standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 8 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
This record holds no controls. A layer is empty when the tagger recorded nothing in it — which is not the same as the paper having nothing to record.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | the methods available for studying perceptual decisions in mice and rats, and whether they can reach the rigour established in primate psychophysics Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | can perceptual decision-making be probed in rodents to a standard comparable with primates, and what does each task design let one conclude Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | sets out what each rodent task design can and cannot rule out, and corrects two widely held beliefs about rodents that turn out to be artefacts of laboratory practice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | method Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | perceptual decision-making in rodents Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | review Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: review | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | a belief about the animal is traced back to how the animal is kept: mice look nocturnal because laboratory food is unlimited Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the correction is checked against morphology rather than behaviour alone - the eyes lack the tapetum a nocturnal animal would have Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | task designs are ordered by what each one can rule out, so the choice of design is presented as a choice of which confound survives Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the criterion problem is made concrete with a hypothetical optogenetic result that would be misread under a go/no-go design Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | d-prime is preferred over the raw hit-minus-false-alarm difference specifically because the latter moves when only the criterion moves Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | a two-stimulus design removes the criterion entirely, because presence must be assigned to one location and absence to the other Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | one stimulus intensity is shown to be uninterpretable: sensitivity, bias and lapse rate produce identical data at a single point Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the fix is a full psychometric curve, whose slope, position and tails separate the three Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | short training is argued against on the grounds that error trials become uninterpretable, since a mistake may be about the stimulus or about the task Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | a well-trained animal makes error trials interpretable, and near-perfect performance on easy trials is the check that the task itself is understood Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | an unpublished four-fold day-of-week effect on trial count is reported, traced to the weekend water schedule Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the tacit knowledge attached to a standard task is named as knowledge that circulates informally and appears in no paper Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The authors state that their own background biases the review toward one brain region and one modality. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the review's coverage: DUE TO OUR OWN BACKGROUNDS AND INTERESTS, WE PERHAPS UNDULY EMPHASIZE ONE BRAIN REGION, THE CEREBRAL CORTEX, AND ONE SENSORY MODALITY, VISION | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The review is framed around unresolved questions rather than settled answers about rodent perceptual ability. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: everything in the review: WE HIGHLIGHT WHAT ARE MAINLY OPEN QUESTIONS ABOUT RODENT PERCEPTUAL ABILITIES AND OUR ABILITY TO ASSESS THESE EXPERIMENTALLY | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The widely held view that rats out-train mice is flagged by the authors as untested. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any reliance on the rats-versus-mice trainability view: AS FAR AS WE KNOW, HOWEVER, THIS VIEW HAS NOT BEEN DIRECTLY TESTED | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | the widely held view that rats out-learn mice has never been directly tested Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[2] - the view is widely held and untested | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | and may be an artefact of training technique rather than a species difference Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the species comparison: RATS MAY ONLY APPEAR TO BE EASIER TO TRAIN SIMPLY BECAUSE MICE REQUIRE DIFFERENT TRAINING TECHNIQUES | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | a term the field uses to justify design decisions has no agreed definition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: every design decision justified by overtraining: THE NOTION OF OVERTRAINING, HOWEVER, IS POORLY DEFINED | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | whether longer training adds more uncontrolled plasticity than shorter training is not established either way Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the argument for shorter training: IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT THIS PLASTICITY WOULD COMPLICATE INTERPRETATION of behavioral and neural data | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | virtual environments lack vestibular feedback, which visual feedback may not compensate for Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: virtual-environment results: THE VISUAL FEEDBACK IN THE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT MAY NOT ENTIRELY MAKE UP FOR THE LACK OF VESTIBULAR FEEDBACK | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | rodents should not be treated as a replacement for primates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the use of rodents as a substitute: IT WOULD BE A MISTAKE TO CONSIDER RODENTS AS A COMPLETE REPLACEMENT FOR PRIMATES IN INVESTIGATIONS OF PERCEPTUAL DECISION-MAKING | limitations[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | whether rodent designs can reach primate psychophysical rigour is left open Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the future of rodent psychophysics: WILL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS IN RODENTS BE ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF RIGOROUS primate methods - left open | limitations[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | punishment-based training learns fast but may induce stress that blocks harder tasks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: punishment-based training: THEY MAY CREATE STRESS, WHICH MIGHT PREVENT LEARNING OF MORE COMPLEX TASKS | limitations[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the whole task toolbox - random-dot motion, forced choice, psychometric curves - carried into rodents together with the standards for interpreting it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the separation of sensitivity from criterion, imported as the reason a rodent task must measure false alarms and not only hits Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the mouse as a nocturnal, minimally visual animal versus as a facultatively diurnal one - the first turns out to be an artefact of unlimited laboratory food Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | detectability - as the raw difference between hits and false alarms versus as d-prime, which is criterion-independent; the two diverge whenever the criterion moves Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | a performance change - as reduced sensitivity, as shifted bias, or as raised lapse rate; three distinct mechanisms indistinguishable at a single stimulus intensity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | two-alternative choice (one stimulus, two responses) versus two-alternative forced choice (two stimuli, two responses) - names that are often conflated and designs that differ in exactly which confound they remove Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | an error trial - as misperception of the stimulus versus as confusion about the task; only training separates them Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | a species difference in trainability versus a difference in the training techniques that happen to have been developed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | rodent frontal cortex as fundamentally different from primate on histological grounds versus as functionally equivalent on behavioural grounds Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: method Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: method — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | method: narrative methods review of task designs, sensory environments, training regimes and reward schedules, evaluated against signal detection theory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: review — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: perceptual decision-making - using ambiguous sensory information to guide action Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: perceptual decision-making in rodents — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | critiques → the view that rodent behaviour is only weakly influenced by vision Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the belief that mice are nocturnal, which the paper traces to unlimited laboratory food Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → rodent studies that measure behaviour at a single stimulus intensity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: how many stimulus intensities were measured: OBTAINING BEHAVIORAL DATA AT ONLY A SINGLE INTENSITY (AS IS OFTEN DONE IN RODENT STUDIES) WOULD NOT ALLOW ONE TO DISTINGUISH THE EFFECTS OF SENSITIVITY, BIAS, AND LAPSE RATE - one measurement cannot separate three quantities | claim_relations[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → the untested consensus that rats learn perceptual tasks faster than mice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: the paper's own words: not been directly tested | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → the use of the difference between hit and false-alarm rates as a detectability measure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: whether the measure survives a criterion shift: THE LATTER CAN CHANGE MARKEDLY FOLLOWING SIMPLE CHANGES IN CRITERION, where the recommended measure does not | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → primate psychophysics, whose task toolbox and standards the paper takes as the benchmark Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → evidence that rodent frontal cortex, like primate, supports working memory and categorization, against the histological argument for fundamental difference Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | Signal Detection Theory —contrasted-with→ Drift Diffusion Model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS WHETHER THE DECISION VARIABLE EVOLVES WITH ACCUMULATING EVIDENCE. 'An increasingly popular ALTERNATIVE TO SDT, the Drift Diffusion Model Quotation withheld.' Both models produce a choice from noisy evidence; only one gives the decision a trajectory in time, which is what makes reaction times predictable and is the whole of the difference. · strength of the relation: 1 also in: Signal Detection Theory · Drift Diffusion Model | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | go/no-go —contrasted-with→ two-alternative choice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: 'this design' = the two-alternative choice task (previous sentences). also in: go/no-go · two-alternative choice | concept_edges[1] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | two-alternative choice —contrasted-with→ two-alternative forced choice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: the refinement is of the two-choice design (previous section); the span names 'two-alternative forced choice' only. | concept_edges[2] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | criterion —distinct-from→ two-alternative forced choice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span argues two-interval designs remove presence/absence bias; distinct-from 'criterion' is loose. also in: criterion · two-alternative forced choice | concept_edges[3] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | psychophysics —operationalised-as→ psychometric curves Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span describes obtaining psychometric functions; operationalised-as is loose. also in: psychophysics · psychometric curves | concept_edges[4] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | water control —causes→ motivation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: 'this regime' = the regime of water control (previous sentence). also in: water control · motivation | concept_edges[5] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | Posterior Parietal Cortex —causes→ evidence integration Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.7
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the PPC is 'POISED TO' integrate multisensory inputs; causes is hedged. also in: Posterior Parietal Cortex · evidence integration | concept_edges[6] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | lapse rate —part-of→ psychometric curves Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes 'psychometric function', not 'psychometric curves'; part-of is loose. also in: lapse rate · psychometric curves | concept_edges[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Go/no-go tasks are highly vulnerable to changes in the animal's motivation and response criterion. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Requiring a decision on every trial makes the design immune to changes in the subject's willingness to respond. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | With two stimulus presentations subjects cannot be biased toward presence or absence, since each choice assigns presence to one location and absence to the other. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Data from a single stimulus intensity, as often collected in rodent studies, cannot separate the effects of sensitivity, bias and lapse rate. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Mice are reliably nocturnal only when food is unlimited, as in the laboratory; with scarcer food they sleep part of the night to save energy. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Rodent eye anatomy provides independent evidence against the nocturnality assumption. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Performance can differ fourfold across the week - about 100 trials per session on Mondays against about 400 on Fridays - by the authors' unpublished observations. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Despite the technical advantages of rodents, the review argues against treating them as a substitute for primate work on perceptual decisions. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mice are reliably nocturnal only when food is unlimited, as it is in the laboratory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | laboratory mice can become entirely diurnal in nature, and rodent eyes lack the tapetum expected of a nocturnal animal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | mouse spatial resolution is about 100 times lower than primate, yet vision is the primary sense rodents use to locate themselves Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | mice performed about 100 trials per session on Mondays against about 400 on Fridays Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | contemporary regimes fix this with constant daily intake and seven-day training Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | some rodent tasks take 2 to 10 days to teach and others 3 to 6 weeks, and rodent training rarely exceeds 2 months Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | rats combine multisensory information about as optimally as humans do Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | even within mice, body weight correlates strongly with the number of trials performed per day Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | go/no-go task Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: go/no-go task | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | two-alternative forced choice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: two-alternative forced choice | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | detectability Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: detectability | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Signal Detection Theory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Signal Detection Theory | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Drift Diffusion Model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Drift Diffusion Model | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | go/no-go Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: go/no-go | content_tags.definitions[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | two-alternative choice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: two-alternative choice | content_tags.definitions[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | forced choice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: forced choice | content_tags.definitions[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Drift Diffusion Model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Drift Diffusion Model | content_tags.definitions[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | psychometric function Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: psychometric function | content_tags.definitions[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | d Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: d | content_tags.definitions[12] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | perceptual sensitivity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: perceptual sensitivity | content_tags.definitions[13] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | sensory bias Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sensory bias | content_tags.definitions[14] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | lapse rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: lapse rate | content_tags.definitions[15] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ~100 times — how much lower spatial resolution is in rats and mice than in primates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | at least 10 — number of retinotopic areas in the mouse visual cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 2–10 days / 3–6 weeks — range of training times needed for mice on easier versus harder perceptual tasks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 6–12 months — typical training time for a primate to reach proficiency on complex tasks, for contrast with rodents Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | a factor of 4 (~100 vs. ~400 trials/session) — Monday-versus-Friday difference in trials completed under a 5-day water-control regime Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 25 ml/kg/day — target constant daily water intake in contemporary training regimes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 10 million years — how much more recently rodents and primates share a common ancestor than either does with the cat Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ~100 times lower — rodent spatial resolution against primate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | factor of 4 — Monday against Friday trial counts under the weekend water regime Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 2-10 days or 3-6 weeks — rodent training durations, rarely beyond 2 months Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 6-12 months — primate training to proficiency on complex tasks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 25 ml/kg/day — a contemporary constant water-intake target Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Signal Detection Theory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Signal Detection Theory | content_tags.statistics[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | false alarms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: false alarms | content_tags.statistics[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Drift Diffusion Model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Drift Diffusion Model | content_tags.statistics[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | lapse rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: lapse rate | content_tags.statistics[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | stimulus strength Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: stimulus strength | content_tags.variables[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | decision criterion Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: decision criterion | content_tags.variables[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | trials/session Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: trials/session | content_tags.variables[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | training duration Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: training duration | content_tags.variables[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.