Dennis G. A. B. OonincxpersName, Joost van ItterbeeckpersName, Marcel J. W. HeetkamppersName, Henry van den BrandpersName, Joop J. A. van LoonpersName, Arnold van HuispersName (2010date). “An Exploration on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Production by Insect Species Suitable for Animal or Human Consumption.” PLoS ONEtitle·j.
Object of study —
Research question — whether edible insects have lower emission intensities and higher growth efficiency than conventional livestock
Contribution — species-resolved emission and growth inputs for life-cycle comparison of insect protein
phenomenon · claim-type · cross-domain-transfer · mechanism · claim-relation · replication-status · limitation — grounded in the full text| phenomenon | carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ammonia, and growth in five insect species — “Methodology/Principal Findings An experiment was conducted to quantify production of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and average daily gain (ADG) as a measure of feed conversion efficiency, and to quantify the production of the greenhouse gases methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) as well as NH 3 by five insect species of which the first three are considered edible: Tenebrio molitor , Acheta domesticus , Locusta migratoria , Pachnoda marginata, and Blaptica dubia.” | |
| claim-type | existence — “The data presented in this study are indispensable for conducting a lifecycle analysis for edible insects.” | |
| method — evidence | — “Per species three to six repetitions were conducted each for a period of three days.” | |
| research question — evidence | — “Before performing a LCA, it is necessary to know the GHG production by edible insects.” | |
| contribution — evidence | — “The data presented in this study are indispensable for conducting a lifecycle analysis for edible insects.” | |
| mechanism | The respired carbon, which comes from the feed, was first taken up from CO 2 in the air and stored in an organic compound during the production of the feed. — “The respired carbon, which comes from the feed, was first taken up from CO 2 in the air and stored in an organic compound during the production of the feed.” | mechanisms[0] |
| mechanism | Although not considered a GHG, NH 3 can indirectly contribute to N 2 O emission [2] , as conversion takes place by specialized soil bacteria [6] . — “Although not considered a GHG, NH 3 can indirectly contribute to N 2 O emission [2] , as conversion takes place by specialized soil bacteria [6] .” | mechanisms[1] |
| mechanism | The main source of gaseous NH 3 is bacterial fermentation of uric acid in poultry manure [7] , [8] and bacterial fermentation of urea in mammals [9] . — “The main source of gaseous NH 3 is bacterial fermentation of uric acid in poultry manure [7] , [8] and bacterial fermentation of urea in mammals [9] .” | mechanisms[2] |
| mechanism | Insects, being poikilotherms, do not use their metabolism to maintain a body temperature within narrow ranges, contrary to homeothermic animals — “Insects, being poikilotherms, do not use their metabolism to maintain a body temperature within narrow ranges, contrary to homeothermic animals.” | mechanisms[3] |
| mechanism | This originates from bacterial fermentation by methanobacteriaceae in the hindgut [39] . — “This originates from bacterial fermentation by methanobacteriaceae in the hindgut [39] .” | mechanisms[4] |
| mechanism | This might to a large extent be explained by ad libitum feeding during the experiment that has been reported to increase oxygen consumption fivefold [22] . — “This might to a large extent be explained by ad libitum feeding during the experiment that has been reported to increase oxygen consumption fivefold [22] .” | mechanisms[5] |
| mechanism | A likely explanation for this higher production of CO 2 is the 7°C higher temperature L. migratoria was kept at, as a difference of 10°C is expected to double CO 2 production. — “A likely explanation for this higher production of CO 2 is the 7°C higher temperature L. migratoria was kept at, as a difference of 10°C is expected to double CO 2 production.” | mechanisms[6] |
| mechanism | It is well possible that the higher N 2 O production measured was caused by saprophytic bacteria utilising the dead A. domesticus and producing N 2 O [6] . — “It is well possible that the higher N 2 O production measured was caused by saprophytic bacteria utilising the dead A. domesticus and producing N 2 O [6] .” | mechanisms[7] |
| mechanism | A possible explanation is that gas exchange in the container is inhibited by the substrate and therefore less emission of NH 3 was measured. — “A possible explanation is that gas exchange in the container is inhibited by the substrate and therefore less emission of NH 3 was measured.” | mechanisms[8] |
| sense | emissions per kilogram of mass gain link environmental cost to protein-production benefit — “In that way a comparison of the selected species with each other and with conventional livestock is based on a cost-benefit principle, in which the GHG production (environmental cost) is directly linked to food production (benefit).” | senses[0] |
| control | These containers were placed in one of two, identical, open circuit climate respiration chambers measuring 80*50*45 cm, with a total volume of 265 L [17] . — rules out systematic differences between chamber designs — “These containers were placed in one of two, identical, open circuit climate respiration chambers measuring 80*50*45 cm, with a total volume of 265 L [17] .” | controls[0] |
| control | The difference in CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations between ingoing and outgoing air thus represents the total production of CO 2 and CH 4 of insects, feed, and substrate. — rules out background inlet-gas concentration — “The difference in CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations between ingoing and outgoing air thus represents the total production of CO 2 and CH 4 of insects, feed, and substrate.” | controls[1] |
| control | To determine CO 2 production from feed and substrate, all feeds were independently tested in the same respiration chambers, without the animals. — rules out CO2 generated by feed and substrate alone — “To determine CO 2 production from feed and substrate, all feeds were independently tested in the same respiration chambers, without the animals.” | controls[2] |
| control | Therefore, the average of the three samples taken during the 3-day trial period was used to determine the change per repetition and to calculate total production. — rules out single-time-point N2O variability — “Therefore, the average of the three samples taken during the 3-day trial period was used to determine the change per repetition and to calculate total production.” | controls[3] |
| control | CO 2 and CH 4 production for all five species were analyzed by means of a one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey post hoc test. — rules out unadjusted multiple pairwise species comparisons — “CO 2 and CH 4 production for all five species were analyzed by means of a one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey post hoc test.” | controls[4] |
| audit | greenhouse gas —operationalised-as→ respiration chamber — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but gases were MEASURED in respiration chambers; operationalised-as is the wrong type. — “During the experiment concentrations of CO 2 and CH 4 were measured every 9 min in the ingoing and outgoing air stream of the respiration chambers. The difference in CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations between ingoing and outgoing air thus represents the total production of CO 2 and CH 4 of insects, feed, and substrate. The exact air volumes were measured with a calibrated Schlumberger G1.6 dry gas meter and corrected for measured air temperature and pressure. CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations were measured in dried gas. Gas was dried in a +2°C dew-point cooler. Nondispersive infrared analyzers were used to measure CO 2 (type Uras 3G, Hartmann and Braun, Frankfurt, Germany) and CH 4 (type Uras 10E, Hartmann and Braun, Frankfurt, Germany). The refreshed air volume was set so that CO 2 levels did not exceed 1%. From each climate respiration chamber, as well as from the incoming air, an air sample was taken for N 2 O analysis after 24, 48, and 72 h with a 60 ml syringe.” | concept_edges[1] |
| note | greenhouse gas —operationalised-as→ respiration chamber — CO2, CH4, and N2O are flatly measured through the respiration-chamber air streams and samples. — “During the experiment concentrations of CO 2 and CH 4 were measured every 9 min in the ingoing and outgoing air stream of the respiration chambers. The difference in CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations between ingoing and outgoing air thus represents the total production of CO 2 and CH 4 of insects, feed, and substrate. The exact air volumes were measured with a calibrated Schlumberger G1.6 dry gas meter and corrected for measured air temperature and pressure. CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations were measured in dried gas. Gas was dried in a +2°C dew-point cooler. Nondispersive infrared analyzers were used to measure CO 2 (type Uras 3G, Hartmann and Braun, Frankfurt, Germany) and CH 4 (type Uras 10E, Hartmann and Braun, Frankfurt, Germany). The refreshed air volume was set so that CO 2 levels did not exceed 1%. From each climate respiration chamber, as well as from the incoming air, an air sample was taken for N 2 O analysis after 24, 48, and 72 h with a 60 ml syringe.” | concept_edges[1] |
| weight | greenhouse gas —operationalised-as→ respiration chamber — 0.95 — “During the experiment concentrations of CO 2 and CH 4 were measured every 9 min in the ingoing and outgoing air stream of the respiration chambers. The difference in CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations between ingoing and outgoing air thus represents the total production of CO 2 and CH 4 of insects, feed, and substrate. The exact air volumes were measured with a calibrated Schlumberger G1.6 dry gas meter and corrected for measured air temperature and pressure. CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations were measured in dried gas. Gas was dried in a +2°C dew-point cooler. Nondispersive infrared analyzers were used to measure CO 2 (type Uras 3G, Hartmann and Braun, Frankfurt, Germany) and CH 4 (type Uras 10E, Hartmann and Braun, Frankfurt, Germany). The refreshed air volume was set so that CO 2 levels did not exceed 1%. From each climate respiration chamber, as well as from the incoming air, an air sample was taken for N 2 O analysis after 24, 48, and 72 h with a 60 ml syringe.” | concept_edges[1] |
| audit | greenhouse gas —operationalised-as→ life cycle analysis — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but LCA is used to ESTIMATE the sector's GHG contribution; operationalised-as is the wrong type. — “Based on a Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) that takes the entire production process of animal products into account, the global contribution to GHG emissions by the animal sector are: 9% for CO 2 (fertilizer production for feed crops, on-farm energy expenditures, feed transport, animal product processing, animal transport, and land use changes), 35–40% for CH 4 (enteric fermentation in ruminants and from farm animal manure) and 65% for N 2 O (farm manure and urine) [2] .” | concept_edges[2] |
| note | greenhouse gas —operationalised-as→ life cycle analysis — The paper flatly reports GHG contributions on the basis of a whole-process life-cycle analysis. — “Based on a Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) that takes the entire production process of animal products into account, the global contribution to GHG emissions by the animal sector are: 9% for CO 2 (fertilizer production for feed crops, on-farm energy expenditures, feed transport, animal product processing, animal transport, and land use changes), 35–40% for CH 4 (enteric fermentation in ruminants and from farm animal manure) and 65% for N 2 O (farm manure and urine) [2] .” | concept_edges[2] |
| weight | greenhouse gas —operationalised-as→ life cycle analysis — 0.95 — “Based on a Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) that takes the entire production process of animal products into account, the global contribution to GHG emissions by the animal sector are: 9% for CO 2 (fertilizer production for feed crops, on-farm energy expenditures, feed transport, animal product processing, animal transport, and land use changes), 35–40% for CH 4 (enteric fermentation in ruminants and from farm animal manure) and 65% for N 2 O (farm manure and urine) [2] .” | concept_edges[2] |
| audit | poikilotherm —causes→ feed conversion efficiency — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says being poikilotherms is EXPECTED to result in higher feed conversion efficiency; hedged. — “Insects, being poikilotherms, do not use their metabolism to maintain a body temperature within narrow ranges, contrary to homeothermic animals. This is expected to result in higher feed conversion efficiencies.” | concept_edges[3] |
| effect direction | poikilotherm —causes→ feed conversion efficiency — increases — “Insects, being poikilotherms, do not use their metabolism to maintain a body temperature within narrow ranges, contrary to homeothermic animals. This is expected to result in higher feed conversion efficiencies.” — “higher” | concept_edges[3] |
| note | poikilotherm —causes→ feed conversion efficiency — Higher efficiency is expected from poikilothermy, so the modal licenses 0.65. — “Insects, being poikilotherms, do not use their metabolism to maintain a body temperature within narrow ranges, contrary to homeothermic animals. This is expected to result in higher feed conversion efficiencies.” | concept_edges[3] |
| weight | poikilotherm —causes→ feed conversion efficiency — 0.65 — “Insects, being poikilotherms, do not use their metabolism to maintain a body temperature within narrow ranges, contrary to homeothermic animals. This is expected to result in higher feed conversion efficiencies.” | concept_edges[3] |
| limitation | A molecular mass of 17 was used and instead of a difference in concentration, the measured concentration was used, leading to a slight overestimation of the actual NH 3 production (between 0 and 0.1 mg/kg BM/day). — “A molecular mass of 17 was used and instead of a difference in concentration, the measured concentration was used, leading to a slight overestimation of the actual NH 3 production (between 0 and 0.1 mg/kg BM/day).” | limitations[0] |
| limitation | A linear time course of consumption was assumed and CO 2 production was recalculated to kg of live insect. — “A linear time course of consumption was assumed and CO 2 production was recalculated to kg of live insect.” | limitations[1] |
| limitation | The fundamental biological differences in growth and development processes between pigs and cattle and the studied insects impeded further synchronization. — “The fundamental biological differences in growth and development processes between pigs and cattle and the studied insects impeded further synchronization.” | limitations[2] |
| limitation | However, other authors [41] , [42] determined a production of 28 mg N 2 O/kg BM/day and 52 mg N 2 O/kg BM/day, respectively, indicating the difficulty of accurately determining N 2 O production [43] . — “However, other authors [41] , [42] determined a production of 28 mg N 2 O/kg BM/day and 52 mg N 2 O/kg BM/day, respectively, indicating the difficulty of accurately determining N 2 O production [43] .” | limitations[3] |
| limitation | Such interactions hinder the application of realistic corrections for the contribution of feed and substrate to the total CO 2 production and thus to quantify the CO 2 production arising from insect metabolism separately. — “Such interactions hinder the application of realistic corrections for the contribution of feed and substrate to the total CO 2 production and thus to quantify the CO 2 production arising from insect metabolism separately.” | limitations[4] |
| limitation | Although we included this repetition in the results, it is not clear whether this represents the practical situation best. — “Although we included this repetition in the results, it is not clear whether this represents the practical situation best.” | limitations[5] |
| limitation | This could indicate that NH 3 emissions might be underestimated due to the relatively short time frame of our experiments. — “This could indicate that NH 3 emissions might be underestimated due to the relatively short time frame of our experiments.” | limitations[6] |
| limitation | A complete lifecycle analysis for species of edible insects is lacking at this point in time [58] and should be the focus point of further studies to allow a conclusive evaluation of the sustainability of insects as a protein-rich food source. — “A complete lifecycle analysis for species of edible insects is lacking at this point in time [58] and should be the focus point of further studies to allow a conclusive evaluation of the sustainability of insects as a protein-rich food source.” | limitations[7] |
finding · quantity · variable · definition · key-term — grounded in the full text| finding | Large differences were found among the species regarding their production of CO 2 and GHGs. — “Large differences were found among the species regarding their production of CO 2 and GHGs.” | content_tags.findings[0] |
| finding | The insects in this study had a higher relative growth rate and emitted comparable or lower amounts of GHG than described in literature for pigs and much lower amounts of GHG than cattle. — “The insects in this study had a higher relative growth rate and emitted comparable or lower amounts of GHG than described in literature for pigs and much lower amounts of GHG than cattle.” | content_tags.findings[1] |
| finding | Pachnoda marginata produced more than three times as much CH 4 per kg of mass gain than B. dubia (4.9 vs 1.4 g). — “Pachnoda marginata produced more than three times as much CH 4 per kg of mass gain than B. dubia (4.9 vs 1.4 g).” | content_tags.findings[2] |
| finding | 3.3 N 2 O N 2 O was produced only in significant amounts by T. molitor and L. migratoria (1.5 and 8.0 mg/kg BM/day, respectively). — “3.3 N 2 O N 2 O was produced only in significant amounts by T. molitor and L. migratoria (1.5 and 8.0 mg/kg BM/day, respectively).” | content_tags.findings[3] |
| finding | Therefore, CO 2 production per kg of mass gain suggests higher feed conversion efficiencies for insects than for mammalian livestock. — “Therefore, CO 2 production per kg of mass gain suggests higher feed conversion efficiencies for insects than for mammalian livestock.” | content_tags.findings[4] |
| finding | All insect species in this study produced much lower amounts of NH 3 (3.0 to 5.4 mg/kg BM/day for A. domesticus, L. migratoria and B. dubia ) than conventional livestock (4.8–75 mg/kg BM/day for pigs and 14–170 mg/kg BM/day for cattle). — “All insect species in this study produced much lower amounts of NH 3 (3.0 to 5.4 mg/kg BM/day for A. domesticus, L. migratoria and B. dubia ) than conventional livestock (4.8–75 mg/kg BM/day for pigs and 14–170 mg/kg BM/day for cattle).” | content_tags.findings[5] |
| finding | The measured NH 3 emission levels of all insect species in this experiment were lower than reported NH 3 emission levels for conventional livestock. — “The measured NH 3 emission levels of all insect species in this experiment were lower than reported NH 3 emission levels for conventional livestock.” | content_tags.findings[6] |
| finding | Conclusions/Significance This study therefore indicates that insects could serve as a more environmentally friendly alternative for the production of animal protein with respect to GHG and NH 3 emissions. — “Conclusions/Significance This study therefore indicates that insects could serve as a more environmentally friendly alternative for the production of animal protein with respect to GHG and NH 3 emissions.” | content_tags.findings[7] |
| quantity | Methodology/Principal Findings An experiment was conducted to quantify production of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and average daily gain (ADG) as a measure of feed conversion efficiency, and to quantify the production of the greenhouse gases methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) as well as NH 3 by five insect species of which the first three are considered edible: Tenebrio molitor , Acheta domesticus , Locusta migratoria , Pachnoda marginata, and Blaptica dubia. — “Methodology/Principal Findings An experiment was conducted to quantify production of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and average daily gain (ADG) as a measure of feed conversion efficiency, and to quantify the production of the greenhouse gases methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) as well as NH 3 by five insect species of which the first three are considered edible: Tenebrio molitor , Acheta domesticus , Locusta migratoria , Pachnoda marginata, and Blaptica dubia.” | content_tags.quantities[0] |
| quantity | Per species three to six repetitions were conducted each for a period of three days. — “Per species three to six repetitions were conducted each for a period of three days.” | content_tags.quantities[1] |
| quantity | CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations measured every 9 min in the respiration chambers' ingoing and outgoing air — “During the experiment concentrations of CO 2 and CH 4 were measured every 9 min in the ingoing and outgoing air stream of the respiration chambers.” | content_tags.quantities[2] |
| quantity | From each climate respiration chamber, as well as from the incoming air, an air sample was taken for N 2 O analysis after 24, 48, and 72 h with a 60 ml syringe. — “From each climate respiration chamber, as well as from the incoming air, an air sample was taken for N 2 O analysis after 24, 48, and 72 h with a 60 ml syringe.” | content_tags.quantities[3] |
| quantity | By assigning CO 2 a value of 1 GWP, the warming potentials of these other gases can be expressed on a CO 2 -equivalent basis: CH 4 has a GWP of 25, and N 2 O has a GWP of 298 [1] . — “By assigning CO 2 a value of 1 GWP, the warming potentials of these other gases can be expressed on a CO 2 -equivalent basis: CH 4 has a GWP of 25, and N 2 O has a GWP of 298 [1] .” | content_tags.quantities[4] |
| quantity | 3.1 ADG and CO 2 production ADG varied between 4.0% ( P. marginata ) and 19.6% ( L. migratoria ) with the three other species having an ADG of 6–7%. — “3.1 ADG and CO 2 production ADG varied between 4.0% ( P. marginata ) and 19.6% ( L. migratoria ) with the three other species having an ADG of 6–7%.” | content_tags.quantities[5] |
| quantity | CO 2 production among the five insect species differed significantly and ranged from 19 ( B. dubia ) to 110 ( L. migratoria ) g per kg BM/day. — “CO 2 production among the five insect species differed significantly and ranged from 19 ( B. dubia ) to 110 ( L. migratoria ) g per kg BM/day.” | content_tags.quantities[6] |
| quantity | GHG emission of four of the five insect species studied was much lower than documented for pigs when expressed per kg of mass gain and only around 1% of the GHG emission for ruminants. — “GHG emission of four of the five insect species studied was much lower than documented for pigs when expressed per kg of mass gain and only around 1% of the GHG emission for ruminants.” | content_tags.quantities[7] |
| quantity | Quantitatively the differences between day and night emission levels are small; 7–10% with a maximum difference of 25% [5] . — “Quantitatively the differences between day and night emission levels are small; 7–10% with a maximum difference of 25% [5] .” | content_tags.quantities[8] |
| definition | global warming potential — “By assigning CO 2 a value of 1 GWP, the warming potentials of these other gases can be expressed on a CO 2 -equivalent basis: CH 4 has a GWP of 25, and N 2 O has a GWP of 298 [1] .” | content_tags.definitions[0] |
| definition | average daily gain — “Average daily gain (ADG) was calculated as follows: (((End mass - Start mass)/Start mass)/3)*100%, in which 3 is the number of days the experiment was running.” | content_tags.definitions[2] |
| concept | greenhouse gas — “The most important GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O).” | concepts[0] |
| concept | global warming potential — “CH 4 and N 2 O have considerably greater global warming potentials (GWPs) than CO 2 .” | concepts[1] |
| concept | average daily gain — “Average daily gain (ADG) was calculated as follows: (((End mass - Start mass)/Start mass)/3)*100%, in which 3 is the number of days the experiment was running.” | concepts[2] |
| concept | feed conversion efficiency — “The ratio between CO 2 production per unit biomass per day and ADG gives an indication of the feed conversion efficiency, in which higher values indicate lower efficiencies.” | concepts[3] |
| concept | metabolic weight — “The same was true for CO 2 production per kg of metabolic weight and per kg of mass gain.” | concepts[4] |
| concept | poikilotherm — “Insects, being poikilotherms, do not use their metabolism to maintain a body temperature within narrow ranges, contrary to homeothermic animals.” | concepts[5] |
| concept | life cycle analysis — “Based on a Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) that takes the entire production process of animal products into account, the global contribution to GHG emissions by the animal sector are: 9% for CO 2 (fertilizer production for feed crops, on-farm energy expenditures, feed transport, animal product processing, animal transport, and land use changes), 35–40% for CH 4 (enteric fermentation in ruminants and from farm animal manure) and 65% for N 2 O (farm manure and urine) [2] .” | concepts[6] |
| concept | respiration chamber — “These containers were placed in one of two, identical, open circuit climate respiration chambers measuring 80*50*45 cm, with a total volume of 265 L [17] .” | concepts[7] |
Full text — tagged
The reference list is not part of the text we hold for this paper. Our copy was extracted from the publisher's page and the bibliography did not survive that extraction, so the article below ends before its references. Nothing has been removed by us.
Abstract. Abstract Background Greenhouse gasterm (GHG) production, as a cause of climate change, is considered as one of the biggest problems society is currently facing. The livestock sector is one of the large contributors of anthropogenic GHG emissions. Also, large amounts of ammonia (NH 3 ), leading to soil nitrification and acidification, are produced by livestock. Therefore other sources of animal protein, like edible insects, are currently being considered. Methodology/Principal Findings An experimentterm·mth was conducted to quantify production of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and average daily gainterm (ADG) as a measure of feed conversion efficiencyterm, and to quantify the production of the greenhouse gasesterm methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) as well as NH 3 by five insect species of which the first three are considered edible: Tenebrio molitor , Acheta domesticus , Locusta migratoria , Pachnoda marginata, and Blaptica dubia. Large differences were found among the species regarding their production of CO 2 and GHGs. The insects in this study had a higher relative growth rate and emitted comparable or lower amounts of GHG than described in literature for pigs and much lower amounts of GHG than cattle. The same was true for CO 2 production per kg of metabolic weightterm and per kg of mass gain. Furthermore, also the production of NH 3 by insects was lower than for conventional livestock. Conclusions/Significance This study therefore indicates that insects could serve as a more environmentally friendly alternative for the production of animal protein with respect to GHG and NH 3 emissions. The results of this study can be used as basic information to compare the production of insects with conventional livestock by means of a life cycle analysisterm. Introduction Production of greenhouse gasses (GHG) is considered as an important cause of climate change [1] , [2] . The most important GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O). Since the end of the 18 th century the atmospheric carbon-dioxide concentration has increased by 30% and CH 4 concentrations by 50% [3] . CH 4 and N 2 O have considerably greater global warming potentialsterm (GWPs) than CO 2 . By assigning CO 2 a value of 1 GWP, the warming potentials of these other gases can be expressed on a CO 2 -equivalent basis: CH 4 has a GWP of 25, and N 2 O has a GWP of 298 [1] . The relative contribution of CO 2 equivalents (CO 2 eq.) of the livestock sector is large, amounting up to 18% of total anthropogenic GHG emissions [2] . Based on a Life Cycle Analysisterm (LCA) that takes the entire production process of animal products into account, the global contribution to GHG emissions by the animal sector are: 9% for CO 2 (fertilizer production for feed crops, on-farm energy expenditures, feed transport, animal product processing, animal transport, and land use changes), 35–40% for CH 4 (enteric fermentation in ruminants and from farm animal manure) and 65% for N 2 O (farm manure and urine) [2] . Direct CO 2 production through respiration is not relevant when determining the impact of GHGs as respiration by livestock is not considered a net source of CO 2 [2] . The respired carbon, which comes from the feed, was first taken up from CO 2 in the air and stored in an organic compound during the production of the feed. However, the ratio between body growth realised and CO 2 production is an indicator of feed conversion efficiencyterm and thereby a relevant indicator for the environmental impact [4] . Livestock is also associated with environmental pollution due to ammonia (NH 3 ) emissions from manure and urine, leading to nitrification and acidification of soil [5] . Although not considered a GHG, NH 3 can indirectly contribute to N 2 O emission [2] , as conversion takes place by specialized soil bacteria [6] . Livestock is estimated to be responsible for 64% of all anthropogenic NH 3 emissions [2] . The main source of gaseous NH 3 is bacterial fermentation of uric acid in poultry manure [7] , [8] and bacterial fermentation of urea in mammals [9] . Besides these environmental problems the livestock sector faces challenges regarding resistance to antibiotics, zoonosis and animal welfare [10] . All these problems together illustrate the need to find alternatives for conventional sources of animal protein. Mini-livestock, for instance edible insects, have been suggested as an alternative source of animal protein [11] . Production of animal protein in the form of edible insects supposedly has a lower environmental impact than conventional livestock [12] , [13] , [14] . When evaluating the total environmental impact of animal protein production, a LCA, in which all production factors are taken into account, is needed. Differences in environmental impact in a LCA can be explained mainly by three factors: enteric CH 4 emissions, feed conversion efficiencies and reproduction rates [4] . Before performing a LCA, it is necessary to know the GHG production by edible insects. This information is lacking in literature. Therefore, in this study we experimentally quantified the direct production of the GHGs CH 4 and N 2 O for five insect species. CO 2 production and average daily gainterm (ADG) were quantified to provide an estimation of feed conversion efficiencyterm. Additionally, NH 3 emissions were quantified. The results of this study represent a quantification of the insect physiological contribution to GHG production by insects and can in turn be used to create a LCA for insect-derived products. Materials and Methods 2.1 Animals and housing Five insect species were studied: fifth larval stage mealworms Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), fifth and sixth nymphal stage house crickets Acheta domesticus (L.) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), third and fourth stage nymphs of migratory locusts Locusta migratoria (L.) (Orthoptera: Acrididae), third larval stage sun beetles Pachnoda marginata Drury (Coleoptera; Scarabaeidae) and a mix of all stages of the Argentinean cockroach Blaptica dubia (Serville) (Dictyoptera: Blaberidae). Currently, T. molitor , A. domesticus and L. migratoria are considered edible, while P. marginata and B. dubia are not. The latter two species were included since they are a potential source of animal protein, for instance by means of protein extraction. These two species can be bred in large numbers with little time investment and are able to utilise a wide range of substrates as feed [15] , [16] . Per species three to six repetitions were conducted each for a period of three days. Animals were housed per species in two cages or containers per respiration chamberterm. These containers were placed in one of two, identical, open circuit climate respiration chambersterm measuring 80*50*45 cm, with a total volume of 265 L [17] . Within these climate respiration chambersterm, T. molitor and P. marginata were housed in two stacked plastic containers (50*30*8.7 cm). The three other species were housed in metal wire cages (45*37.5*41 cm; mesh width 1 mm) with a glass cover plate. To increase surface area for A. domesticus and B. dubia , hollow plastic tubes (20 cm long and 3 cm in diameter), were stacked to a height of 30 cm in the wired cages, while for L. migratoria , two V-shaped-folded metal screens (70*15 cm) were entered per cage. Humidity, temperature, and day length were based on rearing conditions used by commercial insect rearing companies ( Table 1 ). All animal masses reported are averages of fresh mass per cage. The starting and final animal mass per cage are provided in Table 1 . Table 1 Mean values and standard deviations of temperature, humidity, ventilation, hours of light per day and average start and final weight for five insect species. Pachnoda. marginata Tenebrio molitor Blaptica dubia Acheta domesticus Locusta migratoria Temperature (°C) 28.0±0 25.0±0 28.0±0 28.0±0 32.0±0 Humidity (%) 84.3±3.3 79.8±0.2 70.0±0.0 69.9±0.1 69.7±0.2 Ventilation (L/min) 6.46±2.06 6.82±1.31 5.16±0.05 11.18±1.80 4.98±0.39 Hours of light per day 0 0 12 12 12 Start weight (kg) 0.99 0.91 1.10 0.96 0.08 Final weight (kg) 1.10 1.10 1.28 1.17 0.13 2.2 Diet Food was provided for each species at the beginning of each repetition, except when mentioned otherwise. Tenebrio molitor larvae were reared in 300 g mixed grain substrate (wheat, wheat bran, oats, soy, rye and corn, supplemented with beer yeast) with on top pieces of carrot (±15*2 cm) weighing a total average of 637 g per repetition. Acheta domesticus was provided with chicken mash (501 g) with carrot pieces (784 g) on top for each repetition. Locusta migratoria was provided with wheat bran (70 g; Arie Blok Animal Nutrition, Woerden, The Netherlands) in a metal bowl at the beginning of each repetition. Fresh Perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne) was provided daily (463 g in three days). The grass was grown by Unifarm, Wageningen University and Research centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands. P. marginata larvae were kept in a peat moss substrate (2.0 kg per respiration chamberterm) in which chicken mash (285 g) was mixed at the beginning of each three-day repetition. Pieces of carrot (±15*2 cm) with an average total mass of 161 g per repetition were put on top of the substrate. B. dubia was provided with a chicken mash diet (199 g) and carrots (559 g), fresh carrot being added during the repetitions. Peat moss, chicken mash, and carrots, offered to A. domesticus , P. marginata and B. dubia were provided by Kreca V.O.F, Ermelo, The Netherlands. The carrots and mixed grains substrate offered to T. molitor were provided by Insectra, Deurne, The Netherlands. 2.3 Gas measurements During the experimentterm·mth concentrations of CO 2 and CH 4 were measured every 9 min in the ingoing and outgoing air stream of the respiration chambersterm. The difference in CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations between ingoing and outgoing air thus represents the total production of CO 2 and CH 4 of insects, feed, and substrate. The exact air volumes were measured with a calibrated Schlumberger G1.6 dry gas meter and corrected for measured air temperature and pressure. CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations were measured in dried gas. Gas was dried in a +2°C dew-point cooler. Nondispersive infrared analyzers were used to measure CO 2 (type Uras 3G, Hartmann and Braun, Frankfurt, Germany) and CH 4 (type Uras 10E, Hartmann and Braun, Frankfurt, Germany). The refreshed air volume was set so that CO 2 levels did not exceed 1%. From each climate respiration chamberterm, as well as from the incoming air, an air sample was taken for N 2 O analysis after 24, 48, and 72 h with a 60 ml syringe. The syringes were sealed by a shutoff valve and stored at 20°C until analysis (within 48 h). The N 2 O concentration was analysed by a gas chromatograph (CE instruments GC8000 Top, Interscience, Breda, The Netherlands) using a Haysep Q 80–100 mesh 2 m×1/8″ SS column, at a constant temperature of 60°C. N 2 O was detected with an electron capture detector (ECD). Injection volume was 5.0 ml in a fixed loop. NH 3 concentrations in the climate respiration chambersterm were determined twice daily (at 12.00 and 24.00 h) by means of a gas detection tube system (Kitagawa, type AP-20; Komyo rikagaku kogyo, Tokyo, Japan; type 105 NH 3 gas detector tubes with a range of 1–20 ppm). 2.4 Calculations Production of N 2 O was calculated by subtracting the N 2 O concentration from the incoming air from that in the outgoing air. These differences were then used in a formula adapted from Wheeler et al (2003) [18] : ER = Emission rate of N 2 O = [N 2 O] change (ppm×10 −6 )×VV (m 3 /day)×44 (g/mol)/0.0224 (m 3 /mol), where VV = ventilation volume of air in a specified time period. The average concentration difference of the three samples taken during the three-day period was used to determine the average N 2 O production in a repetition. The formula used by Wheeler (2003) was also used for the calculation of NH 3 production. A molecular mass of 17 was used and instead of a difference in concentration, the measured concentration was used, leading to a slight overestimation of the actual NH 3 production (between 0 and 0.1 mg/kg BM/day). CO 2 equivalents were calculated by adding the multiplications of the produced amounts of CH 4 and N 2 O with their global warming potentialterm; 25 for CH 4 , and 298 for N 2 O [1] . Mean body mass was calculated by averaging the body mass at the start of the experimentterm·mth and the body mass at the end of the experimentterm·mth. Average daily gainterm (ADG) was calculated as follows: (((End mass - Start mass)/Start mass)/3)*100%, in which 3 is the number of days the experimentterm·mth was running. The ratio between CO 2 production per unit biomass per day and ADG gives an indication of the feed conversion efficiencyterm, in which higher values indicate lower efficiencies. To determine CO 2 production from feed and substrate, all feeds were independently tested in the same respiration chambersterm, without the animals. A linear time course of consumption was assumed and CO 2 production was recalculated to kg of live insect. 2.5 Statistics The N 2 O and NH 3 assay data were subjected to a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with species and time of sampling (24, 48, or 72 h) as fixed factors to determine whether the time of sampling had an effect. No significant effect of the time of sampling was found for N 2 O (Pillai's trace: F = 1.467, P = 0.199). Therefore, the average of the three samples taken during the 3-day trial period was used to determine the change per repetition and to calculate total production. However, NH 3 production was significantly affected by the time of sampling (day or night; Pillai's trace: F = 4.065, P = 0.019) and the day of the repetition (first, second or third; Pillai's trace: F = 17.170, P<0.001). CO 2 and CH 4 production for all five species were analyzed by means of a one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey post hoc test. Statistical analysis of all data was done by means of SPSS 15.0. Results Production of CO 2 is expressed per kilogram of mean live body mass (BM) per day (24 hours) and per kilogram of mass gain ( Table 2 ) and the average daily gainterm (ADG) is reported ( Table 2 ). Production of CH 4 , N 2 O, CO 2 equivalents, and NH 3 , are expressed per kilogram of mean live body mass (BM) per day ( Table 3 ) and per kilogram of mass gain ( Table 4 ). Table 2 CO 2 production (average ± standard deviation) per kilogram of bodymass per day, per kg of mass gain and average daily gainterm for five insect species, pigs and beef cattle. Species CO 2 (g/kg BM/day) CO 2 (g/kg mass gain) ADG (%) Pachnoda marginata (n = 4) 50±22 a 1,539±518 a 4.0±2.1% a Tenebrio molitor (n = 4) 61±9 b 1,031±349 b 7.3±2.5% b Blaptica dubia (n = 3) 19±3 c 337±51 c 6.1±0.7% c Acheta domesticus (n = 4) 68±10 d 1,468±971 a 7.2±3.4% b Locusta migratoria (n = 6) 110±21 e 734±119 d 19.6±2.1% d Pigs 21.6–29.6 865–1,194 3.2±0.53% Beef cattle 5.3–7.0 2,835 0.3±0.07% BM = Body Mass; ADG = Average daily gainterm; Reported values for pigs and beef cattle were obtained from: [5] Aarnink et al., 1995; [49] Groot Koerkamp et al., 1998; [52] Demmers et al., 2001; [50] Nicks et al., 2003; [59] Beauchemin & McGinn, 2005; [48] Cabaraux et al., 2009 and [53] Harper et al., 2009. Mean values bearing different superscripts in a column differ significantly (P<0.05). Table 3 CH 4 , N 2 O, CO 2 eq. and NH 3 production (average ± standard deviation) per kilogram of bodymass per day for five insect species , pigs and beef cattle. Species CH 4 (g/kg BM/day) N 2 O (mg/kg BM/day) CO 2 eq. (g/kg BM/day) NH 3 (mg/kg BM/day) Pachnoda marginata (n = 4) 0.16±0.085 a 0.0±0.03 a 4.00±2.13 a 0.1±0.16 a Tenebrio molitor (n = 4) 0.00±0.002 b 1.5±0.13 b 0.45±0.04 b 0.0±0.09 a Blaptica dubia (n = 3) 0.08±0.021 c 0.3±0.24 a 2.12±0.57 c 3.0±1.63 b Acheta domesticus (n = 4) 0.00±0.002 c 0.1±0.13 a 0.05±0.04 b 5.4±3.40 c Locusta migratoria (n = 6) 0.00±0.017 c 8.0±13.50 b 2.37±4.02 c 5.4±1.65 c Pigs 0.049–0.098 2.7–85.6 2.03–27.96 4.8–75 Beef cattle 0.239–0.283 N/A 5.98–7.08 14–170 BM = Body Mass; N/A = Not Available; Reported values for pigs and beef cattle were obtained from: [5] Aarnink et al., 1995; [49] Groot Koerkamp et al., 1998; [52] Demmers et al., 2001; [50] Nicks et al., 2003; [59] Beauchemin & McGinn, 2005; [48] Cabaraux et al., 2009 and [53] Harper et al., 2009. Mean values bearing different superscripts in a column differ significantly (P<0.05). Table 4 CH 4 , N 2 O, CO2 eq. and NH 3 production (average ± standard deviation) per kilogram of mass gain for five insect species, pigs and beef cattle. Species CH 4 (g/kg mass gain) N 2 O(mg/kg mass gain) CO 2 eq. (g/kg mass gain) NH 3 (mg/day/kg mass gain) Pachnoda marginata (n = 4) 4.9±1.96 a 1.03±1.06 a 121.86±49.09 a 3±4.8 a Tenebrio molitor (n = 4) 0.1±0.03 b 25.5±7.70 b 7.58±2.29 b 1±2.0 a Blaptica dubia (n = 3) 1.4±0.30 c 5.7±4.05 a 37.54±8.01 c 54±31.1 a Acheta domesticus (n = 4) 0.0±0.09 b 5.3±6.05 a 1.57±1.80 d 142±184.5 b Locusta migratoria (n = 6) 0.0±0.11 b 59.5±104.8 c 17.72±31.22 e 36±10.8 a Pigs 1.92–3.98 106–3457 79.59–1,130 1140–1920 Beef cattle 114 N/A 2,850 N/A BM = Body Mass; N/A = Not Available; Reported values for pigs and beef cattle were obtained from: [5] Aarnink et al., 1995; [49] Groot Koerkamp et al., 1998; [52] Demmers et al., 2001; [50] Nicks et al., 2003; [59] Beauchemin & McGinn, 2005; [48] Cabaraux et al., 2009 and [53] Harper et al., 2009. Mean values bearing different superscripts in a column differ significantly (P<0.05). 3.1 ADG and CO 2 production ADG varied between 4.0% ( P. marginata ) and 19.6% ( L. migratoria ) with the three other species having an ADG of 6–7%. CO 2 production among the five insect species differed significantly and ranged from 19 ( B. dubia ) to 110 ( L. migratoria ) g per kg BM/day. Also, the CO 2 production per kg of metabolic weightterm (i.e. the weight of metabolically active body tissue) differed greatly between species ( Table 5 ). CO 2 production expressed per kg of mass gain was intermediary for L. migratoria due to the high ADG. Still, the CO 2 production of L. migratoria per kg of mass gain was more than double the production of CO 2 by B. dubia . Pachnoda marginata had the highest production of CO 2 per kg of mass gain (1,539 g/kg), which was more than double the amount of L. migratoria . Table 5 CO 2 production (g) per kilogram of metabolic weightterm per day for five insect species, pigs and beef cattle based on Kleiber's law (B = aM b ). Species b = 0.67 b = 0.75 b = 0.82 Pachnoda marginata (n = 4) 7 11 17 Tenebrio molitor (n = 4) 3 7 12 Blaptica dubia (n = 3) 2 4 6 Acheta domesticus (n = 4) 4 8 14 Locusta migratoria (n = 6) 9 17 29 Pigs 63 50 41 Beef cattle 50 31 21 3.2 CH 4 Production of methane was detected for P. marginata and B. dubia , but not for the three other species. Pachnoda marginata produced more than three times as much CH 4 per kg of mass gain than B. dubia (4.9 vs 1.4 g). This difference was caused by a higher production of CH 4 per kg BM (0.16 g vs 0.08 g) and a lower ADG (4.0% vs 6.1%). 3.3 N 2 O N 2 O was produced only in significant amounts by T. molitor and L. migratoria (1.5 and 8.0 mg/kg BM/day, respectively). Production of N 2 O by L. migratoria per kg BM was more than 5-fold the production by T. molitor , this difference decreased to almost 2.5-fold when expressed per kg of mass gain, due to a much higher ADG of L. migratoria . 3.4 NH 3 NH 3 was produced by A. domesticus , L. migratoria , and B. dubia (3.0–5.4 mg/kg BM/day), and ranged from 36–142 mg/kg of mass gain ( Table 3 and 4 ). Significant differences (Pillai's trace: F = 4.065, P = 0.019) between daytime (12.00) and night-time (24.00) NH 3 emission levels were found for A. domesticus (6.4 and 4.4 mg/kg BM/day), L. migratoria (5.6 and 3.9 mg/kg BM/day), and B. dubia (3.4 and 2.6 mg/kg BM/day). Discussion Insects, being poikilothermsterm, do not use their metabolism to maintain a body temperature within narrow ranges, contrary to homeothermic animals. This is expected to result in higher feed conversion efficiencies. CO 2 production related to growth, has an inverse relationship with feed conversion efficiencyterm in a given situation. CO 2 production by insects depends on the species, stage of development [19] , [20] , temperature [21] , feeding status [22] , and on activity level [23] , [24] . A production of 37 g CO 2 /kg BM/day was reported for Anabrus simplex (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae), 40 g CO 2 /kg BM/day for the locust Schistocerca americana (Orthoptera; Acrididae) [25] and 94 g/kg BM/day for adult Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera; Tenebrionidae) [26] . All five species in the current study had a fairly high production of CO 2 . This might to a large extent be explained by ad libitum feeding during the experimentterm·mth that has been reported to increase oxygen consumption fivefold [22] . Reported CO 2 production for inactive, unfed, Tenebrionid adults ranged between 5.4–13.3 g/kg BM/day [27] , which is 5–10 times lower than observed for T. molitor in this experimentterm·mth. This can partially be explained by the locomotory activities of T. molitor larvae in this experimentterm·mth [37] . Furthermore, growing larvae are expected to have a higher CO 2 production than adults. The range of CO 2 production for T. molitor is comparable to the factorial metabolic scope reported for tiger beetles ( Cicindela spp: Coleoptera; Cicindelidae) of 6.1–16.5 [28] . Size differences in animals account for a difference in metabolic rate, and thereby CO 2 production. The relation between metabolic rate (B) and body mass (M) was described by Kleiber [29] as B = aM b , in which a is a constant and b = 0.75. The value of b has been much debated since [30] , [31] , [32] . For poikilothermsterm values between 0.67 and 1.0 have been reported and a comparison of several arthropod species suggested b approximates 0.82 [33] , [34] . The value chosen for b has a large impact on the metabolic weightterm and thereby the calculated CO 2 production ( Table 5 ). Applying b = 0.75 for pigs and beef cattle and b = 0.82 for insects, resulted in a lower CO 2 production based on metabolic weightterm for the studied insect species ( Table 5 ). For L. migratoria CO 2 production was only slightly lower than for beef cattle, however, for the other four species production was between 18% and 54% of that for beef cattle and between 11% and 34% of the CO 2 production of pigs. The CO 2 production per kg BM of insect species investigated in this study was higher than for pigs or cattle ( Table 3 ). This concurs with Prothero et al . (1979) [35] , who reported a higher oxygen consumption per kg of BM for insects than for mammals, assuming the respiratory quotient (CO 2 production/O 2 consumption) has similar values (0.7–1.0) for both animal groups. However, the CO 2 production per kg of mass gain for the five insect species in the current study (337–1,539 g/kg) was either 39% (minimum values) or 129% (maximum values) when compared with pigs (865–1,194 g/kg) and much lower (12%–54% respectively) than cattle (2,835 g/kg). Therefore, CO 2 production per kg of mass gain suggests higher feed conversion efficiencies for insects than for mammalian livestock. These results concur with those of other authors [13] , [14] , [36] , [37] . A similar trend was visible for ADG; the ADG for the five insect species studied was 4.0–19.6%, the minimum value of this range being close to the 3.2% reported for pigs, whereas the maximum value was 6 times higher. Compared to cattle (0.3%), insect ADG values were much higher. In general, the rate of ADG depends, amongst others, on life phase. Therefore, where available, literature data on growing animals were used. The fundamental biological differences in growth and development processes between pigs and cattle and the studied insects impeded further synchronization. CH 4 production for the species studied was in agreement with Hackstein and Stumm (1994) [38] ; for insects, only representatives of cockroaches, termites, and scarab beetles produce CH 4 . This originates from bacterial fermentation by methanobacteriaceae in the hindgut [39] . We found large variability for the N 2 O emission rates. Earlier studies in laying hens using a similar method for determining N 2 O production, concluded that production was either negligible or undetectable [7] , [40] . However, other authors [41] , [42] determined a production of 28 mg N 2 O/kg BM/day and 52 mg N 2 O/kg BM/day, respectively, indicating the difficulty of accurately determining N 2 O production [43] . In earlier studies respiration of feed was considered to have a negligible effect on utilisation of dry mass as determined gravimetrically [44] and therefore on CO 2 production. Later studies suggested that respiration by plant leaves can be an important source of error in the calculation of insect feed intake using gravimetric methods [45] and can cause major errors in energy budget studies of plant-feeding insects [46] . Our reported CO 2 production includes the respiration of the feed ( Table 6 ). The extremely high contribution to total CO 2 production by the substrate of P. marginata (92.5%) was most likely due to large amounts of fungal biomass observed in the mixed feed and substrate when insects were absent in the experimentsterm·mth aimed to obtain correction values for CO 2 -production by the substrate. No fungal growth was apparent during the experimentsterm·mth on feeding P. marginata larvae, suggesting that the contribution of the substrate to total respiration during the experimentterm·mth was much lower. We conclude that the interaction between actively feeding P. marginata larvae and the substrate suppressed fungal growth through either consumption by the beetle larvae [47] of fungal biomass or through unknown chemical or combined chemical/mechanical mechanisms. Such interactions hinder the application of realistic corrections for the contribution of feed and substrate to the total CO 2 production and thus to quantify the CO 2 production arising from insect metabolism separately. Table 6 Calculated CO 2 production of provided feed for five insect species recalculated per kg of animal body mass. Species CO2 production (g)/kg BM of insect Relative contribution Pachnoda marginata 46.2 92.46% Tenebrio molitor 2.2 3.58% Blaptica dubia 0.4 2.31% Acheta domesticus 0.9 1.34% Locusta migratoria 3.3 3.04% For all other species the relative contribution of the feed to total CO 2 production was minor, varying between 1.3% and 3.6%. Although feed respiration did have an impact on production of CO 2 , still the production of CO 2 is much higher for L. migratoria than for the other insect species. A likely explanation for this higher production of CO 2 is the 7°C higher temperature L. migratoria was kept at, as a difference of 10°C is expected to double CO 2 production. Furthermore, the comparatively high ADG of L. migratoria is expected to result in higher production of CO 2. In one of the repetitions for A. domesticus , a lower ADG and increased mortality were observed. Excluding this repetition, the emission of CO 2 per kg BM decreased slightly (68 vs 71 g/kg), but the emission of CO 2 per kg mass gain changed considerably (918 vs 1468 g/kg). This difference can for a large part be explained by a decrease in ADG (from 9.0 to 7.2%). Acheta domesticus did not produce CH 4 , but N 2 O production doubled (from 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg BM; 1.9 vs 5.3 mg/kg mass gain). The production of CO 2 eq. also increased (0.04 vs 0.05 g CO 2 eq. /kg BM and 0.57 vs 1.57 g/kg mass gain). It is well possible that the higher N 2 O production measured was caused by saprophytic bacteria utilising the dead A. domesticus and producing N 2 O [6] . Although we included this repetition in the results, it is not clear whether this represents the practical situation best. Large differences in NH 3 emission have been reported for conventional livestock. Pigs for example emit 4.8–75 mg/kg BM/day [48] , [49] , [50] , poultry 72–436 mg/kg BM/day [41] , [49] , [51] and cattle 14–170 mg/kg BM/day [49] , [52] , [53] . Several factors influence NH 3 emission, such as temperature, relative humidity, food type, moisture content, pH, wind speed, housing type, and substrate [54] , [55] . In the current experimentterm·mth, a clear NH 3 emission pattern was found; higher amounts of NH 3 were emitted during daytime for A. domesticus , L. migratoria and B. dubia , than during nighttime. Day-night rhythms for NH 3 excretion have been documented for pigs [5] and are strongly correlated with activity levels [56] . Quantitatively the differences between day and night emission levels are small; 7–10% with a maximum difference of 25% [5] . In our study this relative difference was approximately 33%. In all cases NH 3 emission levels were higher during the daytime than during the night-time. For L. migratoria this is the active period, for the nocturnal B. dubia and A. domesticus it is not, indicating that a different, unknown variable might influence NH 3 emission patterns in these insects. NH 3 concentrations in the outgoing air, and consequently calculated NH 3 emission, increased from day one to day three in B. dubia (1.57 to 4.29 mg/kg BM/day) and A. domesticus (2.46 to 8.01 mg/kg BM/day). This could indicate that NH 3 emissions might be underestimated due to the relatively short time frame of our experimentsterm·mth. For L. migratoria NH 3 emission did not increase between day 1 and day 3 (5.57 and 5.05 mg/kg BM/day), suggesting that NH 3 production was stable. This might be caused by the faeces of this species that, contrary to those of B. dubia or A. domesticus , dry quickly after defecation. We conclude that P. marginata and T. molitor probably did not emit NH 3 . Poultry deep litter systems [57] have higher NH 3 emission rates than battery systems [55] , which is explained by the presence of substrate. The presence of substrates for P. marginata and T. molitor in this study corresponded with lower NH 3 emissions. A possible explanation is that gas exchange in the container is inhibited by the substrate and therefore less emission of NH 3 was measured. However, it could also be that these species produce less NH 3 . All insect species in this study produced much lower amounts of NH 3 (3.0 to 5.4 mg/kg BM/day for A. domesticus, L. migratoria and B. dubia ) than conventional livestock (4.8–75 mg/kg BM/day for pigs and 14–170 mg/kg BM/day for cattle). Further research is needed to determine for which insect species and to what extent NH 3 emissions increase further when a longer time frame is used. Conclusions To the authors' knowledge, the study presented here is the first to report on both GHG and NH 3 emissions of edible insect species. An evaluation of the GHG emissions of edible insect species is most relevant when based on CO 2 eq. per kg of mass gain. In that way a comparison of the selected species with each other and with conventional livestock is based on a cost-benefit principle, in which the GHG production (environmental cost) is directly linked to food production (benefit). GHG emission of four of the five insect species studied was much lower than documented for pigs when expressed per kg of mass gain and only around 1% of the GHG emission for ruminants. The measured NH 3 emission levels of all insect species in this experimentterm·mth were lower than reported NH 3 emission levels for conventional livestock. The ADG of all insect species in this study was higher than for conventional livestock, while CO 2 production expressed as g/kg mass gain was comparable or lower, which indicates higher feed conversion efficiencies for insects. This study therefore indicates that insects could serve as a more environmentally friendly alternative for the production of animal protein from the perspective of GHG and NH 3 emissions. A complete lifecycle analysis for species of edible insects is lacking at this point in time [58] and should be the focus point of further studies to allow a conclusive evaluation of the sustainability of insects as a protein-rich food source. The data presented in this study are indispensable for conducting a lifecycle analysis for edible insects. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Jean Slangen of the WUR Environmental Sciences Group for his help with the analysis of nitrous oxide. The commercial rearing companies “Kreca” and “van de Ven insectenkwekerij” are kindly acknowledged for their contributions. Dr. T. Vellinga is kindly acknowledged for his careful review of this manuscript. Footnotes