standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 2 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | visuospatial attention and primary visual consciousness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | behavioural-experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: behavioural-experiment | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The behavioural effect of the stimulation was small, attributed to the focal coil and near-threshold intensity used. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the SIZE of the reported effect: THE SMALL BUT SIGNIFICANT MAGNITUDE OF rTMS EFFECTS ON VENTRAL PPC (ABOUT 10%) IS LIKELY DUE TO THE USE OF FOCAL COIL AND NEAR-THRESHOLD INTENSITY OF rTMS | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | rTMS effects are not confined to the targeted region, so the locus of the effect is not purely ventral PPC. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any claim that localises the effect to ventral PPC: THE EFFECT OF rTMS DOES NOT REMAIN LIMITED TO THE TARGETED BRAIN REGION BUT SPREAD TRANSYNAPTICALLY | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | A motor-output contribution to the reaction-time slowing cannot be excluded. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the reaction-time interpretation: THE SLOWING OF THE REACTION TIME IS MAINLY DUE TO VISUOSPATIAL SENSORY PROCESSING, ALTHOUGH A SLIGHT INFLUENCE ON MOTOR OUTPUT CANNOT BE EXCLUDED | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The paper's consciousness measure is the percentage of trials a subject reported seeing. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any citation of this paper as evidence about consciousness: trials associated with the conscious perception of the cue stimuli were defined as seen trials, and the reported measure is their percentage | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The stimulus duration was calibrated per subject to about 50% detection, so the baseline rate is a design target. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the baseline seen-trial rate reported here: the threshold time was defined as the cue duration producing about 50% of correct stimulus detections within a series of 10 trials, so a baseline near 50% follows from the calibration | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | SHAM rTMS delivered at the same sites, and the effect measured as the difference between real and sham Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that the effect is the coil's noise, scalp sensation or the expectation of stimulation rather than the magnetic pulse reaching cortex · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the same sham-difference correlation was computed ACROSS the two experiments as a control comparison Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that a correlation between the consciousness and attention measures is a general property of the difference scores rather than a shared mechanism · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | seen trials Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: seen trials | concepts[0] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | conscious perception Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: conscious perception | concepts[1] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | threshold time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: threshold time | concepts[2] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | correct stimulus detections Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correct stimulus detections | concepts[3] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | primary consciousness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: primary consciousness | concepts[4] | the paper's words | |
| senses | primary consciousness, as measured - THE PERCENTAGE OF `seen trials`: the title claims a functional role in primary consciousness and the experiment records how often a subject reported perceiving a cue at their own threshold duration, so a term from consciousness theory and a detection rate occupy the same slot Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the threshold time - EACH SUBJECT'S OWN 50% POINT: defined as the cue duration giving about 50% correct detections over 10 trials, repeated 7 times, so the quantity is fitted per person and every later percentage is measured relative to that fit Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the 52.9% baseline - NEAR THE DESIGN TARGET BY CONSTRUCTION: the calibration sets each subject near 50% detection, so the baseline seen-trial rate is close to the number the procedure aimed at; the rTMS effect is a departure from a value the method placed there, not from a natural rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Babiloni and others 2006 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → Vallar 2001; Corbetta and Shulman 2002; Karnath and others 2003; Corbetta and others 2005 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the idea that visuospatial attention and primary consciousness are subserved by strictly interdependent networks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | conscious perception —operationalised-as→ seen trials Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 also in: conscious perception · seen trials | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | threshold time —operationalised-as→ correct stimulus detections Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 also in: threshold time · correct stimulus detections | concept_edges[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | post hoc multiple comparison test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: post hoc multiple comparison test | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correlation | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | F-test / p-value Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: F-test / p-value | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mean and standard error Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: mean and standard error | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Repetitive TMS over either left or right ventral posterior parietal cortex significantly reduced the number of cue stimuli that subjects consciously reported seeing, compared with sham stimulation. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Real rTMS over right or left ventral PPC slowed reaction times to go stimuli relative to sham. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The size of the consciousness impairment and the size of the attention impairment were not correlated across individuals. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Any rTMS, real or sham, generally shortened reaction times: 418 ms after sham, 446 ms after left and 438 ms after right PPC stimulation. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | A control analysis validated the subjective reports: reaction times were faster on trials the subject called 'seen' than on trials called 'not seen'. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | visual primary consciousness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: visual primary consciousness | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | primary consciousness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: primary consciousness | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | threshold time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: threshold time | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | reaction time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: reaction time | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Site of Stimulation (real left PPC, real right PPC, sham) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.variables[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | reaction time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: reaction time | content_tags.variables[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | sham condition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sham condition | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | spatial congruence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spatial congruence | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 18 — number of healthy adult volunteers stimulated Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | about 10% — drop in the number of consciously perceived visual stimuli after parietal rTMS versus sham Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | about 25 ms — slowing of reaction time to go stimuli caused by parietal rTMS relative to sham Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 72 ms (±7.9 SE) — mean individually determined perceptive threshold duration of the cue stimulus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | F2,34 = 5.25; P < 0.01 — ANOVA main effect of stimulation site on reaction time in the Attentional experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | r = –0.36, P = 0.13 — correlation between seen-trial count and reaction time after left-PPC rTMS (not significant) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | F1,18 = 5.84; P < 0.025 — control-ANOVA main effect of seen/not-seen condition on reaction time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.