper's own words; structured biochemical-reaction resource replacing textual descriptions — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[72]
conceptbiochemical reactions — not defined in this paper's own words; reaction knowledge represented through Rhea — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[73]
conceptchemical ontology ChEBI — not defined in this paper's own words; ontology Rhea uses to describe reaction participants and transformations — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[74]
conceptreaction participants — not defined in this paper's own words; chemical entities represented in Rhea with ChEBI — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[75]
conceptchemical structures — not defined in this paper's own words; structural chemical information represented through ChEBI — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[76]
conceptchemical transformations — not defined in this paper's own words; reaction changes represented through ChEBI — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[77]
conceptInChIKeys — not defined in this paper's own words; encoded chemical structures usable in search — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[78]
conceptpseudoenzymes — not defined in this paper's own words; enzyme-like proteins whose annotation was reviewed with domain experts — “Expert curation The evaluation of experimental data published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional information extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summaries and via structured vocabularies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactions in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebase of biochemical reactions ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participants, their chemical structures and chemical transformations. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searches on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structures (encoded as InChIKeys) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymes has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field”concepts[79]
conceptfunctional impact of human variation — not defined in this paper's own words; functional consequences of human protein variants — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[80]
conceptclinical significance — not defined in this paper's own words; clinical interpretation dimension assigned when known — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[81]
conceptACMG-AMP — not defined in this paper's own words; guideline framework used to evaluate clinical significance — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[82]
conceptpathogenicity calculator — not defined in this paper's own words; ClinGen tool supporting variant interpretation — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[83]
conceptClinVar — not defined in this paper's own words; repository receiving routine clinical interpretation submissions — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[84]
conceptalternative splicing — not defined in this paper's own words; production of multiple splice isoform proteins from multi-exon genes — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[85]
conceptsplice isoform proteins — not defined in this paper's own words; alternative protein sequences created by splicing — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[86]
conceptfunctional diversity of proteins — not defined in this paper's own words; diversity potentially increased by alternative splicing — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[87]
conceptpost-translational proteolytic cleavage — not defined in this paper's own words; processing that removes amino acids or protein portions — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[88]
conceptmature amino-acid chains — not defined in this paper's own words; processed products generated through proteolytic cleavage — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[89]
conceptpolyprotein — not defined in this paper's own words; single precursor capable of generating multiple products — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[90]
conceptmultiple bioactive proteins or peptides — not defined in this paper's own words; products a polyprotein may generate — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[91]
conceptmachine-readable functional annotations — not defined in this paper's own words; isoform- and chain-specific computable annotations — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[92]
conceptspecific isoforms — not defined in this paper's own words; alternative sequences receiving functional annotations and stable identifiers — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[93]
conceptpolyprotein cleavage products — not defined in this paper's own words; processed products represented in the adapted data model — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[94]
conceptbinary protein interactions — not defined in this paper's own words; interaction data mapped to isoform or processed-chain level — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[95]
conceptIMEx Consortium — not defined in this paper's own words; source consortium for imported molecular interactions — “To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIR principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variation. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significance, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseases. Clinical significance is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculator ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVar to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabularies to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicing to produce a variety of splice isoform proteins, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteins. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chains as a single polyprotein may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptides. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotations for specific isoforms and polyprotein cleavage products, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoforms and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactions imported from the IMEx Consortium of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoform/post-processed chain level”concepts[96]
conceptpre-release dataset — not defined in this paper's own words; rapid dataset exposed before the normal UniProt release — “Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomes rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental data as soon as this was published. A pre-release dataset was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portal in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionality, 3D-structure, binary interactions, and complex formation being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle to ensure the research community accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portal is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access points to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's disease, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variant, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed”concepts[97]
conceptCOVID-19 disease portal — not defined in this paper's own words; dedicated disease-oriented protein-data access point — “Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomes rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental data as soon as this was published. A pre-release dataset was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portal in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionality, 3D-structure, binary interactions, and complex formation being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle to ensure the research community accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portal is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access points to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's disease, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variant, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed”concepts[98]
conceptCOVID portal — not defined in this paper's own words; short label for the dedicated pandemic portal — “Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomes rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental data as soon as this was published. A pre-release dataset was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portal in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionality, 3D-structure, binary interactions, and complex formation being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle to ensure the research community accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portal is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access points to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's disease, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variant, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed”concepts[99]
conceptprotein functionality — not defined in this paper's own words; granular functional knowledge added to prioritized entries — “Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomes rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental data as soon as this was published. A pre-release dataset was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portal in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionality, 3D-structure, binary interactions, and complex formation being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle to ensure the research community accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portal is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access points to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's disease, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variant, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed”concepts[100]
concept3D-structure — not defined in this paper's own words; structural information added to pandemic-prioritized entries — “Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomes rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental data as soon as this was published. A pre-release dataset was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portal in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionality, 3D-structure, binary interactions, and complex formation being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle to ensure the research community accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portal is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access points to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's disease, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variant, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed”concepts[101]
conceptcomplex formation — not defined in this paper's own words; multi-protein assembly information added when available — “Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomes rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental data as soon as this was published. A pre-release dataset was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portal in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionality, 3D-structure, binary interactions, and complex formation being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle to ensure the research community accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portal is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access points to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's disease, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variant, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed”concepts[102]
conceptstandard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle — not defined in this paper's own words; ordinary release schedule exceeded by the COVID portal — “Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomes rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental data as soon as this was published. A pre-release dataset was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portal in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionality, 3D-structure, binary interactions, and complex formation being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle to ensure the research community accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portal is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access points to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's disease, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variant, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed”concepts[103]
conceptdisease-centric access points — not defined in this paper's own words; planned disease-organized interfaces into UniProtKB — “Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomes rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental data as soon as this was published. A pre-release dataset was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portal in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionality, 3D-structure, binary interactions, and complex formation being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle to ensure the research community accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portal is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access points to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's disease, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variant, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed”concepts[104]
conceptAlzheimer's disease — not defined in this paper's own words; second disease focus used for targeted curation — “Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomes rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental data as soon as this was published. A pre-release dataset was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portal in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionality, 3D-structure, binary interactions, and complex formation being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle to ensure the research community accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portal is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access points to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's disease, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variant, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed”concepts[105]
conceptdisease-related amino-acid variant — not defined in this paper's own words; variant criterion for Alzheimer-focused records — “Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomes rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental data as soon as this was published. A pre-release dataset was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portal in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionality, 3D-structure, binary interactions, and complex formation being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portal is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycle to ensure the research community accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portal is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access points to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's disease, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variant, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed”concepts[106]
conceptAutomatic annotation — not defined in this paper's own words; computational enrichment of the dominant unreviewed record population — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[107]
conceptInterPro — not defined in this paper's own words; protein classification tool supporting domains, sites, and annotation — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[108]
conceptUniRule system — not defined in this paper's own words; semi-automated similarity-based rule annotation system — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[109]
conceptrule mining techniques — not defined in this paper's own words; ARBA method for generating annotation models — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[110]
conceptUniFIRE — not defined in this paper's own words; open-source framework applying UniProt annotation rules — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[111]
conceptUniProt Rule Markup Language — not defined in this paper's own words; format for contributed and reusable annotation rules — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[112]
concepteight different predictors — not defined in this paper's own words; predictor ensemble used for disorder consensus — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[113]
conceptsuperfamily, family and subfamily levels — not defined in this paper's own words; three InterPro sequence-classification resolutions — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[114]
conceptfunctional domains — not defined in this paper's own words; protein regions predicted by InterPro member databases — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[115]
conceptimportant sites — not defined in this paper's own words; functional sequence sites predicted by InterPro — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[116]
conceptexperimentally uncharacterized proteins — not defined in this paper's own words; proteins receiving UniRule annotation through similarity — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[117]
conceptknown experimentally characterized proteins — not defined in this paper's own words; reference proteins used for similarity-based transfer — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[118]
conceptmulticlass, self-training annotation system — not defined in this paper's own words; paper's class description of ARBA — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[119]
conceptSAAS system — not defined in this paper's own words; previous rule-based system replaced by ARBA — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[120]
conceptconcise annotation models — not defined in this paper's own words; human-readable high-coverage models produced through rule mining — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[121]
conceptdata exclusion set — not defined in this paper's own words; ARBA filter censoring non-transferable properties — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[122]
concepthuman-readable rules — not defined in this paper's own words; per-release inspectable ARBA rule outputs — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[123]
conceptARBA rules — not defined in this paper's own words; automatic rules used to annotate millions of proteins — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[124]
conceptcombined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems — not defined in this paper's own words; coverage raised from 35 to 49 percent — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[125]
conceptuncharacterized protein names — not defined in this paper's own words; names improved using InterPro signatures — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[126]
conceptdomain X containing protein — not defined in this paper's own words; nomenclature pattern applied from InterPro signatures — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[127]
conceptintrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions — not defined in this paper's own words; major source of proteins missing transferable annotation — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[128]
conceptconsensus-based prediction of long disorder — not defined in this paper's own words; MobiDB-lite prediction added to unreviewed entries — “Automatic annotation The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterPro ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levels, and predicts the occurrence of functional domains and important sites. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterPro member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule system ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteins based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteins, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA), a multiclass, self-training annotation system for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS system. ARBA is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniques to generate concise annotation models with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterPro group membership and taxonomy. ARBA employs a data exclusion set that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rules for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arba/ . 22 894 ARBA rules were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systems from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBA. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein names have been improved using InterPro member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing protein’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotations are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIRE is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Language) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotation systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterPro member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterPro signature regions, and many InterPro signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regions, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorder ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictors to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entries and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries”concepts[129]
conceptProtVista visualisation tool — not defined in this paper's own words; interface displaying mappings on protein sequences — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[130]
conceptpre-calculated mapping — not defined in this paper's own words; mapping between exon amino-acid coordinates and genomic coordinates — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[131]
conceptAligning variants to protein features — not defined in this paper's own words; analysis step connecting variation to domains, sites, and modifications — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[132]
conceptPSI Extended FASTA Format — not defined in this paper's own words; expanded name of PEFF — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[133]
conceptPEFF — not defined in this paper's own words; extended FASTA format for search engines and proteomic metadata — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[134]
conceptProteins API — not defined in this paper's own words; service exposing PEFF variation and sequence data — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[135]
conceptlarge-scale datasets — not defined in this paper's own words; external datasets integrated and mapped onto protein records — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[136]
conceptgenomic coordinates — not defined in this paper's own words; genome positions mapped from protein sequence annotations — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[137]
conceptGRCh38 version of the human genome — not defined in this paper's own words; human reference assembly receiving protein-feature mappings — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[138]
conceptspecific variants — not defined in this paper's own words; variants aligned with functional protein features — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[139]
conceptdisease — not defined in this paper's own words; one consequence variants may help explain — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[140]
conceptresistance to a drug — not defined in this paper's own words; drug-response consequence variants may help explain — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[141]
conceptmechanistic insights — not defined in this paper's own words; interpretive output of aligning variants to protein features — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[142]
conceptmass spectrometry proteomic data — not defined in this paper's own words; source data for integrated peptide identifications — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[143]
conceptProteomeXchange Consortium — not defined in this paper's own words; deposit consortium supplying proteomics data — “Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasets, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation tool ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVar SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mapping of the genomic coordinates for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinates ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteome are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinates on the GRCh38 version of the human genome for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein features, such as functional domains and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insights into how specific variants can lead to disease or resistance to a drug or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic data deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identifications can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validated (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFF (PSI Extended FASTA Format) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standard Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFF format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins API service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species”concepts[144]
conceptCommunity submission — not defined in this paper's own words; interface for adding publications and basic annotations — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ).”concepts[145]
conceptcontrolled list — not defined in this paper's own words; topic list constraining optional community annotation — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ).”concepts[146]
concepttracker tool — not defined in this paper's own words; tool for searching community-contributed bibliography — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ). Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ functionality (red box) in the UniProtKB entry. (ii) Partial snapshot of the submission form, a sample available here: https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/sampleform.html . (iii) After submission and review the publication and information are displayed in the relevant UniProtKB entry with attribution to submitter (red box) in a future public release. Submissions are minimally checked by an experienced curator before being added to the Publications section of the record. A tracker tool has also been developed ( https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/bbsubinfo.html ) to enable users to access and search this wealth of additional bibliography. Researchers are encouraged to add relevant publications to entries of interest to them. Since we started the pilot in release 2019_08 we have seen a continuing increase in user submissions. As of release 2020_04 there have been 674 submissions relating to 424 publications and 557 entries, from 149 unique users”concepts[147]
conceptORCID — not defined in this paper's own words; researcher identifier validating submissions and assigning credit — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ).”concepts[148]
conceptresearcher personal ID — not defined in this paper's own words; paper's description of ORCID — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ).”concepts[149]
conceptmodel organism databases — not defined in this paper's own words; prior adopters of community-curation models — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ).”concepts[150]
conceptexperienced curator — not defined in this paper's own words; human reviewer performing minimal submission checks — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ). Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ functionality (red box) in the UniProtKB entry. (ii) Partial snapshot of the submission form, a sample available here: https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/sampleform.html . (iii) After submission and review the publication and information are displayed in the relevant UniProtKB entry with attribution to submitter (red box) in a future public release. Submissions are minimally checked by an experienced curator before being added to the Publications section of the record. A tracker tool has also been developed ( https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/bbsubinfo.html ) to enable users to access and search this wealth of additional bibliography. Researchers are encouraged to add relevant publications to entries of interest to them. Since we started the pilot in release 2019_08 we have seen a continuing increase in user submissions. As of release 2020_04 there have been 674 submissions relating to 424 publications and 557 entries, from 149 unique users”concepts[151]
conceptcommunity contribution — not defined in this paper's own words; user-supplied publication and annotation route — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ). Figure 5. Community contribution. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ functionality (red box) in the UniProtKB entry. (ii) Partial snapshot of the submission form, a sample available here: https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/sampleform.html . (iii) After submission and review the publication and information are displayed in the relevant UniProtKB entry with attribution to submitter (red box) in a future public release. Submissions are minimally checked by an experienced curator before being added to the Publications section of the record. A tracker tool has also been developed ( https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/bbsubinfo.html ) to enable users to access and search this wealth of additional bibliography. Researchers are encouraged to add relevant publications to entries of interest to them. Since we started the pilot in release 2019_08 we have seen a continuing increase in user submissions. As of release 2020_04 there have been 674 submissions relating to 424 publications and 557 entries, from 149 unique users”concepts[152]
conceptarticles and annotations — not defined in this paper's own words; community-supplied content added to protein entries — “Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotations to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submission’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled list and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and disease, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCID ( https://orcid.org/ ), a researcher personal ID, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databases, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ).”concepts[153]
conceptuser-centered design process — not defined in this paper's own words; design process using workshops, testing, surveys, and research — “Website updates Users are at the center of the UniProt website design and development process. We follow a user-centered design process, conducting regular workshops, user testing, surveys and user research activities involving many users worldwide with varied research backgrounds and use cases. We are currently redesigning the website to take advantage of new technologies and paradigms in web development and welcome the UniProt user community to participate in user feedback and testing activities by contacting us at help@uniprot.org and contributing your user stories and workflows. As part of the redesign process, we have redeveloped both the UniProt interaction viewer (Figure 6A ) and ProtVista viewer, which graphically represents protein sequence features, such as domains, sites, post-translational modifications and variants, and structures. These are now part of the ‘Nightingale’ visualization web component library ( https://ebi-webcomponents.github.io/nightingale/#/ ) and are publicly available as lightweight, flexible, and modular components that can be more easily extended with new features, modified and implemented by users in their own resources (Figure 6B ). The ProtVista viewer has already been implemented by the Open Targets ( 43 ) and the Pharos ( 44 ) databases of unstudied and understudied drug targets amongst others”concepts[154]
conceptUniProt interaction viewer — not defined in this paper's own words; graphical viewer redeveloped for protein interactions — “Website updates Users are at the center of the UniProt website design and development process. We follow a user-centered design process, conducting regular workshops, user testing, surveys and user research activities involving many users worldwide with varied research backgrounds and use cases. We are currently redesigning the website to take advantage of new technologies and paradigms in web development and welcome the UniProt user community to participate in user feedback and testing activities by contacting us at help@uniprot.org and contributing your user stories and workflows. As part of the redesign process, we have redeveloped both the UniProt interaction viewer (Figure 6A ) and ProtVista viewer, which graphically represents protein sequence features, such as domains, sites, post-translational modifications and variants, and structures. These are now part of the ‘Nightingale’ visualization web component library ( https://ebi-webcomponents.github.io/nightingale/#/ ) and are publicly available as lightweight, flexible, and modular components that can be more easily extended with new features, modified and implemented by users in their own resources (Figure 6B ). The ProtVista viewer has already been implemented by the Open Targets ( 43 ) and the Pharos ( 44 ) databases of unstudied and understudied drug targets amongst others”concepts[155]
conceptProtVista viewer — not defined in this paper's own words; graphical viewer for domains, sites, modifications, variants, and structures — “Website updates Users are at the center of the UniProt website design and development process. We follow a user-centered design process, conducting regular workshops, user testing, surveys and user research activities involving many users worldwide with varied research backgrounds and use cases. We are currently redesigning the website to take advantage of new technologies and paradigms in web development and welcome the UniProt user community to participate in user feedback and testing activities by contacting us at help@uniprot.org and contributing your user stories and workflows. As part of the redesign process, we have redeveloped both the UniProt interaction viewer (Figure 6A ) and ProtVista viewer, which graphically represents protein sequence features, such as domains, sites, post-translational modifications and variants, and structures. These are now part of the ‘Nightingale’ visualization web component library ( https://ebi-webcomponents.github.io/nightingale/#/ ) and are publicly available as lightweight, flexible, and modular components that can be more easily extended with new features, modified and implemented by users in their own resources (Figure 6B ). The ProtVista viewer has already been implemented by the Open Targets ( 43 ) and the Pharos ( 44 ) databases of unstudied and understudied drug targets amongst others”concepts[156]
conceptNightingale — not defined in this paper's own words; visualization web component library containing reusable UniProt viewers — “Website updates Users are at the center of the UniProt website design and development process. We follow a user-centered design process, conducting regular workshops, user testing, surveys and user research activities involving many users worldwide with varied research backgrounds and use cases. We are currently redesigning the website to take advantage of new technologies and paradigms in web development and welcome the UniProt user community to participate in user feedback and testing activities by contacting us at help@uniprot.org and contributing your user stories and workflows. As part of the redesign process, we have redeveloped both the UniProt interaction viewer (Figure 6A ) and ProtVista viewer, which graphically represents protein sequence features, such as domains, sites, post-translational modifications and variants, and structures. These are now part of the ‘Nightingale’ visualization web component library ( https://ebi-webcomponents.github.io/nightingale/#/ ) and are publicly available as lightweight, flexible, and modular components that can be more easily extended with new features, modified and implemented by users in their own resources (Figure 6B ). The ProtVista viewer has already been implemented by the Open Targets ( 43 ) and the Pharos ( 44 ) databases of unstudied and understudied drug targets amongst others”concepts[157]
conceptlightweight, flexible, and modular components — not defined in this paper's own words; reusable viewer components intended for outside implementation — “Website updates Users are at the center of the UniProt website design and development process. We follow a user-centered design process, conducting regular workshops, user testing, surveys and user research activities involving many users worldwide with varied research backgrounds and use cases. We are currently redesigning the website to take advantage of new technologies and paradigms in web development and welcome the UniProt user community to participate in user feedback and testing activities by contacting us at help@uniprot.org and contributing your user stories and workflows. As part of the redesign process, we have redeveloped both the UniProt interaction viewer (Figure 6A ) and ProtVista viewer, which graphically represents protein sequence features, such as domains, sites, post-translational modifications and variants, and structures. These are now part of the ‘Nightingale’ visualization web component library ( https://ebi-webcomponents.github.io/nightingale/#/ ) and are publicly available as lightweight, flexible, and modular components that can be more easily extended with new features, modified and implemented by users in their own resources (Figure 6B ). The ProtVista viewer has already been implemented by the Open Targets ( 43 ) and the Pharos ( 44 ) databases of unstudied and understudied drug targets amongst others”concepts[158]
conceptproteome redundancy removal — not defined in this paper's own words; pre-release process removing redundant proteomes — “DATA AVAILABILITY Due to the ever-increasing number of sequence records UniProt is processing with every release cycle, as of release 2020_01 (26 February 2020), UniProt releases are now published every eight weeks. This gives our production team the time required to complete data import, proteome redundancy removal, data checking, integration of external data and automatic annotation of unreviewed records prior to starting the release process. In addition to providing customizable views and downloads in a range of formats via the website, and file sets at the FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ), UniProt supplies users with a number of different options for computational access to the data ( www.uniprot.org/help/programmatic_access ). These include the website RESTful Application Programming Interface (API), stable URLs that can be bookmarked, linked, and reused, the Proteins extended REST API providing genomic coordinates of UniProtKB sequences and annotations imported and mapped from large-scale data imports ( 29 ), and the SPARQL API that allows users to perform complex queries across all UniProt data and also other resources that provide a SPARQL endpoint, such as DisGeNET ( 45 ), Bgee ( 46 ), or Wikidata ( 47 ). The Proteins API has recently been extended to serve the HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative Extended FASTA Format (PEFF) for the proteomics community which enables more metadata, such as detail of amino-acid variants in the FASTA file header section”concepts[159]
conceptRESTful Application Programming Interface — not defined in this paper's own words; programmatic web API for UniProt data — “DATA AVAILABILITY Due to the ever-increasing number of sequence records UniProt is processing with every release cycle, as of release 2020_01 (26 February 2020), UniProt releases are now published every eight weeks. This gives our production team the time required to complete data import, proteome redundancy removal, data checking, integration of external data and automatic annotation of unreviewed records prior to starting the release process. In addition to providing customizable views and downloads in a range of formats via the website, and file sets at the FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ), UniProt supplies users with a number of different options for computational access to the data ( www.uniprot.org/help/programmatic_access ). These include the website RESTful Application Programming Interface (API), stable URLs that can be bookmarked, linked, and reused, the Proteins extended REST API providing genomic coordinates of UniProtKB sequences and annotations imported and mapped from large-scale data imports ( 29 ), and the SPARQL API that allows users to perform complex queries across all UniProt data and also other resources that provide a SPARQL endpoint, such as DisGeNET ( 45 ), Bgee ( 46 ), or Wikidata ( 47 ). The Proteins API has recently been extended to serve the HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative Extended FASTA Format (PEFF) for the proteomics community which enables more metadata, such as detail of amino-acid variants in the FASTA file header section”concepts[160]
conceptstable URLs — not defined in this paper's own words; bookmarkable and reusable access identifiers — “DATA AVAILABILITY Due to the ever-increasing number of sequence records UniProt is processing with every release cycle, as of release 2020_01 (26 February 2020), UniProt releases are now published every eight weeks. This gives our production team the time required to complete data import, proteome redundancy removal, data checking, integration of external data and automatic annotation of unreviewed records prior to starting the release process. In addition to providing customizable views and downloads in a range of formats via the website, and file sets at the FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ), UniProt supplies users with a number of different options for computational access to the data ( www.uniprot.org/help/programmatic_access ). These include the website RESTful Application Programming Interface (API), stable URLs that can be bookmarked, linked, and reused, the Proteins extended REST API providing genomic coordinates of UniProtKB sequences and annotations imported and mapped from large-scale data imports ( 29 ), and the SPARQL API that allows users to perform complex queries across all UniProt data and also other resources that provide a SPARQL endpoint, such as DisGeNET ( 45 ), Bgee ( 46 ), or Wikidata ( 47 ). The Proteins API has recently been extended to serve the HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative Extended FASTA Format (PEFF) for the proteomics community which enables more metadata, such as detail of amino-acid variants in the FASTA file header section”concepts[161]
conceptSPARQL API — not defined in this paper's own words; query interface spanning UniProt and other SPARQL resources — “DATA AVAILABILITY Due to the ever-increasing number of sequence records UniProt is processing with every release cycle, as of release 2020_01 (26 February 2020), UniProt releases are now published every eight weeks. This gives our production team the time required to complete data import, proteome redundancy removal, data checking, integration of external data and automatic annotation of unreviewed records prior to starting the release process. In addition to providing customizable views and downloads in a range of formats via the website, and file sets at the FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ), UniProt supplies users with a number of different options for computational access to the data ( www.uniprot.org/help/programmatic_access ). These include the website RESTful Application Programming Interface (API), stable URLs that can be bookmarked, linked, and reused, the Proteins extended REST API providing genomic coordinates of UniProtKB sequences and annotations imported and mapped from large-scale data imports ( 29 ), and the SPARQL API that allows users to perform complex queries across all UniProt data and also other resources that provide a SPARQL endpoint, such as DisGeNET ( 45 ), Bgee ( 46 ), or Wikidata ( 47 ). The Proteins API has recently been extended to serve the HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative Extended FASTA Format (PEFF) for the proteomics community which enables more metadata, such as detail of amino-acid variants in the FASTA file header section”concepts[162]
conceptSPARQL endpoint — not defined in this paper's own words; query service exposed by linked external resources — “DATA AVAILABILITY Due to the ever-increasing number of sequence records UniProt is processing with every release cycle, as of release 2020_01 (26 February 2020), UniProt releases are now published every eight weeks. This gives our production team the time required to complete data import, proteome redundancy removal, data checking, integration of external data and automatic annotation of unreviewed records prior to starting the release process. In addition to providing customizable views and downloads in a range of formats via the website, and file sets at the FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ), UniProt supplies users with a number of different options for computational access to the data ( www.uniprot.org/help/programmatic_access ). These include the website RESTful Application Programming Interface (API), stable URLs that can be bookmarked, linked, and reused, the Proteins extended REST API providing genomic coordinates of UniProtKB sequences and annotations imported and mapped from large-scale data imports ( 29 ), and the SPARQL API that allows users to perform complex queries across all UniProt data and also other resources that provide a SPARQL endpoint, such as DisGeNET ( 45 ), Bgee ( 46 ), or Wikidata ( 47 ). The Proteins API has recently been extended to serve the HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative Extended FASTA Format (PEFF) for the proteomics community which enables more metadata, such as detail of amino-acid variants in the FASTA file header section”concepts[163]
concepteight weeks — not defined in this paper's own words; new UniProt release interval — “DATA AVAILABILITY Due to the ever-increasing number of sequence records UniProt is processing with every release cycle, as of release 2020_01 (26 February 2020), UniProt releases are now published every eight weeks. This gives our production team the time required to complete data import, proteome redundancy removal, data checking, integration of external data and automatic annotation of unreviewed records prior to starting the release process. In addition to providing customizable views and downloads in a range of formats via the website, and file sets at the FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ), UniProt supplies users with a number of different options for computational access to the data ( www.uniprot.org/help/programmatic_access ). These include the website RESTful Application Programming Interface (API), stable URLs that can be bookmarked, linked, and reused, the Proteins extended REST API providing genomic coordinates of UniProtKB sequences and annotations imported and mapped from large-scale data imports ( 29 ), and the SPARQL API that allows users to perform complex queries across all UniProt data and also other resources that provide a SPARQL endpoint, such as DisGeNET ( 45 ), Bgee ( 46 ), or Wikidata ( 47 ). The Proteins API has recently been extended to serve the HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative Extended FASTA Format (PEFF) for the proteomics community which enables more metadata, such as detail of amino-acid variants in the FASTA file header section”concepts[164]
conceptreference framework for multiscale biomedical data integration and analysis — not defined in this paper's own words; role created by organizing protein knowledge — “CONCLUSIONS UniProt continues to play its pivotal role in the fields of biology and biomedicine, collecting, standardizing and organizing knowledge of proteins and their functions to create a reference framework for multiscale biomedical data integration and analysis. Organisms are being routinely sequenced at the whole genome level, and eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and metagenomic sequencing projects are all contributing to the increased diversity of sequence data in the UniProt databases. It is of increasing importance that our automatic annotation pipelines continue to develop in parallel to ensure that these unreviewed genomes, the vast majority of which are not being experimentally studied at the protein level, are richly and comprehensively annotated with functional information. Expert curation of those proteins biochemically characterized remains a key focus of our activities, to both inform on these well-studied entities and also to act as template entries for information transfer to proteins in related species. As the complexity and depth of our value-added data increases, we are exploring new ways to present the data to users and will continue to serve the community with new and improved website access designed to improve and enhance the user experience and upgraded programmatic access, with ease of use always a priority”concepts[165]
conceptautomatic annotation pipelines — not defined in this paper's own words; systems that must scale with unreviewed genome growth — “CONCLUSIONS UniProt continues to play its pivotal role in the fields of biology and biomedicine, collecting, standardizing and organizing knowledge of proteins and their functions to create a reference framework for multiscale biomedical data integration and analysis. Organisms are being routinely sequenced at the whole genome level, and eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and metagenomic sequencing projects are all contributing to the increased diversity of sequence data in the UniProt databases. It is of increasing importance that our automatic annotation pipelines continue to develop in parallel to ensure that these unreviewed genomes, the vast majority of which are not being experimentally studied at the protein level, are richly and comprehensively annotated with functional information. Expert curation of those proteins biochemically characterized remains a key focus of our activities, to both inform on these well-studied entities and also to act as template entries for information transfer to proteins in related species. As the complexity and depth of our value-added data increases, we are exploring new ways to present the data to users and will continue to serve the community with new and improved website access designed to improve and enhance the user experience and upgraded programmatic access, with ease of use always a priority”concepts[166]
concepttemplate entries — not defined in this paper's own words; expert-curated records used for transfer to related proteins — “CONCLUSIONS UniProt continues to play its pivotal role in the fields of biology and biomedicine, collecting, standardizing and organizing knowledge of proteins and their functions to create a reference framework for multiscale biomedical data integration and analysis. Organisms are being routinely sequenced at the whole genome level, and eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and metagenomic sequencing projects are all contributing to the increased diversity of sequence data in the UniProt databases. It is of increasing importance that our automatic annotation pipelines continue to develop in parallel to ensure that these unreviewed genomes, the vast majority of which are not being experimentally studied at the protein level, are richly and comprehensively annotated with functional information. Expert curation of those proteins biochemically characterized remains a key focus of our activities, to both inform on these well-studied entities and also to act as template entries for information transfer to proteins in related species. As the complexity and depth of our value-added data increases, we are exploring new ways to present the data to users and will continue to serve the community with new and improved website access designed to improve and enhance the user experience and upgraded programmatic access, with ease of use always a priority”concepts[167]
conceptinformation transfer to proteins in related species — not defined in this paper's own words; reuse enabled by expert-curated templates — “CONCLUSIONS UniProt continues to play its pivotal role in the fields of biology and biomedicine, collecting, standardizing and organizing knowledge of proteins and their functions to create a reference framework for multiscale biomedical data integration and analysis. Organisms are being routinely sequenced at the whole genome level, and eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and metagenomic sequencing projects are all contributing to the increased diversity of sequence data in the UniProt databases. It is of increasing importance that our automatic annotation pipelines continue to develop in parallel to ensure that these unreviewed genomes, the vast majority of which are not being experimentally studied at the protein level, are richly and comprehensively annotated with functional information. Expert curation of those proteins biochemically characterized remains a key focus of our activities, to both inform on these well-studied entities and also to act as template entries for information transfer to proteins in related species. As the complexity and depth of our value-added data increases, we are exploring new ways to present the data to users and will continue to serve the community with new and improved website access designed to improve and enhance the user experience and upgraded programmatic access, with ease of use always a priority”concepts[168]
conceptprogrammatic access — not defined in this paper's own words; computational access channel planned for continued improvement — “CONCLUSIONS UniProt continues to play its pivotal role in the fields of biology and biomedicine, collecting, standardizing and organizing knowledge of proteins and their functions to create a reference framework for multiscale biomedical data integration and analysis. Organisms are being routinely sequenced at the whole genome level, and eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and metagenomic sequencing projects are all contributing to the increased diversity of sequence data in the UniProt databases. It is of increasing importance that our automatic annotation pipelines continue to develop in parallel to ensure that these unreviewed genomes, the vast majority of which are not being experimentally studied at the protein level, are richly and comprehensively annotated with functional information. Expert curation of those proteins biochemically characterized remains a key focus of our activities, to both inform on these well-studied entities and also to act as template entries for information transfer to proteins in related species. As the complexity and depth of our value-added data increases, we are exploring new ways to present the data to users and will continue to serve the community with new and improved website access designed to improve and enhance the user experience and upgraded programmatic access, with ease of use always a priority”concepts[169]
Second readings
a facet read a second time, independently, from its own sentence — and whether the two readings agree
claim typemethod — a second reading reaching the same value; recorded: method — “In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource.”alternatives.claim_type
methoddatabase-resource-description — a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value; recorded: system-or-tool-building — “We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curation of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research community through a dedicated portal.”alternatives.method
phenomenonthe UniProt knowledgebase of protein sequence and functional annotation — a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value; recorded: protein knowledge as something that must be tiered by provenance, judged for completeness against neighbours, and delete — “In our last update published in this journal in 2019 ( 3 ), we described how we are responding to the growth in microbial protein sequence records, largely derived from high-quality metagenomic assembled genomes.”alternatives.phenomenon

Full text — tagged

The reference list is not part of the text we hold for this paper. Our copy was extracted from the publisher's page and the bibliography did not survive that extraction, so the article below ends before its references. Nothing has been removed by us.

Abstract. Abstract The aim of the UniProt Knowledgebaseterm is to provide users with a comprehensive, high-quality and freely accessible set of protein sequencesterm annotated with functional informationterm. In this article, we describe significant updates that we have made over the last two years to the resource. The number of sequences in UniProtKB has risen to approximately 190 million, despite continued work to reduce sequence redundancyterm at the proteometerm level. We have adopted new methods of assessing proteome completeness and qualityterm. We continue to extract detailed annotations from the literature to add to reviewed entriesterm and supplement these in unreviewed entriesterm with annotations provided by automated systemsterm such as the newly implemented Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA)term. We have developed a credit-based publication submission interfaceterm to allow the community to contribute publications and annotations to UniProt entries. We describe how UniProtKB responded to the COVID-19 pandemic through expert curationterm of relevant entries that were rapidly made available to the research communityterm through a dedicated portalterm. UniProt resources are available under a CC-BY (4.0) license via the web at https://www.uniprot.org/ . INTRODUCTION The UniProt databases exist to support biological and biomedical research by providing a complete compendium of all known protein sequence dataterm linked to a summary of the experimentally verifiedterm, or computationally predictedterm, functional informationterm about that protein. The UniProt Knowledgebaseterm (UniProtKB) combines reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entriesterm, to which data have been added by our expert biocuration teamterm, with the unreviewed UniProtKB/TrEMBL entriesterm that are annotated by automated systemsterm. The UniRef databasesterm cluster sequence sets at various levels of sequence identityterm and the UniProt Archiveterm (UniParcterm) delivers a complete set of known sequences, including historical obsolete sequencesterm. UniProt additionally integrates, interprets, and standardizes data from multiple selected resources to add biological knowledge and associated metadata to protein records and acts as a central hubterm from which users can link out to 180 other resourcesterm. In recognition of the quality of our data, and the service we provide, UniProt was recognised as an ELIXIR Core Data Resource in 2017 ( 1 ) and received the CoreTrustSeal certification in 2020. The data resource fully supports the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusableterm (FAIRterm) data principles ( 2 ), for example by making data available in a number of community recognised formats, such as text, XML and RDF and via Application Programming Interfacesterm (API)s and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) downloadsterm, providing stable and traceable identifiersterm for protein sequence and protein sequence features and by fully evidencing our data sources throughout. We have also reviewed and updated our data licencing policies. UniProt is continually evolving to meet new challenges while still working to capture all available protein sequence data and to curate the ever-increasing amount of functional data described in the scientific literature. In our last update published in this journal in 2019 ( 3 ), we described how we are responding to the growth in microbial protein sequence records, largely derived from high-quality metagenomic assembled genomes. These will increasingly be added to by large-scale eukaryotic sequencing programs, such as the Darwin Tree of Life ( www.darwintreeoflife.org ) and Earth Biogenome ( www.earthbiogenome.org ) projects. Collectively, these have already resulted in the number of entries contained in UniProtKB growing by >65 million records, an increase of >50% in just 2 years. As the volume of sequence data continues to grow, we will continue to explore different ways to ensure database sustainability and scalability whilst still providing the best possible service to our user community. PROGRESS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS Growth of sequence records in UniProt UniProt release 2020_04 contains over 189 million sequence records (Figure 1 ), with >292 000 proteomesterm, the complete set of proteins believed to be expressed by an organismterm, originating from completely sequenced viral, bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes available through the UniProtKB Proteomesterm portal ( https://www.uniprot.org/proteomesterm/ ). The majority of these proteomesterm continue to be based on the translation of genome sequence submissions to the INSDC source databasesterm—ENA, GenBank and the DDBJ ( 4 )—supplemented by genomes sequenced and/or annotated by groups such as Ensembl ( 5 ), NCBI RefSeq ( 6 ), Vectorbase ( 7 ) and WormBase ParaSite ( 8 ). Viral proteomesterm are manually checked and verified and periodically added to the database. Figure 1. Growth in the number of entries in the UniProt databases over the last decade. UniProt proteomesterm provide the set of proteins currently believed to be expressed by an organism. Previously, this dataset only consisted of complete proteomesterm derived from fully sequenced genomes. This has now been updated to enable the user to access a wider set of proteomesterm with different quality and completeness metricsterm. To enable researchers to evaluate proteometerm completeness and expected gene content, we have adopted the BUSCOterm (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologsterm) scoring method for vertebrate, arthropod, fungal, and prokaryotic organisms on the Proteomesterm portal, in addition to providing details of species and the protein count. BUSCOterm v3 ( 9 ) identifies complete, duplicated, fragmented, and potentially missing genesterm by comparison to a defined set of near-universal single copy orthologsterm. As a result of our adoption of the BUSCOterm algorithm, a number of incomplete and poor-quality proteomesterm were identified and removed from UniProtKB. The Proteomesterm webpage has been redesigned to enable users to view full details of their proteometerm(s) of interest in a single table view (Figure 2 ). We also display the results of the ‘Complete Proteome Detectorterm’ (CPD), an in-house algorithm, which statistically evaluates the completeness and quality of each proteometerm by directly comparing it to those of a group of at least three closely taxonomically related species. The CPD classifies each proteometerm as either ‘standardterm’, ‘close to standardterm’ or an ‘outlierterm’, according to protein count vs. the standardterm distribution of protein count expected for completeness in comparison to a cluster of closely related organisms ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/assessing_proteomesterm ). We additionally provide the assessment of the genome assembly status imported from the source of the genome assembly and annotation (e.g. Ensembl or RefSeq). Users may sort by BUSCOterm or CPD score and/or filter by membership of the Reference Proteome setterm (∼7% of total proteomesterm) A Reference Proteometerm is one that has been selected either by the research communityterm or by computational clusteringterm ( 10 ) as providing the best annotated proteometerm in their cluster and is stably maintained as the chosen representative unless a higher quality proteometerm is identified in that cluster. UniProt Proteometerm pages now also provide a link to download a one-to-one protein set for the corresponding number of unique genes found in the genome. For each gene, a single protein sequence is algorithmically chosen from the proteometerm. This allows users to get a gene-centric subset of representative proteinsterm for a given genome, as opposed to the full proteometerm which includes all proteins (e.g. including isoformsterm) that map to the genome. Figure 2. Bacillus subtilis proteomesterm viewed on the Proteomesterm webpage with BUSCOterm and CPD scores. The left-hand panel suggests further option by which the user could filter the data, for example by only selecting reference proteomesterm. As previously described ( 3 ), we continue to remove almost identical proteomesterm of the same species from UniProtKB ( https://www.uniprot.org/help/proteometerm_redundancy ), leaving only a relevant representative proteometerm in that section of the database. The redundant proteome sequencesterm are available through UniParcterm to researchers and stable proteome identifiersterm (of the form UPXXXXXXXXX, where Xs are integers) are maintained for each redundant proteometerm to ensure findabilityterm. UniRef protein sequence clustersterm facilitate sequence similarity searchesterm, functional annotation, gene predictionterm, and genome and proteometerm comparisons. We have adopted the MMseqs2 algorithmterm to improve the speed of UniRef production ( 11 ), decreasing the time taken to perform UniRef50 clusteringterm from four weeks to 60 hours, and improved procedures to compute proteometerm clusters and identify representative proteomesterm, pan proteomesterm, and core and accessory proteomesterm. Expert curationterm The evaluation of experimental dataterm published in the scientific literature, and summarizing key points of biological relevance in the appropriate reviewed UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot record, is fundamental to the operation of the UniProt database. The functional informationterm extracted from the literature is added both in the form of human readable summariesterm and via structured vocabulariesterm, such as the Gene Ontology (GO)term ( 12 ). The curators also work to improve the computational accessibility of UniProt records, for example updating and replacing the existing textual descriptions of biochemical reactionsterm in UniProtKB using the Rhea knowledgebaseterm of biochemical reactionsterm ( 13 ). Rhea ( 14 ) uses the chemical ontology ChEBIterm (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest) ( 15 ) to describe reaction participantsterm, their chemical structuresterm and chemical transformationsterm. The complete ChEBI ontology is indexed to support hierarchical searchesterm on the UniProt website so that a user searching on a top-level term such as ‘phosphatidylinositol’ (CHEBI:28874) will find reactions involving derivatives such as 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (CHEBI:16618). Users can also search using Rhea identifiers as well as identifiers, names, synonyms and chemical structuresterm (encoded as InChIKeysterm) from ChEBI. A user-friendly visualization for chemical reactions has also been developed to enable Rhea reactions to be viewed on the website within the appropriate UniProt entry (Figure 3 ). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot currently includes annotations for 8,058 unique Rhea reactions, which feature in 220 003 distinct UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot protein records (39.1% of all UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot records are annotated with Rhea) (release 2020_04 of 12 August 2020). The annotation of pseudoenzymesterm has also been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with experts in this field ( 16 ). Figure 3. Catalytic activity comment and Rhea reaction visualized by the reaction graphic for the histone-lysine N -methyltransferase EHMT2 (UniProtKB: Q96KQ7 ). To further ensure our data is both human-readable and also computationally-tractable and continues to adhere to the FAIRterm principles ( 2 ), we are working to standardize the representation of all existing UniProt data on the functional impact of human variationterm. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot has curated over 81 000 variants in 13,000 human protein sequence records from peer-reviewed literature, annotated with information on the functional impact and clinical significanceterm, when known. Over 30 000 of these variants have been associated with Mendelian diseasesterm. Clinical significanceterm is evaluated using the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMPterm) ( 17 ) and ClinGen tools such as the pathogenicity calculatorterm ( 18 ), with all clinical interpretations routinely submitted to ClinVarterm to promote reuse ( 19 ). In addition to the increased use of structured vocabulariesterm to enhance accessibility to UniProtKB records, we have also improved the presentation of the information within each entry. The vast majority of multi-exon genes undergo alternative splicingterm to produce a variety of splice isoform proteinsterm, which can potentially increase the functional diversity of proteinsterm. Currently at least 95% of human genes are believed to be alternatively spliced ( 20 , 21 ) resulting in an estimated 75 000 distinct protein coding sequences. Post-translational proteolytic cleavageterm, where proteins are cleaved to remove some additional amino acid(s) or portion of protein, creates yet more mature amino-acid chainsterm as a single polyproteinterm may generate multiple bioactive proteins or peptidesterm. We have adapted our data model to capture machine-readable functional annotationsterm for specific isoformsterm and polyprotein cleavage productsterm, and now provide such knowledge for >5000 protein sequence entries. This enables the users to mine the data to identify cases where alternative protein sequences generated from the same gene have different functions. UniProtKB provides stable identifiers to both isoformsterm and to post-translationally cleaved chains which are used by many of our collaborators to identify these specific protein sequences in their own resources. This, in turn, has allowed us to further improve our mapping of imported data, for example binary protein interactionsterm imported from the IMEx Consortiumterm of molecular interaction databases are now displayed at the specific isoformterm/post-processed chain level. The representation of isoform-specific annotations and sequence features has been enhanced in the website to facilitate the exploration of this information in UniProt (Figure 4 ). Figure 4. Information extracted from an entry describing Hepatitis C viral protein (UniProtKB: P27958 ) highlighting annotation added at the processed mature chain level, describing the p21 core protein. (PRO_0000037566). Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic The broad expert knowledge of our curation team enables us to quickly respond to areas of new and rapidly expanding biology. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the cause of the 2019–2020 COVID-19 viral outbreak and ensuing pandemic. Its genome sequence was first made publicly available by the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) on 10 January 2020 (accession number MN908947 ). UniProt curators specializing in viral proteomesterm rapidly annotated the proteins encoded by this viral genome, first by similarity to other closely related coronaviruses, and subsequently by updating relevant entries with experimental dataterm as soon as this was published. A pre-release datasetterm was made publicly available, first as text files on the UniProt FTP site, followed by the launch of a dedicated COVID-19 disease portalterm in March 2020 ( https://covid-19.uniprot.org ), providing the latest available pre-release UniProtKB data for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and other viral and human entries relating to the COVID-19 outbreak. As the pandemic has progressed, these entries have been prioritized for further update to support global research efforts, with information relating to a more granular understanding of protein functionalityterm, 3D-structureterm, binary interactions, and complex formationterm being added when either published or deposited in collaborating resources. The COVID portalterm is currently being updated more frequently than the standard 8-weekly UniProt release cycleterm to ensure the research communityterm accesses these data in a timely manner. The COVID-19 disease portalterm is a prototype of our intention to provide disease-centric access pointsterm to the wealth of data contained in UniProtKB records. Another recent example of a disease-focused curation effort has been the update of records relating to Alzheimer's diseaseterm, including proteins containing a disease-related amino-acid variantterm, their interacting partners and model organism proteins important for our understanding of diseaseterm initiation and progression. This work has been supported by clinical researchers active in the field who contributed to a number of workshops held in both the USA and UK and have suggested key protein targets for focused curation ( 22 , 23 ) and provided valuable user input into how this data should be accessed. Automatic annotationterm The ever-increasing amount of genomic data arising from current sequencing projects means that the proportion of unreviewed records in UniProtKB/TrEMBL describing largely predicted proteins represents by far the largest, and most rapidly growing, section of UniProtKB. These unreviewed records are enriched with functional annotation by systems using the protein classification tool InterProterm ( 24 ), which classifies sequences at superfamily, family and subfamily levelsterm, and predicts the occurrence of functional domainsterm and important sitesterm. In UniProtKB/TrEMBL entries, domains predicted by the InterProterm member databases PROSITE, SMART or Pfam are used to automatically provide domain annotations. The semi-automated rule-based computational annotation UniRule systemterm ( 25 ) annotates experimentally uncharacterized proteinsterm based on similarity to known experimentally characterized proteinsterm, adding properties, such as protein name, functional annotation, catalytic activity, pathway, GO terms and subcellular location. We continue to increase the number of UniRules used for annotation and this set has now grown to 6768 (release 2020_04) rules in total. To complement the expert guided process of creating UniRules, we have recently (release 2020_04) introduced the Association-Rule-Based Annotator (ARBA)term, a multiclass, self-training annotation systemterm for automatic classification and annotation of UniProtKB proteins ( 3 ). This replaces the previous rule-based SAAS systemterm. ARBAterm is trained on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, then uses rule mining techniquesterm to generate concise annotation modelsterm with the highest representativeness and coverage based on the properties of InterProterm group membership and taxonomy. ARBAterm employs a data exclusion setterm that censors data not suitable for computational annotation (such as specific biophysical or chemical properties) and generates human-readable rulesterm for each release which are made available at https://www.uniprot.org/arbaterm/ . 22 894 ARBA rulesterm were used to annotate 87 325 890 proteins in release 2020_04, increasing the combined coverage of the rule-based annotation systemsterm from 35% to 49% in UniProtKB/TrEMBL. Sequence feature predictions are currently excluded from annotation by ARBAterm. Additionally, in release 2020_04, more than 15 million uncharacterized protein namesterm have been improved using InterProterm member database signatures, updating their name to ‘domain X containing proteinterm’ following the International Protein Nomenclature Guidelines ( https://www.uniprot.org/docs/International_Protein_Nomenclature_Guidelines.pdf ). For example, the uncharacterized Western lowland gorilla protein UniProtKB:G3RLC3 has now been renamed ‘SH2 domain-containing protein’ giving biological information to the user. This system includes adding names based on domains of unknown function (e.g. UniProtKB:A0A009EMH9 DUF4372 domain-containing protein) as, although not immediately informative, it enables protein grouping thus improving the chances of eventually assigning a function to that domain. All automatic annotationsterm are labelled with their evidence/source. As previously described ( 3 ), UniFIREterm is an open-source Java-based framework and tool developed to apply the UniProt annotation rules on given protein sequences and provided by UniProt to share our knowledge in computational annotation and our rule-based systems ( https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifireterm ). This system is freely available for groups to use for in-house protein annotation projects ( 26 ) or to contribute their own rules in the URML (UniProt Rule Markup Languageterm) format which may be reused for the annotation of UniProtKB entries. The automatic annotationterm systems described above require the presence of an ordered region of protein that can be recognized as a domain or provide a signature of family membership which has been identified by an InterProterm member database. However, over 20% of unreviewed proteins in UniProt do not contain any InterProterm signature regions, and many InterProterm signatures are not associated with transferable annotation. The largest part of missing annotation seems to derive from intrinsically disordered (ID) protein regionsterm, therefore we have collaborated with the MobiDB-lite resource to provide a consensus-based prediction of long disorderterm ( 27 ). The method uses eight different predictorsterm to derive a consensus which is then filtered for spurious short predictions. 109 144 661 predictions of regions of disorder, plus those described as ‘Basic’, ‘Polar’, ‘Acidic’, ‘Polyampholyte’ and ‘Pro-’ or ’Cys-rich’ have been added to 37 286 893 unreviewed entriesterm and it is planned to also import these annotations into the appropriate UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries. Data Integration UniProtKB integrates large-scale datasetsterm, mapping these data onto the appropriate protein sequence records and displaying the mappings via the ProtVista visualisation toolterm ( 28 ) and downloadable via FTP and APIs ( 29 ). Clinically relevant sources of variation (e.g. 100K genomes, gnomAD and ClinVarterm SNPs) are mapped to protein features and variants using a pre-calculated mappingterm of the genomic coordinatesterm for the amino acids at the beginning and end of each exon and the conversion of UniProt position annotations to their genomic coordinatesterm ( 30 ). Functional positional annotations from the UniProt human reference proteometerm are now being mapped to the corresponding genomic coordinatesterm on the GRCh38 version of the human genometerm for each release of UniProt. These mappings are also available as BED files or as part of a UniProt genomic track hub and can be downloaded from the UniProt FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ). Aligning variants to protein featuresterm, such as functional domainsterm and active sites, ligand binding sites and PTMs in the UniProt record, can provide mechanistic insightsterm into how specific variantsterm can lead to diseaseterm or resistance to a drugterm or to a pathogen. UniProt additionally integrates and visualizes unique and non-unique peptides identified by mass spectrometry proteomic dataterm deposited through the ProteomeXchange Consortiumterm ( 31 ) (e.g. PeptideAtlas ( 32 ), MassIVE ( 33 ) and jPOST ( 34 )) and other large-scale initiatives (CPTAC ( 35 ), ProteomicsDB ( 36 ), MaxQB ( 37 ), ETD and CTDP ( 38 )). Peptide identificationsterm can be taken as evidence that a protein has been validatedterm (PE = 1) using a variation of the HPP guidelines (in brief, at least two unique peptides of seven amino acids or more or, for proteins where this cannot be achieved due to sequence constraints, one unique peptide of ten amino acids or more has been mapped to a protein). UniProt also provides the new format PEFFterm (PSI Extended FASTA Formatterm) proposed by the HUPO-PSI (Human Proteometerm Organization-Proteomics Standardterm Initiative) for sequence databases ( 39 ) to be used by sequence search engines and other associated tools (e.g. spectral libraries search tools). The UniProt PEFFterm format currently represents variation and sequence data and is available through the Proteins APIterm service ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/proteins/api/doc/ ) for 31 species. Community curation in UniProt UniProt users have always actively engaged with us and provide important feedback to the resource. The significant number of requests we receive through the Help Desk for articles and annotationsterm to be added to protein entries prompted the development of the ‘Community submissionterm’ page, where researchers are able to add articles that they deem relevant to an entry and provide optional basic annotation by selecting the topics relevant to each paper from a controlled listterm and/or adding short statements about protein name, function, and diseaseterm, as described in the publication. Contributors are asked to supply their ORCIDterm ( https://orcidterm.org/ ), a researcher personal IDterm, which is used to both validate that the submission is genuine and to give credit to the submitter for their work (Figure 5 ). This enables us to leverage the scientific community as a resource for enhancing our curated content, emulating a model already adopted by a number of model organism databasesterm, such as WormBase ( 40 ), PomBase ( 41 ) and FlyBase ( 42 ). Figure 5. Community contributionterm. (i) Use ‘Add a publication’ functionality (red box) in the UniProtKB entry. (ii) Partial snapshot of the submission form, a sample available here: https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/sampleform.html . (iii) After submission and review the publication and information are displayed in the relevant UniProtKB entry with attribution to submitter (red box) in a future public release. Submissions are minimally checked by an experienced curatorterm before being added to the Publications section of the record. A tracker toolterm has also been developed ( https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/bbsubinfo.html ) to enable users to access and search this wealth of additional bibliography. Researchers are encouraged to add relevant publications to entries of interest to them. Since we started the pilot in release 2019_08 we have seen a continuing increase in user submissions. As of release 2020_04 there have been 674 submissions relating to 424 publications and 557 entries, from 149 unique users ( https://community.uniprot.org/bbsub/STATS.html ). Website updates Users are at the center of the UniProt website design and development process. We follow a user-centered design processterm, conducting regular workshops, user testing, surveys and user research activities involving many users worldwide with varied research backgrounds and use cases. We are currently redesigning the website to take advantage of new technologies and paradigms in web development and welcome the UniProt user community to participate in user feedback and testing activities by contacting us at help@uniprot.org and contributing your user stories and workflows. As part of the redesign process, we have redeveloped both the UniProt interaction viewerterm (Figure 6A ) and ProtVista viewerterm, which graphically represents protein sequence features, such as domains, sites, post-translational modifications and variants, and structures. These are now part of the ‘Nightingaleterm’ visualization web component library ( https://ebi-webcomponents.github.io/nightingaleterm/#/ ) and are publicly available as lightweight, flexible, and modular componentsterm that can be more easily extended with new features, modified and implemented by users in their own resources (Figure 6B ). The ProtVista viewerterm has already been implemented by the Open Targets ( 43 ) and the Pharos ( 44 ) databases of unstudied and understudied drug targets amongst others. Figure 6. ( A ) The UniProtKB interaction viewer as seen in entry UniProtKB: Q9NSA3 , the beta-catenin-interacting protein 1. ( B ) The interaction viewer reusable web component in the Nightingaleterm library. DATA AVAILABILITY Due to the ever-increasing number of sequence records UniProt is processing with every release cycle, as of release 2020_01 (26 February 2020), UniProt releases are now published every eight weeksterm. This gives our production team the time required to complete data import, proteome redundancy removalterm, data checking, integration of external data and automatic annotationterm of unreviewed records prior to starting the release process. In addition to providing customizable views and downloads in a range of formats via the website, and file sets at the FTP site ( www.uniprot.org/downloads ), UniProt supplies users with a number of different options for computational access to the data ( www.uniprot.org/help/programmatic_access ). These include the website RESTful Application Programming Interfaceterm (API), stable URLsterm that can be bookmarked, linked, and reused, the Proteins extended REST API providing genomic coordinatesterm of UniProtKB sequences and annotations imported and mapped from large-scale data imports ( 29 ), and the SPARQL APIterm that allows users to perform complex queries across all UniProt data and also other resources that provide a SPARQL endpointterm, such as DisGeNET ( 45 ), Bgee ( 46 ), or Wikidata ( 47 ). The Proteins APIterm has recently been extended to serve the HUPO Proteomics Standardsterm Initiative Extended FASTA Format (PEFFterm) for the proteomics community which enables more metadata, such as detail of amino-acid variants in the FASTA file header section ( 39 ). Outreach and training The training of our users to make the best use of our data continues to be of critical importance to the UniProt Consortium. In order to access our global user base, we are increasingly moving away from classroom style training towards use of distance learning techniques. We regularly run webinars, which range from basic introductions to the use of the web pages aimed at new users and students, to more specialist sessions on, for example, use of the API or 3D structural representation in UniProtKB. The webinars are recorded and are subsequently made available online ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/training/online/ ) where they are supported by related online training materials and YouTube videos ( https://www.youtube.com/user/uniprotvideos/ ). In order to reach new communities, the webinars are widely advertised through social media forums such as Twitter (@uniprot) and Facebook ( https://www.facebook.com/uniprot.org/ ) as well as established mailing lists. CONCLUSIONS UniProt continues to play its pivotal role in the fields of biology and biomedicine, collecting, standardizing and organizing knowledge of proteins and their functions to create a reference framework for multiscale biomedical data integration and analysisterm. Organisms are being routinely sequenced at the whole genome level, and eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and metagenomic sequencing projects are all contributing to the increased diversity of sequence data in the UniProt databases. It is of increasing importance that our automatic annotation pipelinesterm continue to develop in parallel to ensure that these unreviewed genomes, the vast majority of which are not being experimentally studied at the protein level, are richly and comprehensively annotated with functional informationterm. Expert curationterm of those proteins biochemically characterized remains a key focus of our activities, to both inform on these well-studied entities and also to act as template entriesterm for information transfer to proteins in related speciesterm. As the complexity and depth of our value-added data increases, we are exploring new ways to present the data to users and will continue to serve the community with new and improved website access designed to improve and enhance the user experience and upgraded programmatic accessterm, with ease of use always a priority. We greatly value the feedback and annotation updates from our user community. Please send your feedback and suggestions to the e-mail address help@uniprot.org or via the contact link on the UniProt website. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The UniProt publication has been prepared by Alex BatemanpersName, Maria-Jesus MartinpersName, Sandra OrchardpersName, Michele MagranepersName, Rahat AgivetovapersName, Shadab AhmadpersName, Emanuele AlpipersName, Emily H. Bowler-BarnettpersName, Ramona BrittopersName, Borisas BursteinaspersName, Hema Bye-A-JeepersName, Ray CoetzeepersName, Austra CukurapersName, Alan Da SilvapersName, Paul DennypersName, Tunca Dogan, ThankGod EbenezerpersName, Jun FanpersName, Leyla Garcia CastropersName, Penelope GarmiripersName, George GeorghioupersName, Leonardo GonzalespersName, Emma Hatton-EllispersName, Abdulrahman HusseinpersName, Alexandr IgnatchenkopersName, Giuseppe InsanapersName, Rizwan IshtiaqpersName, Petteri JokinenpersName, Vishal JoshipersName, Dushyanth JyothipersName, Antonia LockpersName, Rodrigo Lopez, Aurelien LucianipersName, Jie LuopersName, Yvonne LussipersName, Alistair MacDougallpersName, Fabio MadeirapersName, Mahdi MahmoudypersName, Manuela MenchipersName, Alok MishrapersName, Katie MoulangpersName, Andrew Nightingaleterm, Carla Susana OliveirapersName, Sangya PundirpersName, GuoyingpersName Qi, Shriya RajpersName, Daniel RicepersName, Milagros Rodriguez Lopez, Rabie SaidipersName, Joseph SampsonpersName, Tony SawfordpersName, Elena SperettapersName, Edward TurnerpersName, Nidhi TyagipersName, Preethi VasudevpersName, Vladimir VolynkinpersName, Kate WarnerpersName, Xavier WatkinspersName, Rossana ZarupersName, and Hermann ZellnerpersName at the EMBL- European Bioinformatics Institute; Alan BridgepersName, Sylvain PouxpersName, Nicole RedaschipersName, Lucila AimopersName, Ghislaine Argoud-PuypersName, Andrea AuchinclosspersName, Kristian AxelsenpersName, Parit BansalpersName, Delphine BaratinpersName, Marie-Claude BlatterpersName, Jerven BollemanpersName, Emmanuel BoutetpersName, Lionel BreuzapersName, Cristina Casals-CasaspersName, Edouard de CastropersName, Kamal Chikh EchioukhpersName, Elisabeth CoudertpersName, Beatrice CuchepersName, Mikael DochepersName, Dolnide DornevilpersName, Anne EstreicherpersName, Maria Livia FamigliettipersName, Marc FeuermannpersName, Elisabeth GasteigerpersName, Sebastien Gehant, Vivienne GerritsenpersName, Arnaud GospersName, Nadine Gruaz-GumowskipersName, Ursula HinzpersName, Chantal HulopersName, Nevila Hyka-NouspikelpersName, Florence JungopersName, Guillaume KellerpersName, Arnaud KerhornoupersName, Vicente LarapersName, Philippe Le MercierpersName, Damien LieberherrpersName, Thierry LombardotpersName, Xavier MartinpersName, Patrick MassonpersName, Anne MorgatpersName, Teresa Batista NetopersName, Salvo PaesanopersName, Ivo PedruzzipersName, Sandrine PilboutpersName, Lucille PourcelpersName, Monica PozzatopersName, Manuela PruesspersName, Catherine RivoirepersName, Christian SigristpersName, Karin SonessonpersName, Andre StutzpersName, Shyamala SundarampersName, Michael TognollipersName, and Laure VerbreguepersName at the SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics; CathypersName H. Wu, Cecilia N. ArighipersName, Leslie ArminskipersName, Chuming ChenpersName, Yongxing ChenpersName, John S. GaravellipersName, Hongzhan HuangpersName, Kati LaihopersName, Peter McGarveypersName, Darren A. NatalepersName, Karen RosspersName, C. R. VinayakapersName, Qinghua WangpersName, Yuqi WangpersName, Lai-Su YehpersName, and Jian ZhangpersName at the Protein Information Resource. The UniProt consortium also acknowledges the contributions of Patrick RuchpersName and Douglas TeodoropersName from the SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics who developed the UPCLASS publication classification tool and the ChEBI team at EMBL-EBI for their support in small molecule annotation. Contributor Information The UniProt Consortium, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK; Protein Information Resource, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street NW, Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20007, USA; Protein Information Resource, University of Delaware, Ammon-Pinizzotto Biopharmaceutical Innovation Building, Suite 147, 590 Avenue 1743, Newark, DE 19713, USA; SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Centre Medical Universitaire, 1 rue Michel Servet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. The UniProt Consortium: Alex BatemanpersName , Maria-Jesus MartinpersName , Sandra OrchardpersName , Michele MagranepersName , Rahat AgivetovapersName , Shadab AhmadpersName , Emanuele AlpipersName , Emily H Bowler-BarnettpersName , Ramona BrittopersName , Borisas BursteinaspersName , Hema Bye-A-JeepersName , Ray CoetzeepersName , Austra CukurapersName , Alan Da SilvapersName , Paul DennypersName , Tunca Dogan , ThankGod EbenezerpersName , Jun FanpersName , Leyla Garcia CastropersName , Penelope GarmiripersName , George GeorghioupersName , Leonardo GonzalespersName , Emma Hatton-EllispersName , Abdulrahman HusseinpersName , Alexandr IgnatchenkopersName , Giuseppe InsanapersName , Rizwan IshtiaqpersName , Petteri JokinenpersName , Vishal JoshipersName , Dushyanth JyothipersName , Antonia LockpersName , Rodrigo Lopez , Aurelien LucianipersName , Jie LuopersName , Yvonne LussipersName , Alistair MacDougallpersName , Fabio MadeirapersName , Mahdi MahmoudypersName , Manuela MenchipersName , Alok MishrapersName , Katie MoulangpersName , Andrew Nightingaleterm , Carla Susana OliveirapersName , Sangya PundirpersName , GuoyingpersName Qi , Shriya RajpersName , Daniel RicepersName , Milagros Rodriguez Lopez , Rabie SaidipersName , Joseph SampsonpersName , Tony SawfordpersName , Elena SperettapersName , Edward TurnerpersName , Nidhi TyagipersName , Preethi VasudevpersName , Vladimir VolynkinpersName , Kate WarnerpersName , Xavier WatkinspersName , Rossana ZarupersName , Hermann ZellnerpersName , Alan BridgepersName , Sylvain PouxpersName , Nicole RedaschipersName , Lucila AimopersName , Ghislaine Argoud-PuypersName , Andrea AuchinclosspersName , Kristian AxelsenpersName , Parit BansalpersName , Delphine BaratinpersName , Marie-Claude BlatterpersName , Jerven BollemanpersName , Emmanuel BoutetpersName , Lionel BreuzapersName , Cristina Casals-CasaspersName , Edouard de CastropersName , Kamal Chikh EchioukhpersName , Elisabeth CoudertpersName , Beatrice CuchepersName , Mikael DochepersName , Dolnide DornevilpersName , Anne EstreicherpersName , Maria Livia FamigliettipersName , Marc FeuermannpersName , Elisabeth GasteigerpersName , Sebastien Gehant , Vivienne GerritsenpersName , Arnaud GospersName , Nadine Gruaz-GumowskipersName , Ursula HinzpersName , Chantal HulopersName , Nevila Hyka-NouspikelpersName , Florence JungopersName , Guillaume KellerpersName , Arnaud KerhornoupersName , Vicente LarapersName , Philippe Le MercierpersName , Damien LieberherrpersName , Thierry LombardotpersName , Xavier MartinpersName , Patrick MassonpersName , Anne MorgatpersName , Teresa Batista NetopersName , Salvo PaesanopersName , Ivo PedruzzipersName , Sandrine PilboutpersName , Lucille PourcelpersName , Monica PozzatopersName , Manuela PruesspersName , Catherine RivoirepersName , Christian SigristpersName , Karin SonessonpersName , Andre StutzpersName , Shyamala SundarampersName , Michael TognollipersName , Laure VerbreguepersName , CathypersName H Wu , Cecilia N ArighipersName , Leslie ArminskipersName , Chuming ChenpersName , Yongxing ChenpersName , John S GaravellipersName , Hongzhan HuangpersName , Kati LaihopersName , Peter McGarveypersName , Darren A NatalepersName , Karen RosspersName , C R VinayakapersName , Qinghua WangpersName , Yuqi WangpersName , Lai-Su YehpersName , Jian ZhangpersName , Patrick RuchpersName , and Douglas TeodoropersName FUNDING National Eye Institute, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseasesterm, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseasesterm, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institute On Aging, and National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health [U24HG007822]; National Human Genome Research Institute [U41HG002273]; National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01GM080646, P20GM103446] (the content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health); Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/T010541/1]; British Heart Foundation [RG/13/5/30112]; Open Targets; Swiss Federal Government through the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation SERI; European Molecular Biology Laboratory core funds. Funding for open access charge: National Institutes of Health [U24HG007822]. Conflict of interest statement . None declared.

Interpretive notes.
• Highlighted spans are tagged entities: persName (author), title (venue), placeName (place), date (year), and term (a key concept: domain / ai / method).
• Eponymous or retrospective terms (e.g. “Nash equilibrium”, “segregation”) do not appear in the original source and so are not highlighted — a deliberate choice (see Report 4).
• Some entries begin with a word in capitals. EVIDENCE CORRECTED means the finding still stands and it was our quotation that was wrong — it has been replaced. RETRACTED means the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with its reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED means a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it.
• Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote shown on the same row, so the borrowing can be checked against the thing borrowed from without leaving this page. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.
• Counts: 1 date.
Meta-Tagging Project · record bateman2020-uniprot-the-universal-protein-know.
© 2026 Shir Sivroni