Glioblastoma: Microenvironment and Niche Concept. — TEI-tagged view

Davide SchifferpersName, Laura AnnovazzipersName, Cristina CasalonepersName, Cristiano CoronapersName, Marta MellaipersName (2018date). “Glioblastoma: Microenvironment and Niche Concept..” Cancerstitle·j.

Object of study — the nicheterm·dom concept extended from normal neural stem cells to tumor stem cells in glioblastomaterm·dom

Research question — how the interaction of GBterm·dom stem cells and endothelial cellsterm·key in nichesterm·dom drives tumor growth, invasion and recurrence

Contribution — a pathological account of perivascular, perinecrotic and invasive nichesterm·dom centred on the endothelial cellterm·key and tumor stem cell pair

Full text — tagged

Glioblastomaterm·dom: Microenvironmentterm·key and Nicheterm·dom Concept.

Abstract The nicheterm·dom concept was originally developed to describe the location of normal neural stem cells (NSCs) in the subependymal layer of the sub-ventricular zone. In this paper, its significance has been extended to the location of tumor stem cells in glioblastomaterm·dom (GBterm·dom) to discuss the relationship between GBterm·dom stem cells (GSCs) and endothelial cellsterm·key (ECs). Their interaction is basically conceived as responsible for tumor growth, invasion and recurrence. Nichesterm·dom are described as the points of utmost expression of the tumor microenvironmentterm·dom (TMEterm·dom), therefore including everything in the tumor except for tumor cells: NSCs, reactive astrocytesterm·key, ECs, glioma-associated microglia/macrophagesterm·dom (GAMsterm·dom), myeloid cells, pericytesterm·key, fibroblasts, etc. and all intrinsic and extrinsic signaling pathways. Perivascular (PVNsterm·dom), perinecrotic (PNNsterm·dom) and invasive nichesterm·dom were described from the pathological point of view, highlighting the basic significance of the EC/tumor stem cell couple. PNNterm·dom development was reinterpreted based on the concept that hyperproliferative areas of GBterm·dom are composed of GSCs/progenitors. TMEterm·dom was depicted in its function as the main regulator of everything that happens in the tumor. A particular emphasis was given to GAMsterm·dom, pericytesterm·key and reactive astrocytesterm·key as important elements affecting proliferation, growth, invasion and resistance to therapies of tumor cells.

Keywords: glioblastomaterm·dom, microenvironmentterm·key, nicheterm·dom, pericytesterm·key, reactive astrocytesterm·key 1. Introduction Glioblastomaterm·dom (GBterm·dom) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults accounting for >50% of the tumors of the brain. After surgery, radio- and chemotherapy, survival remains dismal and less than 15 months [ 1 ].

Three main properties of the tumor hampers its successful treatment: (i) The occurrence of GBterm·dom stem cells (GSCs); (ii) the tumor heterogeneity; (iii) the microenvironmentterm·key and the nichesterm·dom. All these features represent crucial points in the tumor therapy.

The hypothesis of a GSC origin of the tumor is based on the assumption that they represent a rare subset of cells within GBterm·dom with significant expansion capacity and the ability to generate new tumors [ 2 ]. The rest of the tumor is composed of variously differentiated cells with limited progenitor capacity or terminally differentiated non-tumorigenic cells [ 3 ]. Therefore, cell heterogeneity and hierarchical organization of GBterm·dom largely depends on its origin from stem cells or progenitors. Other possible origins of GBterm·dom are: (i) From mature astrocytes that may acquire stemness properties through a dedifferentiation process [ 4 , 5 ]; (ii) from neuron glial antigen 2 (NG2) or chondroitin sulphate proteoglyacan 4 (CSPG4)-positive cells, mostly in tumors arising far from the ventricles or with (secondary) Isocitrate Dehydrogenase ( IDH )-mutant GBterm·dom [ 6 ]. Reactive astrocytesterm·key may contribute to glioma development, too [ 7 , 8 ]. In fact, they are derived from precursors with a stem-like phenotype [ 9 ]. Alternatively, GSCs may represent a sheer functional status [ 10 ], depending on the microenvironmentterm·key regulation [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. The location and generation of GSCs inside the tumor have long been discussed [ 3 ]. They may occur either throughout the tumor [ 15 ] or, most probably, in proximity of the central necrosis [ 16 , 17 , 18 ]. They can be found in the highly proliferative areas of GBterm·dom close to central necrosis [ 12 , 19 ]. These areas are characterized by high cell and vessel density, high values of proliferation markers, high expression of hypoxiaterm·key and by the occurrence of circumscribed necrosis; they are in contiguity with the infiltration edges of the tumor.

There is a general agreement that GSCs in the tumor reside in nichesterm·dom that are similar to those hosting normal neural stem cells (NSCs) in the subventricular zone (SVZ) [ 20 ]. In these nichesterm·dom, neuroblasts, quiescent NSCs and transit-amplifying cells (A, B and C cells, respectively) occur [ 21 ]. They are surrounded by ependymal cells projecting an apical process toward the ventricle. They also develop close to vessels, essential for the stemness maintenance [ 22 ]. The main function of the nicheterm·dom in the SVZ is thus to preserve stemness of NSCs [ 22 , 23 ].

The nicheterm·dom concept in malignant gliomas was originally developed to describe the sites where GSCs reside in the tumor and where the tumor microenvironmentterm·dom (TMEterm·dom) exerts its maximum influence. Therefore, for the definition of nicheterm·dom, two conditions must be respected: (i) That GSCs do occur and (ii) that they have direct contact with endothelial cellsterm·key (ECs). These conditions are fully realized only in perivascular nichesterm·dom (PVNsterm·dom) that develop in exchange vessels and not in larger transport vessels with a well-defined layer wall. However, in a broader sense, the term nicheterm·dom also includes perinecrotic nichesterm·dom (PNNsterm·dom) that do contain GSCs, but not ECs, the occurrence of which precedes necrosis development, being not a reactive phenomenon. On the other hand, GSCs/progenitors in different differentiation stages populate solid proliferative areas of GBterm·dom, apparently not associated with necrosis or vessels; their differentiation stage is regulated by the TMEterm·dom.

2. Pathology of Nichesterm·dom 2.1. Perivascular Nichesterm·dom A census of the possible cell components, besides tumor cells, would include normal and reactive astrocytesterm·key, pericytesterm·key, glioma-associated microglia/macrophagesterm·dom (GAMsterm·dom), myeloid cells, fibroblasts, and, obviously, GSCs and normal NSCs [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. In their simplest form, PVNsterm·dom are represented by capillaries or arterioles where ECs are in direct contact with stem cells [ 28 ] ( Figure 1 a). Larger vessels with defined layers, such as transport vessels, cannot function as nichesterm·dom, because they do not allow direct contact between GSCs and ECs. Therefore, not all areas containing vessels and tumor cells would deserve the name nicheterm·dom and are crucial for tumor growth, diffusion, and resistance to therapies [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. The non-cellular component is given by intrinsic and extrinsic signaling pathways [ 25 ].

Glioblastomaterm·dom, IDH wild type. ( a ) CD34+ endothelial cellsterm·key of arterioles and capillaries in direct contact with Nestin+ tumor cells; double immunostaining with CD34 (DAB) and Nestin ( Fast Red ), original magnification (OM) ×400. ( b ) Vessel co-option. Sleeve of tumor cells around capillaries; CD34, DAB, OM ×400. ( c ) Id ., with several Nestin+ tumor cells; DAB, OM ×200. ( d ) Mild infiltration. Reactive astrocytesterm·key on small vessels; GFAP, DAB, OM ×200; ( e ) More intense infiltration. Reactive astrocytesterm·key on vessels; GFAP, DAB, OM ×200; ( f ) High infiltration. Reactive astrocytesterm·key with end-feet on small vessels; GFAP, DAB, OM ×400. IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; DAB, 3,3′- Diaminobenzidine .

Nichesterm·dom are mainly found in infiltration and invasion areas of the tumor, where they are called invasive nichesterm·dom [ 29 , 31 ]. In invasion areas, tumor cells infiltrate normal tissue as single cells and grow along the basal lamina of vessels to form the so-called vessel co-option ( Figure 1 b,c), slipping between vessels and reactive astrocytesterm·key [ 32 ]; the detachment of their end-feet from vessels contributes to the brain-blood-barrier (BBB) disruption ( Figure 1 d–f) [ 33 ].

Reactive astrocytesterm·key produce angiopoietins 1 (Ang-1) and 2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [ 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Nestin+ and Sox2+ tumor cells representing the neoplastic counterpart of normal progenitor cells. They trigger pericyteterm·key dissociation, matrix and basal lamina degradation, vessel dilation, leakiness and extracellular deposition of fibrin, to form the so-called “mother vessels” or chronic hyperplasia [ 37 ]. In the absence of inhibition from pericytesterm·key, ECs proliferate ( Figure 2 a,b); a switch from an avascular to a vascular state follows and sprouts are formed through EC proliferation ( Figure 2 c,d). BBB undergoes disruption with leak of macrophages from the vessels ( Figure 2 e–g). Pericytesterm·key, recruited by platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) [ 38 ], dissociate and ECs proliferate to form new channels that cover with an increased number of pericytesterm·key ( Figure 2 h,i). Whether they are venules or arterioles or neo-formed tumor vessels that do not correspond to any type of normal vessels is difficult to demonstrate. Hypoxiaterm·key obviously occurs, as everywhere in GBterm·dom. Glomeruli appear later, surrounded by macrophages and reactive astrocytesterm·key. In gliomas, glomeruli formation during angiogenesisterm·key takes place as in normal embryos, with the difference that, in the tumor, it is dysregulated and bumpy structures are built that do not contribute to the supply of nutrients and oxygen to the tumor [ 39 ].

Glioblastomaterm·dom, IDH wild type. ( a ) Mild infiltration with inital vessel increase; H&E, original magnification (OM) ×200. ( b ) Id ., CD34+ endothelial cellsterm·key; DAB, OM ×200. ( c ) More advanced tumor infiltration, small vessel with endothelial proliferation and sprouts; H&E, OM ×400. ( d ) Id ., CD34+ endothelial cellsterm·key; DAB, OM ×400. ( e ) Mild infiltration with perivascular macrophages; CD163, DAB, OM ×200. ( f ) Infiltration area with leaked perivascular macrophages; CD163, DAB, OM ×200. ( g ) Ramified microgliaterm·key in tumor parenchyma and perivascular macrophages; Iba-1, DAB, OM ×200. ( h ) Proliferated tumor vessels with NG2/CSPG4+ endothelial cellsterm·key and pericytesterm·key; DAB, OM ×200. ( i ) Glomeruli with α-SMA pericytesterm·key; DAB, OM ×200. IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; DAB, DAB, 3,3′- Diaminobenzidine .

Angiogenesisterm·key is not the only possibility the vasculature has to expand, since vasculogenesis and trans-differentiation of tumor cells into ECs may occur as well [ 35 , 40 , 41 ].

2.2. Perinecrotic Nichesterm·dom Classically, circumscribed necrosis has been interpreted as due to a vessel occlusion or an intravascular thrombosis [ 42 ]. Perinecrotic pseudopalisades have been considered as due to tumor cells fleeing necrosis [ 43 ]. GSCs would be induced by hypoxiaterm·key and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and 2 (HIF-2) [ 35 ]. Alternatively, or additionally, GSCs/progenitors are believed to regularly populate hyperproliferative areas of GBterm·dom near central necrosis with high cell and small vessel density, several mitoses and a high Ki-67/MIB-1 labeling index [ 3 ]. These areas are regulated by the microenvironmentterm·key and are recognizable because of their Nestin, Sox2 and CD133 positivity ( Figure 3 a–k). In these areas, circumscribed necrosis develops as the result of the imbalance between the high proliferation rate of tumor cells and the low one of ECs [ 44 , 45 ]. Indeed, circumscribed necroses are always found in avascular areas of hyperproliferative districts ( Figure 3 a), close to central necrosis of GBterm·dom. The cell population expressing Nestin, Sox2 and other stemness markers, including CD133, remains to border the necrosis as remnants of GSCs/progenitors that populated the area and escaped necrosis [ 12 , 13 ] ( Figure 3 d,e,h–k).

Glioblastomaterm·dom, IDH wild type. ( a ) Circumscribed necrosis in a hyperproliferative area; H&E, original magnification (OM) ×200. The hyperproliferative zone bordering necrosis is almost GFAP-negative; DAB, OM ×200 ( b ) and ×400 ( c ). The same area is highly Nestin-positive; DAB, OM ×200 ( d ) and ×400 ( e ). The same area shows a high Ki-67/MIB-1 labeling index; DAB, OM ×200 ( f ) and ×400 ( g ). The same area is highly Sox2-positive; DAB, OM ×200 ( h ) and ×400 ( i ). The same area is positive for Musashi-1, cryostat section, immunofluorescence (green) ( j ) and highly CD133-positive, cryostat sections, immunofluorescence (red), both OM ×400 ( k ). IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; DAB, DAB, 3,3′- Diaminobenzidine [ 49 ].

A recent paper took into consideration all nicheterm·dom types described in the literature (perivascular, hypoxic, immune, extracellular matrix nichesterm·dom, etc.) concluding that they are not distinct from one another but they are parts of a single GSC nicheterm·dom, according to the hypoxic periarteriolar nicheterm·dom model [ 46 , 47 ] in which cathepsin K would play a functional role [ 48 ]. Roughly, they correspond to the one described as prototype of the PVNterm·dom.

3. Tumor Microenvironmentterm·dom (TMEterm·dom) TMEterm·dom represents the non-cancerous cells inside the tumor, including normal and reactive astrocytesterm·key, GSCs, fibroblasts, immune cells, microgliaterm·key/macrophages, ECs and vascular pericytesterm·key. It also includes proteins and non-protein biomolecules (polysaccharides, hormones, nitric oxide (NO), etc.) produced by all cell types within the TMEterm·dom to support the tumor growth. TMEterm·dom can be mainly detected and demonstrated in nichesterm·dom, but is supposed to regulate everything in the tumor and in the tissue around the tumor or in the brain adjacent to the tumor. GSCs, for instance, mainly occur in nichesterm·dom, but they can also be found in proliferative areas of GBterm·dom as well [ 13 , 50 , 51 ], even conceived as being of hypoxic origin. As a matter of fact, hypoxiaterm·key occurs in the whole tumor, distributed with variable intensity. In necrotic foci, it assumes the typical phenotype of necrosis [ 52 , 53 ], but it may occur in a spot-like manner, with minor intensity and with a not yet modified phenotype. Therefore, besides central and circumscribed necrosis, isolated tumor cells may undergo death as phenotypic hypoxiaterm·key translation because of individual tumor cell responses to a range of oxygen tension [ 29 ]. Other examples are available in the brain tumor pathology. Single apoptotic cells may occur in proliferative areas, due to both the intrinsic, transcriptional pathway of apoptosis associated with duplication, and to the extrinsic pathway associated with a phenotypically subliminal necrosis [ 3 ].

In PVNsterm·dom, the most important signaling is supposed to occur between GSCs/progenitors and ECs [ 3 ] ( Figure 4 ).

Relationship between a stem cell/progenitor and an endothelial cellterm·key [ 13 ].

The stemness status of GSCs/progenitors is maintained by ECs via pathways such as NO, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) [ 46 ] and Notchterm·key activation [ 13 , 25 , 54 ]. Notch-1 and Notch-2 are expressed on GSCs whereas their ligands, Delta-like ligand 4 (DLL4) and Jagged 1 (JAG1), are expressed on the ECs [ 55 ]. GSCs/progenitors would promote EC proliferation, eliciting angiogenesisterm·key through VEGF, and hosting the bone marrow-derived endothelial precursor cells (EPCs) at the tumor. After activation through its ligands Notchterm·key also leads to the final activation of target genes such as HES1 and HEY1 [ 51 , 56 ]. This has been confirmed by the blockade of Notchterm·key by γ-secretase inhibitionterm that reduces the expression of stemness antigensterm such as Nestin, CD133 and Bmi-1. It also inhibits in vitro human GB-derived neurosphere formation and xenografts [ 57 ] promoting their differentiation into blood vessels inserted into the pre-existing vasculature [ 27 ].

Another efficient factor is hypoxiaterm·key, considered to be a hallmark of GBterm·dom [ 53 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ] that activates pro-angiogenic factors, such as Ang-1/2, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), PDGF-BB/PDGFR and VEGF/VEGFR through HIF-1/2 [ 62 ]. Therefore, hypoxiaterm·key triggers multiple signaling pathways that affect GSCs self-renewal, proliferation, cell invasion and survival [ 63 ]. In addition, it also influences therapeutic resistance of GBterm·dom and enhances genetic instability of tumor cells. The low oxygen content in the tumor tissue attenuates the expression of DNA Mismatch Repair (MMR) genes and inhibits free radicals generated from radiation treatment thus impeding therapeutic efficacy. The Multi-Drug Resistance Gene 1 (MDR1/ABCB1) encoding for P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is activated in response to hypoxiaterm·key [ 64 ]. A complicated series of spatially heterogeneous tissue events follows hypoxiaterm·key in GBterm·dom [including energetic metabolism (29)] promoting the malignant phenotype and tumor heterogeneity [ 65 ].

Finally, TMEterm·dom may control the regulation of the equilibrium between tumor stem and non-stem cells ( Figure 5 ).

( a ) Development of circumscribed necrosis. ( b ) Equilibrium between tumor non-stem cells and tumor stem cells [ 66 ].

4. Glioma-Associated Microglia/Macrophagesterm·dom (GAMsterm·dom)—Inflammatory Microenvironmentterm·key GAMsterm·dom cannot be interpreted using the same criteria as for macrophages in other pathological conditions. A fundamental distinction is made between: (i) Resident microglia-derived cells (i.e., the so-called reactive microgliaterm·key with a typical histological appearance) and (ii) blood-borne macrophages. The described dichotomy is given with a certain degree of approximation as, often, the distinction between the two cell types is not so sharp. However, different types of myeloid cells occur. It is worth considering that both resident microgliaterm·key and blood-borne monocytes derive from the yolk sac in different times during embryonic development, the former earlier and directly, and the latter later and through the bone marrow.

The great amount of GAMsterm·dom, almost equal to the number of tumor cells, raises many still unanswered questions. For instance, GAMsterm·dom are mainly identified as reactive ramified microgliaterm·key in low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and as blood-borne monocytes in high-grade gliomas (HGGs) ( Figure 2 e–g). Since microgliaterm·key/macrophages and other myeloid cells are strictly connected with the immunological features of gliomas, there is wide literature on the subject suggesting various therapeutic strategies. Basically, there is compelling evidence that GAMsterm·dom favor tumor progression [ 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ], but uncertainties concerning the M1/M2 polarization and the extent of phagocytosis still exist. Very likely, the dilemma whether they are “friends or foes” [ 80 ] has not been completely solved because of some demonstrations on the “good” role of GAMsterm·dom. Scavenger receptors and phagocytosis seem to be completely lacking; however, Fc-γ receptor expression occurs in the solid tumor and, at a lesser extent, in the peritumoral tissue [ 81 , 82 ].

Monocytes [ 83 ], tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) [ 84 ] and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [ 85 ] are commonly found within the TMEterm·dom [ 70 , 86 , 87 , 88 ]. An intense signaling exchange takes place among MDSCs, ECs, macrophages, tumor cells and reactive cells [ 29 ]. In addition, the influence of chemokines and their receptors must be considered. The most studied signal axes include CXCL12 (SDF-1)-CXCR4, CXCL2-CXCR2, CCL2-CCR2, CX3CL1-CX3CR1, but the problem is far from being completely clarified. The first interaction occurs between macrophages and GSCs [ 83 , 89 ] with the latter activating M2 anti-inflammatory macrophages and, conversely, being maintained in stemness through CXCL12 (SDF-1)-CXCR4 axis. GSCs secrete periostin that recruits M2 tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and promotes glioma growth through intergin α v β3 [ 90 ]. Moreover, TGF-β, released from TAMs, induces matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) and 9 (MMP-9) expression from the tumor to enhance GSC invasion [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. On the other hand, TGF-β, shed from GSCs, promotes the polarization of microgliaterm·key/macrophages into the M2 immunosuppressive phenotype enhancing the capacity of TAMs to inhibit T cell proliferation, thereby promoting tumor progression [ 25 , 95 ]. MDSCs mediate immune suppression and support glioma growth, also interacting with GSCs [ 96 ], mainly by immunosuppressing monocytes and other T cell populations [ 29 ].

GBterm·dom can be classified into Proneural (PN), Neural (N), Mesenchymal (MES) and Classical (CL) subtypes, each with its own GSC content [ 97 ]. MES GSCs show a preferential activation of the Notchterm·key signaling pathway and PDGF receptor, whereas activation of the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway and glycolysis-mediated metabolism pathway prevail in PN GSCs. Radiation therapy may induce in GSCs a cellular transformation resembling the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), called proneural-mesenchymal-transition (PMT) [ 98 ]. Triggering PMT GSCs are maintained, and in this step crucial is osteopontin (OPN) that, secreted by immune cells, promotes GSCs phenotype by activating CD44 [ 99 ]. A complicated mechanism involves PN and MES GBterm·dom expression subtypes, PMT, CD44, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), but how GSCs, ECs and TAMs interact has not yet been completely understood. Several studies on microgliaterm·key/macrophages in gliomas focused on improving patient survival [ 70 , 100 , 101 ]; some of them, mainly in recent times, concerned the use of dendritic cells (DCs). DCs are granular lymphocytes with cell surface markers: major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules, MHC class II molecules and CD86, all of which can help to identify DCs from other myeloid lineage cells [ 102 ]. They recognize and bind antigens in their immature state and then migrate to lymphoid organs where they present processed peptides to T cells in the context of MHC I or II molecules [ 103 , 104 ] inducing tumor antigen-specific immune responses. Additionally, DCs display various features in the immune system that balance the complex system of inflammatory and inhibitory immune reactions in the TMEterm·dom [ 105 ]. Several studies have been designed with a therapeutic task [ 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 ].

5. Pericytesterm·key There is a cross-talk among vascular pericytesterm·key and the other components of the TMEterm·dom, mainly ECs and GSCs. Their interactions during tumor angiogenesisterm·key have been widely discussed. Basically, aberrations in pericyte-EC signaling networks have been regarded as contributing to tumor angiogenesisterm·key [ 110 ]. Pericytesterm·key promote vascular maturation, express PDGFRβ, α-smooth muscle Actin (α-SMA), Desmin and NG2/CSPG4 ( Figure 2 h,i). Pericytesterm·key originate from mesoderm-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) or from neuroectoderm-derived neural crest cells. They are an essential element of the neurovascular unit and participate in the function of BBB. Their reciprocal signaling with ECs, mainly through PDGFRβ and CXCL12 (SDF-1)-CXCR4, TGF-β and Ang-1 has been widely discussed [ 111 ]. Pericytesterm·key may derive from GSCs undergoing mesenchymal differentiation and support vessel function and tumor growth. GSCs are recruited toward ECs via the CXCL12 (SDF-1)-CXCR4 axis and induced to become pericytesterm·key predominantly by TGF-β. Thus, GSCs contribute to vascular pericytesterm·key that may actively remodel PVNsterm·dom [ 112 ].

NG2/CSPG4 promotes tumor growth as a component of both tumor and stromal cells; it is expressed by other cell types, mainly oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs). In myeloid-specific and pericyte-specific NG2/CSPG4 null mice, a reduced growth of the tumor was observed. The loss of pericyte-EC interactions reduces the formation of endothelial junctions, assembly of the basal lamina and reduces macrophage recruitment [ 113 ]. MSCs injected into brain tumors in mouse models resulted in close associations with the tumor vasculature, also with up-regulation of the expression of pericyteterm·key markers [ 25 ]. Through the NG2/CSPG4 knockdown in pericytesterm·key by small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection, 60% reduction of β1 integrin activation and 40% of FAK phosphorylation occur with a concomitant decrease of pericyteterm·key proliferation and migration [ 114 ]. The NG2/CSPG4 ectodomain, shed from pericytesterm·key due to a proteolytic cleavage, may recruit at a distance ECs to sites of angiogenesisterm·key and may activate β1 integrin on ECs.

In the neo-angiogenesis of GBterm·dom, pericytesterm·key start increasing together with the disruption of BBB becoming a good marker of neo-vascularization [ 31 ].

6. Reactive Astrocytesterm·key Reactive astrocytesterm·key are a constant phenomenon associated with gliomas [ 115 ]. They can surround the tumor or can be located inside. Outside the tumor, they can be found in early or in mature stages. In the first case, they are GFAP+ and Nestin+, regularly distributed with round cytoplasms and short processes, often in mitosis. In the second case, they are more regularly distributed, mainly GFAP+ and with several and long processes. Inside the tumor, they can be observed in continuity with the peritumoral gliosis or entrapped in the advancing tumor with a large, gemistocytic type cytoplasm. They are often distributed around vessels, or they may form areas with a dense GFAP+ fibrillary net. Reactive astrocytesterm·key can also be located in highly proliferative areas, around circumscribed necrosis. This means that they may persist for a long time inside the tumor, often in the form of round, GFAP+ cells. The tumor growth speed plays an important role in the reactive astrocyteterm·key morphology; in fact, slow growing tumors may include mature astrocytes. The distinction between reactive astrocytesterm·key and tumor cells is not easy [ 116 ]: the finding of a GFAP+ cell in mitosis does not rule out the possibility that it could be a reactive astrocyteterm·key. However, their histological aspect and distribution has been known for a long time and most GFAP positivity of cells in (primary) IDH -wild type GBterm·dom, must be ascribed to entrapped reactive astrocytesterm·key [ 39 ]. From the functional point of view, peritumoral gliosis cannot be compared with gliosis in other pathological conditions and, for this reason, it must deserve a different interpretation. Notably, reactive astrocytesterm·key from tumor infiltration areas send end-feet to arterioles and capillaries, from which they are detached by infiltrating tumor cells, thus contributing to BBB disruption. In addition, reactive astrocytesterm·key play a major role in the TMEterm·dom.

There are recent and exhaustive reviewsterm·mth on the subject [ 117 ]. Currently, the general opinion is that reactive astrocytesterm·key favor invasion and progression of gliomas exerting a chemoprotection and an immune protection of tumor cells. Reactive astrocytesterm·key interact with glioma cells and facilitate the progression, aggression and survival of tumors by releasing different cytokines. This interaction is further promoted through ion channels and ion transporters that enhance the migratory capability and invasiveness of tumor cells by modifying H + and Ca 2+ concentrations and stimulating cell volume changes [ 115 ].

Several mechanisms involved in the cross-talk between reactive astrocytesterm·key and gliomas favor their proliferation, invasion and resistance to radio- and chemotherapy: (i) Expression of MMP-2, which favors infiltration and secretes CXCL12 (SDF-1) for proliferation and migration [ 118 ]; (ii) synergistic relationship with tumor cells concerning the p53 function between apoptosis and proliferation [ 119 ]; (iii) regulation through NF-κB activated by receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) that decreases IkBα [ 120 , 121 ]; (iv) the gap junction channel protein 43 (Cx43) that confers resistance to glioma cells and prevents apoptosis [ 122 ]; (v) indirect cross-talk via chemokines (interleukin 6, IL-6), TGF-β, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), monocyte chemotactic protein 4 (MCP-4), interleukin 19 (IL-19), VEGF and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), promoting tumor cell invasion [ 123 , 124 ]; (vi) microRNAs [ 125 , 126 ], oncogene astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1), which is associated with poor survival of gliomas [ 127 ] and acts modulating PI3K/Akt, NF-kB, MMP-2 and MMP-9 [ 128 , 129 ] the inhibition of which induces apoptosis [ 130 ]; (vii) L-Glutamin [ 117 ].

In a murine glioma resection and recurrence model, surgical resection has been showed to alter the reactive astrocyteterm·key component of the peritumoral microenvironmentterm·key and injured astrocytes to induce in vitro alterations of transcriptome and secretome that significantly influence tumor biology. This may be important for therapies [ 131 ].

All available speculations on the significance of reactive astrocytesterm·key are based on in vitro experiments or on the demonstration that certain pathways play a role in tumor progression. It is possible that these pathways belong to the tumor cells themselves. Moreover, there is no direct demonstration of a negative influence of reactive astrocytesterm·key on survival in human gliomas. The possibility that reactive astrogliosis opposes tumor invasion, without success, cannot be completely ruled out. Another unanswered question is whether entrapped reactive astrocytesterm·key in the advancing tumor may transform into tumor cells.

7. Conclusions The great amount of contributions on radio- and chemotherapy did not substantially modify survival of GBterm·dom patients. Studies on cell death-based treatments continue [ 132 ] and new approaches are suggested [ 133 ], but more recently, studies on immunity of GBterm·dom have appeared in the literature and special attention is being paid to vaccines, cytokines, DCs, gene therapy and viruses [ 134 , 135 , 136 ]. This seems to be a possible path to advantageous novelties.

Funding This work was supported by Fondazione Compagnia di San Paolo (Turin, Italy) (Grant N° 2016.AAI2705.U3302) and Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Vercelli (Vercelli, Italy).

Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References