IMNGS: A comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies. — TEI-tagged view

Ilias Lagkouvardos, Divya Joseph, Martin Kapfhammer, Sabahattin Giritli, Matthias Horn, Dirk Haller, Thomas Clavel · 2016 · ecology · doi:10.1038/srep33721 · TEI xml · tagged edition · index · concepts · authors
Where this record's text came from. 2026-09-28 schema-0.3 pass: every quote ON THIS RECORD verified as an exact substring of the staged text and anchored, at the merge dated above; concept terms verified present; every edge endpoint an existing node.
Other fields define these differently the same word, defined another way in another discipline
operational taxonomic units 5 fields · OTUs 3 fields · Next Generation Sequencing 3 fields · NGS 2 fields
Tags on this paper every tag the record carries, whether or not the words occur in the text below — a number is how many papers in the corpus carry that tag; a tag with no number is unique to this paper
IMNGS Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing SRA Sequence Read Archive NGS4 Next Generation Sequencing4 OTUs5 operational taxonomic units7 Taxonomy-based queries sequence similarity-queries system-or-tool-building173

Colour legend

Scientific Reports<title level="j">A work — the journal / venue title.
2016<date>A year or date.

Ilias LagkouvardospersName, Divya JosephpersName, Martin KapfhammerpersName, Sabahattin GiritlipersName, Matthias HornpersName, Dirk HallerpersName, Thomas ClavelpersName (2016date). “IMNGS: A comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies..” Scientific Reportstitle·j.

Object of study — the public pool of 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key datasets in the SRAterm·dom

Research question — how to reuse archived 16S ampliconterm·key data for standardized microbial distribution and diversity analysis

Contribution — IMNGSterm·mth, a platform that uniformly processes all SRAterm·dom 16S ampliconterm·key runs into queryable sample-specific databases

Cross-disciplinary analysis
content-tags & facets: phenomenon · claim-type · cross-domain-transfer · mechanism · claim-relation · replication-status · limitation — grounded in the full text
phenomenondistribution and diversity of microbial taxa across archived samples — “Taxonomy-based queries with IMNGS are generally faster than sequence similarity-queries and can be useful for extraction of both ecological patterns and the available sequence space of selected taxa from phyla to families.”
claim-typemethod — “Here we created IMNGS (Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing), an innovative platform that uniformly and systematically screens for and processes all prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene amplicon datasets available in SRA and uses them to build sample-specific sequence databases and OTU-based profiles.”
method — evidence — “All samples represent currently a total of 1.4 billion sequences that clustered into 53,696,442 sample-specific OTUs (operational taxonomic units).”
object of study — evidence — “The SRA (Sequence Read Archive) serves as primary depository for massive amounts of Next Generation Sequencing data, and currently host over 100,000 16S rRNA gene amplicon-based microbial profiles from various host habitats and environments.”
research question — evidence — “However, there is to date a lack of user-friendly and flexible approaches dedicated to standardized and reproducible meta-analysis of microbial distribution and diversity exploiting this large pool of sequence data.”
contribution — evidence — “Here we created IMNGS (Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing), an innovative platform that uniformly and systematically screens for and processes all prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene amplicon datasets available in SRA and uses them to build sample-specific sequence databases and OTU-based profiles.”
mechanismper-sample de novo clustering Clustering each sample on its own keeps unknown sequences and allows continuous updates, at the cost of easy cross-sample comparison. — “Although independent de novo clustering impairs more straightforward comparison between samples as could be done with a common OTU table, it has the advantage to allow continuous update of the database and to retain all unknown sequences that would be otherwise lost during closed reference-based clustering required for creation of such a common OTU table.”mechanisms[0]
mechanismstable niche and vertical transmission A restricted, stable niche and vertical transmission may explain low Poribacteria diversity. — “Perhaps the restricted and evolutionary stable niche as well as vertical mode of transmission of these microorganisms did not favor diversification 31 .”mechanisms[1]
sensesample-specific (OTU) - an OTU name has no reference value outside the sample where it was created — “This means that an OTU name (or number) has no reference value outside of the given sample where it was created.”senses[0]
relationIMNGS —same-as→ Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing — ( ) — “Here we created IMNGS (Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing), an innovative platform that uniformly and systematically screens for and processes all prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene amplicon datasets available in SRA and uses them to build sample-specific sequence databases and OTU-based profiles.” — “IMNGS (Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing)”concept_edges[0]
weightIMNGS —same-as→ Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing — 0.95 — “Here we created IMNGS (Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing), an innovative platform that uniformly and systematically screens for and processes all prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene amplicon datasets available in SRA and uses them to build sample-specific sequence databases and OTU-based profiles.”concept_edges[0]
relationSRA —same-as→ Sequence Read Archive — ( ) — “The SRA (Sequence Read Archive) serves as primary depository for massive amounts of Next Generation Sequencing data, and currently host over 100,000 16S rRNA gene amplicon-based microbial profiles from various host habitats and environments.” — “The SRA (Sequence Read Archive)”concept_edges[1]
weightSRA —same-as→ Sequence Read Archive — 0.95 — “The SRA (Sequence Read Archive) serves as primary depository for massive amounts of Next Generation Sequencing data, and currently host over 100,000 16S rRNA gene amplicon-based microbial profiles from various host habitats and environments.”concept_edges[1]
relationNGS —same-as→ Next Generation Sequencing — ( ) — “Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) methods, including pyrosequencing and Illumina technology, have further revolutionized the field of microbial ecology by allowing in-depth and high-throughput parallel analysis of PCR products from multiple samples.” — “Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) methods, including pyrosequencing”concept_edges[2]
weightNGS —same-as→ Next Generation Sequencing — 0.95 — “Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) methods, including pyrosequencing and Illumina technology, have further revolutionized the field of microbial ecology by allowing in-depth and high-throughput parallel analysis of PCR products from multiple samples.”concept_edges[2]
relationOTUs —same-as→ operational taxonomic units — ( ) — “All samples represent currently a total of 1.4 billion sequences that clustered into 53,696,442 sample-specific OTUs (operational taxonomic units).” — “sample-specific OTUs (operational taxonomic units)”concept_edges[3]
weightOTUs —same-as→ operational taxonomic units — 0.95 — “All samples represent currently a total of 1.4 billion sequences that clustered into 53,696,442 sample-specific OTUs (operational taxonomic units).”concept_edges[3]
relationTaxonomy-based queries —contrasted-with→ sequence similarity-queries — faster than — “Taxonomy-based queries with IMNGS are generally faster than sequence similarity-queries and can be useful for extraction of both ecological patterns and the available sequence space of selected taxa from phyla to families.” — “Taxonomy-based queries with IMNGS are generally faster than sequence similarity-queries”concept_edges[4]
weightTaxonomy-based queries —contrasted-with→ sequence similarity-queries — 0.8 — “Taxonomy-based queries with IMNGS are generally faster than sequence similarity-queries and can be useful for extraction of both ecological patterns and the available sequence space of selected taxa from phyla to families.”concept_edges[4]
replicationoriginal
limitationPoor SRA sample metadata complicates interpretation when samples are not representative of native ecosystems. — “Hence, one current limitation of the resource is related to the poor quality of metadata information about samples in SRA, which complicates interpretation of results if some of the samples under investigation are not representative of native ecosystems.”limitations[0]
limitationTechnology and primer sets affect results; some Poribacteria families may be missed. — “Of course, one should keep in mind that technology and primer sets can have a substantial impact on results 32 and we cannot exclude that other families of Poribacteria that were not captured by the used primers or sequencing protocols exist.”limitations[1]
Content tags
content-observations: finding · quantity · variable · definition · key-term — grounded in the full text
findingAcetatifactor-like sequences above 97% identity are specific to the mouse gut. — “This association became more specific to the mouse gut for sequences with more than 97% identity (commonly used as a conservative within-species identity cut off for full 16S rRNA gene sequences) and was even unique for mice for highly similar amplicon sequences (more than 99% identity).”content_tags.findings[0]
findingPoribacteria sequences form 151 molecular species clusters at about 3% similarity. — “The most conservative clustering produced by CROP supported the existence of 151 molecular species clusters at ~3% similarity (S1-S151).”content_tags.findings[1]
findingPoribacteria show low diversity: one main family with few genera and species. — “The presence of only one main family level group within the phylum that contains also a low number of genera and species indicate an overall low diversity within the phylum.”content_tags.findings[2]
quantity53,696,442 — — “All samples represent currently a total of 1.4 billion sequences that clustered into 53,696,442 sample-specific OTUs (operational taxonomic units).”content_tags.quantities[0]
quantity105,374 — — “The first complete IMNGS crawling of the SRA detected 105,374 runs (samples) that matched the amplicon study description.”content_tags.quantities[1]
quantity67% — — “The database is skewed towards host-associated sources (67%), and particularly human samples (50%).”content_tags.quantities[2]
variablesequence identity — “This association became more specific to the mouse gut for sequences with more than 97% identity (commonly used as a conservative within-species identity cut off for full 16S rRNA gene sequences) and was even unique for mice for highly similar amplicon sequences (more than 99% identity).”content_tags.variables[0]
definitionIMNGS — “Here we created IMNGS (Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing), an innovative platform that uniformly and systematically screens for and processes all prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene amplicon datasets available in SRA and uses them to build sample-specific sequence databases and OTU-based profiles.”content_tags.definitions[0]
key-termsIMNGS, 16S rRNA, amplicon, SRA, OTUs, microbial ecology, Acetatifactor, Poribacteria, UPARSE, taxonomic query
Concepts
terms this paper carries, each with the sentence it was cut from — the layer that joins one paper to another. Terms with no quote yet are on CONCEPTS.html.
conceptIMNGS — Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing — “Here we created IMNGS (Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing), an innovative platform that uniformly and systematically screens for and processes all prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene amplicon datasets available in SRA and uses them to build sample-specific sequence databases and OTU-based profiles.”concepts[0]
conceptIntegrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing — not defined in this paper's own words; the paper's web platform for SRA 16S amplicon data — “Here we created IMNGS (Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing), an innovative platform that uniformly and systematically screens for and processes all prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene amplicon datasets available in SRA and uses them to build sample-specific sequence databases and OTU-based profiles.”concepts[1]
conceptSRA — Sequence Read Archive — “The SRA (Sequence Read Archive) serves as primary depository for massive amounts of Next Generation Sequencing data, and currently host over 100,000 16S rRNA gene amplicon-based microbial profiles from various host habitats and environments.”concepts[2]
conceptSequence Read Archive — not defined in this paper's own words; the public repository of raw sequencing runs — “The SRA (Sequence Read Archive) serves as primary depository for massive amounts of Next Generation Sequencing data, and currently host over 100,000 16S rRNA gene amplicon-based microbial profiles from various host habitats and environments.”concepts[3]
conceptNGS — Next Generation Sequencing — “Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) methods, including pyrosequencing and Illumina technology, have further revolutionized the field of microbial ecology by allowing in-depth and high-throughput parallel analysis of PCR products from multiple samples.”concepts[4]
conceptNext Generation Sequencing — not defined in this paper's own words; high-throughput parallel DNA sequencing — “Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) methods, including pyrosequencing and Illumina technology, have further revolutionized the field of microbial ecology by allowing in-depth and high-throughput parallel analysis of PCR products from multiple samples.”concepts[5]
conceptOTUs — operational taxonomic units — “All samples represent currently a total of 1.4 billion sequences that clustered into 53,696,442 sample-specific OTUs (operational taxonomic units).”concepts[6]
conceptoperational taxonomic units — not defined in this paper's own words; clusters of sequences at a set identity threshold — “All samples represent currently a total of 1.4 billion sequences that clustered into 53,696,442 sample-specific OTUs (operational taxonomic units).”concepts[7]
conceptTaxonomy-based queries — not defined in this paper's own words; searches of the database by taxonomic classification — “Taxonomy-based queries with IMNGS are generally faster than sequence similarity-queries and can be useful for extraction of both ecological patterns and the available sequence space of selected taxa from phyla to families.”concepts[8]
conceptsequence similarity-queries — not defined in this paper's own words; searches by similarity to user-supplied template sequences — “Taxonomy-based queries with IMNGS are generally faster than sequence similarity-queries and can be useful for extraction of both ecological patterns and the available sequence space of selected taxa from phyla to families.”concepts[9]

Full text — tagged

The reference list is not part of the text we hold for this paper. Our copy was extracted from the publisher's page and the bibliography did not survive that extraction, so the article below ends before its references. Nothing has been removed by us.

IMNGSterm·mth: A comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNAterm·key microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies.

Abstract The SRAterm·dom (Sequence Read Archiveterm·dom) serves as primary depository for massive amounts of Next Generation Sequencingterm·mth data, and currently host over 100,000 16S rRNAterm·key gene amplicon-based microbial profiles from various host habitats and environments. This number is increasing rapidly and there is a dire need for approaches to utilize this pool of knowledge. Here we created IMNGSterm·mth (Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencingterm·mth), an innovative platform that uniformly and systematically screens for and processes all prokaryotic 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key datasets available in SRAterm·dom and uses them to build sample-specific sequence databases and OTU-based profiles. Via a web interface, this integrative sequence resource can easily be queried by users. We show examples of how the approach allows testing the ecological importance of specific microorganisms in different hosts or ecosystems, and performing targeted diversity studies for selected taxonomic groups. The platform also offers a complete workflow for de novo analysis of users’ own raw 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key datasets for the sake of comparison with existing data. IMNGSterm·mth can be accessed at www.imngsterm·mth.org .

Microbial communities are key members of many ecosystems on earth. They play important roles in essential biological functions ranging from carbon and nitrogen cycles in the environment to regulation of immune and metabolic responses in colonized animal and human hosts 1 2 . Hence, research in microbial ecologyterm·key is essential for proper understanding of these communities and their functional impact.

One critical aspect in microbial ecologyterm·key is to describe the members of microbial communities that, in contrast to macro ecology, cannot be easily identified and enumerated. Studies in the field had been limited in the past to culture-based approaches that allow isolation of microorganisms as pure cultures and downstream characterization in vitro and in vivo . The limitation of these approaches is that a substantial proportion of microorganisms escape cultivation 3 . Thus, early advances in sequencing technologies enabled culture-independent profiling of microbial communities using phylogenetic markers such as the highly conserved 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene 4 . Next Generation Sequencingterm·mth (NGSterm·mth) methods, including pyrosequencing and Illumina technology, have further revolutionized the field of microbial ecologyterm·key by allowing in-depth and high-throughput parallel analysis of PCR products from multiple samples. These ampliconterm·key sequencing approaches have been used extensively for characterization of diverse ecosystems ranging from aquatic and terrestrial to host-derived ecosystems 5 6 7 .

The maturation of NGSterm·mth technologies has allowed expansion of the number of parallel samples under investigation and enabled investigation of temporal dynamics in composition of microbiomes. Due to continuously increasing capacity and decreasing costs, recent sequencing-based studies were in the range of a few hundreds or thousands of samples per study 8 9 10 11 . These advances resulted in a flood of primary ampliconterm·key sequence data that are usually archived in one of the long-term repositories of the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration, including the Sequence Read Archiveterm·dom (SRAterm·dom), for reference and reuse. These repositories have accumulated unprecedented amounts of 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key datasets that cover the vast majority of biomes on earth biospheres 12 . However, there is to date a lack of user-friendly and flexible approaches dedicated to standardized and reproducible meta-analysis of microbial distribution and diversity exploiting this large pool of sequence data. A web tool that can be used to analyze ampliconterm·key sequences in public archives has recently been published 13 , but the system relies on a relatively limited number of data and is not really extensible.

We previously demonstrated the potential of using accumulated ampliconterm·key data for estimation of the diversity of the bacterial phylum Chlamydiae 14 . In the present work, we describe the Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencingterm·mth (IMNGSterm·mth) web platform, a transparent and fully flexible system for integration of archived ampliconterm·key 16S rRNAterm·key gene sequence reads into readily accessible sample-specific databases. Scripts in the backend of IMNGSterm·mth routinely check and retrieve raw data from SRAterm·dom and uniformly process and classify them. Registered users can obtain sequences across all samples or lists of samples selected by the user, and investigate prevalence patterns based on similarity to selected sequences or taxonomic groups of interest. In addition, a user friendly implementation of the UPARSEterm·key ampliconterm·key analysis pipeline 15 is offered for researchers that want to explore their own raw data and compare them to the similarly preprocessed samples in the IMNGSterm·mth system. The present manuscript contains a detailed description of IMNGSterm·mth and provides example analyses to demonstrate the potential of this novel platform.

Results Features of the IMNGSterm·mth platform IMNGSterm·mth is based on an innovative bioinformatic workflow embedded in a web interface, which allows users to perform large-scale analysis of all 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key datasets available in SRAterm·dom, for instance to generate novel insight into the diversity and ecological distribution of specific bacterial groups of interest. IMNGSterm·mth has two core functions (query types) that help generating such data: sequence similarity search against template sequences provided by the users, and query based on taxonomic classification of sequences available in the IMNGSterm·mth database. A template analysis for each approach is presented in the next sections.

The first complete IMNGSterm·mth crawling of the SRAterm·dom detected 105,374 runs (samples) that matched the ampliconterm·key study description. After quality filtering and processing, 55,073 runs remained that became available for query (build 1510, i.e. October 2015, used in the present paper for description and demonstration purposes; the current size of the IMNGSterm·mth database as per July 2016 is 85121 runs). To ensure a seamless integration of the continuous flow of new samples in SRAterm·dom, the sequences from each sample are clustered de novo at 97% sequence identityterm·var. All samples represent currently a total of 1.4 billion sequences that clustered into 53,696,442 sample-specific OTUsterm·dom (operational taxonomic unitsterm·dom). This means that an OTUterm·dom name (or number) has no reference value outside of the given sample where it was created. Although independent de novo clustering impairs more straightforward comparison between samples as could be done with a common OTUterm·dom table, it has the advantage to allow continuous update of the database and to retain all unknown sequences that would be otherwise lost during closed reference-based clustering required for creation of such a common OTUterm·dom table.

The origin of samples in IMNGSterm·mth is diverse (96 categories), but not uniformly distributed. The database is skewed towards host-associated sources (67%), and particularly human samples (50%). Samples of environmental origin account for approximately 33% of the database. The performance of queries varies greatly depending on the number of samples selected. In general, a taxonomy query is finished within one hour, while a similarity query over all samples can take approximately 6 h per sequence. The analysis of newly generated 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key reads from users is fast, i.e. , returns OTUterm·dom tables and corresponding sequence information from raw data in less than an hour. Readers are invited to look in detail at the methods for information on the scalability of the system.

As described in detail in the Methods section and in README files provided online after analysis, IMNGSterm·mth delivers detailed information about the abundance and distribution of sample-specific OTUsterm·dom that match queried sequences or taxonomic groups in the form of tables and sequence files. Further processing of data to generate figures (as presented below in the template analyses) is intentionally left in the hands of users, because it requires downstream analyses that are case-dependent and must be adjusted according to the respective study purposes. The next results sections present two template analyses meant to exemplify the types of research questions addressable by using IMNGS-derived data.

Host specificity of the bacterial species Acetatifactorterm·key muris The gut microbiota has been implicated in the regulation of host metabolic responses in obesity and chronic metabolic disorders 16 17 . Mouse models of obesity are helpful to study molecular mechanisms underlying microbe-host interactions, but very few key bacterial species regulating host metabolic responses have been identified 18 19 20 . The type strain of Acetatifactorterm·key muris was originally isolated from the intestine of an obese mouse and represents so far the sole described species of the genus 21 . Although we have repeatedly detected changes in the occurrence of molecular species phylogenetically related to A. muris in diet-induced mouse models of obesity as measured by high-throughput sequencing 22 (and unpublished data), there is to date no information about their overall host specificity. Therefore, we used a similarity query in IMNGSterm·mth to determine the ecological characteristics of this novel group of bacteria. The output of this large-scale ampliconterm·key search (including 58,522 sequences originating from 1,253 samples and a cumulative number of 2,332 OTUsterm·dom) showed that bacteria with over 95% identity to Acetatifactorterm·key (approximately the genus level similarity cutoff) have a strong association with gut environments in rodents ( Fig. 1A ). This association became more specific to the mouse gut for sequences with more than 97% identity (commonly used as a conservative within-species identity cut off for full 16S rRNAterm·key gene sequences) and was even unique for mice for highly similar ampliconterm·key sequences (more than 99% identity). At the 97% (“species”) level, the observed relative abundance of A. muris -like sequences in positive samples was low, in general below 1% total sequence reads, suggesting that this bacterium appear at low abundance in most gut environments ( Fig. 1B ). However, the highest relative abundance of Acetatifactorterm·key -like 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconsterm·key using 95% blast similarity as a cutoff were detected in sample SRR1210011 originating from a high-fat diet feeding study in mice 23 , reaching >8% total sequences. The next highest abundances (ca. 4% total reads) originated also from a mouse model of diet-induced obesity 24 . Tracing back those hits revealed OTUsterm·dom with pairwise similarity ranging from 95 to 97%, indicating possible novel species of Acetatifactorterm·key . Interestingly, when corresponding pretreatment samples (before high-fat diet feeding) were examined, Acetatifactor- like ampliconsterm·key were barely or not detected, supporting an association between the presence of Acetatifactorterm·key spp. and diet-induced obesity in mice.

Diversity of the phylum Poribactreria Poribacteriaterm·key is a bacterial phylum that was first identified as an important constituent of microbial communities associated with marine sponges 25 . Poribacteriaterm·key serve as model organisms to understand the interaction between sponges and their diverse microbial community, and they share a number of unique features such as a compartmentalized cell and a high number of eukaryotic-like proteins 26 . To date, no cultivable strain exists but extensive genetic information has been obtained by single cell genomics 27 28 . Beside sponges or water and sediment samples in the vicinity of sponges, reports on the occurrence of Poribacteriaterm·key have been scarce, pointing at a rather strict and intricate association between these bacteria and their host 29 30 . Here, we exploited the accumulated sequence data in IMNGSterm·mth to investigate global diversity and population structure of Poribacteriaterm·key . The taxonomic queryterm·key resulted in 86,293 sequences originating from 200 samples and a cumulative number of 2,425 OTUsterm·dom classified as Poribacteriaterm·key . To maximize the sequence space for analysis, we also added all GenBank-derived 16S rRNAterm·key clones classified as Poribacteriaterm·key . The complete set of sequences was aligned and trimmed around the highest coverage region resulting in a total of 2,308 sequences with >370 nucleotides. These sequences were clustered at different similarity levels resulting in a comprehensive view of Poribacteriaterm·key sequence diversity ( Fig. 2A ). The most conservative clustering produced by CROP supported the existence of 151 molecular species clusters at ~3% similarity (S1-S151). These clusters further assembled in 38 molecular genera at ~5% similarity (G1-G38), and finally in one single molecular family at ~10% similarity (F1). The diversity of Poribacteriaterm·key can be summarized in 8 major (most dominant) molecular species clusters distributed in 6 genera. Looking at the contribution of each of these 8 species in samples that were most abundant in Poribacteriaterm·key sequences, we observed no strict host specificity for a particular sponge species ( Fig. 2B ). Cluster S1 was detected across 92 samples and was the most prevalent in all sponge species, while sequences belonging to cluster S120 showed some preference for the host species Aplysina aerophoba and Xestospongia testudinaria , with 38% and 22% average abundance, respectively.

Discussion IMNGSterm·mth is currently the biggest and most detailed open resource of processed 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key datasets available to date. The user friendly interface guarantees easy and rapid access to the resource. The provided output files return detailed information on the distribution of specific taxa or OTUsterm·dom across a broad range of diverse samples available through IMNGSterm·mth. Results will be of use to researchers interested in testing the occurrence and diversity of any specific bacteria of interest in the broad fields of environmental research, clinical microbiology, and microbial ecologyterm·key. In the present manuscript, we demonstrated major features of IMNGSterm·mth by conducting two showcase studies on the occurrence of the bacterial genus Acetatifactorterm·key in diet-induced obesity and on global diversity of the important sponge symbionts Poribacteriaterm·key .

In contrast to diversity analysis where the source of sequence is partly irrelevant, interpretation of sequence distribution patterns depends heavily on the subset of samples selected for each analysis. Samples that are not representative of normal conditions in a given environment but rather correspond to extreme perturbations or exceptional cases may distort the ecological view of prevalence and abundance (e.g. gut profiles after antibiotic usage not specified in the sample description from SRAterm·dom). Hence, one current limitation of the resource is related to the poor quality of metadata information about samples in SRAterm·dom, which complicates interpretation of results if some of the samples under investigation are not representative of native ecosystems. That is why it is worth investing time in building a curated list of homogenous samples that better represent the question at hand. The list exporting and sharing functionality of IMNGSterm·mth (see methods) helps the production and maintenance of highly curated lists of samples for various environment categories. On the other hand, studies oriented in exploring the global diversity of a particular taxonomic group should benefit from maximal retrieval of targeted sequences using all available samples.

Given a curated list of samples, similarity-based searches offer valuable insight in the distribution of query-like sequences within and across samples. In the example of A. muris , the observed patterns of prevalence supported its origin as a mouse gut-specific bacterial species 21 . At the genus level, Acetatifactorterm·key spp. showed also a strong host specificity of colonization in rodents and indicated clear abundance levels associated with high-fat diet feeding in mice. These hypotheses generated via IMNGSterm·mth searches can now be tested experimentally by studying the molecular basis of this tight host adaptation and the role of Acetatifactorterm·key species in obesity models. Hence, IMNGSterm·mth can now be used as a routine approach to extract information on the ecology of newly described microbes or known species for which such information is lacking.

Taxonomy-based queriesterm·mth with IMNGSterm·mth are generally faster than sequence similarity-queriesterm·mth and can be useful for extraction of both ecological patterns and the available sequence space of selected taxa from phyla to families. The way of analysis of these data is open to the investigator depending on scientific questions to be addressed. Here, we provided an example of a diversity analysis for the phylum Poribacteriaterm·key showing evidence for a sponge-associated bacterial clade with low host specificity. Different sponges can host a mixture of diverse Poribacteriaterm·key sequences, although colonization is dominated by 4 main molecular species. The presence of only one main family level group within the phylum that contains also a low number of genera and species indicate an overall low diversity within the phylum. This is surprising considering the evolutionary time since divergence of Poribacteriaterm·key from the common bacterial ancestor, which happened before diversification of the Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia, Chlamydiae superphylum 26 . Perhaps the restricted and evolutionary stable niche as well as vertical mode of transmission of these microorganisms did not favor diversification 31 . Of course, one should keep in mind that technology and primer sets can have a substantial impact on results 32 and we cannot exclude that other families of Poribacteriaterm·key that were not captured by the used primers or sequencing protocols exist.

Another web tool that exploits ampliconterm·key sequences in public archives has been published 13 . However, the IMNGSterm·mth platform is a transparent and flexible integration of all 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key studies available in SRAterm·dom. With currently >85,000 samples processed, representing approximately 2 billion sequences (build 1607), IMNGSterm·mth is to the best of our knowledge the biggest and most detailed open resource of processed bacterial profiles, which is updated automatically. The existing tool mentioned above is limited to pyrosequencing studies representing a little more than 1.5 million sequences, and the database is not updated regularly. Moreover, it relies on BLAST similarity queries only, so predictions for taxonomic levels below the genus level can be imprecise. The clear and intuitive web front of IMNGSterm·mth enables rapid execution of both similarity and taxonomic queries in a secured and personalized manner. The simplicity and power of the method will facilitate its implementation for a broad range of applications. For instance, rapid retrieval of ecological information on every new isolate or known species of particular clinical or environmental relevance is possible. Furthermore, the capacity for detailed analysis of universal bacterial diversity for any selected taxon of interest has no precedent in the field. One major feature of IMNGSterm·mth is the list-based system where users can select specific samples of particular interest, which contrast to the published system where all sequences were merged together, which decreased search time requirements but comes with the major drawback that sample-specific information is lost. Finally, the user friendly implementation of UPARSEterm·key in IMNGSterm·mth enables direct comparison of users’ own samples with existing datasets. As an independent solution for processing raw sequencing data, this analysis function in IMNGSterm·mth has the advantage to be user friendly, i.e. it has a clear interface and no installation requirements. However, it can be restrictive for expert users and dedicated platforms such as QIIME 33 and MOTHUR 34 offer greater flexibility and control over multiple parameters.

Conclusion The performed studies demonstrate that the IMNGSterm·mth platform is an innovative layer over the SRAterm·dom repository for generation of novel insight in microbiology and microbiome research. Sample-specific integration and processing of all 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key studies available in sequence repositories offer a transparent, flexible, and scalable platform. In combination with a user friendly and intuitive interface, IMNGSterm·mth represents a unique resource for ecological studies and the retrieval of selected microbial prevalence patterns and sequence-based diversity. Given the ever increasing number and volume of new ampliconterm·key sequencing projects, IMNGSterm·mth will rapidly expand the coverage in range and depth of biomes profiles, allowing even more significant results in the near future.

Methods IMNGSterm·mth architecture and specifications IMNGSterm·mth is built as a freely available web platform. The web interface allows registered users to submit and manage jobs or directly download preprocessed sample-specific OTUterm·dom tables and sequences. This is achieved through linkage to several local SQL databases and backbone operations written in Perl and Python. A comprehensive scheme of the IMNGSterm·mth structure is available in Fig. 3 . Registration to use the service is required in order to maintain data and personalized settings ( e.g. , email notifications, manually selected sample lists). Due to the computation cost associated with operations that can be run with IMNGSterm·mth, each user can have only one active job at a time. In case of multiple user requests, additional cloud computing nodes are recruited to serve the demand. Each job is allocated specific resources making parallel processing possible without substantial extension of running times. Nevertheless, in case the number of individual requests exceeds the system capacity (currently 4 local and 6 cloud nodes for a total of 10 parallel jobs processing), jobs are queued based on submission time in a first-come first-served fashion. Because sequence similarity searches are most time-consuming, especially when performed against the complete list of samples available in IMNGSterm·mth, and in order to improve responsiveness of the system and avoid abuse, the maximum number of sequence per query was set to 10. Results are kept in the system for two weeks before automatic removal; therefore, prompt download of results upon completion is advised.

Automated retrieval of 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key data from SRAterm·dom The ftp site of SRAterm·dom is checked automatically on a weekly basis for samples that correspond to 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key studies. Selection is based on the attributes of library preparation such as the strategy (ampliconterm·key or other), source (metagenomic or other) and selection (PCR or other). In addition, a size filter is applied excluding studies with mean sequence length <200 nucleotides for single reads or <120 nucleotides for paired-end reads (counting only the relevant part of the read, i.e. , excluding primers, barcodes, etc.). Selected files are downloaded and an SQL record is created, including accessions and available sample information such as NCBI biosample taxonomy (origin of samples), sequence number per sample, or mean read length.

Processing and classification of SRAterm·dom datasets Every SRAterm·dom dataset (sample) that passes the initial filters is treated independently. Although SRAterm·dom and ENA require studies to be submitted as independent demultiplexed samples, some cases of submission do not follow this rule. Since we have no means to automatically separate those cases, we process all datasets as individual samples as follows. First the samples are pre-filtered to remove non-16S rRNA ampliconterm·key datasets. For this purpose, the first 100 quality reads from each dataset are extracted and tested using sortmeRNA 35 (version 2.0). If >10% of the reads are classified as 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconsterm·key, the corresponding sample is kept for analysis or else discarded. All biological reads in SRAterm·dom files longer than 200, or 120 nucleotides if paired, are exported as fastq files, using fastq-dump (SRAterm·dom tools), and then analyzed with a modified version of the UPARSEterm·key pipeline 15 . This length cutoff was imposed to restrict the analysis to samples containing ampliconsterm·key with sufficient resolution for phylogenetic studies and a relatively secure classification. This decision excludes by default all early days Illumina studies which delivered very short read lengths and/or non-overlapping reads, but keeps the rapidly outnumbering studies performed using Illumina MiSeq platforms. In more details, the exact pipeline is as follows: If reads originate from paired-end sequencing, they are truncated to the most upstream nucleotide position with quality ≤3 and merged. If the final read count per sample after assembly (and corresponding sequence filtering based on expected errors) is <1000 and forward reads were >200 nucleotides, samples are reprocessed as single reads. Single reads are trimmed to the mean read length in the given sample minus one standard deviation; original reads below this threshold length are discarded. Trimmed single or merged paired reads that have an expected error rate >2% are also discarded. Finally, if the final number of high quality reads after all filtering steps is <1000, the corresponding sample is excluded. The quality-filtered fastq reads are then dereplicated, sorted by abundance, and de novo clustered using USEARCH 36 (32-bit version 8) at 97% sequence identityterm·var. The generated OTUsterm·dom are checked for the presence of chimeras against the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) database 37 using UCHIME 38 . Non-prokaryotic OTUsterm·dom ( e.g. , phiX or eukaryotic contaminations) are filtered out using SortmeRNA 35 (version 2.0), and the final OTUterm·dom list is used to map filtered reads and build an OTUterm·dom table with relative sequence abundance for each sample. The representative sequence of each OTUterm·dom is used for taxonomically classification based on the RDP classifier 39 (version 2.11 training set 15). Taxonomic calls with confidence >80% are added as extra taxonomy column in the OTUterm·dom tables. Finally, all the collected information (OTUterm·dom tables, sequences with corresponding taxonomic classification, origin, length) is parsed to the SQL databases, and UBLAST 36 databases are created for future queries. Every single processed sample can be downloaded for inspection or comparison from the IMNGSterm·mth site.

Selection of personalized lists An entry for each sample analyzed in IMNGSterm·mth and its associated information ( e.g. sample classification) is stored in an SQL database that can be viewed in the Lists tab of the web interface. The system offers several options for filtering and selecting lists of compatible samples that may be most appropriate for the type of analysis required. Hence, creation of lists assists in the biological interpretation of results by giving the chance to work on well-curated samples if desired, and also allows minimizing computation time. As an example, in order to create a list of all animal gut samples, we filtered all available datasets containing the word “gut” in their “Origin” and exported the list using the “Export” button. The exported spreadsheet file was then manually curated by removal of all samples with ambiguous host information. The remaining list of selected samples was imported and stored back to IMNGSterm·mth as “Gut samples” list using the “Import” button. As IMNGSterm·mth is continuously expanding, any lists get eventually outdated if not taken care of. If users create a special manually curated list of samples sharing defined characteristics and publish work created by using this list, we strongly recommend adding the list of samples as supplementary materials to the manuscript so that others can reuse it to reproduce data or address novel questions.

Similarity query and prevalence analysis To initiate a similarity query, a target sequence of interest is needed as template. Full or nearly-full length 16S rRNAterm·key gene sequence is recommended to ensure good coverage across all studies independent of 16S rRNAterm·key gene regions. For the purpose of demonstration, we used the 16S rRNAterm·key gene sequence of Acetatifactorterm·key muris (GenBank accession HM989805 ). In the Query/Similarity tab in IMNGSterm·mth, we entered the FASTA formatted sequence of A. muris , selected the “Gut samples” as target list, and 95% as the sequence similarity threshold for query. Similarity queries are performed by IMNGSterm·mth with UBLAST 36 over the preformatted databases of sequences. Depending on the number of selected samples to be searched (all or lists), a similarity query can take up to 6 hours until completion. Results were downloaded from the Jobs tab as a compressed folder containing all output and information files (see Supplementary File S1 for detailed description of output files). Since the purpose of this demo search was to determine the host range of colonization without consideration of relative sequence abundances, the “report.0.tab” file was used, i.e. the report of positive samples per sample category (e.g. marine water, human skin, etc.) where a single hit is sufficient for a sample to be considered as positive. Different levels of relative abundances are offered to users, excluding rare (>0.1% threshold) or including only abundant (>1%) sequences. Detailed information on individual hits can be extracted from the “*.hits.tab” file, containing for instance sample type and matched sequence numbers for each query, and all hit sequences are available in “*.seqs.fasta” (the asterisk indicates the numbering of the sequence used as query).

Taxonomic queryterm·key and diversity analysis To perform a taxonomic queryterm·key, users must select the Query/Taxonomy tab and use the provided taxonomy tables to specify the target taxonomic group of interest. Available options cover all the RDP detected taxonomies of all processed sequences up to the current build. Users should always keep in mind that taxonomic classification among different systems (e.g. SILVA or Greengenes) or even among different builds of e.g. the RDP classifier may differ. For this reason, it is worth checking how a sequence belonging to the taxonomic group of interest would be classified by the RDP classifier release 2.11 (for the current version of IMNGSterm·mth) before performing taxonomic queries. Results are retrieved from the SQL database, include all sequences assigned to the selected taxonomic rank and their abundance in each sample or sample categories, and can be downloaded from the Jobs tab. For demonstration, we used the bacterial phylum Poribacteriaterm·key to determine its sequence-supported diversity and environmental profile. For completeness, we also extracted all 16S rRNAterm·key gene sequences classified as Poribacteriaterm·key in GenBank. The complete set of sequences was aligned with SINA 40 in SILVA 41 . Since not all studies available in SRAterm·dom focus on the same 16S rRNAterm·key gene region, reads from different studies will often not overlap. Because diversity analysis requires homologue positions, the alignment region with highest coverage (number of non-gap bases) was selected and the rest of the alignment was trimmed. Sequences were first clustered into “species” groups (~97% similarity) using CROP 42 (version 1.33), an unsupervised Bayesian clustering method with a soft cutoff boundary showing more conservative estimations of OTUsterm·dom compared with other clustering methods like complete-linkage. The resulting centroid representatives were clustered at the “genus” level (~95% similarity) and then again at the “family” level (~90%). This created a hierarchical organization in a tree like structure, which was visualized using GraPhlAn 43 (version 0.9.7). For the sake of comparison, sequences were clustered also with a complete-linkage method implemented in ESPRIT 44 (version 1.4) using default settings. Details about the occurrence of each OTUterm·dom and the contribution in each sample were extracted from the “taxonomic_occurrences.tab” using custom Perl scripts. For a more detailed description of taxonomic queryterm·key output files, please refer to Supplementary File S2 .

Analysis of novel 16S rRNAterm·key gene ampliconterm·key datasets Users’ raw ampliconterm·key datasets can be analyzed using the same pipeline used for processing SRAterm·dom samples with some additional features, as detailed in own previously published work 45 46 . The pipeline is currently optimized for processing standard Illumina sequencing -derived fastq files. Denovo analysis allows demultiplexing the reads to their corresponding samples based on mapping files containing barcodes information. The implementation is fast, taking less than 1 hour per study (containing at least up to 200 samples). As in the case of SRAterm·dom files, the similarity cutoff for clustering is set to 97% identity. Users have the freedom to select analysis parameters, including trimming options at both sequence ends (as they have been shown to contain biases), and filtering of OTUterm·dom tables based on relative abundance thresholds (to exclude spurious OTUsterm·dom that often appear in deep sequencing datasets). We recommend using sequencing controls (e.g. reagents only, mock communities, samples from germfree animals) in every project to assist in the selection of meaningful cutoffs for your experiment. For a detailed overview of analysis output files, please refer to Supplementary File S3 . Instructions on input files (e.g. sequence orientation of barcodes) are provided online ( www.imngsterm·mth.org ). If the Analysis feature of IMNGSterm·mth is used for de novo processing of sequencing files that are not for comparison with preprocessed SRAterm·dom samples, we recommend to reclassify the OTUterm·dom sequences with the latest online RDP classifier and even improve taxonomic assignments by combining results generated by other taxonomic classification systems like SILVA 41 and Greengenes 47 .

Additional Information How to cite this article : LagkouvardospersName, I. et al . IMNGSterm·mth: A comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNAterm·key microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies. Sci. Rep. 6 , 33721; doi: 10.1038/srep33721 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Interpretive notes.
• Highlighted spans are tagged entities: persName (author), title (venue), placeName (place), date (year), and term (a key concept: domain / ai / method).
• Eponymous or retrospective terms (e.g. “Nash equilibrium”, “segregation”) do not appear in the original source and so are not highlighted — a deliberate choice (see Report 4).
• Some entries begin with a word in capitals. EVIDENCE CORRECTED means the finding still stands and it was our quotation that was wrong — it has been replaced. RETRACTED means the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with its reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED means a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it.
• Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote shown on the same row, so the borrowing can be checked against the thing borrowed from without leaving this page. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.
• Counts: 1 work · 1 date.
Meta-Tagging Project · record lagkouvardos2016-imngs-16s-rrna-profiles.
© 2026 Shir Sivroni