Chirality detection of enantiomers using twisted optical metamaterials — TEI-tagged view

Yang Zhao, Amir N. Askarpour, Liuyang Sun, Jinwei Shi, Xiaoqin Li, Andrea Alù · 2017 · physics · doi:10.1038/ncomms14180 · TEI xml · tagged edition · index · concepts · authors
Where this record's text came from. 2026-09-28 schema-0.3 pass: every quote ON THIS RECORD verified as an exact substring of the staged text and anchored, at the merge dated above; concept terms verified present; every edge endpoint an existing node.
3 quotations on this page contain a reference number where the paper printed a superscript. This journal style prints citations as raised numerals — parameters12,13 — and the extraction flattened them into the line, so the sentence reads parameters 12 , 13 . The digits are citation markers and not part of what the author wrote. The quotes keep them for the same reason they keep every other extraction fault: a quote is reproduced exactly or it proves nothing.
Other fields define these differently the same word, defined another way in another discipline
CD 2 fields
Tags on this paper every tag the record carries, whether or not the words occur in the text below — a number is how many papers in the corpus carry that tag; a tag with no number is unique to this paper
CD4 circular dichroism enantiomers twisted metamaterials metasurfaces plasmonic metamaterials circular dichroism spectroscopy radiative loss background CD signals ConA homotetramer chiral enhancement factor experiment113

Colour legend

Nature Communications<title level="j">A work — the journal / venue title.
2017<date>A year or date.

Yang ZhaopersName, Amir N. AskarpourpersName, Liuyang SunpersName, Jinwei ShipersName, Xiaoqin LipersName, Andrea AlùpersName (2017date). “Chirality detection of enantiomers using twisted optical metamaterials.” Nature Communicationstitle·j.

Object of study — detecting the handedness of chiral molecules with twisted plasmonic metamaterialsterm·mth

Research question — how to detect the handedness of enantiomersterm·dom at much lower concentration and in milliseconds

Contribution — an enantiomeric pair of twisted metamaterialsterm·mth that cancels background CDterm·mth and isolates the molecular chiral response

Cross-disciplinary analysis
content-tags & facets: phenomenon · claim-type · cross-domain-transfer · mechanism · claim-relation · replication-status · limitation — grounded in the full text
phenomenonnear-field chirality enhancement of molecular circular dichroism — “After post-processing, the near-field enhancement effects associated with the achiral enhancement factor are cancelled out, confirming that the near-field chirality enhancement factor is the coefficient that has the essential role in detecting enantiomers in our proposed scheme.”
claim-typemethod — “Here we exploit strong chiral interactions with plasmonic metamaterials with specifically designed optical response to sense chiral molecules down to zeptomole levels, several orders of magnitude smaller than what is typically detectable with conventional circular dichroism spectroscopy.”
method — evidence — “To demonstrate these properties and identify the optimal geometry, we constructed several twisted metamaterials composed of two stacked metasurfaces separated by an 80 nm dielectric layer with densely packed nanorod inclusions and five different twisting angles from one metasurface to the second, spanning from ±30° to ±90° at an interval of ±15°.”
object of study — evidence — “Here we exploit strong chiral interactions with plasmonic metamaterials with specifically designed optical response to sense chiral molecules down to zeptomole levels, several orders of magnitude smaller than what is typically detectable with conventional circular dichroism spectroscopy.”
research question — evidence — “Therefore, the capability of detecting the handedness of enantiomers with significantly less concentration in millisecond time scales would be extremely beneficial for pharmaceutical applications.”
contribution — evidence — “More importantly, our experiments demonstrate that the specific use of a pair of twisted metamaterials with opposite rotation allows us to suppress the background CD response from the metamaterials and to isolate the molecular chiral response to univocally reveal its handedness.”
mechanismchirality enhancement The near-field chirality enhancement factor, not the achiral field enhancement, drives the detection. — “After post-processing, the near-field enhancement effects associated with the achiral enhancement factor are cancelled out, confirming that the near-field chirality enhancement factor is the coefficient that has the essential role in detecting enantiomers in our proposed scheme.”mechanisms[0]
mechanismbackground cancellation Summing measurements on the mirror-image pair removes the metamaterial's own CD. — “More importantly, our experiments demonstrate that the specific use of a pair of twisted metamaterials with opposite rotation allows us to suppress the background CD response from the metamaterials and to isolate the molecular chiral response to univocally reveal its handedness.”mechanisms[1]
senseenantiomeric pair of metamaterials - +60 and -60 degree twisted metamaterials with opposite CD, summed to cancel their own background — “More importantly, our experiments demonstrate that the specific use of a pair of twisted metamaterials with opposite rotation allows us to suppress the background CD response from the metamaterials and to isolate the molecular chiral response to univocally reveal its handedness.”senses[0]
relationCD —same-as→ circular dichroism — ( ) — “To date, molecular chirality is routinely determined using circular dichroism (CD) measurements 5 , 6 .” — “determined using circular dichroism (CD)”concept_edges[0]
weightCD —same-as→ circular dichroism — 0.95 — “To date, molecular chirality is routinely determined using circular dichroism (CD) measurements 5 , 6 .”concept_edges[0]
relationplasmonic metamaterials —contrasted-with→ circular dichroism spectroscopy — smaller than — “Here we exploit strong chiral interactions with plasmonic metamaterials with specifically designed optical response to sense chiral molecules down to zeptomole levels, several orders of magnitude smaller than what is typically detectable with conventional circular dichroism spectroscopy.” — “several orders of magnitude smaller than what is typically detectable with conventional circular dichroism spectroscopy”concept_edges[1]
weightplasmonic metamaterials —contrasted-with→ circular dichroism spectroscopy — 0.8 — “Here we exploit strong chiral interactions with plasmonic metamaterials with specifically designed optical response to sense chiral molecules down to zeptomole levels, several orders of magnitude smaller than what is typically detectable with conventional circular dichroism spectroscopy.”concept_edges[1]
relationmetasurfaces —part-of→ twisted metamaterials — composed of — “To demonstrate these properties and identify the optimal geometry, we constructed several twisted metamaterials composed of two stacked metasurfaces separated by an 80 nm dielectric layer with densely packed nanorod inclusions and five different twisting angles from one metasurface to the second, spanning from ±30° to ±90° at an interval of ±15°.” — “we constructed several twisted metamaterials composed of two stacked metasurfaces”concept_edges[2]
weightmetasurfaces —part-of→ twisted metamaterials — 0.85 — “To demonstrate these properties and identify the optimal geometry, we constructed several twisted metamaterials composed of two stacked metasurfaces separated by an 80 nm dielectric layer with densely packed nanorod inclusions and five different twisting angles from one metasurface to the second, spanning from ±30° to ±90° at an interval of ±15°.”concept_edges[2]
relationradiative loss —causes→ background CD signals — resulting in — “More importantly, the radiative loss of the metamaterial is relatively broadband, resulting in its large background CD signals that may mask any chiral signals from the analytes, making the frequency shift undetectable.” — “the radiative loss of the metamaterial is relatively broadband, resulting in its large background CD signals”concept_edges[3]
weightradiative loss —causes→ background CD signals — 0.8 — “More importantly, the radiative loss of the metamaterial is relatively broadband, resulting in its large background CD signals that may mask any chiral signals from the analytes, making the frequency shift undetectable.”concept_edges[3]
relationConA —is-a→ homotetramer — is a — “ConA is a homotetramer with a dimension of 6.3 × 8.7 × 8.9 nm determined by X-ray crystallography, which indicates the most compact structural dimension 39 .” — “ConA is a homotetramer”concept_edges[4]
weightConA —is-a→ homotetramer — 0.9 — “ConA is a homotetramer with a dimension of 6.3 × 8.7 × 8.9 nm determined by X-ray crystallography, which indicates the most compact structural dimension 39 .”concept_edges[4]
replicationoriginal
limitationIt still measures cumulative optical activity and says nothing about individual chiral centers. — “Although our method still measures cumulative optical activity, sharing a similar drawback as conventional CD measurements that cannot provide specific information on chiral centers, our measurements take only a fraction of a second, orders of magnitude faster than currently available commercial equipment for CD measurements.”limitations[0]
Content tags
content-observations: finding · quantity · variable · definition · key-term — grounded in the full text
findingThe enhanced CD reaches a few degrees, two orders of magnitude above conventional CD spectroscopy. — “We observe an enhanced cumulative CD spectrum of molecules reaching up to a few degrees, two orders of magnitude larger than what conventional CD spectroscopy can typically measure 17 .”content_tags.findings[0]
quantity∼55 zeptomoles — — “We experimentally proved drastically enhanced sensitivity to molecular chirality, sufficient to detect as low as ∼55 zeptomoles of molecules in our imaging area, which corresponds to ∼44 molecules per unit cell of the metamaterial (see Methods: analyte quantity estimation).”content_tags.quantities[0]
variablechiral enhancement factor — “defined as the maximum optical chirality on the metamaterial surface normalized to the far-field chirality”content_tags.variables[0]
definitionenantiomers — “Enantiomers, a pair of chiral isomers with opposite handedness, often exhibit similar physical and chemical properties due to their identical functional groups and composition, yet show different toxicity to cells.”content_tags.definitions[0]
definitioncircular dichroism — “The CD response of a chiral sample is defined as the difference in transmitted power between right- and left-handed circularly polarized light, normalized to the total transmitted power for the two circularly polarized excitations.”content_tags.definitions[1]
key-termschirality, enantiomers, circular dichroism, twisted metamaterials, metasurfaces, plasmonics, chiral enhancement factor, zeptomole, Concanavalin A, near-field
Concepts
terms this paper carries, each with the sentence it was cut from — the layer that joins one paper to another. Terms with no quote yet are on CONCEPTS.html.
conceptCD — circular dichroism — “To date, molecular chirality is routinely determined using circular dichroism (CD) measurements 5 , 6 .”concepts[0]
conceptcircular dichroism — the difference in transmitted power between right- and left-handed circularly polarized light — “To date, molecular chirality is routinely determined using circular dichroism (CD) measurements 5 , 6 .”concepts[1]
conceptenantiomers — a pair of chiral isomers with opposite handedness — “Enantiomers, a pair of chiral isomers with opposite handedness, often exhibit similar physical and chemical properties due to their identical functional groups and composition, yet show different toxicity to cells.”concepts[2]
concepttwisted metamaterials — formed by stacking two or more closely spaced achiral metasurfaces with a proper sequential rotation between neighbouring layers — “To demonstrate these properties and identify the optimal geometry, we constructed several twisted metamaterials composed of two stacked metasurfaces separated by an 80 nm dielectric layer with densely packed nanorod inclusions and five different twisting angles from one metasurface to the second, spanning from ±30° to ±90° at an interval of ±15°.”concepts[3]
conceptmetasurfaces — not defined in this paper's own words; single patterned layers of subwavelength nanostructures — “To demonstrate these properties and identify the optimal geometry, we constructed several twisted metamaterials composed of two stacked metasurfaces separated by an 80 nm dielectric layer with densely packed nanorod inclusions and five different twisting angles from one metasurface to the second, spanning from ±30° to ±90° at an interval of ±15°.”concepts[4]
conceptplasmonic metamaterials — not defined in this paper's own words; engineered metal nanostructures supporting plasmon resonances — “Here we exploit strong chiral interactions with plasmonic metamaterials with specifically designed optical response to sense chiral molecules down to zeptomole levels, several orders of magnitude smaller than what is typically detectable with conventional circular dichroism spectroscopy.”concepts[5]
conceptcircular dichroism spectroscopy — not defined in this paper's own words; the conventional instrument measurement of CD — “Here we exploit strong chiral interactions with plasmonic metamaterials with specifically designed optical response to sense chiral molecules down to zeptomole levels, several orders of magnitude smaller than what is typically detectable with conventional circular dichroism spectroscopy.”concepts[6]
conceptradiative loss — not defined in this paper's own words; energy the metamaterial loses by re-radiation — “More importantly, the radiative loss of the metamaterial is relatively broadband, resulting in its large background CD signals that may mask any chiral signals from the analytes, making the frequency shift undetectable.”concepts[7]
conceptbackground CD signals — not defined in this paper's own words; the metamaterial's own CD, independent of the molecules — “More importantly, the radiative loss of the metamaterial is relatively broadband, resulting in its large background CD signals that may mask any chiral signals from the analytes, making the frequency shift undetectable.”concepts[8]
conceptConA — Concanavalin A — “ConA is a homotetramer with a dimension of 6.3 × 8.7 × 8.9 nm determined by X-ray crystallography, which indicates the most compact structural dimension 39 .”concepts[9]
concepthomotetramer — not defined in this paper's own words; a protein made of four identical subunits — “ConA is a homotetramer with a dimension of 6.3 × 8.7 × 8.9 nm determined by X-ray crystallography, which indicates the most compact structural dimension 39 .”concepts[10]
conceptchiral enhancement factor — defined as the maximum optical chirality on the metamaterial surface normalized to the far-field chirality — “defined as the maximum optical chirality on the metamaterial surface normalized to the far-field chirality”concepts[11]

Full text — tagged

Chiralityterm·key detection of enantiomersterm·dom using twisted optical metamaterials Abstract Many naturally occurring biomolecules, such as amino acids, sugars and nucleotides, are inherently chiral. Enantiomersterm·dom, a pair of chiral isomers with opposite handedness, often exhibit similar physical and chemical properties due to their identical functional groups and composition, yet show different toxicity to cells. Detecting enantiomersterm·dom in small quantities has an essential role in drug development to eliminate their unwanted side effects. Here we exploit strong chiral interactions with plasmonic metamaterialsterm·mth with specifically designed optical response to sense chiral molecules down to zeptomoleterm·key levels, several orders of magnitude smaller than what is typically detectable with conventional circular dichroism spectroscopyterm·mth. In particular, the measured spectra reveal opposite signs in the spectral regime directly associated with different chiral responses, providing a way to univocally assess molecular chiralityterm·key. Our work introduces an ultrathin, planarized nanophotonic interface to sense chiral molecules with inherently weak circular dichroismterm·mth at visible and near-infrared frequencies.

The handedness of enantiomersterm·dom is strongly associated with their pharmacological effects, especially their potency and toxicity 1 : single enantiomerterm·dom drugs are often more efficient than their racemic mixtures 2 ; more importantly, while one chiralityterm·key forms a powerful medicament, the other one may cause serious side effects 3 , 4 . To date, molecular chiralityterm·key is routinely determined using circular dichroismterm·mth (CDterm·mth) measurements 5 , 6 . However, chiral molecules on their own typically possess extremely small CDterm·mth, in the range of only few tens of millidegrees observable in the ultraviolet range 6 . Consequently, conventional CDterm·mth measurements require up to 30 min of integration time to resolve these small signals, and they involve sub-millilitre volumes at a molecular concentration in the micromolar range 6 . These measurements need to be carried out during and after each synthetic step of a chiral compound, which makes it particularly challenging at the beginning of a synthetic approach development when large amounts of analytes are difficult to obtain due to limited production efficiency. Therefore, the capability of detecting the handedness of enantiomersterm·dom with significantly less concentration in millisecond time scales would be extremely beneficial for pharmaceutical applications.

Recent works have discussed the use of plasmonicterm·key and dielectric nanostructures to enhance weak CDterm·mth effects for chiral molecule detection. Chiral metasurfacesterm·dom 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 and achiral plasmonicterm·key 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 and silicon nanospheres 16 have been explored in this context. The CDterm·mth response of a chiral molecule may be significantly boosted around the resonance frequency of a plasmonicterm·key nanosphere 12 ( Fig. 1b ), with a resultant CDterm·mth still in the millidegree range, but now extended to the visible spectrum. This spectral extension is advantageous because long exposure to ultraviolet radiation can severely affect biomolecular samples. However, plasmonicterm·key achiral structures do not allow a univocal chiral detection because the sign of the CDterm·mth spectrum is sensitive to the binding orientation of the chiral molecule to the plasmonicterm·key nanoparticles 15 . Chiral metasufaces 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , in principle, allow unambiguous detection of large chiral molecules. The first chiral detection using a metasurfaceterm·dom was reported in ref. 7 , in which a single layer gammadion structure was used for detecting various proteins. The main mechanism in this work relies on measuring the spectral shift in the far field spectrum due to the nearfieldterm·key interactions between the chiral molecules and the metasurfaceterm·dom. The same mechanism was later extended to different chiral molecules 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 . However, further improving the detection sensitivity based on spectral shift is limited, because the final measured spectrum is typically combined with the background CDterm·mth spectrum of the metasurfaceterm·dom. It is known that introducing molecules in the near-fieldterm·key of plasmonicterm·key structures can also result in spectral shift due to refractive index changes, regardless of their handedness, which makes a direct detection of molecular chiralityterm·key difficult for weak signals coming from low concentrations of molecules.

Schematic plot of enhanced chiral sensing. ( a ) Circularly polarized light impinges onto assemblies of chiral molecules. It normally induces small CDterm·mth in the ultraviolet region, in the millidegree range. ( b ) Chiral sensing with achiral plasmonicterm·key nanostructures shifts the CDterm·mth peak to the resonance of the plasmonicterm·key nanoparticles. ( c ) Enhanced chiral sensing with twisted plasmonic metamaterialsterm·mth, resulting in orders of magnitude enhancement of CDterm·mth signals.

In this paper, we introduce a platform for chiralityterm·key detection based on a plasmonicterm·key ‘twisted' metamaterial that overcomes the above-mentioned limitations. The near-fieldterm·key of these metamaterials can be optimally tailored to amplify chiral–chiral interactions between the metamaterial inclusions and the molecules, enabling high-sensitivity handedness detection of enantiomersterm·dom (schematically shown in Fig. 1c ). We observe an enhanced cumulative CDterm·mth spectrum of molecules reaching up to a few degrees, two orders of magnitude larger than what conventional CDterm·mth spectroscopy can typically measure 17 . Our design provides additional flexibility to easily tune the enhanced CDterm·mth of the molecules to a desired frequency, where the solvent may exhibit minimal absorption. In addition, our approach is capable of detecting the enhanced CDterm·mth response of the molecules isolated from the large background CDterm·mth spectrum of the metamaterial, without relying on any spectral shift. Our proposed method, after proper post-processing that makes it robust against fabrication imperfections, allows us to reliably separate the responses associated with opposite CDterm·mth signs from enantiomersterm·dom in as low as 55 zeptomolesterm·key, an amount that is 10 15 times less than what typical commercial CDterm·mth spectroscopy tools are able to detect.

Results Twisted metamaterialsterm·mth to detect chiral molecules The CDterm·mth response of a chiral sample is defined as the difference in transmitted power between right- and left-handed circularly polarized light, normalized to the total transmitted power for the two circularly polarized excitations. By adsorbing a monolayer of chiral molecules on a metamaterial surface and assuming a chiralityterm·key κ m from the chiral molecules near the CDterm·mth resonance of the metamaterial, the output CDterm·mth response, CDterm·mth o , of the chiral molecule-metamaterial assembly can be written as (see Supplementary Notes 1 and 2 ) where CDterm·mth i denotes the background CDterm·mth of the metamaterial without chiral molecules; T LR is the left-handed circularly polarized transmission coefficient of the metamaterial with a right-handed circularly polarized input (same nomenclature for the other T ij coefficients); is the wave vector with λ being the effective wavelength in free-space, and w is the thickness of the molecular monolayer, for which we assume kw <<1.

It is seen that the output CDterm·mth of the loaded metamaterial is controlled by two relevant terms: the background CDterm·mth of the metamaterial (CDterm·mth i ) and the imaginary part of the chiralityterm·key coefficient κ m , which corresponds to the CDterm·mth of the molecule near the CDterm·mth peak frequency of the metamaterial. As we show in the following, both terms may be properly enhanced using twisted metamaterialsterm·mth 18 , 19 , formed by stacking two or more closely spaced achiral metasurfacesterm·dom with a proper sequential rotation between neighbouring layers. This geometry is ideally suited for our purpose: first, it is based on a planarized surface over which it is easy to deposit molecules with a controllable density; second, it can be composed of simple achiral inclusions (in our geometry gold nanorods) that can significantly boost local light-molecule interactions; most importantly, this geometry retains a giant chiral response associated with their rotation in the stacking direction 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 . To demonstrate these properties and identify the optimal geometry, we constructed several twisted metamaterialsterm·mth composed of two stacked metasurfacesterm·dom separated by an 80 nm dielectric layer with densely packed nanorod inclusions and five different twisting angles from one metasurfaceterm·dom to the second, spanning from ±30° to ±90° at an interval of ±15°. By optimizing the relative twist angle between the two layers, we select both peak wavelength and maximum value of CDterm·mth i , maintaining a high fidelity of fabrication (see Supplementary Note 3 ).

Field enhancement versus chiralityterm·key enhancement The optimized twisted metamaterialterm·mth geometry retains another peculiar property that allows maximizing the chiralityterm·key detection of the adsorbed molecules, associated with efficiently boosting the coefficient κ m in equation (1) . As we discuss in the following, although κ m is closely related to the intrinsic chiralityterm·key of the molecules, its effective value in equation (1) can be enhanced by suitably engineering the near-fieldterm·key light-molecule interaction sustained by the plasmonicterm·key particles forming the metamaterial. The effective chiralityterm·key κ m can be boosted by two distinct mechanisms, based on Poynting's theorem and non-reciprocity theorem. The first mechanism is based on the near-fieldterm·key enhancement factor , defined as the near-fieldterm·key intensity in the vicinity of the metamaterial surface normalized to the far-field intensity . This factor is associated with a larger local density of states supported by achiral plasmonicterm·key effects, consistent with the phenomenon schematically sketched in Fig. 1b and considered in recent papers 12 , 15 . Although this effect is normally important for refractive index plasmonicterm·key sensing, it is not beneficial for the proposed scheme of chiralityterm·key detection. More interestingly, the effective molecular chiralityterm·key κ m can be enhanced by the chiral enhancement factorterm·mth (refs 31 , 32 ), defined as the maximum optical chiralityterm·key on the metamaterial surface normalized to the far-field chiralityterm·key , where the optical chiralityterm·key follows the same definition as the parameter C defined in ref. 33 , 34 . We show in the following that this second enhancement factor is associated with enhanced local optical density of states that are sensitive to the distinct handedness of molecules, which can be largely tuned and boosted by twisted metamaterialsterm·mth, and suitably exploited for the purpose of molecular chiralityterm·key detection.

When molecules interact with the near-fieldterm·key of the metamaterial surface, we can model their interaction with the impinging wave by scaling their imaginary part of permittivity and chiralityterm·key, according to the local field and chiral enhancement factorsterm·mth. This scaling can be understood by considering the enhancement in the power loss density, which stems from the increased local density of states 35 . Since the loss density is directly proportional to and to , we can embed the enhancement of local density of states in the effective permittivity and chiralityterm·key coefficients of the molecules. This enhancement factor stems from the near-fieldterm·key interactions between adsorbed molecules and the metamaterial. Recent experimentsterm·mth have demonstrated that the optical chiralityterm·key coefficient is directly associated with the difference in their absorption of enantiomersterm·dom (the dissymmetry factor of enantiomersterm·dom) 33 , 36 . The twisted metamaterialterm·mth, with boosted and controllable , can therefore become an ideal substrate for chiral detection.

Enhanced CDterm·mth measurements of enantio-pure molecules To prove the unique sensing features of the proposed metamaterial platform, we fabricated a pair of these metamaterials with+and −60° twist angles, as illustrated in Fig. 2a,d , with scanning electron microscope images accordingly shown. Optical measurements of these metamaterials reveal opposite CDterm·mth, as seen in Fig. 2b,e , and confirmed numerically in panels c and f. In the following we show how such ‘enantiomeric pair' of metamaterials can be used to detect molecular chiralityterm·key.

Measurements and simulations of an enantiomeric pair of metamaterials. ( a ) Scanning electron microscope image and illustration of the +60° metamaterial. ( b ) Experimentally measured transmission (left y axis) of the twisted metamaterialterm·mth with RCP (red curve) and LCP (black curve) excitation, and its extracted circular dichroismterm·mth (CDterm·mth) in degrees (blue curve, right y axis). The error bars correspond to the standard deviation of three measurements at different locations of the metamaterials. ( c ) Corresponding numerical simulations of the background transmission and circular dichroismterm·mth for the +60° metamaterial. ( d – f ) Figures for the −60° metamaterial. All scale bars are 500 nm. Within the unit cell, each nanorod is 220 nm × 50 nm × 40 nm; the square lattice has a dimension of 300 nm × 300 nm.

We first consider a set of well-studied enantiomersterm·dom, (S)-(+)-1,2-Propanediol and (R)-(−)-1,2-Propanediol. We choose these molecules as a proof-of-principle study, because of easy access to enantio-pure solutions of both enantiomersterm·dom. We fabricated a pair of +/−60° twisted metamaterialsterm·mth on the same glass substrate, and we created a flow-cell ( Fig. 3a ) over these metamaterials. The S enantiomersterm·dom were first filled into the flow-cell, and we collected their corresponding CDterm·mth spectra on +60° metamaterials and −60° twisted metamaterialsterm·mth, respectively, as shown in Fig. 3b (blue solid circles on +60° twisted metamaterialsterm·mth, blue void circles on −60° twisted metamaterialsterm·mth). The same metamaterial platform was then used to collect the spectra associated with the R enantiomersterm·dom after thorough cleaning ( Fig. 3c , red solid circles on +60° twisted metamaterialsterm·mth, red void circles on −60° twisted metamaterialsterm·mth). The black curves in both panels are control measurements of CDterm·mth spectra with racemic mixtures. We note that the local interaction between the metamaterial and the molecules induces a small frequency shift near the observed CDterm·mth maximum, which can be analytically derived from (1) by expanding CDterm·mth o around the frequency for which . As shown in the Supplementary Equation (4) , this frequency shift can be potentially used to derive the handedness of the chiral molecules: Supplementary Equation (4) indicates an opposite sign of the frequency shift Δ ω , associated with opposite signs in of the enantiomersterm·dom. However, the magnitude of this shift may be different for left- and right-handed excitations, due to the different chiralityterm·key enhancement factors from the metamaterial. More importantly, the radiative lossterm·dom of the metamaterial is relatively broadband, resulting in its large background CD signalsterm·dom that may mask any chiral signals from the analytes, making the frequency shift undetectable.

CDterm·mth spectra of enantiomersterm·dom on metamaterial substrates. ( a ) The flow-cell experimental set-up. ( b ) Experimental measurement of (S)-(+)-1,2-Propanediol on ±60° metamaterials (MTM). The blue solid circles refer to the S enantiomerterm·dom on the +60° metamaterial, the blue void circles refer to the S enantiomerterm·dom on the −60° metamaterial. Similarly, the black curves refer to ±60° metamaterials with the racemic mixture (formed with 1:1 ratio of right- and left-handed Propanediol). The purple triangles indicate the center line of the left-handed and right-handed metamaterials loaded with the racemic mixture (calculated by summing the two black curves and taking its half). The center line does not exactly fall to zero, due to small fabrication imperfections that make the ±60° metamaterials not completely symmetric. The error bars indicate the standard deviation, which comes from three repeated measurements for each analyte across different locations on the metamaterials. ‘MTM w/S' denotes metamaterials with S enantiomersterm·dom. ( c ) Experimental measurement of (R)-(−)-1,2-Propanediol on +60° (red solid circles) and −60° (red void circles) metamaterials. The black and purple curves follow the same nomenclatures as in b . The error bars indicate the standard deviation from three repeated measurements for each analyte across different locations on the metamaterials. ‘MTM w/R' denotes metamaterials with R enantiomersterm·dom. ( d ) CDterm·mth summation to remove the background CDterm·mth of the metamaterials. The curves show clear opposite signs for R and S enantiomersterm·dom. The error bars indicate the standard deviation from the three repeated measurements of each analyte from b , c . ( e ) Full wave numerical simulations based on our model for conditions in b . ( f ) Full wave numerical simulations for conditions in c . ( g ) Calculation of CDterm·mth summation for the S and R enantiomersterm·dom on the metamaterials.

To remove the large background CD signalsterm·dom from the metamaterial and cancel its effective contribution to CDterm·mth o , we sum the measurements obtained with the enantiomeric pair of metamaterial substrates holding the same analytes, by taking advantage of the inherent symmetry of the metamaterial pair . Interestingly, after a suitable calibration process (see Methods: post-processing), we are able to isolate the CDterm·mth signals associated with the molecules even in the case of small fabrication imperfections that are expected to cause slightly different CDterm·mth spectra associated with the two metamaterial substrates. The calibration, performed beforehand on the bare metamaterial samples, removes most of the errors stemming from fabrication differences between the two mirror-symmetric metamaterials. What is left after this post-processing is the isolated CDterm·mth response that directly relates to the sign of the molecule chiralityterm·key, with an enhanced magnitude that is associated with the near-fieldterm·key interaction between the metamaterial and the chiral molecules (shown in Fig. 3d ). In principle, the presence of the chiral molecules may also weakly enhance the CDterm·mth response of the metamaterial itself. However, this effect is very minor due to the low quantity of molecules involved, and it is not expected to influence the proposed sensing procedure.

Analytically, the enhanced CDterm·mth response from the molecules can be written as where , the plus apex indicates the coefficient associated with the +60° metamaterial, and the analogous one for −60° metamaterial may be derived from symmetry considerations: , , , , , . After post-processing, the near-fieldterm·key enhancement effects associated with the achiral enhancement factor are cancelled out, confirming that the near-fieldterm·key chiralityterm·key enhancement factor is the coefficient that has the essential role in detecting enantiomersterm·dom in our proposed scheme. As discussed in the Supplementary Note 2 , this cancellation is robust and, even despite the expected fabrication imperfections, for all measurements reported in the paper we have been able to consistently reproduce the molecular chiralityterm·key measurements several times using different samples, evidenced by the reported standard deviation in the figures.

To model how our twisted metamaterialterm·mth geometry regulates this chiralityterm·key enhancement factor, we use a pair of electric and magnetic dipoles placed within the near fieldterm·key of the metamaterial substrate and monitor their radiated electrical fields with left-handed and right-handed polarizations in the far-field, extracting the output CDterm·mth. The phases of these two dipoles are properly chosen to resemble the handedness of the enantiomersterm·dom (see Methods for details). Based on reciprocity, the left-handed or right-handed circularly polarized radiation features of these dipole sources provide an indication of the absorption features of the enantiomersterm·dom, when excited by circularly polarized waves. With S ( Fig. 3e ) and R ( Fig. 3f ) enantiomersterm·dom placed at 10 nm above the metamaterial substrate, their simulated output CDterm·mth spectrum matches reasonably well the experimental results, with a pronounced peak near 1,000 nm wavelength. We believe that the discrepancy at shorter wavelengths comes from additional losses in the adhesion layers and the substrate, which are not taken into account in the simulations. The unambiguous detection of the molecular chiralityterm·key is well summarized by equation (2) , where ΣCDterm·mth o displays opposite signs for S and R enantiomersterm·dom, due to their opposite signs in . This is experimentally verified in Fig. 3d , showing the summed CDterm·mth spectrum for the two enantiomersterm·dom, confirmed by the simulations in Fig. 3g .

Enhanced CDterm·mth measurements of other chiral molecules We have discussed how the chiralityterm·key enhancement factor is a near-fieldterm·key effect, and it is, therefore, especially sensitive to very thin layers of molecules close to the metamaterial surface, which is of most practical interest in applications requiring high sensitivity chiralityterm·key detection. In order to prove this point, we tested a monolayer protein sample Concanavalin Aterm·key prepared at a concentration of 1 mg ml −1 in a buffer solution (see Methods: Preparation of chemicals for details). The protein was spin-coated on the metamaterials, forming a 10 nm thick film. This thickness was confirmed through ellipsometry measurement. Figure 4a shows the initial negative bending near 970 nm in the measured ΣCDterm·mth o , indicating the protein's right-handedness 37 . Although a much smaller amount of analytes was used in this experimentterm·mth compared to the one in Fig. 3 , the results in Fig. 4a show a much cleaner spectrum, attributed to the bigger intrinsic molecular chiralityterm·key of Concanavalin Aterm·key. Further verification was conducted on a chiral anticancer drug, Irinotecan Hydrochloride, ((S)-4,11-diethyl-3,4,12,14-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-1H-pyrano[3′,4′:6,7]indolizino[1,2-b]quinolin-9-ylester, Sigma Aldrich), which is commonly used to treat colorectal cancer or metastatic cancers that chemotherapy has failed to treat. The resultant ΣCDterm·mth o clearly shows an initial positive bending over the spectral range between 750 to 1,050 nm, indicating its left-handed nature ( Fig. 4b ). For large chiral molecules, a net Cotton effect is commonly observed due to the superposition of individual Cotton effects. In Fig. 4 , we indeed observe the Cotton effect, consistent with a conventional CDterm·mth measurement of the molecule (see Supplementary Note 4 ). In our enhanced CDterm·mth spectrum, this effect is transferred to the visible spectrum through plasmon-induced chiralityterm·key transfer 12 , 15 . The implications of these additional examples are twofold. First, the proposed method shows an inherent robustness to molecules with different molecular weight, solution quantity, buffer solution, and it is only sensitive to the handedness of the chiral molecules. Second, the enhanced chiral detection is observed with a monolayer of analytes, confirming that our scheme relies purely on a near fieldterm·key effect ( Supplementary Note 5 ).

Monolayer chiral sample measurements. ( a ) Measured monolayer protein (Concanavalin Aterm·key prepared with 1 mg ml −1 concentration) on ±60° metamaterials (MTM). The solid black (red) squares (circles) refer to measurements from the +60° metamaterials (with proteins), the void black (red) squares (circles) refer to that from the −60° metamaterials (with proteins), and the grey straight line indicates 0 degree CDterm·mth for guide-to-the-eye. The CDterm·mth summation of the protein (blue diamonds) shows a negative bend, indicating the overall ‘right-handedness' of the analyte. For a large protein with different chiral centers, the CDterm·mth signal is more complicated, and may show spectral oscillations with changing signs. Our results are consistent with chiralityterm·key assignment based on conventional CDterm·mth measurements. The error bars indicates standard deviation from three repeated measurements for each analyte across different locations on the metamaterials. The legend ‘MTM w/P' denotes the metamaterials with proteins. ( b ) CDterm·mth measurements of a chiral anticancer drug (Irinotecan hydrochloride at a concentration of 1 mg ml −1 ) on metamaterials. Its CDterm·mth summation (blue diamonds) with the same pair of metamaterials shows positive bend, indicating its overall ‘left-handedness'. The black curves were measurements from the ±60° metamaterials with water, and the grey straight line indicates 0 degree CDterm·mth for guide-to-the-eye. The error bars indicates standard deviation from three repeated measurements for each analyte across different locations on the metamaterials. The legend ‘MTM w/w' denotes the metamaterials with water; ‘MTM w/D' denotes the metamaterials with the chiral drug. The inset indicates that this measurement is conducted in a flow-cell setting.

Discussion In a broader context, our results show that, by employing a pair of twisted metamaterialsterm·mth we can realize a powerful platform for chiral molecular detection. We experimentally proved drastically enhanced sensitivity to molecular chiralityterm·key, sufficient to detect as low as ∼55 zeptomolesterm·key of molecules in our imaging area, which corresponds to ∼44 molecules per unit cell of the metamaterial (see Methods: analyte quantity estimation). Please note that such sensitivities are not achieved solely due to the large magnification objectives, therefore, they should not be considered the best possible performance for the described sensing procedure. With proper instrument development (detectors with low noise or smaller pixels), a higher sensitivity is expected. Increased sensitivity can also be achieved by incorporating a nanofluidic system and flowing chiral molecules between the twisted layers instead of atop. We envision that our platform may be directly integrated with such nanofluidic systems 38 , allowing one to detect attograms of analytes per measurement, and to separate and detect in real-time the level of chiralityterm·key down to a few molecules. The molecules that we have chosen for these proof-of-principle studies cover a variety range of molecular weights from 76.09 Da (or 76.09 gmol −1 ) to 104 kDa, indicating the robustness of the method. More importantly, our experimentsterm·mth demonstrate that the specific use of a pair of twisted metamaterialsterm·mth with opposite rotation allows us to suppress the background CDterm·mth response from the metamaterials and to isolate the molecular chiral response to univocally reveal its handedness. Although our method still measures cumulative optical activity, sharing a similar drawback as conventional CDterm·mth measurements that cannot provide specific information on chiral centers, our measurements take only a fraction of a second, orders of magnitude faster than currently available commercial equipment for CDterm·mth measurements. Our approach is ideal for sequential measurements using microfluidic systems of very small quantities of molecules. We believe that these findings can open important directions for biomedical measurements and drug synthesis, based on the unique properties of suitably engineered optical metamaterials.

Methods Sample fabrication The metamaterial sample was fabricated using electron beam lithography and an etch-back planarization method initially introduced in ref. 19 on an optical flat glass substrate. The spacer between the two metasurfacesterm·dom was achieved using electron beam deposition of silicon dioxide, and the thickness was controlled as 80 nm with a 5% thickness variation. The dimensions of the unit cell nanodipole is 220 nm × 50 nm × 40 nm (length × width × thicknesss). The unit cell is embedded in a square lattice of 300 nm × 300 nm. The fabricated plasmonic metamaterialterm·mth sample has a foot-print of 200 μm by 200 μm, which includes more than 400,000 unit cells.

Preparation of chemicals Enantiomersterm·dom (S)-(+)-1,2-Propanediol and (R)-(−)-1,2-Propanediol were used as received (Sigma-Aldrich, products 540242 and 540250, 96%). The Propanediol enantiomersterm·dom were prepared with a flow-cell with thickness of ∼70 μm. The anticancer drug (Sigma-Aldrich, Irinotecan hydrochloride) was dissolved in water and formed a solution with concentration of 1 mg ml −1 . The anticancer drug experimentterm·mth was also performed with the flow-cell. The flow-cell was prepared and replaced every time for each measurement. The protein was dissolved in 10 mM Tris/HCl buffer solution with a controlled pH value at 7, forming a concentration of 1 mg ml −1 . The prepared protein solution was spin-coated onto the clean metamaterial sample at a spin speed of 2,000 r.p.m., forming a monolayer of ∼10 nm, which is confirmed with the ellipsometry measurements (J.J. Woollam M-2000 DI).

Cleaning procedure The metamaterial samples were used for multiple measurements. After each measurement, the sample was immersed in deionized water for 72 h and then cleaned in base piranha solution to remove excess organic residues on the sample (3:1 mixture of ammonium hydroxide (NH 4 OH) with hydrogen peroxide). This treatment also left the metamaterial hydrophilic for better adhesion especially for the protein sample, which was prepared by spin-coating.

Optical measurement The transmission spectrum was measured using a home-built set-up. A tungsten halogen lamp (Ocean Optics, HL-2000-HP) was used as a white light source (360–2,400 nm) at a power of 8.8 mW. The output from the halogen lamp was coupled to a spectrometer with an optical fibre, directly followed by a 35 mm focal length lens (AC254-035-B), a linear polarizer (Newport, 10LP-VIS-B) and a quarter wave-plate (Special Optics, 8-9012-1/4) to obtain circularly polarized incident light. This incident light was focused onto the sample with a 10 × objective (N.A.=0.28, Mitutoyo) at normal incident angle. The focal spot on the sample was around 0.5 mm in diameter, which covered the entire sample area (200 μm by 200 μm). The transmitted light was then collected via a second objective (100 × , N.A.=0.70, Mitutoyo), followed by an imaging lens with a focal length of 200 mm (Thorlabs, AC254–200-B-ML) before the spectrometer (Princeton Instruments, SpectraPro-500i). We then selected a small area of the magnified image using the entrance slit (about 2.6 mm by 0.26 mm) of the spectrometer corresponding to an area of 26 μm by 2.6 μm on the sample. The transmitted signal was dispersed by a grating (300 g mm −1 , 500 nm blazing) inside the spectrometer onto a liquid nitrogen-cooled, Si charge coupled device (Princeton Instruments, 7508-0002). The displayed transmission spectra are combined spectra taken at three different central wavelengths with an integration time of 100 ms for each measurement. Three to five measurements were repeated on each sample across the metamaterial from top to bottom and the results were found to be consistent.

Analyte quantity estimation To estimate how many ConAterm·dom molecules cover the imaging area, we used a silicon surface as the reference surface for molecule counting. We spin-coated the wafer with the ConAterm·dom solution under the same condition as we prepare our sample (2,000 r.p.m. at a concentration of 1 mg ml −1 ). We scanned the spin-coated surface using atomic force microscope. The atomic force microscope images before and after scanning indicate relatively densely packed molecules on the surface ( Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Note 6 ). Using image-processing software (ImageJ), we estimate that approximately 44±7 molecules cover one unit cell area of the metamaterial. The imaging area is 26 μm by 2.6 μm on the sample, which covers ∼751 unit cells of the metamaterial, corresponding to approximately 33,360 molecules in the imaging area, or ∼55 zeptomolesterm·key. The area that one ConAterm·dom molecule occupies is estimated based on the dimension of the molecule. ConAterm·dom is a homotetramerterm·dom with a dimension of 6.3 × 8.7 × 8.9 nm determined by X-ray crystallography, which indicates the most compact structural dimension 39 .

Full-wave numerical simulations Fully vectorial numerical simulations are conducted using commercially available software based on finite integration method (CST Microwave Studio 2011). The material permittivities used in the simulations are explicitly described as following: permittivity of gold follows the values from ref. 40 ; the permittivity of the adhesive layer, Titanium, is simulated using values obtained from website ( http://refractiveindex.info/ ); the glass substrate is considered as a nondispersive silicon dioxide with permittivity of 2.25 and negligible absorption. In the numerical calculations of Fig. 3 , the chiral molecules are modelled using a pair of electric (with amplitude of 3.54 × 10 −31 cm) and magnetic dipoles (with amplitude of 1.06 × 10 −22 Am 2 ) with in and out of phase for right-handed (R) and left-handed (S) enantiomersterm·dom, respectively. The racemic mixture is simulated when the electric and magnetic dipoles are perpendicular to each other. The dipole pairs are placed at 10 nm above the twisted metamaterialterm·mth substrate in the center of the crossed rods. CDterm·mth spectra are calculated by extracting the ratio between the left-handed and right-handed radiated fields in the far field.

Post processing With fabrication imperfections in reality, from the +60° metamaterial doesnot completely cancel out from the −60° metamaterial (as shown in Fig. 3 ). But in the summation of CDterm·mth, it can remove the system errors that come from this fabrication imperfection because the same imperfection exists in and in all measurements with and without molecules. Therefore, ΣCDterm·mth o is still directly related to the signs of the molecular chiralityterm·key. To clearly demonstrate this and de-embed a CDterm·mth sum that reflects the molecular property free from the fabrication imperfections, we subtract the CDterm·mth sum of each enantiomerterm·dom by the background CDterm·mth sum as shown in the above equation.

Data availability The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional information How to cite this article: ZhaopersName, Y. et al . Chiralityterm·key detection of enantiomersterm·dom using twisted optical metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 8, 14180 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14180 (2017).

Publisher's note : Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References.

Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Welch Foundation with grant numbers F-1802 (A.A.), F-1662 (X.L.), the Air Force Office of Scientific Research with grant number FA9550-13-1-0204 (A.A.), NSF DMR-1306878 (X.L.), and the Army Research Office W911NF-11-1-0447 (A.A., X.L.).

Footnotes References Associated Data Supplementary Materials Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References.

Data Availability Statement The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Interpretive notes.
• Highlighted spans are tagged entities: persName (author), title (venue), placeName (place), date (year), and term (a key concept: domain / ai / method).
• Eponymous or retrospective terms (e.g. “Nash equilibrium”, “segregation”) do not appear in the original source and so are not highlighted — a deliberate choice (see Report 4).
• Some entries begin with a word in capitals. EVIDENCE CORRECTED means the finding still stands and it was our quotation that was wrong — it has been replaced. RETRACTED means the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with its reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED means a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it.
• Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote shown on the same row, so the borrowing can be checked against the thing borrowed from without leaving this page. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.
• Counts: 1 work · 1 date.
Meta-Tagging Project · record zhao2017-twisted-metamaterials-chirality-detection.
© 2026 Shir Sivroni