standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 6 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | rapid changes in A1 spectrotemporal receptive fields while an animal detects a tone in noise Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | whether the magnitude of task-driven receptive field plasticity depends on task difficulty, and whether the change is one of gain or of shape Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | separates gain from shape change and shows they move in opposite directions, with the sign of the net effect set jointly by task difficulty and by the cell's distance from the target frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | rapid task-related plasticity of auditory cortical receptive fields Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | a contrast matched filter: the acoustic features of the foreground are enhanced and those of the background suppressed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the net effect keeps the target salient by two different routes - enhancing near cells when the tone is loud, suppressing far cells when it is buried Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the active STRF is modelled explicitly as a scaled passive STRF plus an orthogonal shape change, S_d = g.S_b + delta Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | STRFs are measured from the reference TORCs alone, never during target presentation, so the measurement does not include the target Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | attentional load is validated behaviourally by inserting identical intermediate-difficulty probes into easy and hard blocks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | STRF frequency resolution is too coarse to exclude that some A1 neurons build narrow matched filters at the exact target frequency. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | It is unknown how far the gain-reduction/shape-enhancement pattern is specific to the tone-in-noise task, its avoidance paradigm, or the fixed noise level. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Most cells could not be held across multiple task conditions, so difficulty comparisons are largely between rather than within cells. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Disentangling stimulus structure from behavioural paradigm requires further experiments; the interpretations offered are conjectures. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The 0.6-octave boundary dividing near from far cells was an arbitrary choice. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[4] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | the near/far dividing line is arbitrary, stated as such, and shown not to change the results Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the standard STRF power normalisation used in the group's previous papers does not separate gain from shape Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the dependence of gain on task difficulty was NOT confirmed when all performance levels were pooled Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | changes often persisted after the task with no systematic relation to the type of plasticity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | most cells were recorded in only one task condition, so within-cell comparison across difficulties is limited Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[9] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the finding that harder tasks recruit more attention, and the probe-trial design used to demonstrate it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the matched filter, imported as the model for how a receptive field should adapt to separate foreground from background Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the target tone frequency and signal-to-noise ratio held constant throughout a given task Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a within-task change in the stimulus itself explaining the receptive-field change attributed to task difficulty · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | shape Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: shape | concepts[5] | 0.85 | the paper's words |
| senses | plasticity here is rapid and reversible - measured as the difference between active and passive STRFs within a session, not as learning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | task difficulty is operationalised as target SNR, and validated separately by lick withdrawal time and by probe-trial performance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | gain and shape are given distinct definitions by an explicit model: gain is the fraction of the STRF that keeps its original shape, shape change is the orthogonal remainder Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | near and far are defined by a 0.6-octave cut from the target frequency, which the paper calls arbitrary and tests Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | method: STRFs measured from responses to modulated broadband TORC references during and before a conditioned-avoidance tone-in-noise detection task, at target SNRs from +15 to -10 dB Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: attention-driven receptive field plasticity in primary auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: rapid task-related plasticity of auditory cortical receptive fields — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Fritz et al. (2003; 2005; 2007a,b), the group's earlier demonstrations of rapid task-related STRF plasticity with pure-tone targets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the "contrast matched filter" hypothesis of Fritz et al. (2007a) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → visual studies of task difficulty and attention (Boudreau et al., 2006; Spitzer et al., 1988; Spitzer and Richmond, 1991), which did not separate gain from shape Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS GAIN AGAINST SHAPE. 'Quotation withheld' Two ways a receptive field can change that a single measure cannot separate - so the earlier result is a sum of two effects that this paper's [7] then shows move differently with difficulty. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → earlier task-related plasticity results from the same group in tone-versus-TORC and tone-versus-tone paradigms (Fritz et al., 2003; 2005; 2007b) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Fritz et al. on rapid STRF plasticity with pure-tone targets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → the contrast matched filter model, by showing the sign of the change depends on difficulty and on distance from target Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS DISTANCE FROM THE TARGET FREQUENCY, AND THE SIGN FLIPS ACROSS IT. 'when we grouped the plasticity changes by near and far cells, it became apparent that near cells on average were enhanced (red) whereas far cells were suppressed (blue).' The matched-filter model is qualified rather than refuted: it holds, with a sign that depends on where the cell sits. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → visual studies showing task difficulty enhances attentional modulation, which did not separate gain from shape Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS GAIN AGAINST SHAPE, on a second target. Same sentence as [2]: 'THESE MEASUREMENTS DID NOT DISTINGUISH RECEPTIVE FIELD GAIN FROM SHAPE CHANGES.' One limitation of one earlier method, disqualifying it for two different claims this paper makes - which is why the sentence supports two rows rather than one. | claim_relations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → their own gain-versus-difficulty result, which did not survive pooling across performance levels Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS WHETHER THE CELLS ARE POOLED ACROSS PERFORMANCE LEVELS. 'Quotation withheld.' The paper's own effect survives one analysis choice and not another, and it says which - an analyst decision reported as a result rather than buried in methods. | claim_relations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · task difficulty —operationalised-as→ signal-to-noise ratio Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span named neither endpoint; this clause states the operationalisation outright - difficulty IS the signal-to-noise ratio in this design. — strength of the relation: 1 also in: task difficulty · signal-to-noise ratio | concept_edges[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | gain —contrasted-with→ shape Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: the paper's central result: they move in OPPOSITE directions in the same cells - gain decreased while shape changes were excitatory | concept_edges[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | task difficulty —causes→ attention Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: and it is tested rather than assumed, via probe trials of identical difficulty in easy and hard blocks
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span states a hypothesis about attentional resources; causes states it as a finding. also in: task difficulty · attention | concept_edges[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | attention —operationalised-as→ probe trials Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but probe trials were inserted to test attention; operationalised-as is loose. also in: attention · probe trials | concept_edges[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | task difficulty —operationalised-as→ signal-to-noise ratio Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: RE-GROUNDS another row of this record: the relation was always stated, the endpoint names were not in the span. also in: task difficulty · signal-to-noise ratio | concept_edges[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | STRF —operationalised-as→ TORCs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: RE-GROUNDS another row of this record: the old span named ONE endpoint. | concept_edges[6] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p-value Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: p-value | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | median Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: median | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mean Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: mean | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ANOVA across SNR conditions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA across SNR conditions | content_tags.statistics[4] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | STRF power normalisation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: STRF power normalisation | content_tags.statistics[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | an alternative noise-aware shape-change method Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Engaging in the detection task reduced overall STRF gain in the majority of recorded cells relative to the passive state. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Shape changes, unlike gain changes, were excitatory and frequency-specific, concentrated in cells tuned near the target tone. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The combined gain and shape adaptations sharpened the target-versus-noise representation differently at high and low SNR. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The magnitude of receptive-field adaptation tracked behavioural performance, being greatest in the best-performing sessions. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Suppression of receptive fields grew as the task became harder and reached significance only in the low-SNR condition. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Behaviourally, lick withdrawal time lengthened as target SNR fell, in all three ferrets. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Identical intermediate probe trials were discriminated better within hard blocks than within easy blocks. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Naive animals exposed to the identical stimuli showed some minor but no consistent receptive-field changes. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The gain reduction was a broad, difficulty-independent effect present in near and far cells alike, in contrast to the difficulty-dependent shape changes. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Going from high to low SNR targets suppressed firing to the reference noise by roughly a third. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | gain decreased in most cells during task performance while shape changes were excitatory and specific Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | grouped by distance from the target, near cells were on average enhanced and far cells suppressed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | suppression became significant only in the low SNR tasks, at about -13% Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the same tone placed far from a cell's BF produced suppression where near placement produced enhancement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the trend of increasing suppression at low SNR repeated in this subset, with the STRF changes amplified Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | naive animals given identical stimuli showed no consistent STRF changes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | raising difficulty suppressed firing to the reference noise by about a third overall Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | probe trials of identical difficulty were detected about 10% better inside hard blocks than inside easy ones Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | gain was at or below 1 in most cells, with medians near 0.9 for near-high-SNR and 0.7 for far-low-SNR Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | contrast matched filter Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: contrast matched filter | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | lick withdrawal time (LWT) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: lick withdrawal time (LWT) | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | TORC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: TORC | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | contrast matched filter Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: contrast matched filter | content_tags.definitions[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | lick withdrawal time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: lick withdrawal time | content_tags.definitions[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | performance level Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: performance level | content_tags.variables[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | STRF gain Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: STRF gain | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | lick withdrawal time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: lick withdrawal time | content_tags.variables[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | naïve animals Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: naïve animals | content_tags.variables[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | target SNR Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: target SNR | content_tags.variables[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | discrimination rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: discrimination rate | content_tags.variables[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 237 — single cells in the population analysis of receptive-field plasticity, from two behaving ferrets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 93, 57, and 87 — single units in the high, mid and low SNR difficulty groups respectively Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mean = −13.1 % — average amplitude change at best frequency in the low-SNR (hardest) condition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 10–30% — reduction in STRF gain caused by task engagement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.9 and 0.7 — median gain values for near cells in high-SNR tasks and far cells in low-SNR tasks (values below 1 mean suppression) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 350 ms — lick withdrawal time after target onset in the easiest (pure tone) detection task Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.6 octaves — best-frequency distance criterion separating near cells from far cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 85 — cells from the top-third best-performing sessions analysed separately Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 93 units from 3 naïve animals — control sample recorded with identical stimuli but no behavioural task Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.6 octaves — the near/far dividing line, called arbitrary and shown not to matter Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 112 near versus 125 far cells — the balance the cut produced Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 93, 57 and 87 single units in high, mid and low SNR — the difficulty groups Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | -13.1%, p < 0.05 — mean suppression, significant only at low SNR Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 58.6% versus 69.2% — probe detection in easy versus hard blocks at identical SNR Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 93 units from 3 naive animals — the no-behaviour control Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 350 ms — lick withdrawal time for a pure-tone target Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[15] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.